Related
Yes, as you can see samsung ditched their exynos processor for snap dragon 801 and it is a super great news.. you all please post your opinions..
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
And they ditched Wolfson too.
BaronInkjet said:
And they ditched Wolfson too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And that leads to tremendous dissapointment! hah
NoteboyTech said:
And that leads to tremendous dissapointment! hah
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absent a real home run, they would not get my business again. And that clearly didn't happen.
NoteboyTech said:
Yes, as you can see samsung ditched their exynos processor for snap dragon 801 and it is a super great news.. you all please post your opinions..
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't even know if the Exynos Infinity is a processor or not. LOL
dandroid13 said:
You don't even know if the Exynos Infinity is a processor or not. LOL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know what exynos infinity is.
I was happy for snapdragon so that LTE is confirmed and we can have more love from the developers...
You know s4 i9500 didnt have lot of love from devs...
Yet a 64 bit octacore exynos infinity would have been ground breaking
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
NoteboyTech said:
I know what exynos infinity is.
I was happy for snapdragon so that LTE is confirmed and we can have more love from the developers...
You know s4 i9500 didnt have lot of love from devs...
Yet a 64 bit octacore exynos infinity would have been ground breaking
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Snapdragon is only good if you're looking for AOSP, all major custom ROMs are there for the Exynos S4 like Omega and Wanam. So what is the Exynos Infinity?
Bro, I know that's why I said the developer love! yet see there is no 4g on i9500 and sm-n900 the s4 and note 3 so in the end if you own a superspeedy device you would require a super speedy internet! so for the sake of 4g I am praising the snapdragon! nevertheless you post your opinion! Explain us about exynos infinity"processor"
I read somewhere that they ate thinking of exynos version.
Sent from Note 3 (The beauty & beast)
Exynos infinity was a god damn tagline, not a processor. Stop reading BS sites.
No it didnt ditch exynos 2.1ghz.. bencchmark topper will come
sent via Samsung Galaxy S4 i9500
http://www.engadget.com/2014/02/25/samsung-galaxy-s5-octo-core/
Don't know if it's Exynos Infinity, but Samsung never claimed that Infinity would be coming to the S5. Infinity probably doesn't even have the yields yet to be used.
Well that was fast. Samsung already updated and removed the octo core version.
vbetts said:
http://www.engadget.com/2014/02/25/samsung-galaxy-s5-octo-core/
Don't know if it's Exynos Infinity, but Samsung never claimed that Infinity would be coming to the S5. Infinity probably doesn't even have the yields yet to be used.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exynos "infinity" is not the name of a processor(or lineup) again,it may be called something else (GH7 was something leaks were pointing out at,but nothing definite as such)
i9100g user said:
Exynos "infinity" is not the name of a processor(or lineup) again,it may be called something else (GH7 was something leaks were pointing out at,but nothing definite as such)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So then Infinity was just the name of the event for Exynos?
Not like it matters either way, Exynos yields recently weren't high enough to take to other parts of the world.
NoteboyTech said:
No it didnt ditch exynos 2.1ghz.. bencchmark topper will come
sent via Samsung Galaxy S4 i9500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exynos 5422 (2.1ghz A15s ,A7s at 1.5ghz?)
What about GPU? 628 or 678 they will need to improve their GPU performance to match the performance of adreno 330 in snapdragon variant (so a higher clocked 628 or 678)
A15 cores running at 2.1GHz yeah it will either melt ur device or it will suck the battery in very fast time , and probably its stuck with the ****ing clusters migration with NO GTS :|
so probably the Snap 801 will be better
and the funny thing Samsung didn't mention anything about GS5 with Exynos ( seems they are ashamed with their processor )
Galaxy Note 4 SM-910C(Exynos) and Galaxy Note 4 SM-910S(Snap Dragon)
The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 is at last official and the following thing we're holding up for is the official release date.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Quick Review:
The display does not shock us as various leaks had officially uncovered that Galaxy Note 4 would accompany a 5.7inch Super AMOLED displays screen which upholds QHD resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
As we had said before it supports 515ppi. The presentation certainly seems rich and brilliant however the QHD determination does not appear to be the main real motivation to buy for Note 4.
Outline :
Weighing 6.2 ounces, the Note 4 is heavier than the 5.9-ounce Note 3. The extra robustness is at any rate part of the way because of the Note 4′s metal edge, however the back is still a delicate touch plastic. Samsung selected an all-plastic chassis on the Note 3. The Note 4 is likewise somewhat taller and thicker than its ancestor (6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches vs. 6 x 3.1 x 0.3 inches).
Cameras:
The Note 4 steps up the back camera's resolution from 13 MP to 16 MP, however that’s not the only improvement. Samsung added in optical image stabilization (OIS), which is incredible at capturing shots enduring as you zoom in. The organization claims you'll have the capacity to zoom up to 8x and still get a sharp pic.
Samsung has made its phablet more selfie-friendly, boosting the front camera's megapixel number from 2 MP on the Note 3 to 3.7 MP on the Note 4, while conveying a 90-degree wide-edge lens. You can go significantly more extensive than that, however you'll have to enter an extraordinary mode.
Spen:
Not at all like alternate telephones, Samsung's Galaxy Note family likewise offers a stylus, or S Pen, which has additionally been enhanced on the Galaxy Note 4. The new S Pen offers consumers a "significantly more credible pen experience," as per Samsung, and can even copy composition on paper with a wellspring or calligraphy pen.
Battery:
That battery is pretty much the same size as Note 3, however Samsung says it will charge to 50 percent in 30 minutes because of Qualcomm's Quickcharge engineering. That said, I'm concerned the denser screen will lead the Galaxy Note 4 to have shorter general battery life than the enduring Galaxy Note 3.
Here is my View post your views and thoughts below.
i
because of ARMv8 & 64-Bit processors
+
Octa-Cores that work simultaneously
+
(i m not sure) better RAM bandwidth!
I prefer Exynos
Not very sure with which version I'll go for, but I seem to like Exynos, due to the HMP and lower clocked companion cores for battery life too
Also I'm to some extent familiar with the architecture of Exynos chips, so maybe it'll come in help while practicing development, but maybe I can learn about the Snapdragons too, the main thing I like about Krait architecture is the per core voltage control and dynamic body voltage adjustment on hardware level.
Is the Exynos better then the Snapdragon ?
Sent from my SM-N900
Where is the review ?
SamLayer said:
Is the Exynos better then the Snapdragon ?
Sent from my SM-N900
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SD is much better when compared to exynos
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk
bala_gamer said:
Where is the review ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Above in the OP lol.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk
This time the Exynos 5433 is much powerful and faster as compared to Snapdragon 805 variant. The exynos is capable of running all the eight cores simultaneously unlike the previous version in Note 3. Morever Exynos's LTE modem is of Cat 6 category whereas that of Snapdragon is Cat 4. Exynos is equipped with a 64 bit processor whereas the SD with 32 bit. Exynos also marks higher on the Antutu Benchmark. Therefore 910c is the killer variant this time!
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
MoonSTRuK said:
This time the Exynos 5433 is much powerful and faster as compared to Snapdragon 805 variant. The exynos is capable of running all the eight cores simultaneously unlike the previous version in Note 3. Morever Exynos's LTE modem is of Cat 6 category whereas that of Snapdragon is Cat 4. Exynos is equipped with a 64 bit processor whereas the SD with 32 bit. Exynos also marks higher on the Antutu Benchmark. Therefore 910c is the killer variant this time!
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, the Exynos has Cat4. while the Snapdragon has Cat6. Also, people are quite skeptical of the Exynos being 64 bit, in spite of the superior performance.
My bad! Yes you are right. ....Exynos is actually Cat 4.....I got confused between C and S. Thanks for the correction
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
MoonSTRuK said:
My bad! Yes you are right. ....Exynos is actually Cat 4.....I got confused between C and S. Thanks for the correction
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem, Samsung has a nag for playing with the specs of a single version, so it's bound to get confusing. Here are the 2 possible specs at the moment:
1.
CPU: Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 (SM-N910S), Quad-core 2.7 GHz Krait 450, 32 bit.
GPU: Adreno 420
LTE: Cat6
2.
CPU: Exynos 5433 (SM-N910C), Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 1.9GHz quad-core Cortex-A57 (Possibly 64 bit, most likely 32 bit).
GPU: Mali-T760
LTE: Cat4
Dat Noob said:
No problem, Samsung has a nag for playing with the specs of a single version, so it's bound to get confusing. Here are the 2 possible specs at the moment:
1.
CPU: Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 (SM-N910S), Quad-core 2.7 GHz Krait 450, 32 bit.
GPU: Adreno 420
LTE: Cat6
2.
CPU: Exynos 5433 (SM-N910C), Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 1.9GHz quad-core Cortex-A57 (Possibly 64 bit, most likely 32 bit).
GPU: Mali-T760
LTE: Cat4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exynos5 (Exynos5433) - 32-bit. Series Exynos6 & Exynos7 - 64-bit
Pako7 said:
Exynos5 (Exynos5433) - 32-bit. Series Exynos6 & Exynos7 - 64-bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do we know which one is 64 bit among the exynos versions? What model would it be? I read the Antutu's benchmark tests a couple of days ago before the launching of Note 4. It compared the Exynos and the Snapdragon versions. Exynos was found to be superior. I wonder if same results would be maintained after the official launch?
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 02:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:41 PM ----------
Or note 4 would not have a 64 bit version at all?
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
MoonSTRuK said:
How do we know which one is 64 bit among the exynos versions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
from source code in vger.kernel.org
Pako7 said:
Exynos5 (Exynos5433) - 32-bit. Series Exynos6 & Exynos7 - 64-bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought the same, but it seems that it is really 64 bit. Some information in Geekbench showed an internal "version" code for A57 cores. Maybe Samsung decided to not tell anything about it's 64 bit design because the S805 is still 32bit and they don't want to bother the users that buy the Qualcomm version. Hav read an interesting article about that. Will search for the link
SaschaHa said:
I thought the same, but it seems that it is really 64 bit. Some information in Geekbench showed an internal "version" code for A57 cores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already know about GB
Maybe Samsung decided to not tell anything about it's 64 bit design because the S805 is still 32bit and they don't want to bother the users that buy the Qualcomm version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think so too
1st Review out from Russia of SM-910C model (Exynos)
http://translate.google.com/transla...dbox=0&usg=ALkJrhhH_KG0kFV6aV7xO0DNHZMnsDIABQ
OIS in action vs GS5:
Improved low light photos, samples in the article. Dynamic range looks good.
GN4 vs GN3:
GN4 vs GS5:
NOTE: The benchmark scores look little less than what we have seen. Nothing to worry. I am sure the Geekbench test he ran is for this result: http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/811052
This is the lowest number in the Geekbench database, and rest all others are much higher.
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/search?dir=desc&q=universal5433&sort=score
I don't get it guys... Which one comes with 4G?
I want to buy this phone by pre order at some online store in indonesia, 8.999.000 in rupiah
In the specification tab, they doesn't mentioned 4G.. Only 3G with hexa core(i think its exynos)
Which series comes with 4G?
Thanks
ciklek said:
I don't get it guys... Which one comes with 4G?
I want to buy this phone by pre order at some online store in indonesia, 8.999.000 in rupiah
In the specification tab, they doesn't mentioned 4G.. Only 3G with hexa core(i think its exynos)
Which series comes with 4G?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Almost all the versions come with 4G. I think just the N910H doesn't.
There is no hexacore model, take care.
Lodix said:
Almost all the versions come with 4G. I think just the N910H doesn't.
There is no hexacore model, take care.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohh sorry, i meant octa core. 1.9 GHz Octa Core Processor (1.9 GHz Quad + 1.3 GHz Quad core) and 2.5G (GSM/GPRS/EDGE) : 850/900/1800/1900 MHz | 3G (HSPA+ 42Mbps): 850/900/1900/2100 MHz
Really? so the note 4 mentioned above is N910H version? There's no specific processor mentioned, just like that one above...
We have two models (chipset wise):
1- SM-N910S running Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
(Quad-core Krait 450 CPU at up to 2.7 GHz per core/Adreno 420 GPU/4G LTE Advanced/28 nm HPm)
2- SM-N910C running Exynos 5433
(big.LITTLE HMP: Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 1.9GHz quad-core Cortex-A57 /Mali-T760 GPU/20nm)
Which one do you think is better, and why?
============== Update (2014-09-26) ==============
It's seems -contrary to earlier beliefs- that SM-N910S is not a snapdragon 805 version but an Exynos 5433 version with LTE-A!
Please don't rely on the model number, and make sure to check the online product description or box backside (if you buying physically) for the chipset informtion before buying
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Screenshot from Korean Note 4 unboxing video (0:19)
Lets see first whether Exynos is really a 64bit a57+a53 combo and then we vote as there is no evidence yet in the wild. On the contrary, well known people from Sammobile , Anandtech and XDA believe that its a a15+ a7 combo!
Edit: Its A57+A53!
Are we using the best fastest chip in US? Thats all I want.
Exynos will be better in benchmarks cause it has better gpu & cpu and propably will support 64bit for Android L update. On the other hand it only supports LTE cat 4, when Snapdragon 805 supports LTE cat 6. Snapdragon will be better for devs.
Definitely Snapdragon, there is a huge amount of developer support for it across multiple different phones here on XDA. The dev forum for the Note 3 is more than 5x the size of the exynos forum for the Note 3. There is still no AOSP/Cyanogenmod for the exynos Note 3. I see a lot of posts in the Note 3 forums about various things saying, "So when is this coming to my exynos version?" and rarely does it ever.
i
Geeks Empire said:
because of ARMv8 & 64-Bit processors
+
Octa-Cores that work simultaneously
+
(i m not sure) better RAM bandwidth!
I prefer Exynos
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good:
Qualcomm Snapdragon of course. The Exynos versions always end up being orphans in terms of developer enhancements. There are never many custom ROMs or anything other development for Exynos because there are comparatively few Exynos handsets out there and few developers own them.
.
I'm big on the whole emulator thing.i read somewhere someone claimed samsung fixed whatever driver problem they had in previous exynos chips. Couple that with great benchmark scores and it's looking good, based on the past it seems the snap dragon has some sort of finicky driver issues that developers have to work around. But then again, benchmarks can utilize more than 2 cores, and on paper, the snap dragon is clocked much higher although with less cores.
Is there any official info which region will get exynos and who will get snapdragon?
darkkain said:
Is there any official info which region will get exynos and who will get snapdragon?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
darkkain said:
Is there any official info which region will get exynos and who will get snapdragon?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think European countries will get Snapdragon and other countries will get Exynos.
(Like Galaxy Note 3's Region Lock)
Sent from my SM-N900
20nm is better than 28nm. better and battery friendly ..:good:
darkkain said:
Is there any official info which region will get exynos and who will get snapdragon?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exynos goes to Europe... Snapdragon to the USA...
Galaxy Tab S is exynos for Europe and snap for USA. Maybe will be the same this time.
Wysłane z mojego GT-I9505G przy użyciu Tapatalka
Which model will Outside of the Europe & USA Get ?
Sent from my SM-N900
dilgit said:
exynos goes to Europe... Snapdragon to the USA...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They switched to 805 for Europe.
AndreiLux said:
They switched to 805 for Europe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So who gets Exynos, Asia? Still don't know what I'm aiming for, Exynos or Snapdragon, but it's good to know who gets what.
I not sure how true Samsung Store Malaysia told me Malaysia is 100% getting the S805 which same as Note 3 also Snapdragon chipset.
Please this be true, I only want S805 and all users at hotter Malaysia forum lowyat seems all vote for S805 also.
well according to this website: http://www.eprice.com.tw/mobile/talk/4523/4912030/1/rv/samsung-galaxy-note-4-review/
the exynos version got a 50k+ antutu score, far above any existing soc, while on geekbench 3 the exynos version also scores much higher than s5 (snapdragon 801), like 20-25% higher. But they couldn't finish the test for the sd 805 version, which is a bit strange...
however, it is difficult to imagine how the snapdragon 805 version can manage to achieve paired performance as above if it is really true, as 805 and 801 soc are basically the same architecture, and the performance gain can only come from the higher clock (2.7 vs 2.5 ghz) so nowhere near a 20% increase, and this we already saw from the benchmarks for s5 lte-a version which features a 805 soc.
ps: another interesting tidbit from the preview above... the instructions set for the exynos version is still armv7, basically means it is still a 32bit architecture, as opposed to the 64bit many believe (hope) it would be which should mean the instruction set should be armv8...
alexcarterkarsus said:
well according to this website: http://www.eprice.com.tw/mobile/talk/4523/4912030/1/rv/samsung-galaxy-note-4-review/
the exynos version got a 50k+ antutu score, far above any existing soc, while on geekbench 3 the exynos version also scores much higher than s5 (snapdragon 801), like 20-25% higher. But they couldn't finish the test for the sd 805 version, which is a bit strange...
however, it is difficult to imagine how the snapdragon 805 version can manage to achieve paired performance as above if it is really true, as 805 and 801 soc are basically the same architecture, and the performance gain can only come from the higher clock (2.7 vs 2.5 ghz) so nowhere near a 20% increase, and this we already saw from the benchmarks for s5 lte-a version which features a 805 soc.
ps: another interesting tidbit from the preview above... the instructions set for the exynos version is still armv7, basically means it is still a 32bit architecture, as opposed to the 64bit many believe (hope) it would be which should mean the instruction set should be armv8...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Forget Antutu!! Don't trust that much.
Check this beauty:
It literally demolishes Qualcomm.. nvidia Shield Tablet scores around 1100 and 3500.
The single-core performance is very near to A7 (obviously multi-core is way higher). Along with 20nm, this is turning out to be very enticing.
Does anyone have any idea why the Tab S2 isn't running in 64 bit? It was mentioned by many sources that the Exynos 5433, though the same chip as the Note 4, would be 64 bit enabled, but it's not.
It was disappointing to learn that Marshmallow did not enable 64 bit as I thought it might.
It is very dissapointing, I was hoping to run dolphin emu latest biuld :/ Its a shame that its 8-core processor cannot be put to good use.
#BlameSamsung
Hi,
Wanted to check if anyone got their hands on with an Exynos Note 9 and noticed any performance improvements in terms of efficiency or sustained performance.
Did they made any changes to Exynos 9810 SoC since S9+ was released?
I hope they didn't cripple it with their implementation!
Thanks in advance.
lycan_codex said:
Hi,
Wanted to check if anyone got their hands on with an Exynos Note 9 and noticed any performance improvements in terms of efficiency or sustained performance.
Did they made any changes to Exynos 9810 SoC since S9+ was released?
I hope they didn't cripple it with their implementation!
Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Valid question but why are you asking here?
didnt you see the post NOT to ask questions here? Thats why we have a Q&A thread dude
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=77314134
sent from my Exynos S9 plus, Pixel 2 XL or Note FE
I thought this would be a discussion and was hoping anyone would come up with some info and news.
lycan_codex said:
I thought this would be a discussion and was hoping anyone would come up with some info and news.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im with you, interesting topic for sure but its posed as a question seemed to me.
Either its a good topic for sure, wish i had answers
sent from my Exynos S9 plus, Pixel 2 XL or Note FE
lycan_codex said:
Hi,
Wanted to check if anyone got their hands on with an Exynos Note 9 and noticed any performance improvements in terms of efficiency or sustained performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was Anadtech who first thoroughly lab-tested and rooted out the performance/heat management/battery endurance differences bet^n the Exynos 9810 & Snapdragon 845 in the Galaxy S9.
Hence, I contacted Andrei(one who did the testing and wrote that article) and he informed that Anandtech won't be reviewing the Exynos/SD Note 9 for now, but if there's any change in the behaviour of the SoC, it'll be visible in the kernel sources and he will check that without requiring the Note 9.
Andrei is famous in these forums. Thank you for your information. I wanted to email him as well but did it for the rest of us. Lets hope they made some improvements. Else even 4000 mah wont be enough. I have pre-ordered Note 9 exynos version and sold off my s9+ back to the Samsung store guys.
Fresh article - Anandtech's deep dive into Exynos 9810's M3 cores:
https://www.anandtech.com/show/13199/hot-chips-2018-samsungs-exynosm3-cpu-architecture-deep-dive/
Update::Sad news) :
Samsung released Kernel source code of Exynos Galaxy Note 9 and Andrei was quick to check it. Sadly, he confirmed that there are no changes.
Virgo_Guy said:
Update::Sad news) :
Samsung released Kernel source code of Exynos Galaxy Note 9 and Andrei was quick to check it. Sadly, he confirmed that there are no changes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I havent had the battery issues on my exynos s9 plus that others have but i think for the note 9 im going to give the N9600 snapdragon a try. Samsung knows there is an issue here and have had ample time to correct on the s9 and damn sure on the Note 9 and to do nothing is just pure laziness
sent from my Exynos S9 plus, Pixel 2 XL or Note FE
Can someone explain to me what's so bad about the implementation by Samsung?
Nasty_z said:
Can someone explain to me what's so bad about the implementation by Samsung?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better to read the article where its explained in detail but the end result has been terrible battery life for many.
sent from my Exynos S9 plus, Pixel 2 XL or Note FE
force70 said:
I havent had the battery issues on my exynos s9 plus that others have but i think for the note 9 im going to give the N9600 snapdragon a try. Samsung knows there is an issue here and have had ample time to correct on the s9 and damn sure on the Note 9 and to do nothing is just pure laziness
sent from my Exynos S9 plus, Pixel 2 XL or Note FE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung quietly fix what they can. But at times they're not very good at fixing when they announce and "pretend" to not have an issue officially. Including sheer laziness, what if what they have achieved in the Exynos 9810 is the "optimum one" in the heat-performance-endurance ratio ? When they didn't do it in this S9's I felt they were saving something for the next big thing - Note 9 Exynos.
..
Will be happy to know how you would feel getting one snapdragon. I thought of doing the same, but it has network comptibility issues here, so didn't.
This Antutu Stress test prove that Samsung did some "tweaks" for Exynos: more throttle, lower freqs most of time to keep it cooler, less batt drain