Related
Is it normal to get only 905 points from quadrant with darky's9 and speedmod? Before updating from darky's 8 i did get 1245points.
jere92 said:
Is it normal to get only 905 points from quadrant with darky's9 and speedmod? Before updating from darky's 8 i did get 1245points.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is rubbish, people can make themselves get quadrant scores of 3000 + so dont rely on that.. if your phone responds quick and it feels quick in your hand, thats all that matters.
azzledazzle said:
Quadrant is rubbish, people can make themselves get quadrant scores of 3000 + so dont rely on that.. if your phone responds quick and it feels quick in your hand, thats all that matters.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly, I had a 2000+ score with my old JPO+lagfix, now, i'm at ~1000 with my custom ROM, but the phone is so smoother, and it run without lagfix!
jere92 said:
Is it normal to get only 905 points from quadrant with darky's9 and speedmod? Before updating from darky's 8 i did get 1245points.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had the same issue after the first 2 times booting up, but it solved itself after 2 more boots and now i am getting 1600 again.
Chris
azzledazzle said:
Quadrant is rubbish, people can make themselves get quadrant scores of 3000 + so dont rely on that.. if your phone responds quick and it feels quick in your hand, thats all that matters.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. Insanity ROM has over 2000 but I have found Darky's is the smoothest out of them all IMO
if your phone is fast and responsive why care about quadrant?
it's nice and smooth, no problem i were just worried about if i did something wrong.
Quadrant is rubbish, is not relevant, if you make 2 or 3 tests consecutive there will be different results, so... if you're like how is your phone moving that means you obtain the best results.
I still don't understand why people stick to their quadrant scores. Of course it is fun, but if you can do stuff with your phone and no annoyance like lag or whatsoever. Who cares whether quadrant score is 100 or 200?>
OOOOOOOk... soooooooooooo...
from now on i will leave the kernels to people who know what theyr doing because i didnt get the results i wanted plus i dont know nearly enough to make it how i want it
BAAAAAAAAAAAAM...
i really dont know how to do this very well so pardon me if i screw up, i made this kernel with stefan gundhoer's bases, i didnt do many modifications, kernel is essencialy the same, just with my personal clocks on every part of the phone, the name speaks for itself, and though my phone can run it, many o2x's out there may not be able to run this, needless to say this doesnt kill phones, but anyway use it at your own risk
credits: Stefan Gundhoer: this is all his work, only tweaked by me
Korumera: who was very kind in lending a noob some upload space
all things said, hope you enjoy it and if u like it, dont forget to thank me. even if you dont, just thank me so i can be happy
kernel name:gueste2X_skyline_UltimatePhoneBurner
DOWNLOADS:http://www.xdafileserver.nl/ultimatephoneburner-kernel/
here's what u all wanted:clocks:
cpu max:1.56Ghz
ddr2 max:300 Mhz(failed to increase it quite simply coz im a noob )
avp:320 Mhz
gpu: 366Mhz
I\O default:sio
if you decide to try out this kernel, make sure to run cf-bench a few times, its the best way you have of knowing if it really is stable, when it comes to stability testing, cf-bench is the way to go.
Please could you tell what differences does your kernel has over the original build of Stefan's?
almost forgot. i will post benchmark scores for the non bielievers very soon
hakankarani said:
Please could you tell what differences does your kernel has over the original build of Stefan's?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not many differences, only everything overclocked. and i do mean everything...
will post details on the op in a few mins
skylinegt77 said:
almost forgot. i will post benchmark scores for the non bielievers very soon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
could you also post the clokcs please =D??
will be usefull for poeple that know how far they can go on their phone
for example one of my 2x devices only can go up to 1.2
but my other 2x can be clocked to 1.6
owain94 said:
could you also post the clokcs please =D??
will be usefull for poeple that know how far they can go on their phone
for example one of my 2x devices only can go up to 1.2
but the other one can be clocked to 1.6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont worry guys, im just sooo excited that im having a real hard time focusing, will post clocks in a few mins, all of em. just bare with me a bit since im a noob
ok, maybe it will take a bit longer guys, i just tried to re flash the kernel and somehow the file was corrupt, im recompiling right now and will sort everything. so sorry
so now everything is pretty explicit, you know what ur getting if u install it, i cant promise your phone will run it, but if it does u will love it
skylinegt77 said:
all things said, hope you enjoy it and if u like it, dont forget to thank me. even if you dont, just thank me so i can be happy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I approve this !
skylinegt77 said:
OOOOOOOk... soooooooooooo...
BAAAAAAAAAAAAM...
i really dont know how to do this very well so pardon me if i screw up, i made this kernel with stefan gundhoer's bases, i didnt do many modifications, kernel is essencialy the same, just with my personal clocks on every part of the phone, the name speaks for itself, and though my phone can run it, many o2x's out there may not be able to run this, needless to say this doesnt kill phones, but anyway use it at your own risk
credits: Stefan Gundhoer: this is all his work, only tweaked by me
Korumera: who was very kind in lending a noob some upload space
all things said, hope you enjoy it and if u like it, dont forget to thank me. even if you dont, just thank me so i can be happy
kernel name:gueste2X_skyline_UltimatePhoneBurner
DOWNLOADS:http://www.xdafileserver.nl/ultimatephoneburner-kernel/
here's what u all wanted:clocks:
cpu max:1.55Ghz
ddr2 max:640 Mhz
avp:300 Mhz
gpu: 366Mhz
I\O default: deadline
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi
good to see you trying something with your own
ddr2max 640mhz? i dont understand this. default is 300Mhz, you doubled it and not freezed?
by the way the max safe frequency is 1556Mhz at 1350mV
vadonka said:
hi
good to see you trying something with your own
ddr2max 640mhz? i dont understand this. default is 300Mhz, you doubled it and not freezed?
by the way the max safe frequency is 1556Mhz at 1350mV
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, i always end up wanting things that most people are affraid of trying XD thats 1 of the reasons why im saving money to go take an android programing course. well, cant save much now since im unemployed XD
yeah buuut, to be honest, i just did another version, i wasnt very confortable with the temperatures my phone was reaching, somehow gueste seems to heat up more than etana by a lot, but we cant compare, 2 completely different builds. why dont u make us a 1556 mhz version? id love it
as for the ram issue, dont ask me, but i turned it up 20 mhz at a time and the scores for ram on antutu went up every time
skylinegt77 said:
yeah, i always end up wanting things that most people are affraid of trying XD thats 1 of the reasons why im saving money to go take an android programing course. well, cant save much now since im unemployed XD
yeah buuut, to be honest, i just did another version, i wasnt very confortable with the temperatures my phone was reaching, somehow gueste seems to heat up more than etana by a lot, but we cant compare, 2 completely different builds. why dont u make us a 1556 mhz version? id love it
as for the ram issue, dont ask me, but i turned it up 20 mhz at a time and the scores for ram on antutu went up every time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you OC'd everything to the limits, no wonder the phone get's hot
skylinegt77 said:
yeah, i always end up wanting things that most people are affraid of trying XD thats 1 of the reasons why im saving money to go take an android programing course. well, cant save much now since im unemployed XD
yeah buuut, to be honest, i just did another version, i wasnt very confortable with the temperatures my phone was reaching, somehow gueste seems to heat up more than etana by a lot, but we cant compare, 2 completely different builds. why dont u make us a 1556 mhz version? id love it
as for the ram issue, dont ask me, but i turned it up 20 mhz at a time and the scores for ram on antutu went up every time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i already did, raise the oc limit from 1504mhz/1325mV to 1556Mhz/1350mV
it doesn't seems instable or more heat. it can handle this, of course im not using this at default only in xoc mode
but im definetly not reccomended to raise the sdram freq above to 350Mhz. it can damage your hardware! the memory is very sensitive. maybe for a short time it will work really fast but long time cause irreversible damage.
the max gpu freq is 400Mhz
the max avp is 300Mhz
the max vde freq is 700Mhz
if you go above that levels you risk the potentital hardware damage.
vadonka said:
i already did, raise the oc limit from 1504mhz/1325mV to 1556Mhz/1350mV
it doesn't seems instable or more heat. it can handle this, of course im not using this at default only in xoc mode
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
now u only need to increase the ram freq a bit when can we get our hands on the modified version?
Stefan Gündhör said:
you OC'd everything to the limits, no wonder the phone get's hot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thing is, i tried the cpu oc first without oc'ing anything else and the result was the same...
Stefan Gündhör said:
you OC'd everything to the limits, no wonder the phone get's hot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jeez! Stefan...
In other words you have unleashed every possibility of a thermo-nuclear war within our phones with the release of DIY kernel builder
I like that...
Divyan said:
Jeez! Stefan...
In other words you have unleashed every possibility of a thermo-nuclear war within our phones with the release of DIY kernel builder
I like that...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have a feeling that will be ended up badly after a while
developing a kernel its not a plaything
Stefan: you are truly a brave man about releasing your kernel builder pack. probably many noob user will ask you for help which mean a lot of private message
vadonka said:
i have a feeling that will be ended up badly after a while
developing a kernel its not a plaything
Stefan: you are truly a brave man about releasing your kernel builder pack. probably many noob user will ask you for help which mean a lot of private message
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dont think it will end up badly simply because the phones cpu will crash due to instability before anything seriously wrong happens.
skylinegt77 said:
i dont think it will end up badly simply because the phones cpu will crash due to instability before anything seriously wrong happens.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im not exactly talking about that
i just think its not a good idea tell all the people to develop a kernel. its actually a hard thing. that will be ended up badly
@skylinegt77
Stop this chit-chat. Show us some benchmarks!
Please?
vadonka said:
i have a feeling that will be ended up badly after a while
developing a kernel its not a plaything
Stefan: you are truly a brave man about releasing your kernel builder pack. probably many noob user will ask you for help which mean a lot of private message
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sometimes we have to understand that it is good to remain in our domain of competence...this is what we say in aviation....to be safe and allow others to be safe...hopefully no one bricks their device or burn it to ashes....
Antutu benchmarks score gets reduced after installing the latest update from Sony.
i have run the benchmark soon after unboxing the device.. and it gave me a score of 20707..
and there was an update from Sony which after installing for some reason locks the processor speed when its heated up.. when i run the benchmarks now it gives me a score of 16080 with a processor speed of 1.2 Ghz while the processors actual speed is 1.5 Ghz.
even i did a factory reset and tried running the benchmarks.. but still the same results in 16k-17 window..
is any one else facing this issue after installing the update
Isn't it affected by the numbers if apps you have on your phone? And it's always better to do a restart and run the bench mark right after before running any other apps.
And btw, those numbers means nothing. Don't get hooked onto those apps, it doesn't mean your phone is any slower than others.
Sent from my C6603 using xda app-developers app
LitoNi said:
Isn't it affected by the numbers if apps you have on your phone? And it's always better to do a restart and run the bench mark right after before running any other apps.
And btw, those numbers means nothing. Don't get hooked onto those apps, it doesn't mean your phone is any slower than others.
Sent from my C6603 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, those are just numbers .. but still i was puzzled if it was happening after installing the update.... otherwise the phone is fine. except for the known heating problem :cyclops:
LitoNi said:
Isn't it affected by the numbers if apps you have on your phone? And it's always better to do a restart and run the bench mark right after before running any other apps.
And btw, those numbers means nothing. Don't get hooked onto those apps, it doesn't mean your phone is any slower than others.
Sent from my C6603 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But the fact that Antutu is showing he has a 1.2 Ghz processor, for me is a reason to worry. Even if the numbers are lower, it should show 1.5Ghz.
So, maybe there is some overheating problem on his phone.
Antutu has recently been updated - refer the comments on the Play Store. Seems other people with different phones getting high scores before the update and then lower scores post update.
I think this is the solution to the problem...... Mind you I just ran Antutu and got 20656
mubeen.asim said:
Antutu benchmarks score gets reduced after installing the latest update from Sony.
i have run the benchmark soon after unboxing the device.. and it gave me a score of 20707..
and there was an update from Sony which after installing for some reason locks the processor speed when its heated up.. when i run the benchmarks now it gives me a score of 16080 with a processor speed of 1.2 Ghz while the processors actual speed is 1.5 Ghz.
even i did a factory reset and tried running the benchmarks.. but still the same results in 16k-17 window..
is any one else facing this issue after installing the update
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When the XZ heats up, the processor throttles down. That's why it shows you the 1.2Ghz.
mubeen.asim said:
Antutu benchmarks score gets reduced after installing the latest update from Sony.
i have run the benchmark soon after unboxing the device.. and it gave me a score of 20707..
and there was an update from Sony which after installing for some reason locks the processor speed when its heated up.. when i run the benchmarks now it gives me a score of 16080 with a processor speed of 1.2 Ghz while the processors actual speed is 1.5 Ghz.
even i did a factory reset and tried running the benchmarks.. but still the same results in 16k-17 window..
is any one else facing this issue after installing the update
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AnTuTu is kinda generalization of hardware accessibility and performance
So i think it almost depend on Kernel, after that update all kernels updated to Feb. kernel (a kernel with different date)
and Sony said will update xperia Z to 4.2.2 with 3.6 (*nix) kernel
and it can increase performance and higher AnTuTu benchmark
:good:
mubeen.asim said:
Antutu benchmarks score gets reduced after installing the latest update from Sony.
i have run the benchmark soon after unboxing the device.. and it gave me a score of 20707..
and there was an update from Sony which after installing for some reason locks the processor speed when its heated up.. when i run the benchmarks now it gives me a score of 16080 with a processor speed of 1.2 Ghz while the processors actual speed is 1.5 Ghz.
even i did a factory reset and tried running the benchmarks.. but still the same results in 16k-17 window..
is any one else facing this issue after installing the update
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I am concerned, I think these are all crap in reality. Because you can run these benchmarks over and over again and keep getting different results, even after disabling things like autosync etc.
In theory the phone should run benchmarks faster when it is colder, but when I ran these tests they were much worse.
My phone didn't change much after updates for bench mark scores.
Phones do have a thermo throttling of the CPU to stay within the SAFE temperature ranges, so the 1.2GHz will most likely have something to do with this.
danw_oz said:
As far as I am concerned, I think these are all crap in reality. Because you can run these benchmarks over and over again and keep getting different results, even after disabling things like autosync etc.
In theory the phone should run benchmarks faster when it is colder, but when I ran these tests they were much worse.
My phone didn't change much after updates for bench mark scores.
Phones do have a thermo throttling of the CPU to stay within the SAFE temperature ranges, so the 1.2GHz will most likely have something to do with this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, indeed the benchmark programs depend on many factors.. i had factory restored the Rom from Sony Pc companion, and again the first time i run, it shows me 20k number.. and then it gradually decreases when i run again. i wonder if its the same with other phones which have the same processor.
mubeen.asim said:
Yes, indeed the benchmark programs depend on many factors.. i had factory restored the Rom from Sony Pc companion, and again the first time i run, it shows me 20k number.. and then it gradually decreases when i run again. i wonder if its the same with other phones which have the same processor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well ran it just after you mentioned this got 18000, next run 20170 and nothing really can have changed between those runs, and that is a significant difference
danw_oz said:
Well ran it just after you mentioned this got 18000, next run 20170 and nothing really can have changed between those runs, and that is a significant difference
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
does it show the same processor speed in two runs?
so your e-p***s just got smaller after update ?
Jealous cuz u don't have one. !
Sent from my C6602 using xda app-developers app
mubeen.asim said:
does it show the same processor speed in two runs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Surely did, phone is always really fast, so I do not believe these benchmarks. Maybe I was running on just 3 cylinders (cores)
In other words, don't trust benchmarks
harfot said:
In other words, don't trust benchmarks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
partly true.. but it the difference is way too much with others scores then points to a problem in the device...
mubeen.asim said:
partly true.. but it the difference is way too much with others scores then points to a problem in the device...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't think so, every device I have used has done the same thing, find it impossible to believe that it is a problem device. The problem is most likely to do with the way that a phone operates, if the memory does a garbage collection event while you are doing a test, is going to throw a ridiculous result
---------- Post added at 07:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:37 AM ----------
harfot said:
In other words, don't trust benchmarks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty much.
danw_oz said:
Don't think so, every device I have used has done the same thing, find it impossible to believe that it is a problem device. The problem is most likely to do with the way that a phone operates, if the memory does a garbage collection event while you are doing a test, is going to throw a ridiculous result
---------- Post added at 07:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:37 AM ----------
Pretty much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good:
So, i'm getting a really low 3D Mark score for a "gaming" device like this, i think that Nvidia do something wrong with the Tegra 3 GPU, i got it running at 650Mhz and i get like 3000 points... other devices on the same range get a lot better scores... what to do to get better 3D on our 4X?
Well this is my score...I'm not sure our much other devices get, but from the results our O4X is in the same range as the Note 2...so I guess that those results aren't that bad...
Btw I used the official CM10.1.0 rom with stock cm kernel...
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
JAsko_san said:
Well this is my score...I'm not sure our much other devices get, but from the results our O4X is in the same range as the Note 2...so I guess that those results aren't that bad...
Btw I used the official CM10.1.0 rom with stock cm kernel...
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think that is a better score that i do have with V20C and iodak kernel, i will try another kernel and compare...
DankoFGL said:
So, i'm getting a really low 3D Mark score for a "gaming" device like this, i think that Nvidia do something wrong with the Tegra 3 GPU, i got it running at 650Mhz and i get like 3000 points... other devices on the same range get a lot better scores... what to do to get better 3D on our 4X?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you running anything else? I ran at stock speeds (no overclock anything) and got 4100-4200 on five straight runs. I have no idea what a normal score for the Tegra 3 is supposed to be.
I get same result. My kernel nothing touched from defaults.
I think it is ok all tegra 3 devices get similar scores one x+ gets about 3800.
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
for benchmarking, stock rom > aosp rom > cm based roms > other roms, from my experience. even when you bring custom kernels to the table, it's the same.
edit:
f.e., on quadrant, stock with custom kernels could go around 6100, aosp rom we have went to 5500, cm based went up to 4800, while others went up to 4500.
Stock with what customs? Im using iodak is there a begter kernel? Mc4 lags as hell even at 520mhz gpu a 1600mhz cpu
Enviado desde mi LG-P880 usando Tapatalk 4 Beta
DankoFGL said:
Stock with what customs? Im using iodak is there a begter kernel? Mc4 lags as hell even at 520mhz gpu a 1600mhz cpu
Enviado desde mi LG-P880 usando Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we have like four available kernels for stock, try all four and see which one runs the fastest. as for mc4, i could swear i saw people reporting playing that with no lag... strange
DankoFGL said:
Stock with what customs? Im using iodak is there a begter kernel? Mc4 lags as hell even at 520mhz gpu a 1600mhz cpu
Enviado desde mi LG-P880 usando Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried uninstalling all these overclock softwares and testing without them?
Flying_Bear said:
we have like four available kernels for stock, try all four and see which one runs the fastest. as for mc4, i could swear i saw people reporting playing that with no lag... strange
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe the problem is that i use the full graphics modded APK... and not the tegra 3 that i bought via playstore... also, Dead space lags too... mabye a kernel related problem, i will flash the rom and kernel again and see...
DankoFGL said:
Maybe the problem is that i use the full graphics modded APK... and not the tegra 3 that i bought via playstore... also, Dead space lags too... mabye a kernel related problem, i will flash the rom and kernel again and see...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, that might be the issue. unfortunately, tegra3 in our phone didn't quite live up to my expectations, which sux since even nexus7 has better performance than our phone. didn't try dead space either, so cant really tell. i did try vice city and nfs, they ran quite good on stock for me.
Flying_Bear said:
yeah, that might be the issue. unfortunately, tegra3 in our phone didn't quite live up to my expectations, which sux since even nexus7 has better performance than our phone. didn't try dead space either, so cant really tell. i did try vice city and nfs, they ran quite good on stock for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i will download again from google play and come back and tell
Enviado desde mi LG-P880 usando Tapatalk 4 Beta
Flying_Bear said:
yeah, that might be the issue. unfortunately, tegra3 in our phone didn't quite live up to my expectations, which sux since even nexus7 has better performance than our phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does it? 3DMark benchmarks disagree.
I did manage to reproduce the OP's results though. I installed TegraOverclock and suddenly my 3DMark results were the same as the ones he posted. If I uninstall it I get the attached image.
Subtleone said:
Does it? 3DMark benchmarks disagree.
I did manage to reproduce the OP's results though. I installed TegraOverclock and suddenly my 3DMark results were the same as the ones he posted. If I uninstall it I get the attached image.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
average results for nexus 7 are better than those for o4x, unfortunately.
http://community.futuremark.com/hardware/mobile/LG+Optimus+4X+HD/review
Flying_Bear said:
average results for nexus 7 are better than those for o4x, unfortunately.
http://community.futuremark.com/hardware/mobile/LG+Optimus+4X+HD/review
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You might wish to see the image I posted on a non-overclocked phone.
Subtleone said:
You might wish to see the image I posted on a non-overclocked phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and i can post my image of benchmark with 3200 score, overclocked . since my score is as valid as yours, we might as well take the average that's on the website - and the average number says that nexus7 performs better than o4x.
on the other hand, i dont game much these days, and the games i do run, run well enough. so, it's just a benchmark, a number; however i have expected tegra3 in this phone to have higher number than tablet with practically identical chip in it
Flying_Bear said:
and i can post my image of benchmark with 3200 score, overclocked . since my score is as valid as yours, we might as well take the average that's on the website - and the average number says that nexus7 performs better than o4x.
on the other hand, i dont game much these days, and the games i do run, run well enough. so, it's just a benchmark, a number; however i have expected tegra3 in this phone to have higher number than tablet with practically identical chip in it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While it is indeed just a number, it does actually measure something. Unless my configuration is somehow exploiting it specifically to achieve those scores, you might wish to see why you underscore so much and fix it. The phones are identical after all, and no one is talking about fancy coolers or the like as exists in PCs.
Subtleone said:
While it is indeed just a number, it does actually measure something. Unless my configuration is somehow exploiting it specifically to achieve those scores, you might wish to see why you underscore so much and fix it. The phones are identical after all, and no one is talking about fancy coolers or the like as exists in PCs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did some testing, and may have the answer for you. The vanilla iodak sets the CPU to 1.7GHz and the 3D and 2D GPU to 520MHz, all of which are maximum values, hence the very good 3DMark scores. If you use an app such as TegraOverclock and set those values you should get the same scores or at least very close to them. I did notice that any attempt to apply an overclock to the GPU was instantly rejected. If I tried to set it to 600MHz it was immediately set at... 300MHz, so as far as I can tell, 520 is the highest possible.
I
Subtleone said:
I did some testing, and may have the answer for you. The vanilla iodak sets the CPU to 1.7GHz and the 3D and 2D GPU to 520MHz, all of which are maximum values, hence the very good 3DMark scores. If you use an app such as TegraOverclock and set those values you should get the same scores or at least very close to them. I did notice that any attempt to apply an overclock to the GPU was instantly rejected. If I tried to set it to 600MHz it was immediately set at... 300MHz, so as far as I can tell, 520 is the highest possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it puts to 300mhz because is the minimun, in 520mhz the minimun is 200...
Edit: flashed back V20C, getting 3570 stock, i will flash Iodak again.. and test... without donwloading tegra overclock...
Edit again, this is with iodak v6 stock settings it seems that thegra overclock app reduces the performance of our devices...
Stock kernel has its gpu running at 200mhz base, scaling up to 416. Custom kernels can increase that, which leads to higher scores. I got 4k by increasing gpu to 520mhz. I don't see how just having tegra oc installed could break anything
Is this normal, when I made a quadrant benchmark stock 9.1.a.1.140 got 6k points. The CyanogenMod stable 10.1 got 3k points?
Any explain? Maybe bad GPU drivers?
Or maybe because benchmark tests don't really mean anything
gregbradley said:
Or maybe because benchmark tests don't really mean anything
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You think I will not lose performance? At the moment I do not have any "super perfrmance" game to test it.
No, I think benchmark tests are not really that accurate and should not be used to compare one ROM against another, even on the same phone.
OK thank you for help.I will Test gta vc later