Related
Anyone use this and experiencing any benefits from overvolting. I know its pretty unsafe to overvolt but my phone has trouble staying stable at 1.3ghz for more than 20 minutes and was wondering if overvolting it to 1325mv would help? I just don't feel like spending 2 dollars on an app that might not even help.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
Yes, it would help
xopher.hunter said:
Anyone use this and experiencing any benefits from overvolting. I know its pretty unsafe to overvolt but my phone has trouble staying stable at 1.3ghz for more than 20 minutes and was wondering if overvolting it to 1325mv would help? I just don't feel like spending 2 dollars on an app that might not even help.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't you mean to say Under-volt because Over-volt which isn't possible, would mean giving more voltage to the frequency meaning more juice being sucked, and most likely wouldn't work out in the first place. haha
1.3Ghz should normally be @ 1325mv anyway, so you would want to Under-volt it 50-100mv if you can, i normally have 600-1000Mhz UV'ed by 50mv, 200-400Mhz UV'ed by 75mv & 100Mhz UV'ed by 100mv. I dont even use anything higher anymore seeing how there is no use for it besides saying " Oh hey look my phone can do this or can do that" only purpose is to
benchmark and who cares anymore haha. Its fun every now and again.
XxLostSoulxX said:
Don't you mean to say Under-volt because Over-volt which isn't possible, would mean giving more voltage to the frequency meaning more juice being sucked, and most likely wouldn't work out in the first place. haha
1.3Ghz should normally be @ 1325mv anyway, so you would want to Under-volt it 50-100mv if you can, i normally have 600-1000Mhz UV'ed by 50mv, 200-400Mhz UV'ed by 75mv & 100Mhz UV'ed by 100mv. I dont even use anything higher anymore seeing how there is no use for it besides saying " Oh hey look my phone can do this or can do that" only purpose is to
benchmark and who cares anymore haha. Its fun every now and again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Technically, the over clocked frequencies are under volted by default. That is why some phones can't handle the OC - it's the same issue people have with too much UV on the stock frequencies.
Higher frequencies require higher voltages, but the voltages required by over clock frequencies would exceed the maximum voltage rating of the chip. So the developers had to UV those frequencies to avoid exceeding the max voltage - they decided that instability (and recoverable problems that may result) are a safer risk than burning up the chip
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
XxLostSoulxX said:
Don't you mean to say Under-volt because Over-volt which isn't possible, would mean giving more voltage to the frequency meaning more juice being sucked, and most likely wouldn't work out in the first place. haha
1.3Ghz should normally be @ 1325mv anyway, so you would want to Under-volt it 50-100mv if you can, i normally have 600-1000Mhz UV'ed by 50mv, 200-400Mhz UV'ed by 75mv & 100Mhz UV'ed by 100mv. I dont even use anything higher anymore seeing how there is no use for it besides saying " Oh hey look my phone can do this or can do that" only purpose is to
benchmark and who cares anymore haha. Its fun every now and again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overvolting is 100% possible.
Did the news get around about a guy named butcher pete?
Yes the app allowed overvolting. I bought it.
Sent From My Evo Killer!
I overvolted 1.3ghz to 1350mv and it has been smooth ever since. I know its gonna waste my battery away but I needz my 1.3 jiggawatts. Not really but its fast lol and helps dungeon defenders not stutter as much.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
styles420 said:
Technically, the over clocked frequencies are under volted by default. That is why some phones can't handle the OC - it's the same issue people have with too much UV on the stock frequencies.
Higher frequencies require higher voltages, but the voltages required by over clock frequencies would exceed the maximum voltage rating of the chip. So the developers had to UV those frequencies to avoid exceeding the max voltage - they decided that instability (and recoverable problems that may result) are a safer risk than burning up the chip
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll chime in, you are absolutely correct. XxLostSoulXx, you are definitely wrong: of course it is possible to overvolt. I can see the OP's reasoning and I would say go for it, just be careful and keep in mind that you are already above spec voltages for 1.3ghz.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
I have it too. Just have to know how to take your time with it.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
thomasskull666 said:
I'll chime in, you are absolutely correct. XxLostSoulXx, you are definitely wrong: of course it is possible to overvolt. I can see the OP's reasoning and I would say go for it, just be careful and keep in mind that you are already above spec voltages for 1.3ghz.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess if you say so but i cant OverVolt it only allows me to UVolt.
But if higher frequencies require higher voltages meaning his phone already cant handle why would he give it more voltage on top of it shouldn't he Uvolt to become stable?
XxLostSoulxX said:
I guess if you say so but i cant OverVolt it only allows me to UVolt.
But if higher frequencies require higher voltages meaning his phone already cant handle why would he give it more voltage on top of it shouldn't he Uvolt to become stable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The paid version of voltage control? Because the light version doesn't have the overvolt option...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
XxLostSoulxX said:
I guess if you say so but i cant OverVolt it only allows me to UVolt.
But if higher frequencies require higher voltages meaning his phone already cant handle why would he give it more voltage on top of it shouldn't he Uvolt to become stable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you're misunderstanding a little. Undervolting reduces the voltage it uses. So less power. Higher frequencies require more power to function well. So taking power away would only make the problem worse. Undervolting is ONLY useful for saving battery power. Overvolting would eat your battery, but give more energy to the higher frequency, and level out the stability.
XxLostSoulxX said:
I guess if you say so but i cant OverVolt it only allows me to UVolt.
But if higher frequencies require higher voltages meaning his phone already cant handle why would he give it more voltage on top of it shouldn't he Uvolt to become stable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. He needs more voltage to power the frequencies he can't handle. Why do you think the phone freezes if you UV too much? And Overvolting is more than possible.
theimpaler747 said:
No. He needs more voltage to power the frequencies he can't handle. Why do you think the phone freezes if you UV too much? And Overvolting is more than possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay can you give me a screen shot of doing it or a link to the voltage control because i believe i have the latest and i cant theres no option for me to OverVolt when i hit the frequency the bar. its to the right and only can move it to left thus UnderVolting seeing how it says -25,-50 and so on.
Look it up in the market it costs 2 dollars I bought it yesterday
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
XxLostSoulxX said:
Okay can you give me a screen shot of doing it or a link to the voltage control because i believe i have the latest and i cant theres no option for me to OverVolt when i hit the frequency the bar. its to the right and only can move it to left thus UnderVolting seeing how it says -25,-50 and so on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The free version of voltage control should have advertised over volt as a feature of the paid version
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
styles420 said:
The free version of voltage control should have advertised over volt as a feature of the paid version
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
styles420 said:
The free version of voltage control should have advertised over volt as a feature of the paid version
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im not understanding what you mean by that its advertised over volt as a feature of the paid version?
do you mean to say that in the free version its a feature or there saying in the paid version you have the option?
Tegrak overclock.
Bought it earlier today, got me stable at 1.3 (instead of only 1.2) with an extra 50mv on both core/internal voltages. Awesome. And its TRUELY faster.
Sent from my pocket rocket
XxLostSoulxX said:
Im not understanding what you mean by that its advertised over volt as a feature of the paid version?
do you mean to say that in the free version its a feature or there saying in the paid version you have the option?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The paid version is called Voltage Control Extreme. It is a paid app. Its an add on to the free Voltage Control. So if you get it and install it, it doesn't show up as another app but it will allow you to overvolt instead of only undervolt. It will help those who can't get 1300 or 1400 stable as long as they don't go overboard with it
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/intel...omputing-needs-better-story/63597?tag=nl.e539
This is for those who at least know their way around the IT world. Otherwise you will just be like "ok? so what?"
I wonder if it could compile ics lol!
Sent from my VS910 4G using xda premium
[email protected] could do it a lot faster vs using a petaflop
I just wonder if Crysis would run smoothly on it or not yet?
majorpay said:
I just wonder if Crysis would run smoothly on it or not yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On High, for sure...
But don't forget to turn AA and vysnc off.
Is the Tegra3 processor a 2core, 3core or 4core and what is the GHZ speed of this Tegra3? I love this new Nexus7 it is totally awesome.
Quad hut actually has 5...I believe it is 1.2ghz stock (could be wrong).
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using xda premium
Just watched a neat nVidia video on the Tegra 3. It has 4-cores and a "companion core". The companion core does all the mundane background stuff and sucks the least juice. The other cores only kick in when needed, like for loading an app quickly, playing a game, etc.
The video was linked in another thread on XDA...just can't remember where.
It's a 5 core chip with a 12 core GPU, clocked at 1.3 ghz.
Sent from my G2x still on GB
GeneralCrocket said:
It's a 5 core chip with a 12 core GPU, clocked at 1.3 ghz.
Sent from my G2x still on GB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.5Ghz still recognized as quad core
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
XxLostSoulxX said:
1.5Ghz still recognized as quad core
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's 1.3 ghz with 4 cores + power saving core.
Sent from my G2x still on GB
I second the above^^
My last bionic (.2233 ICS leak) scored a 3032. Was in the same range consistently. I just placed an insurance claim. I'm now running the .232 leak and can't get over 2300... Any ideas what is causing the significantly lower scores?
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using xda app-developers app
check your clock speed. your old phone ws probly at 1.2ghz and now your new one sounds like its at 1.0
You're absolutely right. So newer phone runs slower? Any known fixes for this?
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using xda app-developers app
StlrFan said:
You're absolutely right. So newer phone runs slower? Any known fixes for this?
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know it seems to be random. I dont think its specifically newer phones.
After a littlw research, I read that 1.2 ghz chips that failed testing for the razr where placed in the bionic since it was only set to run at 1 ghz but they overclock to the 1.2 if you have one of the failed razr chips.
i'm very happy and satisfied with lollipop on my galaxy tab S so far its been doing a great job compare to kitkat not saying there are no bugs but the goodies are more than bugs and baddies here are my antutu and geekbench results please share your experience and results here with screenshots
1- antutu
http://i.cubeupload.com/IL2fAD.png
2- Geekbench
http://i.cubeupload.com/C7YDYL.png
mamali.z said:
i'm very happy and satisfied with lollipop on my galaxy tab S so far its been doing a great job compare to kitkat not saying there are no bugs but the goodies are more than bugs and baddies here are my antutu and geekbench results please share your experience and results here with screenshots
1- antutu
http://i.cubeupload.com/IL2fAD.png
2- Geekbench
http://i.cubeupload.com/C7YDYL.png
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine wifi 8.4 running Lollipop got 36450 on Antutu and 14265 on 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited.
LakersDroid said:
Mine wifi 8.4 running Lollipop got 36450 on Antutu and 14265 on 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats nice , you got lollipop OTA ? or via odin
mamali.z said:
thats nice , you got lollipop OTA ? or via odin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got the OTA. 3DMark before under KitKat was in the 13K so some improvement under Lollipop.
Antutu is about the same for me under KitKat.
Sweet ROM V2 BOE2 T805Y 10.5
Mine went down a lot from the update???
Sent from my SM-T707V using XDA Free mobile app
efanatic said:
Mine went down a lot from the update???
Sent from my SM-T707V using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do a factory reset. I had the same problem. My score went from 34900 to 40100 after doing so.
xRevilatioNx said:
Do a factory reset. I had the same problem. My score went from 34900 to 40100 after doing so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will give that a shot tonight
Sent from my SCH-I545 using XDA Free mobile app
Factory reset and got 40371.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using XDA Free mobile app
Please excuse my ignorance....
I can sort of understand PC benchmarking in the case of testing how a system you built your self measures up. I don't exactly understand mobile device or well any system that is not built by the person running the test.
An exception would be if Grand Theft Auto San Andreas had a fps tool then that benchmark could help someone decide if they want a tab s, assuming they wanted to play that game. The thing is that artificial benchmarks give you a number but there is a lot more then that number that decides if a peice of software will run well on a particulr device (some under our control and some that can not be changed).
efanatic said:
Factory reset and got 40371.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How's it running now? Should be like butter for you...
Running much much better
Sent from my SCH-I545 using XDA Free mobile app
efanatic said:
Factory reset and got 40371.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Qualcomm or exynos?
Tavocampana said:
Qualcomm or exynos?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Qualcomm
Sent from my SM-T707V using XDA Free mobile app
Around 35000 on SM-T700 Exynos. I did a factory reset from settings and i still get around 35000. I guess Qualcom is more powerful or Antutu has a problem and reads data incorrectly. I have root and debloated.
I read that Samsung crippled the Exynos 5420 so it cannot use all 8 cores at once due to thermal problems, Since i have never found an app that showed the activity from all eight cores i cannot be certain, also the gpu only uses 6 cores not the full 8 according to what i have read.
John.
40084. Stock, not rooted T800.
For some reason Tapatalk FCs when I try to insert a picture (screenshot).
So what's the solution? Custom ROM?
Tinderbox (UK) said:
I read that Samsung crippled the Exynos 5420 so it cannot use all 8 cores at once due to thermal problems, Since i have never found an app that showed the activity from all eight cores i cannot be certain, also the gpu only uses 6 cores not the full 8 according to what i have read.
John.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unless you can show documented and sourced proof that what you say is true, it's just hersay. Otherwise the 40k plus benchmark scores on antuntu, is more than enough proof, that the device is an absolute demon.
Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
Well show me an app that shows at least 5 cores working at once, I am not asking for all 8.
I have the Exynos 5420 T800 myself, but i will not talk it up because i own one, i need proof.
John.
xRevilatioNx said:
Unless you can show documented and sourced proof that what you say is true, it's just hersay. Otherwise the 40k plus benchmark scores on antuntu, is more than enough proof, that the device is an absolute demon.
Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse