Database Develop

[Wow] Nexus 7 32gb uses faster memory

Reading up on some daily news, I came across an article reviewing the new N7 hardware and the 4.2 update.
The reviewer soon found out that the 32gb unit was much snappier in booting and loading apps. So he put it to the test against an 8gb unit and the results are clear.
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/11/googles-nexus-7-gets-a-fresh-coat-of-paint-for-the-holidays/
Much faster read and access times on the new 32gb units.
TEST.............................................................8GB NEXUS 7..........32GB NEXUS 7
Boot time.........................................................39.7 seconds.............28.5 seconds
Launching GLBenchmark Egypt HD test..............11.2 seconds...............8.8 seconds
Downloading and installing 27.4MB application.....22.5 seconds.............16.1 seconds

player911 said:
Reading up on some daily news, I came across an article reviewing the new N7 hardware and the 4.2 update.
The reviewer soon found out that the 32gb unit was much snappier in booting and loading apps. So he put it to the test against an 8gb unit and the results are clear.
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/11/googles-nexus-7-gets-a-fresh-coat-of-paint-for-the-holidays/
Much faster read and access times on the new 32gb units.
TEST.............................................................8GB NEXUS 7..........32GB NEXUS 7
Boot time.........................................................39.7 seconds.............28.5 seconds
Launching GLBenchmark Egypt HD test..............11.2 seconds...............8.8 seconds
Downloading and installing 27.4MB application.....22.5 seconds.............16.1 seconds
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We, the first 8GB/16GB buyers, got stolen on this one.
I am not paying for a Nexus 10 after this.

So Asus aren't allowed to improve parts in later batches? That's ridiculous, it's likely that the better memory got cheaper and so was used, keeping the BOM the same with better performance. Just because they aren't Apple and don't make even a minor change a huge deal with a new version doesn't mean it's bad.

RusherDude said:
We, the first 8GB/16GB buyers, got stolen on this one.
I am not paying for a Nexus 10 after this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Calm down. The 16gb was faster than the 8gb from the beginning. See: http://www.anandtech.com/show/6130/the-16gb-nexus-7-storage-performance for a rundown of the difference between 8gb vs 16gb.
Looking at the numbers, its tough to say whether there is even a difference between the 16gb vs the 32gb. Someone would need to test them the same way side by side to be sure.

RusherDude said:
We, the first 8GB/16GB buyers, got stolen on this one.
I am not paying for a Nexus 10 after this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You didn't get "stolen", you got exactly what you paid for.
Higher capacity SSDs have always been faster. It's no surprise this is also true in tablets. The 16 GB version is also faster than the 8 GB.

Interesting, thanks.

The 16 GB version of the Nexus 7 has faster storage than the 8 GB, the Ars Technica figures are quite a bit lower than my 8GB, anyway I've never noticed a performance issue on my device.
Between the 32 GB & 16 GB I doubt there is much difference, in a previous thread I asked an early buyer of the 32 GB model to Androbench it against their 16 GB, the result was similar.
---------- Post added at 07:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:17 PM ----------
pboesboes said:
You didn't get "stolen", you got exactly what you paid for.
Higher capacity SSDs have always been faster. It's no surprise this is also true in tablets. The 16 GB version is also faster than the 8 GB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Storage in current phones / tablets is not SSD but eMMC, both use NAND memory but there are major differences.

This is common practise with solid state storage, a 128gb SSD will be slower than a 256gb even though they're made my the same manufacturer. A 64gb version will be faster than the 32gb version. Nothing to get pissed about, just they way things worked.

Probably but seems the gains are pretty large. Regardless of the reason, I still found it fascinating that there are such big differences between the units sizes. Very good knowledge if you are on the fence about saving a few bucks on memory. No longer is the battle just whether you can survive with a set space but also picking a slower one.

Sell your 16 and buy a 32 and profit?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

player911 said:
Probably but seems the gains are pretty large. Regardless of the reason, I still found it fascinating that there are such big differences between the units sizes. Very good knowledge if you are on the fence about saving a few bucks on memory. No longer is the battle just whether you can survive with a set space but also picking a slower one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reading the arstechnica article, is not clear if the WIFI 32GB version is faster as well. They only tested the 3G 32GB version. Do you think the WIFI version would have the same boost on nand?

There's also something humorous about people complaining about being "had" on a device with little to no profit margin.

Dorkington said:
There's also something humorous about people complaining about being "had" on a device with little to no profit margin.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even funnier is I bet if you randomly picked 10 8GB owners and gave them a 32GB version 0 of them would notice any difference in speed.
The difference in speed is as close to being placebo as you can get without actually being placebo.

styckx said:
Even funnier is I bet if you randomly picked 10 8GB owners and gave them a 32GB version 0 of them would notice any difference in speed.
The difference in speed is as close to being placebo as you can get without actually being placebo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well. As an 8GB owner, I stumbled upon this thread while trying to figure out why my Nexus 7 felt so sluggish, so my gut feeling says that this may not be so placebo after all.
I bought the 8GB version on impulse due to a ridiculously good offer, so neither the slow and little RAM, or the fact that the left side of the screen almost seem to come unglued trouble me. But coming from the original Samsung Tab + the SGII phone, I must admit I'm a bit disappointed in the (lack of) speed and snappiness of the Nexus... Had expected more after two years. Ok, the resolutions is higher and the screen is nice, but that's it.

So my Ford Escort doesnt go as fast as the Ford Mustang and I AM PISSED!
I just assumed all cars made by Ford, even with different specs, would achieve the same road results.
Dupe me and stuff.

I can say honestly that it is no placebo. I have a 16gb and also bought a 32gb a week ago. Within 5 minutes, the difference was very apparent. To get a better feel, I took the 16 back to stock via fastboot and faced them off on equal ground. I did not benchmark, mainly because two 16's can differ in a benchmark. Would not have proved a thing. So, I went by feel. Both on the same wifi network, the 32 crushed the 16 in dl time, install time, and just overall feel. Scrolling, reaction and graphics were a big difference. I installed NFS mw on both, and the 32 was much much smoother. Those are just my personal findings, for what its worth.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium

I don't know, my 16g running at 1.6/484/666 is faster then my dads stock 32g.
Root it and install a better kernel.
Sent from my KillRom Nexus 7

rebel1699 said:
I can say honestly that it is no placebo. I have a 16gb and also bought a 32gb a week ago. Within 5 minutes, the difference was very apparent. To get a better feel, I took the 16 back to stock via fastboot and faced them off on equal ground. I did not benchmark, mainly because two 16's can differ in a benchmark. Would not have proved a thing. So, I went by feel. Both on the same wifi network, the 32 crushed the 16 in dl time, install time, and just overall feel. Scrolling, reaction and graphics were a big difference. I installed NFS mw on both, and the 32 was much much smoother. Those are just my personal findings, for what its worth.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you run tests to eliminate the placebo effect? Probably not.
I've used both the 16gb and 32gb versions and there's virtually no difference.
Sent from my Nexus 7
Stop... MUFFIN TIME!!!

veeman said:
Did you run tests to eliminate the placebo effect? Probably not.
I've used both the 16gb and 32gb versions and there's virtually no difference.
Sent from my Nexus 7
Stop... MUFFIN TIME!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, but I know how to tell which is downloading faster and installing quicker, which is lagging more and whatnot. Sometimes, you dont need a benchmark to do something as simple as monitor time elapsed. Sometimes in the age of technology, a stopwatch and simultaneous side by side comparison is still very useful. Overthinking can occasionally be a problem.
And if your gonna ask a question like" Did you run a test" and then answer you own question with incorrect and sarcastic assumption, just save your time and dont ask. As a result, I wont answer it, and let you look like the fool all alone.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
---------- Post added at 09:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:14 AM ----------
Sveke said:
I don't know, my 16g running at 1.6/484/666 is faster then my dads stock 32g.
Root it and install a better kernel.
Sent from my KillRom Nexus 7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats very true, but I compared both stock. If the 16 has a custom kernel, then the 32 needs to have the same in order for a comparison to be anywhere near accurate. You could compare a stock gm engine to a blown 383 too, but it would be pointless. Dont need a dragstrip to figure that one out.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium

Not to be a Debbie Downer here, but we've seen variations larger than this in N7's running the same specs, ROMs, etc. Hence the many differences in the "lag thread" and many other threads. A test between 2 units isn't even remotely conclusive.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

Nexus 5 gen 2

The specs I can see in the second gen nexus 5 is a:
5.1 inch QHD IPS LCD screen
K1 64bit processor
3GB RAM
2800MAh battery
16GB 32GB and later on a 64GB of internal storage one
The first Nexus with a sd card slot since the Nexus One
13mp back camera and 2mp front
Android L 64bit

And they might call it.. the Nexus 6!

ChronoReverse said:
And they might call it.. the Nexus 6!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol I doubt that unless it will be around 6 inches which I can't see happening unless it will have a 5.5 inch screen.

5 mp front
Sent from my GT-I9505G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

raventothepowerofpi said:
The specs I can see in the second gen nexus 5 is a:
5.1 inch QHD IPS LCD screen
K1 64bit processor
3GB RAM
2800MAh battery
16GB 32GB and later on a 64GB of internal storage one
The first Nexus with a sd card slot since the Nexus One
13mp back camera and 2mp front
Android L 64bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like it!
But I'd like to offer not less 3000MAh battery and 5,5 inch QHD IPS LCD screen.
Also it is nessesary not less 5mp front camera and FM tuner.

crisis_trustee said:
I like it!
But I'd like to offer not less 3000MAh battery and 5,5 inch QHD IPS LCD screen.
Also it is nessesary not less 5mp front camera and FM tuner.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anything could happen but truthfully I am basing this on how nobody could figure out what would happen with the Nexus 5 and had a lot less specs than most rumors yet still has amazing performance and the battery life is pretty good for it's size because of it being pure Android. An FM radio chip would be amazing but in order for that to work they would have to ship earbuds with the device which I do not see happening.

raventothepowerofpi said:
The specs I can see in the second gen nexus 5 is a:
5.1 inch QHD IPS LCD screen
K1 64bit processor
3GB RAM
2800MAh battery
16GB 32GB and later on a 64GB of internal storage one
The first Nexus with a sd card slot since the Nexus One
13mp back camera and 2mp front
Android L 64bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
more then likely it will be a 2500MAh battery and 2GB of RAM and also not worth upgrading. google always puts ****ty batteries in their phones.

svengalis said:
more then likely it will be a 2500MAh battery and 2GB of RAM and also not worth upgrading. google always puts ****ty batteries in their phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eh, they are really good with battery optimization so they don't usually need a big battery, why I said 2800mah instead if 3000mah+ and said 3gb of ram because they wouldn't make a 3rd one with 2gb of ram I would assume, but then again Samsung did that with the S5.

crisis_trustee said:
... and FM tuner.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No please keep it cheap to buy!

Ltdrev said:
No please keep it cheap to buy!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It'll probably stay 350 USD unless the lowest memory version is 32gb then it will likely be 400 USD lol

raventothepowerofpi said:
It'll probably stay 350 USD unless the lowest memory version is 32gb then it will likely be 400 USD lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just hope they don't start adding too much bells n whissles like Sumsumg, Soony and other LGg's products...

Ltdrev said:
Just hope they don't start adding too much bells n whissles like Sumsumg, Soony and other LGg's products...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't matter how much they add as long as they keep the good price, the other stuff it just a plus

raventothepowerofpi said:
It doesn't matter how much they add as long as they keep the good price, the other stuff it just a plus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope they include some LSD!

There's a thread on this already.
>*Google Nexus 5*>*Nexus 5 General*>*Google Nexus 6 - What do you think?

^^^ THIS.
Please use the existing thread as noted above.

How fast is the 512gb version vs 128gb

Hey guys quick question. Can you post some benchmarks of the 512gb version and the 128gb version? I curious if there is any performance gain with the 2 extra go of memory. There isn’t anything like that on YouTube. I appreciate it.

Both phones will be fast as hell. The extra 2 gig ram means that you can essentially have more apps open at the same time and I have noticed a slightly zippier performance compared to my 6gb s9 plus

mikey_sk said:
Both phones will be fast as hell. The extra 2 gig ram means that you can essentially have more apps open at the same time and I have noticed a slightly zippier performance compared to my 6gb s9 plus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for replying Mikey. Both of those phones the S9+ and Note 9 have the same cpu, correct?

Correct. You would hard tell the difference. The s9 can be found as an A Grade refurb online for less than £500 here in the UK if you hunt about. That's over half the price of the N9 for essentially the same real world performance...

mikey_sk said:
Correct. You would hard tell the difference. The s9 can be found as an A Grade refurb online for less than £500 here in the UK if you hunt about. That's over half the price of the N9 for essentially the same real world performance...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was one of Zeedomax's arguments from his YouTube channel High on Android. He was basically saying the SD845 has been out since the S9 introduction and technically Samsung shouldn't be selling the note9 as much as it is, since the chips are now 6 plus months old and cheaper to buy.
Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

mikey_sk said:
Correct. You would hard tell the difference. The s9 can be found as an A Grade refurb online for less than £500 here in the UK if you hunt about. That's over half the price of the N9 for essentially the same real world performance...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well there's no s-pen, which is why you buy a Note, so... Not the same performance to me. I get what you're trying to say, but I cannot comprehend why anyone would go for the Note9 without wanting a stylus.
---------- Post added at 12:41 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:38 AM ----------
Limeybastard said:
That was one of Zeedomax's arguments from his YouTube channel High on Android. He was basically saying the SD845 has been out since the S9 introduction and technically Samsung shouldn't be selling the note9 as much as it is, since the chips are now 6 plus months old and cheaper to buy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's $159 over S9+ for: double storage, larger battery, stylus with Bluetooth, a screen capable of understanding 4096 pressure sensitivity levels, and a slightly better, brighter screen at that. How is that $159 jump not justified? I don't get it. That's a ton of extra stuff. Just because people don't use the stylus and special screen, doesn't mean they aren't costs. And larger battery and double storage alone is "worth that" for many.

yes even the 6GB Note 9 version is faster than the 6GB S9 plus version.

Picking up my 128 today from Best Buy. Seems like almost everyone is buying the 512 even if it’s not needed. I don’t really think there’s a huge difference between 6 or 8gb of ram for daily usage.

dooku77 said:
Picking up my 128 today from Best Buy. Seems like almost everyone is buying the 512 even if it’s not needed. I don’t really think there’s a huge difference between 6 or 8gb of ram for daily usage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Essentially no there is not a major real world difference. However there are probably power users on here where the extra ram and the 512 would be useful

dooku77 said:
Picking up my 128 today from Best Buy. Seems like almost everyone is buying the 512 even if it’s not needed. I don’t really think there’s a huge difference between 6 or 8gb of ram for daily usage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One word Merica. The place where bigger numbers equals more sales. Example Mercedes Benz, 500sel , yet here it was one labeled a 550 sel or something . Perception of the market.
Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

Which size note 9

Jey guys quick question im moving from the s8+ to the note 9 and I was wondering which size should I get 128gb or 512 is it worth getting bigger size

Why are you asking a question only you know the answer to? Do you need a lot of internal storage based on your phone usage or not?

I was asking for suggestions Ive heard some people state that its not worth getting the bigger version

jxb25 said:
I was asking for suggestions Ive heard some people state that its not worth getting the bigger version
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea it really boils down to if you really need it as far as your use...what space your using now? also, who you plan on getting it through tmobile or sammy

This reminds me of a recent situation I witnessed at a Mexican restaurant. Somebody with an iPhone X sat down at the bar and was offered chips and salsa, which 99 times out of a 100 are complimentary at Mexican restaurants. He replied do I have to pay for it. I'm not pointing out the economics of this. I am pointing out you have a very expensive option of 128GB or 512GB and your only response so far is you've read the 512GB is not worth it.
Things that make you go hmmmm...

On the average people went for.....
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-note-9/how-to/note-9-united-kingdom-thread-rumours-t3825345

It's very subjective. I can say for me, the 128GB version with my 256GB sd card is overkill. I will never come close to filling up either the internal storage or the sd card and I download a ton of YouTube and Plex videos to watch offline while I'm flying.

Ok cool thanks for the info that was given with the poll and personal views

Yeah bit of a daft question really.
I got the 128, should I have got the 512?
See, just like that one ?

beta546 said:
Yeah bit of a daft question really.
I got the 128, should I have got the 512?
See, just like that one ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
smh..calling the man question a silly one...

antawnm26 said:
smh..calling the man question a silly one...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is a silly question though, it's like me starting a thread to ask everyone whether I like chicken, or fish ?

holywhitebread said:
Why are you asking a question only you know the answer to? Do you need a lot of internal storage based on your phone usage or not?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He's trying to instigate acts of hatred
Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

128GB is probably more than enough storage for your app and game data. As you could use the microSDCard to store all your other data

antawnm26 said:
smh..calling the man question a silly one...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a bit like me asking my partner if she wanted my 12 inch penis or his 2 inch penis. We've been happily married now for 10 years! Just go with the set rule....(see what I did there, 12 inches- Rule).

jxb25 said:
Jey guys quick question im moving from the s8+ to the note 9 and I was wondering which size should I get 128gb or 512 is it worth getting bigger size
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I recommend getting the 8GB/512GB model,but,more so for the extra RAM than the extra storage.
I would have liked to seen a 3rd option placed between the two, with 8GB RAM / 256GB storage.

OnePlus 7 Pro - Indian Discussion Thread.

Dedicated thread for Indian OnePlus 7 pro owners
Share your thoughts guys, let the discussion begin
OnePlus 7 Pro: Price and Variants
The OnePlus 7 Pro starts at a Rs 48,999 for the base model with 6 GB RAM and 128 GB storage.
8 GB RAM with 256 GB storage variant which offers the option of getting a Red phone (Almond will only be available in June). This variant comes in at Rs 52,999.
As for the top-end variant with 12 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage, the price tag goes up to Rs 57,999. This variant also arrives only in Nebula Blue and will be available for grab only from 28 May.
OnePlus 7 Pro: Introductory offers
OnePlus has teamed up with Reliance Jio to offer OnePlus 7 Pro users benefits worth Rs 9,300, of which, Rs 5,400 will be provided in the form of cashback vouchers in the MyJio app, while the remaining Rs 3,900 will be awarded in the form of partner benefits. This includes discounts worth Rs 2,000 or 20 percent on purchases being made through Zoomcar and Rs 1,550 off on flight tickets and hotel bookings.

Horoscope said:
Dedicated thread for Indian OnePlus 7 pro owners
Share your thoughts guys, let the discussion begin
OnePlus 7 Pro: Price and Variants
The OnePlus 7 Pro starts at a Rs 48,999 for the base model with 6 GB RAM and 128 GB storage.
8 GB RAM with 256 GB storage variant which offers the option of getting a Red phone (Almond will only be available in June). This variant comes in at Rs 52,999.
As for the top-end variant with 12 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage, the price tag goes up to Rs 57,999. This variant also arrives only in Nebula Blue and will be available for grab only from 28 May.
OnePlus 7 Pro: Introductory offers
OnePlus has teamed up with Reliance Jio to offer OnePlus 7 Pro users benefits worth Rs 9,300, of which, Rs 5,400 will be provided in the form of cashback vouchers in the MyJio app, while the remaining Rs 3,900 will be awarded in the form of partner benefits. This includes discounts worth Rs 2,000 or 20 percent on purchases being made through Zoomcar and Rs 1,550 off on flight tickets and hotel bookings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Root Krega Apun Aaj. Darr Nahi Lagta Humko ?

Was about to start one, glad the OP started it[emoji1], first time oneplus buyer, hope it lives upto the expectations
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

Recieved the device and unpacked , am I the first one here ?[emoji50]
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

I received it on 17th while my friend got on 16th.
Absolutely love my phone.
53k is a lot of money and I was pretty sure not to spend that much but then couldn't resist and got one. (also the big credit should go to oneplus for their clever marketing)
Waiting for gcam ports. Tried one mi9 one not that great not that bad.

I got my device delivered on 17th. So far I am a little concerned with the battery life compared to my OP6 it seems to be discharging a lot faster. I hope a future update brings variable refresh rate. That should help with battery a lot. Other than that, I am extremely happy with the device.

Got mine Friday, apart from camera exceeded all expectations. Got a gcam port working, will test it out and update..

Will I see any real life performance difference between 6gb and 8gb variant?
I am usually a moderate - heavy user (Lots of gaming)
I usually keep my phone for 2-3 years. (Still rocking the OP3)
Any advise will be appreciated.

Hey guys.
I'm stuck between buying the 6GB RAM & 128GB ROM or the 8GB & 256GB ROM Nebula version.
I like the blue version but I think the more RAM and storage space is overkill and just a waste of money even though it's not a huge amount (4k INR).
Any suggestions?
Oh and I'm going to upgrade from my OP3 so really looking forward to having the new phone.

Go for the 8GB one
affection788 said:
Will I see any real life performance difference between 6gb and 8gb variant?
I am usually a moderate - heavy user (Lots of gaming)
I usually keep my phone for 2-3 years. (Still rocking the OP3)
Any advise will be appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aniruddha10 said:
Hey guys.
I'm stuck between buying the 6GB RAM & 128GB ROM or the 8GB & 256GB ROM Nebula version.
I like the blue version but I think the more RAM and storage space is overkill and just a waste of money even though it's not a huge amount (4k INR).
Any suggestions?
Oh and I'm going to upgrade from my OP3 so really looking forward to having the new phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would say the both of you should go for the 8GB one. Although, If you look at it you pay 4K more for 2GB Ram VS the GB variant. But you are paying 5K less compared to the 12GB. If you plan to use the phone over 2 years, the 6GB may have trouble as apps become larger. The 8GB gives you a little more future proofing which is a nice middle ground.
I got the 8GB + 256GB because I have the following games installed PUBG + Call Of Duty + Asphalt + Fortnite
Also I watch a lot of 4K content on my phone (Each file is about 15Gb) and it is good to be able to store more than 3 movies.
Hope this helps.

Has anyone noticed the exceptional RAM drainage? My phone, on rest it's consumed a huge chunk of the RAM

Waiting for the Nebula Blue variant to be available. Getting a non-Nexus/non-Pixel device after a very very long time, so I'm a little anxious to try something new. Did y'all get only the Mirror Gray variant or is the phone also available in Red like the Original Post states?

Red is not available for pro afaik, it's only for the regular version @saravoxy and I remember seeing you in some other forum long back [emoji3]
Sent from my GM1911 using Tapatalk

---------- Post added at 02:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:33 PM ----------
[/COLOR]
n2851991m said:
I would say the both of you should go for the 8GB one. Although, If you look at it you pay 4K more for 2GB Ram VS the GB variant. But you are paying 5K less compared to the 12GB. If you plan to use the phone over 2 years, the 6GB may have trouble as apps become larger. The 8GB gives you a little more future proofing which is a nice middle ground.
I got the 8GB + 256GB because I have the following games installed PUBG + Call Of Duty + Asphalt + Fortnite
Also I watch a lot of 4K content on my phone (Each file is about 15Gb) and it is good to be able to store more than 3 movies.
Hope this helps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you share the battery drain you experienced playing Pubg? In 90hz/60hz and also FHD/QHD?

bala_gamer said:
Red is not available for pro afaik, it's only for the regular version @saravoxy and I remember seeing you in some other forum long back [emoji3]
Sent from my GM1911 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey Bala. I remember you very well haha, you were quite active and very helpful in Galaxy S3 Indian thread. Surprised to see you getting an One plus device ?, how are you liking the phone so far?

zeus_47 said:
Has anyone noticed the exceptional RAM drainage? My phone, on rest it's consumed a huge chunk of the RAM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you notice the same when you keep the screen at 60Hz refresh rate? I will not be surprised if a huge chunk of RAM is eaten alive by the 90 Hz RR.

saravoxy said:
Hey Bala. I remember you very well haha, you were quite active and very helpful in Galaxy S3 Indian thread. Surprised to see you getting an One plus device [emoji846], how are you liking the phone so far?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha thanks, yea first time getting an oneplus device so far it's good and a great performer
Sent from my GM1911 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 08:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:12 AM ----------
zeus_47 said:
Has anyone noticed the exceptional RAM drainage? My phone, on rest it's consumed a huge chunk of the RAM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ram boost would be on by default ,try disabling it if you want to see more free Ram ,but that being said the device itself will take care of ram usage and free it wherever needed that's the way Android is designed.
Sent from my GM1911 using Tapatalk

Hello everyone,
Any link for best tempered glass in india..??

8 - 9 % in an Hour
affection788 said:
---------- Post added at 02:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:33 PM ----------
[/COLOR]
Can you share the battery drain you experienced playing Pubg? In 90hz/60hz and also FHD/QHD?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had about 9% drain while playing PUBG at HDR + Colorful 90Hz.
Clash Royale on the other hand showed about 11% drain in 1Hr and 14 Mins
The resolution is set to auto and I am not sure if PUBG plays at 1440p or 1080p (Could anyone Confirm ?)

Hai anyone bought one plus from offline store like chroma reliance digital?? If so please tell me about the offers too..