Database Develop

Intel Chip

Hello everyone
I've been reading for a few days in this forum about the Motorola Razr i
I certainly found interesting articles but strangely I have found that very few refer to the Intel chip
just as I have been looking about the chip of "Motorola Razr i" and found a curious comment
"Medfield z2460 was meant to test the waters and is the reason why it was launched in india and not the US. Just a precursor to the medfield z2580. The z2580 and Clovertrail will be offered in dual core variants (not to mention quad core for clover trail) and will ditch the imagination technologies sgx 540 for an sgx 544 mp2 which runs 34 [email protected] mhz.
The sgx 540 gets 6.4 gfllops @400mhz . The adreno 225 runs at 24.5 [email protected] 400mhz and the tegra 3 (t30l or t33) gpu runs 13 [email protected] mhz. So being that 6.4gflops vs 24.5gflops is relative to 202% what do you think happens with 34 gflops vs 24.5 gflops? Plus the s4 is 103 mflops single threaded while medfield z2460 is 90 mflops single threaded on the cpu side. That's pretty close. Dual core comparison with sgx544 might actually be superior and at a higher process node (32nm vs 28nm), and that's with an in order instruction set vs ARM's out of order. I don't see how you get "x86 Atom has very slim chances when taking on Qualcomm’s ARM processors or any other new generation ARM mobile CPU from Samsung or Nvidia" with that info. Your talking a gpu and a core.
Come spring they go out of order, not to mention ditching 5 year old architecture for silvermont, 22nm process and inclusion of intel hd gpu with 40 to 80 gflops (depending on eu count) and you think there will be no competition? Even the apq8064 adreno 320 only has approx 40-45 gflops but that doesn't include the modem so higher tdp .
Maybe the exynos 5250 with mali [email protected] 68 gflops will be a threat given release schedule but still, nearly matching single threaded performance with the best chip on the market (and with 5 year old architecture), and beating every ARM chip to date in java script for a first try/test the waters offering? Swap a gpu and add a core and its game on. And adding new architecture, 22nm, out of order instruction and hd graphics and ARM might have a problem until 64 bit ARM v8."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My question is How true is this?
not publish the link to the site because I do not know if this is right in this forum.
I apologize for possible flaws in my English.

I'm having a super-smooth experience, so yeah, the hyper-threaded single-core chip is doing a very fine job compared to the ARM competitors.
But is it true that Intel will go out-of-order for their next architecture? Because the whole point behind Atom processors was to take advantage of Intel's advanced lithography and well tought architecture, then simplify it to make it consume much less energy (and go from out-of-order to in-order was one of those simplifications).

Well I always thought Intel smartphone chips were more powerful CPU wise but gpu wise its behind.
And christ you can quote all the figures you like but it doesn't mean it'll actually reach that. Its what the individual parts can achieve.
Put them into a phone and reduce the power consumption to an acceptable level = a lot less than quoted figures
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app

[Leak] Early benchmark of future ARM chip...

Hi guys
One of my friends today just receive some unknown sample product (He's working on a labs)
+Snap 810 @2,2GHz (development board)
+Tegra K1 64bit Denver Dual Core @2,5 GHz
+Tegra K1 32 bit Quadcore
Benchmark result of Snap 810 vs everything (early beta kernel complied with GCC4.9 and benchmark in 64bit if available)
Single core Snap 810 vs [email protected] 2,5Ghz: increase 25% in single thread and 50% Multithread
+vs Tegra K1 64bit: 28% loss in single thread and 50% faster MultiThread
+vs Tegra K1 32bit: 12% faster in single thread and 34,5% faster in Multithread (2 thread vs 8 thread )
+vs Apple A7: 13,5% loss in singlethread and 86,5% faster in multithread (Same, 2 thread vs 8...)
+vs Apple A8: 20% loss in singlethread and 71% faster in multithread (same thing, 2 vs 8)
Also I have benchmark of Adreno 430(driver and chip still beta): faster than 30% vs Adreno 420, more than 90% faster than Apple A7 (PowerVR G6430) but loss 8-10% vs Tegra K1
Also more breaking news: Samsung Note 4 Exynos version is using Samsung CMC221 modem, Samsung have plan to use Intel XMM7260 with 22 band LTE cat 6 but drop it and using own-product with 7 band lte and cat 4
And Exynos version this time is more powerful than Snap
P/S: All thing I mentioned is confidental and NO PICTURE OF THEM (if they found out we leak them, we will get....)

Nexus 4 Benchmarks

I ran a bunch of benchmarks on my LG Nexus 4 16GB.
Antutu 24884
Quadrant 6494
Basemark OS II 558
Basemark X 11127
Passmark (System 2292, CPU 13517, 3D 695)
3DMark IceStorm Unlimited 11330
Vellamo (Multi-Core 1204, Browser 2188)
Geekbench 3 (Single 505, Multi 1654)
GPU Benchmark 3D 12523

Please use the existing benchmark thread
Nexus 4 Benchmarks thread
Closed

[Q] Mi Note Pro Snapdragon 810 version/revision?

Sorry if this has been asked before, did a couple searches and found nothing related so here it goes: as title says is there a way to check the Snapdragon version/revision of this phone? I mean factory wise, no third party tools. I'm a bit confused because this phone launched under the statement of the Snapdragon 810 v2 revision 2.1 and the thermal heats / performance improvements. But recently I've seen some Sony/HTC phones that were released under the "old" version (specially the M9) having a firmware update that brought the performance to the same scores in all benchmarks to the rev 2.1 supposedly the Mi Note Pro has so I'm a bit confused with all of the revisions, is this one a different revision? Is there a way to check it out, like in recovery mode or through adb/fastboot? If so could you post and share your results / findings? Thanks

The snapdragoon 810 rev. 2.1 have a overclocked GPU , "normal" 810 chip have a gpu clock set to 600 ; 2.1 versions have a 630 clock in the gpu, so download cpuz and check it.

Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL sdm 660 instead of 636 ?

Hello,
On geekbench the Asus Zenfone 5 show a sdm 660 SoC instead of the 636 announced by Asus (can't post url, it's my first thread on xda)
But except in a few youtube reviews I didn't heard a lot about this.
I receive mine in the beginning of June, so I will check if this is the case.
What SoC have you on your Zenfone 5 ?

GgLaPoule said:
Hello,
On geekbench the Asus Zenfone 5 show a sdm 660 SoC instead of the 636 announced by Asus (can't post url, it's my first thread on xda)
But except in a few youtube reviews I didn't heard a lot about this.
I receive mine in the beginning of June, so I will check if this is the case.
What SoC have you on your Zenfone 5 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, actually, it is just the motherboard that is branded as 660 , the cpu is 636 ;(
But it is a very good question.
Here is the CPU-Z.
We can see it is detected as Snapdragon 660 BUT model is 636 and cpu frequency is maxed at 1.8Ghz (the 660 has a max frequency of 2.2Ghz). So it must be the 636.
But again, the GPU is detected as Adreno 512 which is the 660's GPU........... And benchmark of the GPU is very low.
So, CPU-Z is wrong or the phone is upside down lol

I have seen that the snapdragon 660 and snapdragon 636 are the same except for the GPU who's better for 660.
Did you run the benchmark with AI Boost enabled ?
Maybe Asus put an underclocked 660 in the Zenfone 5 to justify the famous "AI boost".
When I receive the phone I will benchmark the GPU with AI boost enabled and compare it with the adreno 512 score. We'll see.

Here are some more screenshots.
Whithout IA boost then with it.
It seems they put 636 but with adreno 512.