I am still running OE2 rooted on my device, and I was wondering with all the new versions up to 6.0.1 thats hit these phones, Have the ability to be rooted?
I still sense "no" from other threads. If thats the case, I think ill stay on the year+ old OE2.
Was just wondering. thanks.
No root yet to SM-G925a on 6.0.1
if you absolutely need root then stay on oe2, but marshmallow is faster and battery saver compared to that. much difference. plus the new security updates keeps the phone more secure.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G925A using Tapatalk
Related
I'm currently on Krypton 1.4 (Kitkat 4.4.4) and this is pretty much stock 4.4.4 with the carrier bloat removed and some additional tweaks. I have not seen 5.1.1 ROM in a similar fashion, am I overlooking something in the development section or since 5.1.1 was recently OTA I need to exercise more patience? Thank you!
There is no VZW 5.x OTA, so that's probably why you've not seen anything. Maybe wait until there is an actual update before asking again?
Sent from my Nexus 6
meber said:
I'm currently on Krypton 1.4 (Kitkat 4.4.4) and this is pretty much stock 4.4.4 with the carrier bloat removed and some additional tweaks. I have not seen 5.1.1 ROM in a similar fashion, am I overlooking something in the development section or since 5.1.1 was recently OTA I need to exercise more patience? Thank you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exercise more patience.
5.1 is still going through Test Drive and Soak tests, it hasn't been finally pushed yet to anyone... The full push MIGHT happen next week -> https://plus.google.com/+DavidSchuster/posts/ci1UAEv2oYB
I'm not sure how long it will then take to make a custom rom built on 5.1 after it hits our phones. If they'll need to wait for the SBF files, or what...
And since you have a Non-Dev Verizon device, you might want to see -> http://forum.xda-developers.com/moto-x/general/lollipop-warning-unlocked-via-sunshine-t3114428 But if you're not planning on taking an OTA, then you should be relatively ok.
I'm quite happy on the 5.0.2 but with all the 5.1.1 problems with rooting and such.
Anyone have an opinion on 5.1.1?
Yes worth it.
Sent from my SM-G920T
Brava27 said:
I'm quite happy on the 5.0.2 but with all the 5.1.1 problems with rooting and such.
Anyone have an opinion on 5.1.1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There isn't really any issue with rooting 5.1.1, easy as flashing the unikernel. As far as the other stuff goes I honestly haven't really seen any significant improvement that would make me upgrade to 5.1.1 if I had it to do over again. Most of the issues with 5.0.2 have been patched via community fixes. The other issue is, at least for the time being, once you go to 5.1.1 you can't downgrade.
boosting1bar said:
There isn't really any issue with rooting 5.1.1, easy as flashing the unikernel. As far as the other stuff goes I honestly haven't really seen any significant improvement that would make me upgrade to 5.1.1 if I had it to do over again. Most of the issues with 5.0.2 have been patched via community fixes. The other issue is, at least for the time being, once you go to 5.1.1 you can't downgrade.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your input
Only thing I can really think of is on 5.1.1. you can open apps directly from the lock screen if they have a notification showing.
Hi all I have been searching on the newest firmware for the note 4 was going to install but I get mixed info one which is the newest to install I have baseband ANK4 cannot that be updated to COG2 or DOFC which is the newest? Thank you searched for answer but get mixed info
Cog2 and cod6 are both 5.0.1 firmware. One of these is, cant remember which, has the stagefright patch.
Dog1 is 5.1.1
ctrlaltdeln said:
Cog2 and cod6 are both 5.0.1 firmware. One of these is, cant remember which, has the stagefright patch.
Dog1 is 5.1.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ctrlaltdeln is correct.
Expanding upon his response.
These are for NON T3
U2DOK2 bumps 5.0.1 to 5.1.1
COG2 has stagefright running 5.0.1
COD6 is first Lollipop rollout with 5.0.1
These are for T3
U1DOK2 is 5.1.1
DOG1 is 5.1.1
5.1.1 has been released for NON T3 version on 11/30/15
Andel7539 said:
Ctrlaltdeln is correct.
Expanding upon his response.
These are for NON T3
COG2 has stagefright running 5.0.1
COD6 is first Lollipop rollout with 5.0.1
These are for T3
DOG1 is 5.1.1
5.1.1 has not been released for NON T3 version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Might want to amend that. DOK2 is the first 5.1.1 build for the 910T and it came out last night / this morning.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
vprasad1 said:
Might want to amend that. DOK2 is the first 5.1.1 build for the 910T and it came out last night / this morning.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Amended.
Andel7539 said:
Amended.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reading through the DOK2 thread, it's also available for the T3.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
DOK2 is the newest firwame, you can download it and update over Odin
Is no one concerned that once you flash DOK2 that you can't currently go back to any previous version? What happens if you decide you don't like any of the roms with DOK2 and want to go back, to Firekat for example?
phoneturf said:
Is no one concerned that once you flash DOK2 that you can't currently go back to any previous version? What happens if you decide you don't like any of the roms with DOK2 and want to go back, to Firekat for example?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No.
1. N910T3 users never had that option to try Firekat
2. N910T users have had a few months of 5.1.1 ROM ports from Sprint 5.1.1, and some are still available to determine whether they're willing to make the permanent leap.
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
phoneturf said:
Is no one concerned that once you flash DOK2 that you can't currently go back to any previous version? What happens if you decide you don't like any of the roms with DOK2 and want to go back, to Firekat for example?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I installed the modem and baseband, doesn't matter about 'going back' cause I use an awesome AOSP ROM.
The real question is if you're happy with the ROM you are on, why switch?
Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
phoneturf said:
Is no one concerned that once you flash DOK2 that you can't currently go back to any previous version? What happens if you decide you don't like any of the roms with DOK2 and want to go back, to Firekat for example?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm... potentially concerned. DOK2 seems fine and all, but apparently going forward there will be "no ability to downgrade due to updated security policies". OK, makes some sense, and the Note 4 receives updates so infrequently it's (sort of) less of an issue than with other devices, but what is this "security policy" accomplishing beyond removing user choice/control? Not every firmware version is flawless... for example, let's say DOK...6 reduces SOT by 2 hrs and drops WIFI connections every hour? Whatever, DOK2 just happens to be a much better user experience... too bad, enjoy your bugged firmware until the next update (that is, potentially several months or maybe even never).
Further, I really don't think "regular users" downgrading their firmware to their detriment is a problem... or something that even happens. This policy is really only something that is likely to affect "power users" detrimentally. I mean, I'm all for device security and everything, but it really seems (to me) that anyone who would potentially be considering downgrading their firmware would be quite capable or weighing the pros and cons of doing so.
So there's my essay on the topic.... to summarize, not a negative issue now, but potentially something that could become one, for no discernible reason, in the future.
My Note 4 is the older 910T variant. It is still running 5.0.1. I have not taken the 5.1.1 update yet which I blocked using the Debloater. I have not rooted yet because I have a pending warranty issue (GPS) I need to take care of.
Here is my question. Is the root method for 5.0.1 inherently better than that of 5.1.1? If I understand correctly, the 5.1.1 method is systemless and does not use/require a custom kernel and some apps may not play well with this, such as Viper for Android.
I am concerned about this because I suspect Samsung may replace my 910T with a 910T3. This should solve my GPS problems but it seems that it may put me in a less advantageous rooting situation.
Am I correct on this? Can anyone shed light on this for me?
Thanks.
Rootabaga said:
My Note 4 is the older 910T variant. It is still running 5.0.1. I have not taken the 5.1.1 update yet which I blocked using the Debloater. I have not rooted yet because I have a pending warranty issue (GPS) I need to take care of.
Here is my question. Is the root method for 5.0.1 inherently better than that of 5.1.1? If I understand correctly, the 5.1.1 method is systemless and does not use/require a custom kernel and some apps may not play well with this, such as Viper for Android.
I am concerned about this because I suspect Samsung may replace my 910T with a 910T3. This should solve my GPS problems but it seems that it may put me in a less advantageous rooting situation.
Am I correct on this? Can anyone shed light on this for me?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are correct in that 5.1.1 stock kernel requires systemless root. There is at least one kernel out there that is very close to stock that will accept system root, the name of which I can't remember.
I found systemless root to be almost completely functional, but did hit a roadblock or two (like V4a). Stock kernel is so much better than any other I've tried on touchwiz that its the only one I care to use, though I've given up on touchwiz completely as of late.
There are plenty of touchwiz variant custom ROMs to choose from, varying in different aspects of performance that you may or may not preferable to stock.
Thanks, that was a helpful reply.
If I understand you correctly, it sounds like you actually prefer the stock 5.1.1. kernel. Were you also rooted prior to the 5.1.1. update, using a custom kernel?
Rootabaga said:
Thanks, that was a helpful reply.
If I understand you correctly, it sounds like you actually prefer the stock 5.1.1. kernel. Were you also rooted prior to the 5.1.1. update, using a custom kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just got my 910T3 a few months ago and it already has 5.1.1 on it. I would not revert to 5.0.1 because of issues it had, like memory leaks.
And yes, I prefer stock kernel. None of the alternatives seem to match the performance or battery life of stock.
From what i understand there is no way to root a g900a on Marshmallow.
Im currently on G900AUCU3BOC4 (5.0) and im rooted, im on the fence about updating to 6.0.1 but i loooove using for example Titanium Backup to remove/freeze unwanted apps and other apps that need root.
I havent used a Marshmallow device, so im wondering if its worth it to lose root for it?
(im i right about there being no way of keeping root on 6.0.1?)
Thanks for your input!
If you're looking for performance enhancement NOOOO
But if you want some new features probably yes
Also before you upgrade see if there's way for downgrade so if you don't like it you can downgrade
Sent from my Asus Zenfone 2
I don't see any reason to sacrifice root for MM.