You can hack password WiFi? - Off-topic

Hi,Guy!
Today I want some people to test this app and comment your think below. One Deloper in Vietnam said: " This app can hack any WiFi and not need rooted device?".
Link to app: MOD EDIT: Removed
Please help me! Thank all.
Have a nice day.

the thing with hacking software is.. well it hacks things..
Gesendet von meinem ONE E1003 mit Tapatalk

This "one developer" wouldn't happen to be YOU, would it?
We don't talk about that sort of thing here.

Thread closed per rule 9:
9. Don't get us into trouble.
Don't post copyrighted materials or do other things which will obviously lead to legal trouble. If you wouldn't do it on your own homepage, you probably shouldn't do it here either. This does not mean that we agree with everything that the software piracy lobby try to impose on us. It simply means that you cannot break any laws here, since we'll end up dealing with the legal hassle caused by you. Please use common sense: respect the forum, its users and those that write great code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nathan
Forum Moderator.

Related

windows 7 7068 was found on www

there are the downloads of win 7,the newest version 7068
I will have a test ,hope it will performance good and smooth.
softearth said:
there are the downloads of win 7,the newest version 7068
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
READ THE FORUM RULES!
9. Don't get us in trouble.
Don't post copyrighted materials or do other things that will obviously lead to legal trouble. If you wouldn't do it on your own homepage, you probably don't want to do it here either. This does not mean we agree with everything the software piracy lobby try to impose on us, it simply means you cannot break any laws here, since we'll end up dealing with legal hassle caused by you. Please use common sense: respect the forum, its users, and those that write great code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Works perfect!!!!!!!! But this is free distribution by microsoft him self, I cannot see any abuse, tell me if I am wrong?
TheoMobile said:
Works perfect!!!!!!!! But this is free distribution by microsoft him self, I cannot see any abuse, tell me if I am wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is only legal when it is downloaded from microsoft's servers... Anyway, better safe than sorry! Most people on this forum probably knows how to search a torrent site...
Nice gesture, though

can developer steal a rom from another developer?

just a subj... is it possible the some developer just take a rom which weas made by someone else and announce as his one achivement? (sulerly, some minor ganages could be done in the rom)
how to identify the thief?
alex_awful said:
just a subj... is it possible the some developer just take a rom which weas made by someone else and announce as his one achivement? (sulerly, some minor ganages could be done in the rom)
how to identify the thief?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not really stealing i guess as long as you put out credits of the people who created it, or by asking permission from the developers.
centrax said:
It's not really stealing i guess as long as you put out credits of the people who created it, or by asking permission from the developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if the "owner" has not been aware about any usage of his rom, is it faire to thread the rom? "credits" are given when a team were worked out the rom, or when you take the result of someone's job and just say "hey, i take it" ?
in my opinion, it is situational and depends on the context.
A =/= B =/= C
But they could share similarities that most people would agree something was done morally wrong. I guess you could share with us the situation then we can give a better opinion?
kaijura said:
I guess you could share with us the situation then we can give a better opinion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i just wondering is there a sort of "widly known gentelmen agreement" about such situations. and the second matter is to get an idea how both parties (both developers) can get "a profitable solution" for both (= peace)
In my opinion, the developers community should be honest for it members. And other users have to proud for the achievments of this community. All team's results would be better, than results of each developer. That's why they should be together ^.^
PS sorry for bad english, I hope you understand my meaning
NikkyNine said:
That's why they should be together ^.^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all should be together with all ... sounds impossible
the problem is HOW can others results be used for making app / rom etc?
what is allowed to do and what is forbidden (ethically)?
alex_awful said:
all should be together with all ... sounds impossible
the problem is HOW can others results be used for making app / rom etc?
what is allowed to do and what is forbidden (ethically)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To work together - allowed, to use with proper credits - allowed. To edit build.prop and post as own rom - not. I think so.
NikkyNine said:
To work together - allowed, to use with proper credits - allowed. To edit build.prop and post as own rom - not. I think so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that is what i intended to clarify
alex_awful said:
just a subj... is it possible the some developer just take a rom which weas made by someone else and announce as his one achivement? (sulerly, some minor ganages could be done in the rom)
how to identify the thief?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you suspect something, you can always go and compare files.
Technically you can do whatever you want since android is open source.
Ethically it isbetter to consult with rom owners about using parts of a rom and credit them offcourse
Sent from my GT-P7100 using XDA Premium HD app
Psyloid said:
Ethically it isbetter to consult with rom owners about using parts of a rom and credit them offcourse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if someone did not done it (consult) before he take a part of rom, what will happen? does it mean that othe other community will declare a boycott against him? or just say "you'd better stop doing it"?
Of course you're all talking about the Rom owners, Google... Right? Or perhaps HTC? I would be very surprised if any Rom posted in our dev thread have asked Linus Torvalds personally if they could post a derivation of his operating system here.
You don't see too many credits to those 3 either...
It's public domain, nobody here has built a Rom entirely from scratch all have borrowed from the community and the source, and if they offer even one piece of code that's new, I say good on them, they are contributing to the community, and the community will take from and build on that too.
But let's cut to the chase, why are you asking the question? You're planning to contribute? Or are you here to point the finger at someone for stealing your creation?
alex_awful said:
if someone did not done it (consult) before he take a part of rom, what will happen? does it mean that othe other community will declare a boycott against him? or just say "you'd better stop doing it"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They come to your house and stab you in the back.
Lol !!!
Sent from my GT-P7100 using XDA Premium HD appu
alex_awful said:
if someone did not done it (consult) before he take a part of rom, what will happen? does it mean that othe other community will declare a boycott against him? or just say "you'd better stop doing it"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like everyone has stated, being a open source code and that no one in here is making profit from the roms, (on this site at least i can not speak for the world) it is really a null point of theft everything is free you can not steal something that is owned by the public. As well if you plan on taking something from a rom I would strongly suggest that you ask, and give proper credit were it is due. personally if i worked on a project and someone was using my development with no permission or credit i would publicly humiliate them in anyway possible so that the ass who "stole"
my work would never be able to call it his own again. As well the XDA community is great group of people who if you steal anything from another rom with no permission will find out and ostracize you for your pathetic attempt to pass of someone else's blood sweat and tears as your own.
Nuff said lol

the forbidden kernal

i know what is the forbidden kernal is called t*** kernal i know
but my question is why is it forbidden ???
due to non compliance to gpl
no code release
android is/should be open source, which means letting people know exact code is in there, re-used or not.
Like N said above.
Because not gpl, you dont know what's in there plus proper acknowledgement s not given where it is due, etc.
That is why this thread will be locked soon.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
I dont know what is the name... can i know wht it is?
No
Sent from my Amazon Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
noteandfound said:
I dont know what is the name... can i know wht it is?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wikipedia
In Norse mythology, t*** . is a hammer-wielding god associated with thunder, lightning, storms, oak trees, strength, the protection of mankind, and also hallowing, healing and fertility
imdb
t*** (2011)
The powerful but arrogant warrior T*** is cast out of the fantastic realm of Asgard and sent to live amongst humans on Earth, where he soon becomes one of their finest defenders.
If you guys keep hinting at the name you are violating xda terms of service.
This Kernel is not worth the effort anyway... its really unstable for me.
asf58967 said:
If you guys keep hinting at the name you are violating xda terms of service.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think this thread is in violation of xda . the op simply wanted to know why the kernel is banned here ..that's all . he didn't want to download it nor asked for any links . sharing links maybe a violation . but a simple name and explanation not so
at least that's how I have interpreted it .
if not here where is he supposed to ask such a simple question ? yahoo answers ????
itsrijo said:
I don't think this thread is in violation of xda . the op simply wanted to know why the kernel is banned here ..that's all . he didn't want to download it nor asked for any links . sharing links maybe a violation . but a simple name and explanation not so
at least that's how I have interpreted it .
if not here where is he supposed to ask such a simple question ? yahoo answers ????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Although I know what you mean, any mention of non gpl compliant code is forbidden. I think this should be flagged to the mods. Any questions, it's best to pm someone who knows, it doesn't need to be public.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
OP did you get your answer...any more infomation needed PM can be sent to me.
Thread Closed & Thank You

By By Pitate Bay

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2473408,00.asp?mailingID=9ECCEDCE17E16557B575153E720E623C?mailing_id=1124372
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2473253,00.asp?mailingID=674EA98527C645C12361B761EDC152B9?mailing_id=1121698
...........................................................................................................
Neah
TPB is still alive, they just changed the server from sweden to Costa Rica.
I don't want to get ban, but the name changed from MOD EDIT: links removed.
It's still not working properly but it has the same features and more important, the same Data as before
Another failed attempt to kill the master of piracy
Getting rid of one big torrent site will only encourage more little ones. Their fighting a losing battle. It's too late to stop pirating software. Is come to far.
I'm nearly sure this thread will get removed. It's warez people, I would never suggest anyone using it, ever
From my CM11 S3
ShapesBlue said:
I'm nearly sure this thread will get removed. It's warez people, I would never suggest anyone using it, ever
From my CM11 S3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey! I don't use it, I just know people who use it, and know how it works. I just believe torrents/pirating has come too far to be stopped now.
Jesse72 said:
Hey! I don't use it, I just know people who use it, and know how it works. I just believe torrents/pirating has come too far to be stopped now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh that I agree with man
From my CM11 S3
ShapesBlue said:
Oh that I agree with man
From my CM11 S3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I thought you were accusing me.
Jesse72 said:
Thanks. I thought you were accusing me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No not at all, just saying threads like this are bound to get closed or even deleted
From my CM11 S3
Closing this thread since TPB's main purpose is warez.
6. Do not post warez.
If a piece of software requires you to pay to use it, then pay for it. We do not accept warez nor do we permit any member to request, promote or describe ways in which Warez, cracks, serial codes or other means of avoiding payment, can be obtained. This is a site of developers, i.e. the sort of people who create such software. When you cheat a software developer, you cheat us as a community
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can review all the rules here.

Cataclysm

Folks - I've read great things about the Cataclyst ROM but found the official thread on it had been closed by an XDA moderator. If I install it and run into issues, would there be some people supporting it and what thread?
Thx
sam008 said:
Folks - I've read great things about the Cataclyst ROM but found the official thread on it had been closed by an XDA moderator. If I install it and run into issues, would there be some people supporting it and what thread?
Thx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Hence the closed thread. The dev left XDA.
ouch so i guess no further versions of his rom then?
sam008 said:
ouch so i guess no further versions of his rom then?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't want to sound like a douche... But re-read my last post.
*IF* he's releasing still, it's not on XDA and directing people via post to anywhere off-site is at least frowned upon (if not prohibited).
Yoinx said:
*IF* he's releasing still, it's not on XDA and directing people via post to anywhere off-site is at least frowned upon (if not prohibited).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe we should let @atl4ntis know that we love to see him back in whatever XDA thread or XDA (sub)forum. Not only for his work, but also because he is a helpfull and nice person.
Possibly his XDA account is still active.
We could mention him in our posts so he knows we do not forget. At this moment we have to respect his decision because he is hurt.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
NLBeev said:
Maybe we should let @atl4ntis know that we love to see him back in whatever XDA thread or XDA (sub)forum. Not only for his work, but also because he is a helpfull and nice person.
Possibly his XDA account is still active.
We could mention him in our posts so he knows we do not forget. At this moment we have to respect his decision because he is hurt.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The mention might work unless like most of the more senior members he has mention notifications turned off.
Can anybody please tell me what happened?
His rom is perfect as it's stock with just enough amount of customization.
Sad that he left.
jk0l said:
Can anybody please tell me what happened?
His rom is perfect as it's stock with just enough amount of customization.
Sad that he left.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I understand it there was a dispute with another dev and that lead to a dispute about whether or not his rom was original work. XDA moved it to the non original section and he decided to abandon the project.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Labs
TonikJDK said:
As I understand it there was a dispute with another dev and that lead to a dispute about whether or not his rom was original work. XDA moved it to the non original section and he decided to abandon the project.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here in the Netherlands @atl4ntis was popular. The Dutch press praised him for his 'cataclysm mod'.
The bulk of the problem was that he claimed his work was all original, yet refused to provide evidence to back his claims. Before anyone starts in on the "Apache license doesn't require sources" line, I know he was within his rights to refuse to show his sources. However, if you don't show sources, how can you reasonably expect anyone to believe your work is original?
The XDA staff made the right call here. If you refuse to prove your work is original, your work doesn't get to be located in the Original Android Development forum. In any event, this will be a moot point going forward as all new devices will only have one development section. That said, the mods and/or admin should be going through all device forums that have both an Android Development and Original Android Development subforum, and merging the two subforums into one.
sam008 said:
Folks - I've read great things about the Cataclyst ROM but found the official thread on it had been closed by an XDA moderator. If I install it and run into issues, would there be some people supporting it and what thread?
Thx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can go here; we'll be glad to help.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/android/general/info-cataclysm-mod-dead-t3307703
sam008 said:
... If I install it and run into issues, would there be some people supporting it and what thread...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
=http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3307703

Categories

Resources