Database Develop

Photo quality

Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the HTC 10 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!

i want to see photo quality of HTC 10

Wipe the lens if you're getting glare
Immediately after pulling the phone out of the box I was getting serious glare from any light source. Sunlight was washing out all of my photos, and any light-bulb produced very pronounced streaks and flare. I didn't immediately wipe the lens down as I didn't think it would make much difference (never really had to worry about it on previous phones).
I thoroughly wiped the lense down, and saw significant improvement.
I have a number of before and after photos, but I can't post to the forum yet as I am new to the community. I will upload them later, or message me and I will send them to you.

I must say I'm quite impressed, especially coming from the atrocious LG G2 camera! Straight out of the camera, no editing... http://i.imgur.com/uT7Djm6.jpg

i think not really sharp

I'm no photography expert but from comparing with S7 line and P9 Plus, I think the 10's cam needs improvement. Before taking a pic it really looks nice but after taking the pic it becomes a bit dull. Not really sure how to describe it.

enyaj said:
I'm no photography expert but from comparing with S7 line and P9 Plus, I think the 10's cam needs improvement. Before taking a pic it really looks nice but after taking the pic it becomes a bit dull. Not really sure how to describe it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know what you mean, the picture is very clear when in live view, but after capture and save to JPG it "compress/process" too much, make the photo looks something wrong.
if you take photo in raw mode then the DNG will much better.
I agree, Note 7 and S7 is much better as you got a good photo and don't need to do anything, while the HTC 10 need to do some work before can get an on pair result.
Sometime my old Nexus 5 will take a better photo then the HTC 10, especially HDR.
---------- Post added at 03:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:18 AM ----------
joe.cole1 said:
I must say I'm quite impressed, especially coming from the atrocious LG G2 camera! Straight out of the camera, no editing... http://i.imgur.com/uT7Djm6.jpg
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
look at the sky, the famous HTC 10 white out

Best in class

how can i change to raw mode ??

I find the camera lacking against my Nexus 6P, I don't get that good pix with my 10 at all. Often blurry and bad pics indoors without flash on. Otherwize I find that the 10 got better battery life atleast

The F1.8 aperture is fast and the OIS works well in low light. And as it's only 12MP taking and storing photos is quick. Overall picture quality is good but not standout.

its pretty respectable

for me is the best camera https://www.flickr.com/photos/maik_reifschneider/albums/72157667953569555

Slow sutter speed image sucks compare to the s7 edge.
even though it's support upto 16sec.

@sagor1
I do not think so, htc 10 is better.
2017-02-19 02:29 by Maik Reifschneider, auf Flickr

starbase64 said:
@sagor1
I do not think so, htc 10 is better.
2017-02-19 02:29 by Maik Reifschneider, auf Flickr
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://imgur.com/6ofjpd1
Htc 10 8sec shutter speed.
http://imgur.com/sqsxlQd
Again Htc 10 now with 16sec shutter speed 100iso other thing is set to auto.
http://imgur.com/20U107u
S7 edge shutter speed 10sec iso 50 & other thing set to auto.

@sagor1
htc recognize much more light, the right setting is needed
---------- Post added at 19:48 ---------- Previous post was at 19:47 ----------
HTC 10 - Pano
2017-02-23 17:37 by Maik Reifschneider, auf Flickr

starbase64 said:
@sagor1
htc recognize much more light, the right setting is needed
---------- Post added at 19:48 ---------- Previous post was at 19:47 ----------
HTC 10 - Pano
2017-02-23 17:37 by Maik Reifschneider, auf Flickr
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
everything is set to auto except shutter speed & iso.
s7 edge image looks more pleasant to me.
It would be better if htc camera can set iso to 50

i have camera mod and can set ISO68 - ISO52939 and shutter speed 1/8000 - 30 minutes.
i have more shutter speed steps e.g. 1sec, 1,5sec, 2sec, etc.
the right setting looks the same result

starbase64 said:
@sagor1
htc recognize much more light, the right setting is needed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May I ask: Did u edit the images externally? Snapseed, RAW to Photoshop, Lightroom?

Photo quality

Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the LeEco Le Pro3 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!

X722 here. IMX298 is pretty great in direct sunlight. Seems to find focus quickly too. See the second image.
https://ibb.co/eJoy9b <---- Sky and colours washed out? Sadly this one seems to lack EXIF, dunno why. Maybe I had flash on.
https://ibb.co/kGu5pb

Hi guys, in my X720 (with Nougat - LOS 14.1 - Superluminal) I really can't decide which camera is the best.
I'm using Google Camera, Bacon Camera and A Better Camera Unlocked.
Withouth looking the exif data, for you, which is the better one?
https://lensdump.com/i/K3Miv
https://lensdump.com/i/K3vP2
https://lensdump.com/i/K3YdC
Thank you and have a good day!

for me the second looks ok, but for best results you should take a picture in a room with the same iso and from a tripod, exactly in the same position.

Here new 3 Photo (not with tripod, but taked at the same time)
Bacon Camera - https://lensdump.com/i/KKzs9
Google Camera con HDR+ - https://lensdump.com/i/KKlZo
A Better Camera Unlocked - https://lensdump.com/i/KKOci
Here new 6 Photos
Bacon Camera - https://lensdump.com/i/Kz0OA - https://lensdump.com/i/KzjTq - https://lensdump.com/i/KSJa3 - https://lensdump.com/i/KS6dr
Google Camera con HDR+ - https://lensdump.com/i/KzWyD - https://lensdump.com/i/Klaur - https://lensdump.com/i/KSCLF - https://lensdump.com/i/KSTNb
A Better Camera Unlocked - https://lensdump.com/i/KzAn0 - https://lensdump.com/i/Kz28F - https://lensdump.com/i/KSR4T - https://lensdump.com/i/KSki7
Personal opinion: After a careful analysis of the photos, I think that Bacon Camera is the one that keeps the details "richer" even if it tends to underexpose the photos.
The photos with Bacon Camera are indeed "uncompressed" in BMP format.
Google Camera and A Better Camera Unlocked (both with HDR enabled) have a better balance of lights and shadows, but they lose a lot of detail by mixing more photos.

What GCams works on stock rom ?

I find it a shame that most who have smartphone lepro3 does not dare to post their photos taken in low light with the Google camera application to prove that it is not at all bad compared to other smartphones.
I share the link of my photos https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipNwEVDBueDHV0JINHqdoKWIIxdPbihOOz3DwoSbztu_Hn5s0KxCCKI7Jb8sf_YTIg?key=dklud2xhd09oRHlHWnY5NE43S1Z3VVVyMFNqVXpn

Btsinfo3 said:
I find it a shame that most who have smartphone lepro3 does not dare to post their photos taken in low light with the Google camera application to prove that it is not at all bad compared to other smartphones.
I share the link of my photos https://photos.google.com/share/AF1...?key=dklud2xhd09oRHlHWnY5NE43S1Z3VVVyMFNqVXpn
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
witch version of google camera are you using?
can you share your apk?
---------- Post added at 04:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:24 PM ----------
here you can find my test
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=77155448&postcount=473

BadCluster said:
witch version of google camera are you using?
can you share your apk?
---------- Post added at 04:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:24 PM ----------
here you can find my test
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=77155448&postcount=473
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of the photos were taken by several applications like the photos in 16/9 the v6 of arnova and the gcam 1.7
and recent photos are taken with version 6.1.021 MGC and Arnova.
GoogleCamera_6.1.021.220943556.apk
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jc4fwIjUL2SnirIpF_1U3vkcRzB4_qMF/view

I put the link photos taken with the samsung galaxy 7 edge to compare the photos of day and night compared to the quality of snapshots taken with gcam 6.1.021 with our smartphone lepro3.
https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipNwEVDBueDHV0JINHqdoKWIIxdPbihOOz3DwoSbztu_Hn5s0KxCCKI7Jb8sf_YTIg?key=dklud2xhd09oRHlHWnY5NE43S1Z3VVVyMFNqVXpn

Photo quality

Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the HTC U11 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!

Iso 100
SS :8 s
Very low light

Well, I think that HTC is not providing same quality for same money.
Basically, me and a friend both have an HTC u11, both dual sim versions, running the same version of android 8.0
My phone: has a red-ish tint on the screen / camera is worse in the same lighting conditions
His phone: screen is more pleasant to look at, does not have the red-is ting / camera is better in the same lighting conditions
Both phones have JDI LCD panels.
I'll upload two photos and let you guys judge which one is better:
First photo: iso-728 and 1/15 sec
Second photo: iso-494 and 1/20 sec

Al3xxxinho said:
Well, I think that HTC is not providing same quality for same money.
Basically, me and a friend both have an HTC u11, both dual sim versions, running the same version of android 8.0
My phone: has a red-ish tint on the screen / camera is worse in the same lighting conditions
His phone: screen is more pleasant to look at, does not have the red-is ting / camera is better in the same lighting conditions
Both phones have JDI LCD panels.
I'll upload two photos and let you guys judge which one is better:
View attachment 4421161
View attachment 4421162
First photo: iso-728 and 1/15 sec
Second photo: iso-494 and 1/20 sec
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The first is better. Less chromatic aberration.

with google cam

rdy2go said:
with google cam
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which Gcam version do you use?

Video quality

Your friends are never going to believe what you did. The only way to prove it to them is with that video you took. Rate this thread to express how videos shot on the Razer Phone 2 come out. A higher rating indicates that videos are smooth (and not choppy) and that auto-focus works very well, and that the camera adjusts quickly to different lighting conditions while recording.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!

Video quality is excellent, in my opinion. Coming from a ZTE axon 7 pro, and a very worn out, dying galaxy S4 before that. Hardware in the new Razer is excellent, in comparison to my experience. Stock app does ok, and they now have 4k 60fps. Does very well in low light. but if you want slow motion or time lapse, you HAVE to get the gcam app. Razer STILL has not included those options in their firmware updates. As of 10/16/2019
Link below for a verified working gcam with slow motion and time lapse included.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rAgBKJ9ZixrsfP2_29HHJabm-2g9etLY/view?usp=drivesdk
Version 6.2.030

Photo quality

Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Redmi K30 Pro) come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!

So i took few photos.
1) Stock cam portrait mode on object
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50231433373/in/album-72157715505381368/
comment: very nice object separation, good detail preservation.
2) Star of this phones camera setup - macro cam
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50230897823/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50230898113/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50231760232/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50231543996/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50232080781/in/album-72157715505381368/
comment: just wow, quality, details. Best macro shot i've seen on any phone.
3) Normal shots
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50232298942/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50232080956/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50233393941/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50233396586/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50233610022/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50233615612/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50233617217/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50233617707/in/album-72157715505381368/
comment: very decent photos, great hdr, colors, details, white balance on point.
4) Snaps from 8k video
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50231585333/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50232228536/in/album-72157715505381368/
comment: anbilivable these are snaps from video, great detail, low noise - love it!
Yet to test - low light.
As for these shots i grade camera 5/5

CROrION said:
So i took few photos.
1) Stock cam portrait mode on object
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50231433373/in/album-72157715505381368/
comment: very nice object separation, good detail preservation.
2) Star of this phones camera setup - macro cam
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50230897823/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50230898113/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50231760232/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50231543996/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50232080781/in/album-72157715505381368/
comment: just wow, quality, details. Best macro shot i've seen on any phone.
3) Normal shots
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50232298942/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50232080956/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50233393941/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50233396586/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50233610022/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50233615612/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50233617217/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50233617707/in/album-72157715505381368/
comment: very decent photos, great hdr, colors, details, white balance on point.
4) Snaps from 8k video
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50231585333/in/album-72157715505381368/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/50232228536/in/album-72157715505381368/
comment: anbilivable these are snaps from video, great detail, low noise - love it!
Yet to test - low light.
As for these shots i grade camera 5/5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it possible to take photos in raw?

@Peterrrrr said:
Is it possible to take photos in raw?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes

Could you post a few raw from outdoors daylight?

Would like to see some night shoots and video too

Coming from an S8 plus, is this an upgrade when it comes to camera?

khestoi said:
Coming from an S8 plus, is this an upgrade when it comes to camera?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Off course !

khestoi said:
Coming from an S8 plus, is this an upgrade when it comes to camera?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My pro zoom edition just arrived 3 days ago. Before I had the exynos s8+. I am waiting for the bootloader unlock by xiaiomi, but I can already tell you that even with china rom and stock camera it is a big jump

Just few point and shoot pictures (k30 pro zoom edition) with stock miui camera.
https://i.imgur.com/gISwowB.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/iwFRLG0.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/Uqqq8n7.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/S8PBRfv.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/gbLHKki.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/i8YNLfu.jpg

Hello Team
Can anybody share few photos of example documents? [newspaper, school-book, book, etc]. Taken indoor [so it means under "mean" light conditions].
For me it is interested how this phone handle such photos.

One thing Ive noticed when I was taking photos of documents/book pages was that it blurs on the periphery. It's clear on the center, but becomes *very subtly* blurry on the outward edges as if you've moved your hand for a split second. I shoot in a well lit room with light (bulb and natural light, and I shoot from the above (natch) so Im not sure why the focus is not uniform and. has blurring on the edges. Also using gcam btw: Twichaya2.

BystandrX said:
One thing Ive noticed when I was taking photos of documents/book pages was that it blurs on the periphery. It's clear on the center, but becomes *very subtly* blurry on the outward edges as if you've moved your hand for a split second. I shoot in a well lit room with light (bulb and natural light, and I shoot from the above (natch) so Im not sure why the focus is not uniform and. has blurring on the edges. Also using gcam btw: Twichaya2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I noticed the same thing in the photo comparison tool from gsmarena.com: https://www.gsmarena.com/piccmp.php3?idType=5&idPhone1=10220&idPhone2=10097&idPhone3=9816
I wonder how pronounced the effect is in real world usage, keeping in mind that for some photos of humans, the face is at the edge of the frame.

this is why I asked for real examples. I have seen the same "issue" with many other cameras.