Here we go again........ - Off-topic

https://www.channelnews.com.au/trump-hits-huawei-and-zte-with-ban/
It doesn't make sense to bail out ZTE then kill them again.......

Wow, this is strange news indeed.

From what I can read, it's only for government use, not for the public.
The Verge said:
In the end, Congress decided on a measure that will essentially ban the US government or anyone that wants to work with the US government from using components from Huawei, ZTE, or a number of other Chinese communications companies. The ban goes into effect over the next two years.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

stinka318 said:
https://www.channelnews.com.au/trump-hits-huawei-and-zte-with-ban/
It doesn't make sense to bail out ZTE then kill them again.......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you actually read the article?
"The ban which is part of the Defense Authorization Act bans phones and parts produced by Huawei and ZTE from being used by United States government or anyone who wants to work with the government."

It's very important to read everything mentioned in an article else false information will be spread. In this case it doesn't affect normal users and it's only about the US.

It all starts to make sense.
Tim Cook recently had dinner at Bedminster golf course with the President and First Lady.
Didn't Apple get recently bumped to 3rd place in the world standings?

CSRoad said:
It all starts to make sense.
Tim Cook recently had dinner at Bedminster golf course with the President and First Lady.
Didn't Apple get recently bumped to 3rd place in the world standings?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup
of course it's has to do with that
Money runs the world

bornlivedie said:
From what I can read, it's only for government use, not for the public.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And normal people are not in government jobs.......

stinka318 said:
And normal people are not in government jobs.......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I said.

bornlivedie said:
That's what I said.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So tell me do you have to be above the average to get a government job if you look at the amount of people that work in the government not just a few jobs the whole lot across the board and there immediate family members would be in the ban as well......

stinka318 said:
So tell me do you have to be above the average to get a government job if you look at the amount of people that work in the government not just a few jobs the whole lot across the board and there immediate family members would be in the ban as well......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't understand exactly what you're trying to say and it seems you misinterpreted my post.

bornlivedie said:
From what I can read, it's only for government use, not for the public.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well **** the US government. They are not good anyway.

bornlivedie said:
Don't understand exactly what you're trying to say and it seems you misinterpreted my post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Didn't misinterpreted anything you look at how many jobs in local government and then federal government and there immediate family members it is quite a few people......

Mods should close the close the thread

Druboo666 said:
Mods should close the close the thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why should it be closed.......

XDA, including the off topic section, is not a place to discuss politics.
Thread Closed

Related

Who will be the next US president?

Please vote
I'm just guessing that this topic will be locked as it'll get way to heated and political.
If i were to start on Bush and McCain, i'm sure i'd get in some trouble So that's Obama for me (even though i'll miss this voting election by a few months).
Well, that McCain sure is [INSERT OPINION]. Whereas Obama without a doubt is [INSERT OPPOSITE OPINION].
But seriously, get registered today, or your opinion won't count either way.
Why is this in about XDA. XDA is on Servers in The Netherlands if I recall correctly.
Moved to Off-Topic.
I'm only going to say this once. Respectable exchange of opinions and ideas are allow. If it gets out of Hand, the thread will be closed and Bans will be given!
Well, I'm gonna throw up a bunch of videos, watch as many or as few as you want, and make your own judgments.
1
1B (related)
2
3
4
5
6
Black93300ZX said:
Well, I'm gonna throw up a bunch of videos, watch as many or as few as you want, and make your own judgments.
1
1B (related)
2
3
4
5
6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What? Don't want to post the Anti-Obama Videos too? Sounding like CNN
JimmyMcGee said:
What? Don't want to post the Anti-Obama Videos too? Sounding like CNN
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Find me some, show me exactly how Obama lies about everything he does... Please.
Black93300ZX said:
Find me some, show me exactly how Obama lies about everything he does... Please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Heheh. If he does he does it well!
I saw the polls about a week ago and that's when I realized Obama isn't leading at ~70%. I didn't expect McCain to have so many supporters. I mean... 50 percent?!
Eh. McCain still might have a chance. I mean Palin completes him. She can do things he cant. While Obama.......had....*cough*....made.....a...*cough* pretty bad choice at picking a vice president. They basically share views. They'll agree to the same thing so they'll always follow each other >.> Just stating opinion. Even though I'm not a US Citizen or 18+ in age. Just a US Resisdent that will be paying the taxes of the debt later in my life that you people created today >.>
I think Joe Biden KILLED Palin in tonight's debate.
derekwilkinson said:
I think Joe Biden KILLED Palin in tonight's debate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I love how she beats around the bush on EVERY question. Simple question, the woman asked her "so is it safe to say that you two agree on gay marriage, you did say you didn't agree with it right?" And she goes on for 45 seconds talking about gay marriage! Haha hilarious. After she was done the woman asking questions was just like "ooookay... so you agree, now let's move on."
I see the education system of this country has been corrupted by CNN and MSNBC.
What next? Get your daily news from John Stewart. No wait I know....get real "independent" journalism from the NY Times.
Honestly, if you think that a debates makes somebody intelligent or qualified to run a county or be second in command they you need to re-evaluate your own knowledge. Would it not be better to have somebody deliberate on topic before spouting out something?
Black93300ZX said:
I love how she beats around the bush on EVERY question. Simple question, the woman asked her "so is it safe to say that you two agree on gay marriage, you did say you didn't agree with it right?" And she goes on for 45 seconds talking about gay marriage! Haha hilarious. After she was done the woman asking questions was just like "ooookay... so you agree, now let's move on."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't beating around the bush also mean that, "Yes I agree, but for those of you who don't understand why let me just explain a bit?"
first off I agree with the above post 12!!
ok here comes an observation from me in South Africa ...my observation is that every president of the USA for some time now is far worse than the previous (this is just my opinion) so regardless of who the next president it gonna interesting for me to see what's next? ...but I think Obama is gonna win..
(well I shouldn't talk too much, our political situation is currently in the dog house )
"long live democracy...so long as you agree with me" - absorber786
AllTheWay said:
I see the education system of this country has been corrupted by CNN and MSNBC.
What next? Get your daily news from John Stewart. No wait I know....get real "independent" journalism from the NY Times.
Honestly, if you think that a debates makes somebody intelligent or qualified to run a county or be second in command they you need to re-evaluate your own knowledge. Would it not be better to have somebody deliberate on topic before spouting out something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know Palin isn't qualified to run our country from far more than her debate tonight. It's nice to see you go ahead and criticize so quickly, I'm sure you'd love Palin to lead your country then? Hockey mom with 2 years of experience as governor of what? Oh yeah, the 2nd largest city in a state that has 683,000 people. New York City has roughly 8.5 million, and the man who was at the helm of that for a decade wasn't qualified to be president... But a woman who has 1/5th the experience and 1/100th the population under her is surely built for the job. If you think these candidates haven't carefully considered and weighed the options for every question and topic they spoke about tonight, tell me, why would they be running for president? They've prepared, they know what their stances are on every subject, and the debate is simply an opportunity to put them up against each other. I think you're the one who's misinformed or undereducated if you think this is a Jeopardy show-down for who can answer questions fastest, it's just a way for the people to see these two doctrines in direct comparison.
absorber786 said:
ok here comes an observation from me in South Africa ...my observation is that every president of the USA for some time now is far worse than the previous (this is just my opinion)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan... I'd say Reagan was slightly more successful than Nixon. ;-)
I see what you're saying, overall the presidents don't seem to stack up to what's been said about the past... But I think GWB is about to complete such a giant failure of a term that it skews our opinions on these things. Let's hope for a better future.
Black93300ZX said:
I think you're the one who's misinformed or undereducated if you think this is a Jeopardy show-down for who can answer questions fastest, it's just a way for the people to see these two doctrines in direct comparison.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I think Palin is a bad choice, but when I do vote I don't vote who I want to be vice president. Please share with us your infinite wisdom, in which an election was decided based soley on the vice presidential canidate. I do remember in 1992 when a man named Bill Clinton ran from a "small" state called Arkansas. I think he did pretty well as President. Just because somebody doesn't have vast experience in governing a large group of people doesn't make they disqualified from being a leader.
Do I think that picking Palin was a bad choice, yes. It was a political move by John McCain to gain votes. Will it pay off, I don't think so.
People are just so quick to judge somebody. I personally like the fact that she doesn't have vast experience in Washington politics and brings something new to the table. If you think policy and decisions by the president is made solely by themselves, then you sir are misinformed.
Black93300ZX said:
I know Palin isn't qualified to run our country from far more than her debate tonight. It's nice to see you go ahead and criticize so quickly, I'm sure you'd love Palin to lead your country then? Hockey mom with 2 years of experience as governor of what? Oh yeah, the 2nd largest city in a state that has 683,000 people. New York City has roughly 8.5 million, and the man who was at the helm of that for a decade wasn't qualified to be president... But a woman who has 1/5th the experience and 1/100th the population under her is surely built for the job. If you think these candidates haven't carefully considered and weighed the options for every question and topic they spoke about tonight, tell me, why would they be running for president? They've prepared, they know what their stances are on every subject, and the debate is simply an opportunity to put them up against each other. I think you're the one who's misinformed or undereducated if you think this is a Jeopardy show-down for who can answer questions fastest, it's just a way for the people to see these two doctrines in direct comparison.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With all of the "Liberal Talking Point's" just spouted, tell me Obama's qualifications to be President.
Talk about "Drinking the Kool-Aid". If you are going to spout opinions at least spout your own.
AllTheWay said:
Actually I think Palin is a bad choice, but when I do vote I don't vote who I want to be vice president. Please share with us your infinite wisdom, in which an election was decided based soley on the vice presidential canidate. I do remember in 1992 when a man named Bill Clinton ran from a "small" state called Arkansas. I think he did pretty well as President. Just because somebody doesn't have vast experience in governing a large group of people doesn't make they disqualified from being a leader.
Do I think that picking Palin was a bad choice, yes. It was a political move by John McCain to gain votes. Will it pay off, I don't think so.
People are just so quick to judge somebody. I personally like the fact that she doesn't have vast experience in Washington politics and brings something new to the table. If you think policy and decisions by the president is made solely by themselves, then you sir are misinformed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you're saying Palin isn't qualified to run the country, but that's not a reason to vote against McCain/Palin. McCain is 72 years old, did you know that'd make him the oldest president in history? There's a good chance, with the high stress level of the job, that a 72-76 year old won't live through his entire term. Here's a shocker, who's president then? Palin. The part that bothers me though, is that McCain is just as much of a liar as Palin is... And a few of his positions (the war mainly) are enough to turn me away from him, he said he plans to be in Iraq for another decade... That's ridiculous. HAHA I just read the last sentence of your post, and here's what you're saying... "They don't need to be capable of making the decisions themselves, because no decision is made solely by the president." WAKE UP to the real world, regardless of how many people are advising them, a bad president can still **** things up (see: President #43). Do you want to compare Palin to Clinton? Bill clinton was governor of Arkansas (an entire state, not a town) for 12 years. So here's what you're comparing to be the same. Clinton: 2,350,000 people under his governance for 12 years. Palin: Governor for 2 years, and get ready for this population, it's 10x less than even I thought... 9,780. Oh man, you're sooo right, there's no difference between 12 years and over 2 million people to 2 years and 10 thousand... Palin's just as qualified!
P1Tater said:
With all of the "Liberal Talking Point's" just spouted, tell me Obama's qualifications to be President.
Talk about "Drinking the Kool-Aid". If you are going to spout opinions at least spout your own.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He was an Illinois state senator from 1997-2004 and on the US senate from 2005 until present. He didn't get captured in another country 50 years ago, but I'm sure that would've made him much more qualified to be president. I think some people like to forget when talking about McCain, the man has 12 houses and a wife with more money than god, he's not the person he was 5 decades ago. He'll be just as conservative as GWB, and I love how he says he'll "shake things up" in Washington and end corruption... 7 of his major supporters are lobbyists, but I'm sure he's going to be the one to take them down... Right. The simple fact that everyone has heard 500 times but still ignores, McCain has had the same stance as George W. Bush on 90% of the issues that have come to question. Are you guys happy with the last 8 years of presidency? I know I'm not.

Male or Female

A quick, simple poll just to see how many female/males are actually on this forum.
Results will be obvious
Other... WTF ?
Livven said:
Other... WTF ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well you don't know, We could have some shemale/transsexuals on the forum
LOL
Well, but they also are either male or female...
Livven said:
Well, but they also are either male or female...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do get the awkward peoplee... LOL
I think you meant hermaphrodites
........... Other 1 7.14%
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ow... WHO HERE??!?!
This poll's results were over before it started
M
F
U
I
are the options in the software I work with
Dave
there are no females on the internet!!
qiuness said:
there are no females on the internet!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They could be females on the internet
I am shocked and saddened by a couple of remarks made by some members in this thread. I THOUGHT our mutual love of tech transcended "isms". I thought we were beyond SEXISM. How very, very sad.
witch1 said:
I am shocked and saddened by a couple of remarks made by some members in this thread. I THOUGHT our mutual love of tech transcended "isms". I thought we were beyond SEXISM. How very, very sad.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So....you're one of those "Don't call me a chick" chicks, eh?
No, but, to assume that women can't be interested in tech is ignorant. To imply such is to acknowledge that you are insecure in your masculinity and are seeking a way to feel superior to women.And its also outdated, arachiac, and intellectually backwards. I feel no need to insult someone because they have the unfortunate genes to be born a mere man.
Ouch!
telegraph0000 said:
So....you're one of those "Don't call me a chick" chicks, eh?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't call me a chick! I'm too old for that! Call me an old hen! LOL!
Actually, from where I'm standing, I don't care much about he/she/it! Maybe we all should be it! Or better I.T.!
I want to be an Old Hen, too, woven! I like I.T., too....or perhaps we could be OTHER----ya' know-HUMAN.
witch1 said:
No, but, to assume that women can't be interested in tech is ignorant. To imply such is to acknowledge that you are insecure in your masculinity and are seeking a way to feel superior to women.And its also outdated, arachiac, and intellectually backwards. I feel no need to insult someone because they have the unfortunate genes to be born a mere man.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You won me over at Witch1 Senior member....
witch1 said:
No, but, to assume that women can't be interested in tech is ignorant. To imply such is to acknowledge that you are insecure in your masculinity and are seeking a way to feel superior to women.And its also outdated, arachiac, and intellectually backwards. I feel no need to insult someone because they have the unfortunate genes to be born a mere man.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER!!
I sympathize with you but insulting everyone who is "unfortunate" enough to be born "a mere man" because a couple of people made a generalization just lowers you to their level.
I dont even know what I'm doin in the "Off-topic" section... but this thread was kind of funny.. heh

Thanks Obama

So, ICE just recently seized one of my favorite websites ATDHE.net
It was great to be able to tune in and watch Top Gear/The Office on repeat ALLLLLL DAYYY. I know there are sites where you can pick an episode and watch it, but are there any that play them on a continuous loop like ATDHE did?
For anyone interested, they jumped domains to ATDHE.me, but for now, only live sports are available.
You're mad at Obama for a law being enforced?
vbetts said:
You're mad at Obama for a law being enforced?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You think I LITERALLY blame Obama for this?
booyakasha said:
You think I LITERALLY blame Obama for this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks Obama
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would take a picture, but this is easier.
If you're being sarcastic, you should probably add -sarcasm- tag. Hard to tell on the old interwebz.
Huhh. ..no political related threads are allowed here...even in off-topic. In a few words...no obama name in threads since it can lead to political discussion .
Lol
Sent from my sexy assistant. (HTC Incredible running cm7)
If you have nothing to fear, you have nothing to hide...
Surely that should read "if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear"?
/pedant
DirkGently1 said:
If you have nothing to fear, you have nothing to hide...
Surely that should read "if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear"?
/pedant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how about this one
if its not your business , u have nothing to nose around for
its amazing how happily most give up their rights , life in dictatorian egypt must be amazing too , isnt it ... *sigh*
I agree wit ya
thanks obama lol;d am from poland!
well this thread went to ****.
/sarcasm /sarcasm /sarcasm

The End of the Internet, Stop SOPA!

It is extremely dissapointing being an American, internet censorship like china coming to an internet near you. Please help spread the word and boycott all these companies supporting SOPA, with there lobbying funds! These corporations are behind this censorship
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xjisu18X6s7lPtAsIQg5Ol3KJjymPT2az1kasQVwGiw/mobilebasic?pli=1
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
More and more of our freedoms are being taken away everyday.
This bill better not pass.
Also thats a buttload of companies to call. lol
Looking for a revolution if this does pass
-My life is a shooting range, people never change-
Adauth said:
More and more of our freedoms are being taken away everyday.
This bill better not pass.
Also thats a buttload of companies to call. lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It sure is, but boycotting these tyrannical companies will do as well. We will win!
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
You mean to tell me those companies listed are actually lobbying for the sopa bill to pass? Oh no. This in combination with the info here, http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pro/1108PSINEWVD/PPSIMC00/PR, we are in for a interesting 2012
Get Google & Facebook to join in the protest here:
http://www.change.org/petitions/google-inc-full-blackout-of-their-websites-on-january-18th-2012-in-protest-of-sopa
robosiris said:
You mean to tell me those companies listed are actually lobbying for the sopa bill to pass? Oh no. This in combination with the info here, http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pro/1108PSINEWVD/PPSIMC00/PR, we are in for a interesting 2012
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Took me like an hour to watch that, but it's pretty interesting.
ncmacasl said:
Get Google & Facebook to join in the protest here:
http://www.change.org/petitions/google-inc-full-blackout-of-their-websites-on-january-18th-2012-in-protest-of-sopa
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done.
ncmacasl said:
Get Google & Facebook to join in the protest here:
http://www.change.org/petitions/google-inc-full-blackout-of-their-websites-on-january-18th-2012-in-protest-of-sopa
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just signed

Question [CLOSED] Please consider this worth your time.

<Moderator Edit>: Thread closed.
It is not okay to encourage others to take actions that may result in the punishment or firing of people doing their job - most of the time they're contractors who don't even work directly for the company who makes your device. I did see what was written in later posts, but the OP wasn't changed and still encouraged other users to punish people doing their jobs.
I empathize. You are allowed to vent on XDA, but only if done respectfully, without profanity, and as long as it's relevant to an already existing thread, and don't vent non-stop. Stand-alone threads made for venting or trying to punish others is not what XDA is for.
Everyone, have a better day.
@roirraW "edor" ehT
Why are you doing this?
Arealhooman said:
Why are you doing this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cause change can happen when enough people care.
maamdroid said:
Cause change can happen when enough people care.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if yo don't even care to explain what that's about that's just a nasty rant, tho'.
Plus, that's a nuber in the United States, so...
All you're really doing is making the rep who answered the call have their numbers tank which could eventually get them terminated.
<Moderator Edit>: Removed profanity, and I will be sending a PM with the details. Also deleted the image.
This 100% works:
Boycott OnePlus and don't buy anythings from this brand
OnePlus MUST disappear from this world !!
Call them
<Moderator Edit>: Removed Mega link - not relevant to the subject of this thread.
I have same issue with zte. I want to root ZTE blade A5 2019, it is unisoc SC9863A and it needs an unlock file to be signed. I sent hundreds of emails, all wortless:
I really don't know what to do. Also I tried asking my provider, but they don't know what I'm talking about. Really sad all of this
Please call every day.
Please make a positive
You're just going to get the person answering your call fired. That's literally all that's going to happen from this. Companies do not care about this as it is not reflected on their profit and loss.
mackdacre said:
You're just going to get the person answering your call fired. That's literally all that's going to happen from this. Companies do not care about this as it is not reflected on their profit and loss.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mackdacre said:
You're just going to get the person answering your call fired. That's literally all that's going to happen from this. Companies do not care about this as it is not reflected on their profit and loss.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please tell me how as a customer I'm suppose to understand how a company runs itself. I can move on to another phone/company ...are you saying this company should be left alone and a customer shouldn't be able to ask them questions for fear that the person I'm asking the questions to may be fired?
Edit:. The one thing I won't do because I know it's just gonna impact the person is rating low on a survey...I never actually get transferred to a survey, but I can't in my own morality rate low. If they ever put me to the survey, I will always rate the max high...
maamdroid said:
Please tell me how as a customer I'm suppose to understand how a company runs itself. I can move on to another phone/company ...are you saying this company should be left alone and a customer shouldn't be able to ask them questions for fear that the person I'm asking the questions to may be fired?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All companies care about is making as much money as possible. If you don't like how the company is run, then don't give them your money.
mackdacre said:
All companies care about is making as much money as possible. If you don't like how the company is run, then don't give them your money.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm, or you can ask them questions...
What if I like their product...but I don't like a thing they are doing? I need to move on?? The charging OnePlus has is so fantastic...I love my 10T. It's ok that I ask and question about msm.
I think you'd get more traction if you had a big campaign at XDA to find the least sucky device.
There should be a ranking of devices.
I realize that the rooter community is small compared to the user base.
But I also think they have a lot of influence on what their friends and family buys.
Renate said:
I think you'd get more traction if you had a big campaign at XDA to find the least sucky device.
There should be a ranking of devices.
I realize that the rooter community is small compared to the user base.
But I also think they have a lot of influence on what their friends and family buys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just got the email from OnePlus. The signature from the guy says. "Never Settle""
So funny when a couple posts back has a customer saying...just settle...lol. Never Settle...
<Moderator Edit>: Removed profanity, and I will be sending a PM with the details.
Just buy the domaine name and do a webpage !
Nixeus2 said:
Just bought the domaine name and do a webpage !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait really! Spread the message
BBK Electronics
Oppo
OnePlus
Vivo
Realme
iQOO
Bonus track:
Xiaomi
hank81 said:
BBK Electronics
Oppo
OnePlus
Vivo
Realme
iQOO
Bonus track:
Xiaomi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Categories

Resources