I have a note 9 512gb variant with 8gb ram. However when I go to apps in settings none of the apps report full 8gb ram. See the attached screenshot. Storage is reported correctly by apps but not ram.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
ankydu said:
I have a note 9 512gb variant with 8gb ram. However when I go to apps in settings none of the apps report full 8gb ram. See the attached screenshot. Storage is reported correctly by apps but not ram.View attachment 4614341
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's because all the running and cached apps take up an enormous chunk of the ram, I have the 6gb version and barely have 2gb available ram, shocking really, I am pretty disappointed, you should be even more so haha.
I even have over 100 apps disabled which did free up a bit, but not much.
I have a le eco le max 2 with 6gb ram with a custom pie rom on it, with almost 5gb free at all times.
I see no performance issues on the note 9 but it seems daft to advertise a phone with 6 gb of ram where barely 2 is ever available. Obviously any operating system and running/cached apps are going to take up some of that ram...but really over %60?
ankydu said:
I have a note 9 512gb variant with 8gb ram. However when I go to apps in settings none of the apps report full 8gb ram. See the attached screenshot. Storage is reported correctly by apps but not ram.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2GB of RAM are eaten up by "SWAP" on this phone.
I'm no expert on the subject or a developer, so, here's a thread that touches on the subject:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/apps/magisk/module-swap-torpedo-run-faster-reliably-t3766883/page1
Verify it for yourself with the app RAM TRUTH:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=sa.ramtruth
Unless you're rooted, (AFAIK) there's nothing you can do to change how RAM is used.
Sent from my SM-N960U using XDA Labs
But does it really matter day to day? I honestly don't notice any lag with my N9 (6GB). I wonder what kind of paces some of y'all are putting your N9 through that makes negative RAM performance actually noticeable. But I guess I'm not really that kind of user?
roaduardo said:
But does it really matter day to day? I honestly don't notice any lag with my N9 (6GB). I wonder what kind of paces some of y'all are putting your N9 through that makes negative RAM performance actually noticeable. But I guess I'm not really that kind of user?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here, but, I'm glad I opted for the 8/512 version.
After experiencing 8G RAM on a few phones (BlackShark/OnePlus 5T/RazerPhone), I wasn't about to pass up the option, especially on a Samsung device, running a much heavier skin than vs the abovementioned. Out of all of those (Note9 included), I'd have to say the RazerPhone seemed smoother/faster, but not by very much.
Sent from my SM-N960U using XDA Labs
remember the Android Mantra; "unused ram is wasted ram"..
forget about how much free ram is "available"; it means absolutely nothing on a modern Android Phone..
beta546 said:
That's because all the running and cached apps take up an enormous chunk of the ram, I have the 6gb version and barely have 2gb available ram, shocking really, I am pretty disappointed, you should be even more so haha.
I even have over 100 apps disabled which did free up a bit, but not much.
I have a le eco le max 2 with 6gb ram with a custom pie rom on it, with almost 5gb free at all times.
I see no performance issues on the note 9 but it seems daft to advertise a phone with 6 gb of ram where barely 2 is ever available. Obviously any operating system and running/cached apps are going to take up some of that ram...but really over %60?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The RAM usage is different. Android works accordingly to what is available.
4GB, 6GB, 8GB.
It actually utilizes what is available. The more RAM you have the more it will use
Well... Running Bitdefender in the background and my phone is not even reaching 4GB.
Anyway more is better than less, I'm sure some future version of Android will take full advantage of that RAM
Related
Such a cool Phone but why has it only 512 RAM? My next phone schould last for ~3 years and i doubt that 512MB ram will be enough
What are your opinions on this? Are 512MB enough today or should i look after another Phone with 1GB RAM??
On which Apps could 512 MB RAM have a negatively impact?
Greetz und Thanks
My Question about the RAM Issue:
- Can Swapper2 be used ?
- Can u use Swapper2 on many Applications (does it make sense)?
Thanks for your help!
512MB is enough..
Yeah i think it too, that first it will be enough.
But i'm not buying a new Mobile Phone every year. And i don't believe if it it's enough in 1 or 2 years. So it would be great it swapper works or sth like this.
Nxt Question:
How much RAM do i effectively got. Cause i read that u have 512 MB minus 128 MB for the GPU minus 200 for the OS.
So there is perhaps 200 free for the apps?
Is this right ?
Ram in 2X:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Root it, remove a few of the preinstalled apps or exchange them against some with lower memory usage or use a custom rom and you will even have more ram available. I think 512 MB will be enough...
You should also be able to lower the ram reserved for the gpu. It should be possible to free up to 100mb if you dont play many games otherwise up to 64mb.
According to some reviews it seems that the Optimus 2X reserves 128MB for the GPU. This would mean you only get a total of 512 - 128 = 384MB of RAM for Program Memory.
That's at least one thing HTC did well on their latest devices. Devices like the Incredible S and the Desire S ship with 768MB of RAM.
I think the RAM in the 2X is enough to work with the device but it sure ain't a lot.
Bill Gaits Believed that 640K RAM will be enough few years ago
But Yes so far (i am using android for 2 years now) it proved - 512MB are enough!
And if there only 2-3 devices with bigger RAM - so developers will stick with 512 for a while.
my opinion is that 512 mb is good for this time. i have a galaxy s with a custom Rom and i have 339 mb of ram and the device.work fine.
i see that i will use approx 20 mb of extra ram and(galaxy vs LG) and also you have a dual core.processor that optimize some operation.
well... i think that for this moment and for approx 1 year 512mb of ram will be a good choose!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
i just got the o2x yesterday. 1,5 gb og the 8gb are dedicated to android, so no worries, you can install all the apps you want
planetj said:
i just got the o2x yesterday. 1,5 gb og the 8gb are dedicated to android, so no worries, you can install all the apps you want
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not a question...
Got a o2x and can confirm you got 381mb of free ram for apps... that makes 128mb dedicated for gpu. Got around 110 mb free at the moment, and I have a lot of Apps running. When I get custom rom, some of the ram will be cleared, when removing unnecessary apps. I got adw launcher running on top of stock ui
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA Premium App
Isn't this phone supposed to come with to two gb ram?
How come it says 1.5gb
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my kick ass HTC ONE using Tapatalk 2
Weird. It shows 2gb in about>hardware but in apps it shows 1.5. Rom toolbox also shows 1.5.
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
Perhaps 512MB dedicated to system RAM only
500 MB is probably being used by the GPU
1.5GB of RAM is available to these running applications. If you navigate to Settings > About> Hardware Information the 2GB value will be seen. 0.5 GB is dedicated to ensure the device software runs smoothly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://support.htc.com/en-us/030-H...B_of_RAM_available_when_viewing_Running_apps?
mutelight said:
https://support.htc.com/en-us/030-H...B_of_RAM_available_when_viewing_Running_apps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All thats says is that its "used by something else". The question is what.
And judging from how its worded it seems like its referring to the 0.5 GB going to the GPU.
It actually says its used to make things run smoother. I don't know how much you know about hardware, but GPUs have their own ram. A phone GPU wouldn't share system ram. Ram is used to hold temporary files such as an open app. As soon as that app is force closed/force stopped then that information is flushed from ram. Think of it like having a dual core processor. One core of ram keeps the currently running app or apps in its memory. Meanwhile, the other 512 mb core holds just system software. That way your apps are never making your Sense/ROM/etc slow. Its pretty smart.
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
Most devices do this. The reserved RAM is to store critical processes like the dialer, base Android process, and other related things.
The operating system requires ram to actually run, its no different than a pc, total ram is not the same as available ram.
I'm 99.999% sure that the ram you are not seeing is system/hardware reserved memory that would not report as available memory.
youkosnake said:
It actually says its used to make things run smoother. I don't know how much you know about hardware, but GPUs have their own ram. A phone GPU wouldn't share system ram.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most phone GPU's dont have dedicated memory and would in fact share system memory much like most laptops graphics cards.
Pretty sure if you cat /proc/iomem you'll see the addresses of the ram that has been reserved by the system.
Darkendvoid88 said:
I'm 99.999% sure that the ram you are not seeing is system/hardware reserved memory that would not report as available memory.
Most phone GPU's dont have dedicated memory and would in fact share system memory much like most laptops graphics cards.
Pretty sure if you cat /proc/iomem you'll see the addresses of the ram that has been reserved by the system.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I echo this. Basically it is just all a matter of how the system is reporting the memory. On my Note II, it shows almost all of the 2GB, on my HTC One, it excludes the system reserved memory.
Anyone else notice that right out of the box you only have 23GB of usable storage on the 32GB variant?
I know that you'll never get the full storage amount due to the ROM taking up space. However, on both my Nexus 4 and Nexus 5, with 16GB total space, I had at least 12GB available right out of the box. So I'm used to having ~4GB of unusable space. But 9GB of space taken right off the bat for a pure Android device with no bloatware does not seem right to me.
Anyone know why this might be?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Starting from lollipop, the phone uses art run time. Art takes up more space in the internal storage, it's one of the tradeoffs when compared to dalvik.
And no you can't change back to dalvik on lollipop.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Good to know. Thanks!
I guess this is just one more reason many should opt for the 64GB.
Now that I'm on a computer, I can elaborate my point in more detail,
Android 4.4 KitKat, at least on the Nexus 5, includes a new runtime call “Android runtime”, ART. Though it’s not a very creative name, it is pretty creative in what it does. Unlike JIT, which must compile every app whenever it’s loaded, ART works on a concept called ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation. With ART, when you download and install an app it automatically pre-compiles. This takes up more space on your device and takes longer to initially install when compared to Dalvik. However, apps launch quicker and are arguably faster when run using ART rather than Dalvik. What’s more, since less time is required to run apps, your processor doesn’t get worked as hard and your battery life may benefit as a result.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://pocketnow.com/2013/11/13/dalvik-vs-art
Do note that the above is from Kit Kat's ART which can be different from Lollipop's ART (improved and more finalized)
This isn't much difference to the 32gb Nexus 5 which has 26gb.
That's weird -did you get a carrier model vs an unlocked one from the playstore?
People were posting 25GB free last week for the 32GB....
I have 54 GB free "total space" on mine.
I got the the 32GB
Pilz said:
I have 54 GB free "total space" on mine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have a 64gb. System overhead seems to be about the same as OP's.
OP, were any carrier apps loaded on during setup? If so, remove and get that space back.
RW-1 said:
OP, were any carrier apps loaded on during setup? If so, remove and get that space back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For this phone, only AT&T gets carrier apps pre-loaded. To be honest, a lot of the Google Applications are bloatware.
Bloatware examples are: Fit, Earth, Books, Movies, Google+, etc.
zephiK said:
For this phone, only AT&T gets carrier apps pre-loaded. To be honest, a lot of the Google Applications are bloatware.
Bloatware examples are: Fit, Earth, Books, Movies, Google+, etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you, but to the OP's issue, he may regain some of his space by removing them, it's been said that you can remove those said carrier apps. As to the others, they may be removable, or one may need root if they are loaded just in /system. Thing is the OP hasn't stated if he got a GP or moto phone, or one from a carrier to begin with.
Initially I was disappointed with the seemingly low space, but you have to keep in mind that a good chunk of that 32GB is lost to formatting (I'd estimate around 10%-15%). The rest is used by the operating system. So 24GB of free space is very plausible on a 32GB device.
wtherrell said:
You have a 64gb. System overhead seems to be about the same as OP's.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct I was posting that as a comparison seeing that mine has about the same amount of space taken up.
So, Me and my friend decided to give a test run. I know conditions were different, One was offline and the other was on Dual VoLTE.
But, This much of a gap?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Seems like a processor issue with the 512
JazonX said:
So, Me and my friend decided to give a test run. I know conditions were different, One was offline and the other was on Dual VoLTE.
But, This much of a gap?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure the 512 wasn't in power save mode? Battery was at 15% compared to 87% on the 128.
skally said:
Are you sure the 512 wasn't in power save mode? Battery was at 15% compared to 87% on the 128.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This.
Not true i saw for 512gb got close to 300000. Something fishy with those stats the 512 kicks the 128 .
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S9+ using XDA Labs
nothing fishy, bad test. one phone running at full charge while the other phone is running in low battery mode. rerun the test again when both are at the same battery level
Venom0642 said:
Not true i saw for 512gb got close to 300000. Something fishy with those stats the 512 kicks the 128 .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, that's a huge win for the 512, if true. Is that not a real-world performance type of difference, in your estimation? I'm really struggling with the decision of 128 vs. 512. I have a 256GB SD card and don't even have 50GB used up on my Note8 internal... So I'm thinking I should stick with the 128 and save the $250. Unless there's actually a performance difference, but I'm not sure 8GB can do much at this stage. I don't know!
PsiPhiDan said:
Wow, that's a huge win for the 512, if true. Is that not a real-world performance type of difference, in your estimation? I'm really struggling with the decision of 128 vs. 512. I have a 256GB SD card and don't even have 50GB used up on my Note8 internal... So I'm thinking I should stick with the 128 and save the $250. Unless there's actually a performance difference, but I'm not sure 8GB can do much at this stage. I don't know!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There both beast, but the 512gb will be faster that the 128gb , just go with what you think you need, the 8gb is for very hardcore gaming.
Running On My Galaxy S9+ SM-G965U Wicked Venom
Second Run
JazonX said:
Second Run
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the 512?
---------- Post added at 05:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:55 PM ----------
Venom0642 said:
There both beast, but the 512gb will be faster that the 128gb , just go with what you think you need, the 8gb is for very hardcore gaming.
Running On My Galaxy S9+ SM-G965U Wicked Venom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would it be faster? Wouldn't it just be better at memory management?
JazonX said:
Second Run
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks like my decision to go for the 128 is looking better and better.
Snapdragon 512 over 301000
Exynos always bad in benchmarks Snapdragon kicks it on it . Glad i always on Snapdragon.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S9+ using XDA Labs
Venom0642 said:
Snapdragon 512 over 301000
Exynos always bad in benchmarks Snapdragon kicks it on it . Glad i always on Snapdragon.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S9+ using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In theory then the Snap 128 should beat the snap Exynos then? One thing I've learned in the past couple of years is benchmarks are essentially for bragging rights, there is no real world impact on an Antutu score from 250 to 300k. Not unless you are measuring apps opening in milliseconds and want to claim because your phone opened said app .00001 ms faster you win. I've never had any type of problems in real world use of the Note 8. I suspect it stays the same with the 9.
Semantics said:
In theory then the Snap 128 should beat the snap Exynos then? One thing I've learned in the past couple of years is benchmarks are essentially for bragging rights, there is no real world impact on an Antutu score from 250 to 300k. Not unless you are measuring apps opening in milliseconds and want to claim because your phone opened said app .00001 ms faster you win. I've never had any type of problems in real world use of the Note 8. I suspect it stays the same with the 9.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah correct, also in my opinion i always say Benchmarks are a gimmick in my book , i really don't care what it shows. Just my 2 cent.
Running On My Galaxy S9+ SM-G965U Wicked Venom
Venom0642 said:
Yeah correct, also in my opinion i always say Benchmarks are a gimmick in my book , i really don't care what it shows. Just my 2 cent.
Running On My Galaxy S9+ SM-G965U Wicked Venom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. The best benchmarks are your hands on the device.
PsiPhiDan said:
This is the 512?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes
Perhaps Samsung is using slower memory chips in the 512gb version? I remember awhile back some phones of the exact same model were unperforming because they were using slower memory chips in some of them.
Sent from my LG-H918 using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Pre production firmware? Could cause unexpected results.
Anyone who got a Note 9 in the 512 GB size today in the US who could possibly run this test? I am curious for another comparison here.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
512GB Note 9
Here you go. US unlocked version direct from Samsung. Arrived today.
Michael
From a technical standpoint, I don't think 2 gigs of extra RAM is gonna give the phone a 20% boost in performance, but is 64 gigs enough keeping in mind no expandable storage?
I'm coming from Redmi 2 Prime with 16gig internal, but I have a 32gig SD which is almost filled all the times.
So what do you say - should i wait for the 128gigs to come?
Also, for my Indian friends, can anybody guess the price of 128gigs? I'm thinking under 20k probably.
iamsubhranil said:
From a technical standpoint, I don't think 2 gigs of extra RAM is gonna give the phone a 20% boost in performance, but is 64 gigs enough keeping in mind no expandable storage?
I'm coming from Redmi 2 Prime with 16gig internal, but I have a 32gig SD which is almost filled all the times.
So what do you say - should i wait for the 128gigs to come?
Also, for my Indian friends, can anybody guess the price of 128gigs? I'm thinking under 20k probably.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@iamsubhranil
no need to guess the 6/128 model price, it's already listed for €283.78 at gearbest but I personally think there's no huge difference in performance as android 9 will use ~2,5GB RAM and pixel 3 XL will even come with 4GB, right? howevery finally it depends on usage, for playing games Mi A2 might not be a top deal, I read it's getting hot. for my daily usage - web, email, fotos! - the 4GB model is perfect.
meltbanana said:
@iamsubhranil
no need to guess the 6/128 model price, it's already listed for €283.78 at gearbest but I personally think there's no huge difference in performance as android 9 will use ~2,5GB RAM and pixel 3 XL will even come with 4GB, right? howevery finally it depends on usage, for playing games Mi A2 might not be a top deal, I read it's getting hot. for my daily usage - web, email, fotos! - the 4GB model is perfect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I own the 6/128 model while my brother has the 4/64. As far as I can tell, it rarely makes a difference, such as when engaged in many apps (We've tried with Snapchat, Facebook, Whatsapp, Camera, and Google Photos. It was a minimal difference but I have to say that the extra storage with cloud functionality is awesome. I wonder if I can root this Android One model of the 6X.
It's not getting hot in my opinion, unless it's charging. It goes well beyond 50 degrees, which is kinda toasty. I have tested the thermal issue as such: Pokemon GO with max brightness and 4K-30FPS max brightness. The phone got a bit excited at start but in the end it managed to keep itself from overheating without reducing performance that much. As for the camera... I am a bit disappointed since I was expecting something a bit better than the A1 but it seems to be pretty much the exact same. I can do some sample photos of everything if anyone is really interested.
iamsubhranil said:
From a technical standpoint, I don't think 2 gigs of extra RAM is gonna give the phone a 20% boost in performance, but is 64 gigs enough keeping in mind no expandable storage?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As it's been for a long time (computers, laptops, etc), the extra ram won't increase performance. It ** Will ** perform better if you open many many apps at the same time.
Do you do that? If it's necessary for you to, then wait. If not, then don't.
The extra storage is soooo subjective. I don't create or use huge files. If I did create huge video files (as an example), I'd use wifi and upload to some cloud storage, when possible. But, some people may be doing multiple vids in a short time and don't have the opportunity to upload... so for them it may be worth getting the 128.
It's not really a mystery, if you have ever run into storage limits (say with a 64), then get the 128. If you haven't before, you probably won't now.
I too wish the Mi A2 had an expansion slot, it would be nice. But is it a necessity? Not for me it's not. I could use it for years and never have it affect me.
If you can wait then get the 6/128. If you need the phone right now then buy the 4/64.
It all depends on what your requirements are.
mauley said:
If you can wait then get the 6/128. If you need the phone right now then buy the 4/64.
It all depends on what your requirements are.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How much storage you got free in the 128GB variant at first time after booting?
ahadrox said:
How much storage you got free in the 128GB variant at first time after booting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had 110GB of free space after initial setup
mauley said:
I had 110GB of free space after initial setup
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info! And do you play PUBG Mobile on Mi A2? If yes, than can you say which graphics settings are in there by default?
ahadrox said:
Thanks for the info! And do you play PUBG Mobile on Mi A2? If yes, than can you say which graphics settings are in there by default?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No sorry I don't play the pubg game so wouldn't really know.
ahadrox said:
Thanks for the info! And do you play PUBG Mobile on Mi A2? If yes, than can you say which graphics settings are in there by default?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pubg graphics settings
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Mi A2 using Tapatalk
oh hey guys.
I was about to purchase a2, then the bomb called poco f1 dropped, and I went for that immediately ?
thank you all for your help.