Database Develop

TYTN 2 Kaiser MSM7200 faster than Samsung 500Mhz?

After quick view from some website , I found that the MSM7200 which is assembled in Kaiser is faster than Samsung 400Mhz and 500Mhz Processor.
Samsung 500Mhz(P3600i), Samsung 400Mhz(Dopod D810),TYTN II(MSM7200)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Below is my summary of the test statistic above.
CPU Index
SAMSUNG 400Mh - 13XX
SAMSUNG 500Mhz - 14XX
MSM7200 400Mhz - 15XX
Graphics Index
SAMSUNG 400Mh - 9XX-12XX
SAMSUNG 500Mhz - 12XX
MSM7200 400Mhz - 3XXX
According to the statistic, seem the MSM7200 is faster than the Samsung 400 and 500Mhz CPU £¬ especially Graphics Index¡£ But in real world , how come it is underperformance and slower than 838Pro ? especially gaming , video and Emulator . Is the software optimization issue? direct draw issue or the test results are fake?

belon_cfy said:
According to the statistic, seem the MSM7200 is faster than the Samsung 400 and 500Mhz CPU £¬ especially Graphics Index¡£ But in real world , how come it is underperformance and slower than 838Pro ? especially gaming , video and Emulator . Is the software optimization issue? direct draw issue or the test results are fake?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who knows what exactly these tests are actually testing. Everything, but the msm7200 devices, are certainly using their ATI chips.

Didn't MSM7200 had like a duo core type of working???
And cause not working 100% is cause of lack of drivers. But will be fixed end March.

xmoo said:
Didn't MSM7200 had like a duo core type of working???
And cause not working 100% is cause of lack of drivers. But will be fixed end March.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The driver is not a driver to enable ATI imagion.
Hopefully the new "Driver" can much improve 2D rendering performance for gaming , video and WM GUI.

8.4 do not have hmp

just wonder about that.
some say exynos 5420 support hmp by theory, yet samsung disable it, while 5422 / 5430 / 5433 support in reality.
i check it by cpuz, it clearly shows cluster switch and only 4 cores can be use at the same time.
5433 (note 4)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
5430 (samsung alpha)
5422 (ODROID-XU3 Lite System)
5420 (note3)
even note3 get lollipop update, kernel is still a 3.49, no hmp will be given, it shows only linux about 3.10 can support hmp.
and i don't think samsung will update kernel for us.

Heat and battery-life wise I do not reckon they would enable this.

What is hmp?

LoVeRice said:
What is hmp?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_big.LITTLE#HMP

Ah this conversation again. The exynos5420 was supposed to support hmp but ended up being broken and as such will never work. Sorry guys.

Yep. According to AndreiLux it is impossible to be implemented for our Exynos5420. He has stated the exact reasons why in various posts on the Web.
I have seen evidence of working HMP on Samsung Exynos5420 at one of the developer shows a year or so back though, but doesn't necessarily mean a software patch will make it work here. Hardware needs work too, which we can't change. ...

CPU-z
i just noticed something else wrong with my galaxy tab s 8.4 the CPU-Z info "http://i.cubeupload.com/3LpKj0.png" the exynos 5420 suppose to be with 4 slow cores at 1.5 and 4 fast cores at 1.9 but on this info from CPU-z it shows them all as 1.9 somehow , and also here "http://i.cubeupload.com/vUgZnP.png" it shows the screen dpi 320 instead of 359 . is it the same on your device as well ? can you share any screenshots or info thanks im using CPU-z 1.1 btw

mamali.z said:
i just noticed something else wrong with my galaxy tab s 8.4 the CPU-Z info "http://i.cubeupload.com/3LpKj0.png" the exynos 5420 suppose to be with 4 slow cores at 1.5 and 4 fast cores at 1.9 but on this info from CPU-z it shows them all as 1.9 somehow , and also here "http://i.cubeupload.com/vUgZnP.png" it shows the screen dpi 320 instead of 359 . is it the same on your device as well ? can you share any screenshots or info thanks im using CPU-z 1.1 btw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Either the app is wrong or you have the later model with Exynos 5433.

UpInTheAir said:
Either the app is wrong or you have the later model with Exynos 5433.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ty for responding i kinda am sure it is 5420 as it shows on CPU-Z info => http://i.cubeupload.com/3LpKj0.png
it is freaking me out :S

[SPECS] ZTE Axon

Hi all
With a lot of the features found in leading manufactures handsets, the ZTE Axon looks like a promising device. One omission is a microSD card slot, which for me is a must. Who's planning on purchasing the ZTE Axon, and why?
For those unaware of the specs:good:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Specifications:
Display - IPS LCD, 5.5 inches, 1440 x 2560 pixels (~534 ppi pixel density)
Chipset - Qualcomm Snapdragon 810
CPU - Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & Quad-core 2 GHz Cortex-A57
GPU - Adreno 430
RAM - 4 GB
Memory - 32 GB
Camera - 13 MP + 2MP (Dual camera), 4128 x 3096 pixels, autofocus, dual LED flash
Secondary Camera - 8 MP
Sensors - Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Connectivity - Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, WiFi Direct, Wi-Fi hotspot, Bluetooth v4.1
Battery - 3000 mAh
Dimensions - 153.9 x 73.7 x 9.4 mm
Weight - 173 g
Color Availability - Ion Gold, Chromium Silver, Phthalo Blue
Source: gsmarena

I have ordered this phone plus case from Amazon. As a Belgian, the total cost of the phone, tax and duty included, is almost the cost of a S6 Edge. But I like the being a bit more original so I have chosen this phone. The specs are nice and so are most reviews. Really looking forward and I hope having it by the end of the week.

This seller is telling that sim slot 2 can take microSD too.
Is it true?

Csetoue said:
This seller is telling that sim slot 2 can take microSD too.
Is it true?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
An Axon Lux is pictured, China only for this release. Notice fingerprint reader on back. Axon does not have this, check pics in case thread under accessories. No SD expansion slot on Axon, only Axon Lux

Question Anyone getting the Sm-G9980 (Exynos dual SIM)?

I havent seen any comments on it yet. Waiting for mine to arrive. Its the HK version. Like Note 20 Ultra its snapdragon like the US version but dual sim like the European version (with similar bands, so it wont get 5G in the US). Snapdragon dual sim Note 20 Ultra has been great but it is literally the last version to get upgraded (its still on android 10 today).

Yep. Got mine yesterday. The exact model number is SM-G998B/DS

No, that's not the same. That's the dual sim exynos version. Yours is 998B/ds. 9980 is the dual sim snapdragon (whenever they add the 0 it's the Chinese snapdragon version).

Any there any review compare directly 9980 snapdragon adn 998B exynos 2100? Are there difference?

-Zork- said:
Any there any review compare directly 9980 snapdragon adn 998B exynos 2100? Are there difference?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Performance of sd is much more better. Even the sd865+ cpu on asus rog 3 phone smoke samsung exynos 2100 chip
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

If that is your device mate, it must be absolutely boiling or something ain't right.

Does this exynos dual sim phone do 5g+5g dual standby? Samsung says NO on chat while on Amazon it says it does

ekerbuddyeker said:
I havent seen any comments on it yet. Waiting for mine to arrive. Its the HK version. Like Note 20 Ultra its snapdragon like the US version but dual sim like the European version (with similar bands, so it wont get 5G in the US). Snapdragon dual sim Note 20 Ultra has been great but it is literally the last version to get upgraded (its still on android 10 today).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some users are stating the SM-G9980 in the US on T-mobile's network are getting the 5G. As far as performance the Snapdragon and Exynos SoC's are comparable however the Snapdragon devices will deliver superior gaming due to their improved CPU. AnTuTu comparisons reflect the difference.
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra Snapdragon vs Exynos: How big is the performance gap?
It's a battle of benchmarks in our Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra Snapdragon vs Exynos tests. Which one wins? Click here and find out.
www.androidauthority.com

Battle of Flagship smartphone processors

The year 2022 will see one of the fiercest battles in the history between Mediatek and Qualcomm where both these brands are ready with MediaTek Dimensity 9000 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipsets respectively to grab the flagship market. Which one of these would do you think would do better?

Moot competition. There will be newer chipsets that will supersede the performance of both 9000 and Gen 1 in 6 months.
Also both vendors don't support their chipsets for more than 2 years so history will remember these clowns for meteoric rise in e-waste.

Nothing beats my XDA Exec!
NETWORKTechnologyGSM / UMTS
LAUNCHAnnounced2005, AugustStatusDiscontinued
BODYDimensions127 x 81 x 25 mm (5.0 x 3.19 x 0.98 in)Weight285 g (10.05 oz)KeyboardQWERTYSIMMini-SIM
DISPLAYTypeTFT resistive touchscreen, 65K colorsSize3.6 inches, 73 x 55 mm, 40.1 cm2 (~39.0% screen-to-body ratio)Resolution640 x 480 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~222 ppi density) Handwriting recognition
PLATFORMOSMicrosoft Windows Mobile 5.0 PocketPCCPUIntel Bulverde 520 MHz
MEMORYCard slotSDIO/MMCInternal64MB RAM, 128MB ROM
MAIN CAMERASingle1.3 MPVideoYes
SELFIE CAMERASingleVGA videocall cameraVideo
SOUNDLoudspeakerYes, with stereo speakersAlert typesVibration; Downloadable polyphonic, MP3, AAC ringtones3.5mm jackNo Dual speakers
COMMSWLANWi-Fi 802.11bBluetooth1.2GPSNoInfrared portYesRadioNoUSBminiUSB
FEATURESSensorsBrowserWAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML (PocketIE) Pocket Office
Voice memo
MP3/AAC player
BATTERYTypeRemovable Li-Ion 1620 mAh battery
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Yabbut

karandpr said:
Moot competition. There will be newer chipsets that will supersede the performance of both 9000 and Gen 1 in 6 months.
Also both vendors don't support their chipsets for more than 2 years so history will remember these clowns for meteoric rise in e-waste.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe, but perhaps everything works like this. Dimensity 9000 may be so good, but every good things gets old in some days.

I don't need no stinking support