Database Develop

TYTN 2 Kaiser MSM7200 faster than Samsung 500Mhz?

After quick view from some website , I found that the MSM7200 which is assembled in Kaiser is faster than Samsung 400Mhz and 500Mhz Processor.
Samsung 500Mhz(P3600i), Samsung 400Mhz(Dopod D810),TYTN II(MSM7200)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Below is my summary of the test statistic above.
CPU Index
SAMSUNG 400Mh - 13XX
SAMSUNG 500Mhz - 14XX
MSM7200 400Mhz - 15XX
Graphics Index
SAMSUNG 400Mh - 9XX-12XX
SAMSUNG 500Mhz - 12XX
MSM7200 400Mhz - 3XXX
According to the statistic, seem the MSM7200 is faster than the Samsung 400 and 500Mhz CPU £¬ especially Graphics Index¡£ But in real world , how come it is underperformance and slower than 838Pro ? especially gaming , video and Emulator . Is the software optimization issue? direct draw issue or the test results are fake?

belon_cfy said:
According to the statistic, seem the MSM7200 is faster than the Samsung 400 and 500Mhz CPU £¬ especially Graphics Index¡£ But in real world , how come it is underperformance and slower than 838Pro ? especially gaming , video and Emulator . Is the software optimization issue? direct draw issue or the test results are fake?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who knows what exactly these tests are actually testing. Everything, but the msm7200 devices, are certainly using their ATI chips.

Didn't MSM7200 had like a duo core type of working???
And cause not working 100% is cause of lack of drivers. But will be fixed end March.

xmoo said:
Didn't MSM7200 had like a duo core type of working???
And cause not working 100% is cause of lack of drivers. But will be fixed end March.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The driver is not a driver to enable ATI imagion.
Hopefully the new "Driver" can much improve 2D rendering performance for gaming , video and WM GUI.

[APP] Snapdragon BatteryGuru [officially supported]

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.xiam.snapdragon.app
This is an official Qualcomm app
Snapdragon™ BatteryGuru extends battery performance and improves overall user experience by intelligently making changes that optimize Snapdragon device functionality. This app:
•Delivers longer battery life with fewer charges
•Intelligently learns how you use your Snapdragon smartphone and optimizes your device without disabling smartphone functionality
•Requires no user configuration - Snapdragon BatteryGuru automatically learns and adjusts the smartphone settings so you don’t have to.
After a brief 2-4 day introduction period, Snapdragon BatteryGuru learns the user’s behaviors and then notifies the user that it is ready to extend the battery life and improve the experience. Snapdragon BatteryGuru continues to operate in the background, deepening its understanding of the user and further optimizing the experience over time.
Available as a Beta release at this time, Snapdragon BatteryGuru supports a majority of Snapdragon powered devices in North America and European Union at this time and we are working rapidly to support additional Snapdragon powered devices and regions in the coming months. If you experience problems using this app, we'd really appreciate if you send us an email at [email protected] explaining your problem prior to leaving a review – we’ll try to respond as soon as possible.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Lets get testing guys, post your findings below
for anyone having problems downloading in your region, find file in attachment below.

Thanks, I will try in one moment xP

Do you know if it modifies kernel or interferes with setCPU?
I sent them a message about it, let's see what they say.

No it don't mess with kernel, I also don't think it adjust cpu frequency as I think it would need root permission, which this app don't require.
Sent from my HTC One X

yepp, I installed it, and looks like what it does is that it organises when apps connect for sync and update, which sounds really good, and others don't do that.

yep, they said:
Thank you for your enquiry.
BatteryGuru does not modify the kernel or CPU settings in and way.
Regards,
Snapdragon BatteryGuru Team
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

[SOLVED] Overclock over 2.89GHz - possible?

Hello,
I'm making custom kernel for Z3 and Z3 Compact,
and I tried to get overclock to 3.0GHz.
I edited msm8974pro.dtsi according to Faux123's commit
and also edited msm8974.dtsi in this commit (later I changed to 3.2GHz but didn't changed).
"3033600" should be appeared in CPU freq,
but all I get was "2899200", which I didn't write in the code.
Strangely, there is 3033MHz in CPU voltage adjustment.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Is this hardware limit, or software limit which we can break?
I don't really need 3.0GHz, but I want to know the limit.
[EDIT]
Now there is possibility for over 2.89Ghz!
Thanks flar2's patch.
https://github.com/WedyDQ10/AndroPlusKernel_leo/commit/471a2a4e0bed6f8a98445ef620f912e951a396a1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MInMHSRxs3M

I'm not really sure it regards to the above. However, due to overclocking PC hardware myself, there is always a synthetic limit.
For example:
Some devices will be able to reach higher clocks than others.

How do other Snapdragon 801 devices perform, LG G3, Moto X 2014? Take that as benchmark.

CentaXx said:
How do other Snapdragon 801 devices perform, LG G3, Moto X 2014? Take that as benchmark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I found kernel for LG G3, but it's up to 2.7GHz.
https://github.com/tectas/android_k...mmit/b834bfab313058f5ec0856213dc8cb882e6a46aa
I couldn't find kernel for Moto X 2014.

AndroPlus said:
I found kernel for LG G3, but it's up to 2.7GHz.
https://github.com/tectas/android_k...mmit/b834bfab313058f5ec0856213dc8cb882e6a46aa
I couldn't find kernel for Moto X 2014.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@Myself5 implemented 3.0ghz OC on Z2 for AOSP based ROM's (KK and LP). Have a word with him over it.

waynekirby said:
@Myself5 implemented 3.0ghz OC on Z2 for AOSP based ROM's (KK and LP). Have a word with him over it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://github.com/Myself5/android_...mmit/507d603fbf7041f8e29c093e06c2e4a1ae785f65
https://github.com/Myself5/android_...mmit/b30b5c15a3852caa3c9e5e35890dd0a8928cfd66
https://github.com/Myself5/android_...mmit/07e2fe9210f0a4c5af49bb25155afdc6cf0002e9
https://github.com/Myself5/android_...mmit/89b41ebe6c6ce1a685eab936631f7988b796e07f
https://github.com/Myself5/android_...mmit/38a93dcb0040100c1bd5f49b05555eb97f36c8ca (may not be needed, can't guarrantee it isn't tho)
This is the LP Kernel Repo. I also added GPU OC in case you care, just check the commits
Actually the 2.89GHz Value should be 3GHz, as it also get's refered to on the Voltage Table in Faux Clock (3033MHz) but the Clock only goes up to 2899,2MHz. Don't know what this is related to.
BTW: The main work for this was done by @faux123 for the HTC One M8, I just adopted it for the Z2 @AndroPlus Let me know when you found a solution, I am glad to fix this for the Z2 too.

Now I found solution of flar2's commit!
We can go over 2.89Ghz... but it's not stable.
https://github.com/WedyDQ10/AndroPlusKernel_leo/commit/471a2a4e0bed6f8a98445ef620f912e951a396a1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MInMHSRxs3M

Could someone explain to me what the third value in < 2265600000 1120000 738 >; in msm8974.dtsi means and how this third value is calculated? Thanks in advantage

[Score]Antutu : Best Android Smartphones 2014

2014 is a great year for mobile device industry. Numerous flagships of big brands and also some black horses run into the best choice list. To help you make the right call, AnTuTu picked the top 10 smarthphones for you, according the testing items (CPU, GPU, UX, ROM and etc.) of AnTuTu benchmark V5.0 and above. This ranking report is based on device testing data submitted by AnTuTu benchmark users, covering more than 160 countries.
Meizu, Nexus 6 and Samsung Alpha got top 3.
Half of top 10 are from China manufacturers.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
top 10 in 2013 VS 2014

Why note 4 in 4th
And why it score only 44669
exynos 7 better than this

Shame in real life the Note 4 (Snapdragon version) is a lot slower than the benchmarks would suggest.
Sluggish OS performance and sluggish game performance put's it well below it's place in the benchmarks in my book.
HTC One M8 at the very least frankly shows it up when it comes to speed and fluidity.

A rom, debloat and tweaks makes model f a bit more smooth. But it's sad that you have to. Old N5 or M7-8 is another league, so it's down to TouchWiz. For some this a deal breaker and for some not. I hope that A5 will change this a bit.
You never know
http://www.ubergizmo.com/2015/01/sa...ptimized-as-stock-android/?utm_source=mainrss
PS. I also have the MX4 and sadly it has a slower gpu than cpu.
Skickat från min SM-N910F via Tapatalk

Pftt...nonsense antutu score of only 44k. I'm getting around 51k on my N910C exynos version.

Under 45000? People must be bench marking in a sauna. I will always get 49xxx-50000.

This was at room temp and device temp was normal.. Not sure what was going on here but I mostly get around 48-49000
Sent from my SM-N910F using XDA Free mobile app

Stock N910C

I get 49000 to 51000, stock rooted, 910c

N910F stock nk4.

Stock n910c. @ about 10 - 15 celcius.

N910U ultimate kernel at 32 F = 0 C temp..!!

Okarina26 said:
N910U ultimate kernel at 32 F = 0 C temp..!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's scary! Did you put it in the freezer just long enough for it to reach 0C and then get the phone out to do the test....

My Exynos was always at 49k, now after the ultimate kernel and 1080p resolution it gets 52k every time. 45k? That must be SnapD.

LOW BENCHMARK SCORE ONE UI 3.0

After ONE UI 3.0 the geekbench benchmark of the S20 FE 5G SNAPDRAGON 865 is very low, comparing to the past ONE UI 2.5
The multi- core is the worst.
Been getting results like
SINGLE CORE: 851
MULTI CORE: 2783
Weird that when Europe gets the first samsung with a snapdragon version available, it gets bottleneck like this?
Seems more like samsung is trying to hide the performance difference between EXYNOS and SNAPDRAGON. The multi core performance now looks like exynos 990
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Are they doing this on purpose?

Hi bro, wondering how did you got the oneui 3.0 for Snapdragon version. iam still on 2.5 with december security patch. and yes the acores are two low as per your screenshot

trinath89 said:
Hi bro, wondering how did you got the oneui 3.0 for Snapdragon version. iam still on 2.5 with december security patch. and yes the acores are two low as per your screenshot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the update was global, thats weird. i got it in 25 december.
My coutry is Portugal (europe)

bernardorosa said:
the update was global, thats weird. i got it in 25 december.
My coutry is Portugal (europe)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately... Not so global... Especially for the US.
Although your multi-core score is a bit under 300 less than mine, your single-core score is only 13 less than my S20FE running OneUI 2.5. It could very well be cases of testing anomalies, installed software or testing environment causing differences. Or... It's probably just a case of new OS version that hasn't been entirely ironed out. You still appear to have slightly better scores than Exynos 990 (about midway between Exynos 990 average and my average on multi-core by the look of it), so unless you notice a significantly worse battery life, I wouldn't assume that Samsung has succeeded in dumbing down the SD865 to Exynos levels yet. Have a good one!

i'm having the same issue, i posted about it on reddit.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Galaxy_S20/comments/kn9oww
i'm only getting 2600 for multicore (base s20 - snapdragon 865). previously i got 3000

This is a known bug which Samsung has acknowledged. They promise to fix it in a future update. I'll see if I can find the link and edit this post when I do.
EDIT: As promised. Here's your link.
Samsung Android 11 update poor benchmark performance acknowledged
The poor benchmark performance on Samsung phones after installing Android 11 has been acknowledged and a fix for the issue is in the works.
piunikaweb.com

xphyle1971 said:
This is a known bug which Samsung has acknowledged. They promise to fix it in a future update. I'll see if I can find the link and edit this post when I do.
EDIT: As promised. Here's your link.
Samsung Android 11 update poor benchmark performance acknowledged
The poor benchmark performance on Samsung phones after installing Android 11 has been acknowledged and a fix for the issue is in the works.
piunikaweb.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thx bro