2014 is a great year for mobile device industry. Numerous flagships of big brands and also some black horses run into the best choice list. To help you make the right call, AnTuTu picked the top 10 smarthphones for you, according the testing items (CPU, GPU, UX, ROM and etc.) of AnTuTu benchmark V5.0 and above. This ranking report is based on device testing data submitted by AnTuTu benchmark users, covering more than 160 countries.
Meizu, Nexus 6 and Samsung Alpha got top 3.
Half of top 10 are from China manufacturers.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
top 10 in 2013 VS 2014
Why note 4 in 4th
And why it score only 44669
exynos 7 better than this
Shame in real life the Note 4 (Snapdragon version) is a lot slower than the benchmarks would suggest.
Sluggish OS performance and sluggish game performance put's it well below it's place in the benchmarks in my book.
HTC One M8 at the very least frankly shows it up when it comes to speed and fluidity.
A rom, debloat and tweaks makes model f a bit more smooth. But it's sad that you have to. Old N5 or M7-8 is another league, so it's down to TouchWiz. For some this a deal breaker and for some not. I hope that A5 will change this a bit.
You never know
http://www.ubergizmo.com/2015/01/sa...ptimized-as-stock-android/?utm_source=mainrss
PS. I also have the MX4 and sadly it has a slower gpu than cpu.
Skickat från min SM-N910F via Tapatalk
Pftt...nonsense antutu score of only 44k. I'm getting around 51k on my N910C exynos version.
Under 45000? People must be bench marking in a sauna. I will always get 49xxx-50000.
This was at room temp and device temp was normal.. Not sure what was going on here but I mostly get around 48-49000
Sent from my SM-N910F using XDA Free mobile app
Stock N910C
I get 49000 to 51000, stock rooted, 910c
N910F stock nk4.
Stock n910c. @ about 10 - 15 celcius.
N910U ultimate kernel at 32 F = 0 C temp..!!
Okarina26 said:
N910U ultimate kernel at 32 F = 0 C temp..!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's scary! Did you put it in the freezer just long enough for it to reach 0C and then get the phone out to do the test....
My Exynos was always at 49k, now after the ultimate kernel and 1080p resolution it gets 52k every time. 45k? That must be SnapD.
Related
I've tried the Charge and Thunderbolt along with the Revo, and for some reason the 4g on the Revo is less that half the speed of the other devices using the Speedtest app. Someone on another forum commented about this as well. Do you folks think this is a radio issue that can be fixed? Otherwise, I'll be taking the Revo back.
Thanks!
What is your dl speed because in all honesty any dl above 3 MB/sec is overkill. Here in SE TX mine avgs. 8 down/5 up. Try another server it does vary greatly. Remember it is a burst speed and is dependant on how many users are on a tower plus other factors beyond your control. A true OC-3 speed of 20 down /20 up runs about $20,000 a month for a business.
I'm always between 8 - 11 down and 4 - 6 up out here in Charleston, SC
Sent from my LG Hobo 4G
Average 4G speed around my home is 8-12 dwn, 5-9 up.
Sent from my VS910 4G using XDA App
drutman said:
What is your dl speed because in all honesty any dl above 3 MB/sec is overkill. Here in SE TX mine avgs. 8 down/5 up. Try another server it does vary greatly. Remember it is a burst speed and is dependant on how many users are on a tower plus other factors beyond your control. A true OC-3 speed of 20 down /20 up runs about $20,000 a month for a business.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Verizon probably has run their own fiber to their towers... and they are probably running OC-12 or 24 lines.
Hehehe... had to block the isp, as we are our own... That is shared with 1500 other users...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
4G LTE in Milwaukee is VERY fast.
Near the airport, strong constant 20-30mbps and 4-9mbps up.
I have yet to venture to Madison yet or Wisconsin Dells, as those are the other two major city's in WI to have LTE setup.
on a side note, I will say with my first LG which was borked and stuck with the stock shipping software my downloads were some what slower then my new one with the current stock software. 15mbps max on the old software and 30mbps with the new software.
Like everyone else, I'm closely following the development of ICS ROMs for my SGT 8.9. Truth be told, I've been running Galaxian Soup for the better part of two weeks now, really enjoying the clean look of the stock Android interface and lack of TouchWiz bloat.
But I'm also concerned about performance because, well, I'm a geek.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
So I decided to benchmark the two ICS ROMs under development against the stock TouchWiz 3.2 ROM to see how they stack up. The contenders are the Galaxian Soup Beta 1.4 and unofficial CyanogenMod 9.
Method
Each ROM was tested 7 times with AnTuTu Benchmark so as to accumulate data. The first run was thrown out in each case as the first run with AnTuTu tends to be slower. Thus I collected and reported 6 runs for each ROM. Standard deviations were calculated and recorded to see how consistent the ROMs are in each area, and the mean scores chosen to represent each ROM. I did not overclock in Galaxian Soup or CM9, so the clock speed was 1ghz in each case to keep the playing field level. I almost forgot to mention that I ran the benchmark on a Honk Kong market GT-P7300 WiFi/3G.
Results (Scroll down to see totals)
Code:
TW 3.2 GS ICS B1.4 CM9 ICS
Mean +/- Mean +/-
RAM 817 826 1% 702 -14%
CPU Integer 1421 1432 1% 1405 -1%
CPU float-point 1091 1098 1% 1111 2%
2D graphics 293 295 1% 262 -10%
3D graphics 904 627 -31% 616 -32%
Database IO 354 325 -8% 334 -6%
SD card write 115 129 12% 131 14%
SD card read 191 191 0% 187 -2%
Total score 5186 4922 -5% 4749 -8%
The results speak for themselves. Both ROMs being in alpha or beta status have some work to do, especially in the area of 3D graphics. But we know the devs are working on a host of issues (not to mention that they have lives of their own!), so let's be patient. On the other hand, both ROMs bring a lot to the table in terms of SD card write performance! As the devs put newer releases out there, I'll update the results here to see how they are coming along.
In the meantime, thanks to the devs for working hard on these for the community. Both ROMs look great and deserve a look!
Although these stats throughout show a performance loss, let me assure you that in the daily use it feels a lot faster and smoother!
Hi all
so i have decided to buy P9
and i want to ask how is the performance and how is the camera shot
can someone give me some Pics ?
and the battery life is it really good ? how much would last if i'm using the phone only for browsing and calling ?
any advice to go with P9 single sim or Dual sim ?
does the NFC really needed or useful in anything beside payment ?
Cam is very good for photography, mediocre at video. Performance is excellent. Battery lasts me almost always two full work days.
clouds5 said:
Cam is very good for photography, mediocre at video. Performance is excellent. Battery lasts me almost always two full work days.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here! Amazing phone, there is a whole thread with camera samples. With one word - GREAT. Totally worth the money and as a device the only other device that's better for me is the Pixel phone right now. But still I like the design of P9 more, so I would get it over the Pixel any day
Makeuseof. Com has an article about 9 things you can use NFC for that'll impress your friends.
Check it out
Can somebody check the performance of p9 and post the results in uxbench that is available playstore for free with no ads and is developed by me?
For now the fastest of all are mi5s and s7 edge exynos as you can see in compare tab. I wonder how well the kirin 955 performs in terms of cpu and generally ux performance.
The test is quick to complete about 2 minutes.
UXBench:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
dedovec said:
UXBench:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you!
Excellent performance! 955 is as fast as 821 and exynos in single core and leads the multicore by far!
The little slow performance on nand write speed did not let it be the fastest phone in user experience! But single and multicore performance is really out of this world!
---------- Post added at 09:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:56 AM ----------
Excuse me for deleting the second run. I just keep the best performance for every device.
I have seen someone posted a test run with very high score. Until now Huawei P9 is the king of UXbench.
I will send a request in Mate 9 forum to ask somebody to test the device. I wonder how far can go the 960 chip.
Introducing Android Oreo (Go edition)
A powerful experience for entry-level smartphones. It’s the best of Android, built with new and reimagined apps, so even the most affordable Android smartphones are as sweet as can be.
Built to use less
Brand new apps designed for lighter updates and downloads help create more space while significantly improving performance. That’s what we call a win, win.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hope somebody will start porting soon.
Thank you.
vishaletm said:
Introducing Android Oreo (Go edition)
A powerful experience for entry-level smartphones. It’s the best of Android, built with new and reimagined apps, so even the most affordable Android smartphones are as sweet as can be.
Built to use less
Brand new apps designed for lighter updates and downloads help create more space while significantly improving performance. That’s what we call a win, win.
Hope somebody will start porting soon.
Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude that's targeted for devices with low specs... About 512-1024MB RAM. Our device is not that low spec to use android go. Normal android will run just fine with no difference in performance. Instead it will only degrade the UX...
Think of it like this :
There's a game which needs 8gb RAM and 2gb GFX mem to run.
Now if you have two pc with following spec :
PC1 : 16gb RAM, 4gb GFX mem
PC2 : 32GB RAM, 4gb GFX mem
Do you think the game will run faster on PC2 than PC1? Not at all! Both of them already have the required amount of RAM. Both will be fluid and smooth and fast. The difference is almost zero and the most noticeable difference in them would be fps only (which is not comparable on our phone)
It would be unnecessary to waste time on making go edition when the normal edition works fast already.
I don't think anyone from my development group will make it.
However if we do make it under some circumstances in future, it would take months. Android 8 development has been going on from September. It still isn't out yet. Expect the same for go.
After ONE UI 3.0 the geekbench benchmark of the S20 FE 5G SNAPDRAGON 865 is very low, comparing to the past ONE UI 2.5
The multi- core is the worst.
Been getting results like
SINGLE CORE: 851
MULTI CORE: 2783
Weird that when Europe gets the first samsung with a snapdragon version available, it gets bottleneck like this?
Seems more like samsung is trying to hide the performance difference between EXYNOS and SNAPDRAGON. The multi core performance now looks like exynos 990
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Are they doing this on purpose?
Hi bro, wondering how did you got the oneui 3.0 for Snapdragon version. iam still on 2.5 with december security patch. and yes the acores are two low as per your screenshot
trinath89 said:
Hi bro, wondering how did you got the oneui 3.0 for Snapdragon version. iam still on 2.5 with december security patch. and yes the acores are two low as per your screenshot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the update was global, thats weird. i got it in 25 december.
My coutry is Portugal (europe)
bernardorosa said:
the update was global, thats weird. i got it in 25 december.
My coutry is Portugal (europe)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately... Not so global... Especially for the US.
Although your multi-core score is a bit under 300 less than mine, your single-core score is only 13 less than my S20FE running OneUI 2.5. It could very well be cases of testing anomalies, installed software or testing environment causing differences. Or... It's probably just a case of new OS version that hasn't been entirely ironed out. You still appear to have slightly better scores than Exynos 990 (about midway between Exynos 990 average and my average on multi-core by the look of it), so unless you notice a significantly worse battery life, I wouldn't assume that Samsung has succeeded in dumbing down the SD865 to Exynos levels yet. Have a good one!
i'm having the same issue, i posted about it on reddit.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Galaxy_S20/comments/kn9oww
i'm only getting 2600 for multicore (base s20 - snapdragon 865). previously i got 3000
This is a known bug which Samsung has acknowledged. They promise to fix it in a future update. I'll see if I can find the link and edit this post when I do.
EDIT: As promised. Here's your link.
Samsung Android 11 update poor benchmark performance acknowledged
The poor benchmark performance on Samsung phones after installing Android 11 has been acknowledged and a fix for the issue is in the works.
piunikaweb.com
xphyle1971 said:
This is a known bug which Samsung has acknowledged. They promise to fix it in a future update. I'll see if I can find the link and edit this post when I do.
EDIT: As promised. Here's your link.
Samsung Android 11 update poor benchmark performance acknowledged
The poor benchmark performance on Samsung phones after installing Android 11 has been acknowledged and a fix for the issue is in the works.
piunikaweb.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thx bro