Related
Did any Americans on this forum vote for the bush?
Personally I hope not......
wonder how many recounts they do this time around ?
and maybe a trail ?
read about there being very many activists trying to keep people from voting this time
flyers saying the election had been moved to the day after
and
people comming round to peoples doors saying that the election place they were to go to had been shutdown and they could just write their vote in and give it to them
pretty crazy well suppose some people care more about who win then the democratic process
I'm sure there are some.
The fact that the rest of the world was hoping Kerry would win, has little influence to the us-citizens. Like we should care what America thinks of who we should vote for.
I just hope that this victory, doesn't give Bush a carte-blanche on his foreign policy. The fact that he no longer has to worry about getting re-elected won't help his diplomatic powers. He also doesn't have to care anymore about men coming home in body bags. These men believing they fought for freedom, democracy and the glory of the US, but in fact only went to defend the intrest of some multinationals.
Jupiter said:
Did any Americans on this forum vote for the bush?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Statistically, one out of two.
Not sure your question is really inocent though :roll:
I think you like hot & touchy thread
The fact that the rest of the world was hoping Kerry would win, has little influence to the us-citizens. Like we should care what America thinks of who we should vote for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah it could even have the opposite effect a lot of people would get stubbern and do the opposite then what some snotnosed rest of the world person would advice
I just hope that this victory, doesn't give Bush a carte-blanche on his foreign policy. The fact that he no longer has to worry about getting re-elected won't help his diplomatic powers. He also doesn't have to care anymore about men coming home in body bags. These men believing they fought for freedom, democracy and the glory of the US, but in fact only went to defend the intrest of some multinationals.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but how that he dont have to worry about reelection he may begin to worry about how he looks in the history books and be less confrontational agenst the rest of the world when it comes to deplomatics
here a big news papir had a pole
32000 people voted
kerry got 79%
nater got 8%
nobody got 7%
bush got 6%
so one might say that if that pole had been reality bush lost to nobody
Guys,
Please give me 5 specific reason why Kerry should have been elected, concrete issues/reasons, not just buzz words.
Thanks,
paulmc
imho then kerry was less religous in his motivs when it came to politics thinking stemcell research and giving gay people the rights of marriage in some form or another
imho then kerry was less likely to offend and alienate allies and other countries in the world
imho then kerry would not have a prison camp on cuba where the internaitiol laws conserning prisoners of war were not enforced
maybe the kerry administation would have had less % of people being investergated for insider deals and corruption
and finaly then imho then it keeps a better balance if the house of rep
and the senetors and president is not in the hands of a single party
it's more moderated
just a few things i could come up with on the top of my head
of cause there are surely people who differ in openion
Please give me 5 specific reason why Kerry should have been elected, concrete issues/reasons, not just buzz words
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who said I wanted Kerry to be elected. Its a case of Predator vs Alien. Whoever wins, we lose!
Not sure your question is really inocent though
I think you like hot & touchy thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who, me?
Jupiter said:
Not sure your question is really inocent though
I think you like hot & touchy thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who, me?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes
paulmc said:
Guys,
Please give me 5 specific reason why Kerry should have been elected, concrete issues/reasons, not just buzz words.
Thanks,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll give you my personal opinion, conceptual more than practical as I do not live in the US, nor be concerned with elements such as "he voted that" or "he said this".
I think Bush is a dangerous religious totalitarist. I have no reason to vote for Kerry, but plenty to wish that Bush be moved aside from active international politics.
To me this man should not be re-elected as he should be forced into in LaHaye and charged with the 5 following elements against him:
1. Invading a sovereign country in complete violation of all international law, without UN approval, under very suspicious reasons, obviously telling lies about AMD and supposed connection with Ben Ladden
2. When forced to admit the is no connection between Sadam Hussein, Ben Ladden and AMD, thus no reason to invade this country, not even admitting he was wrong or worst, he got cheated or even worse of all, he deliberately lied to his people, to the nations concerned and to the rest of the world.
3. Establishing concentration camp for Afghanistan prisoners in complete violation of international law, and principles, and international treaty without having those prisoners charged of anything, and allowing no international control of what is happening in this camp
4. Sending his army to perpetuated atrocity and humiliation to irakee prisoners who have not even been charged of anything. (Keep in mind that all the US commanding officers in Irak saw before leaving, the French film "The Battle of Alger" showing what France did during the battle of Algeria, were we did exactly what you are doing presently in Iraq because we were facing the same problem). Let's call it what it is Atrocity. And we know what we are talking about for we did it too!
5. Legitimating the exclusive right for the US to strike any nations they think be a potential threat to their interest and freedom, and denying any one else the right to do so. This is to me the worst of all as establishing this principle is like opening the box of Pandora. It is open to excess, abuse and one-sided interpretation.
I've put a lot of strong word in my post. Take a moment and think about it
- Why does most of the earth citizen desired that this guy be not elected?
- Why did France, which is one of the FEW developed nations that NEVER started a war against your country and which stood many times with your people to fight all along your history, decided to stand-up and shout so loud.
- Why did my small country (France), which has relative small influence, little to offer and many to loose, be backed up by so many countries in its protest?
The US cannot be right against the rest of the world; else this is not democracy any more.
This is to me the 5 reasons why Kerry should be elected.
What would be 5 reasons to elect Bush?
- Why did France, which is one of the FEW developed nations that NEVER started a war against your country
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so that mean that there are pretty few developed nations since when i think i can mention
briten / canada
mexico
germany
japan
vietnam
koera
who were at war with us
[quote="Rudegarso that mean that there are pretty few developed nations since when i think i can mention
briten / canada
mexico
germany
japan
vietnam
koera
who were at war with us
[/quote]
????
Sorry I did not get this ? What is you point ?
If you talk about nations who were officially at war with the US, you can add UK, Italy, Spain, Philippine, Laos. Buy my post was more about Western European nations
i were just wondering which countries had been to war with US since they were formed and you helped me by adding some that i dident remember
IMHO, for me it's kind of obvious why Bush will win... (not that I like to see him win), but remember that ever since Bush started his presidential period, the US where attacked in their own territory, so basically all Bush has done is to govern based on terror, and in the other hand all Kerry has done is negate the terror threat and threaten to reduce the weapons and national security budgets. Ok, it might be true that the terror threat is not that great, but tell that to the American people and I bet they rather not take chances.
So, I think that for the American people, which basically has lived in terror for more than three years, it's imperative that Bush takes care of business, you know, fight for "freedom" in his own selfish pathetic way :evil:
Like the old sayng goes "better safe than sorry"... :roll:
[thought]I wonder why Al Gore didn't run this time? [/thought]
i believe it's rare that a loosing party put the same guy up more then once
popular vote showed that people dident like him too much last time
that he were to unanimated for their taste
.....................................
I really really don't understand what you're trying to say in the post...
kid go back to school and learn how to spell...
its illegal to change the IMEI or "radio signature" of the phone, its the identity the phone has on a list the phone company has. Due to the fact that not everyone in the world is happy and nice, phones get stolen and companys blacklist phones (IMEI numbers), changing your IMEI number and circumventing this is a punishable by law. Theres also the fact that there is no point to change an IMEI number unless for malicious intent.
silly question, mediocre answer close thread
First of all you're post makes no sense what so ever, maybe you should of read what you was posting, second of all it is illegal to change the VIN number on you're car full stop, yes you can scratch it off and scribe you're own on their but that doesn't mean you have change it does it, !!
You're Knife story is just stupid and there is no point to it.
IMEI numbers will not be change for legal reason's would you be happy if someone claimed fraud on there phone got it replaced changed there IMEI number to the same as yours I think not,
Not only have you wasted a thread you have made you're self look like a 10 year old that cant spell or string a sentence together (I had to read it twice to try and make out what you was saying) maybe next time think about what you are going to post, yes I no flaming is against the rules here but meh you deserve it in this instance.
What a waste of time people come on here for help and to help people and learn new things not sit and read pointless threads.
Peace out
Moved to Off Topic.
egzthunder1 said:
Moved to Off Topic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your actually keeping this topic?
PurpleSmurfLlama said:
Your actually keeping this topic?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed! The kid should do a spell check atleast
i read the first few lines and came to the conclusion the OP doesn't have a clue what is what in the world of the English Language... There is no legitimate excuse for changing your IMEI number...
Mr. randyrubb, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard.
At no point in your rambling, incoherent post were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought.
Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
ist true, my skill in reading is now -3 points. Fail.
only American phone companies do that for her own stone age systems. no one else in the world register a phone to the provider . least not in the Free world (China, north Korea, Iran, and the USA maybe do so)
The minute your phone is on with a sim card in it the carrier to whom the sim card belongs to knows what phone you have. Yes, even in europe.
he may be foreign guys stop being assholes.
Yes its illigal but there are tools that do it I had to do it to 2 of my phones for reasons I will not explain and I do have tools to do it.
Its legal to do it for educational purposes but do not use the device if you think you might get cought.
Yes... foreign on an AT&T network...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=276851
Danni3 said:
[...]its illegal to change the IMEI[...]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to what law? All that gets quote here is a bill that didn't pass.
Hello Friends!
I'm admin of polish fan site about Samsung Wave, which is in some way banned here in xda, because I could not find any topic about it
Anyway, we are aware of Samsung that starting to behave like other big company's in terms of 'user feedback'. A lot of customers that bought Wave are complaying about several, not repaired until today issues/bugs, these are :
1. RAM issues - It has got 512MB, but it goes like it would have 128-256MB.
user who tooks his device from the box sometimes can't even open a website without 'error, no memory, close some apps to free more' - but user than sees, that there is nothing else than webbrowser opened!
2. Lack of office-files editing options avalible in the phone. This is what I use a lot. On my forum there are two main voices - one half says "if you want it, pay for it", second half thinks like me - device for this cash, should have it built-in.
3. Treating users, and their opinions by Samsung - We stated our demands 3-4 moths ago. Samsung never reveals changelogs in his fw - moreover, when we claerly said 'answer our questions with something more than <<we will talk this internaly>> <<we will think about that>> etc... What they did ? Yes, they answered us just same way as always, God!....
There should be some great apps in SamsungApps, where are they ? Why can't we get more than 1 app running at the time ? Imagine using SPB Mobile Shell, and nothing more, because this is how phone behave. It just restarts the secondly and more apps to their "first splash screen". So Yes, you can run multiply instances of programs, but in REAL time (and thats what multitasking means) you can run just ONE APP....
Other words : Samsung Wave with his issues is still being used by thousends of people. Me and my friends we got many so-going issues with out Waves and I personally cannot belive, that this is not a problem of every single user.
That stated I must say, that I liked Wave v.much, by I was pushed by Samsung to sell it. RAM/Multitasking is worse than in old NokiaN95-2.
So if you agree with us, or got 30 seconds to spent, please help us all and sign/like this.
This is petition link :
petitionspot.com/petitions/ImproveSamsungBADA
Your sincerly
Bart
Samsung, in my opinion anyways, are well known for pushing some bad firmware to devices, and having no transparency about issues and what is going on to resolve them. IN the 4/5months that I had an Omnia HD I8910HD I had many issues, all were meant to be fixed by a magical firmware upgrade that was meant to be released about 4 days after I got the phone. They never released it, it got pushed back and back, and I still do not know if they have released it. Its a shame, as I know their TV support is well equipped.
Basically, I feel this will fall onto death ears, and samsung will just continue repeating themselves.
worst/lamest/corniest name ever for a software meant to be bought by millions
It's not badass
Not to offend you [OP]. But as an admin do you allow the same exact thread to be posted twice? For shame.
good day.
chopper the dog said:
Not to offend you [OP]. But as an admin do you allow the same exact thread to be posted twice? For shame.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha
And LoL @JimJam
Just heard about this myself.
Thoughts, prayers, etc. go out to those affected.
Link: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-12533291
Yep, Christchurch has been having earthquakes for a while now on a frequent basis but this is the worst one yet, my prayers go to all the people who suffered.
All my best for the ppl on that zone of the wrold
I'm in the thick of it - was in a lecture when it hit. Thankfully, we're back up and running with water & power now (Hell, the cable's back up), my suburb's one of the least damaged. Bit less of a wake-up call and more of a genuine disaster than September's - last rumour I heard was that a good number of the 65 confirmed casualties were from a preschool on the ground floor of a large building in the CBD. I really hope that's not true.
Well, between all the storm flooding in eastern Australia and now these earthquakes, I'll bet you folks from that region are about tired of being dumped on like this!
I live in Florida, and when we had those hurricanes come through in 2004 / 2005, a lot of people (myself included) were really at our wits' end.
Are there any long-term recovery plans in New Zealand?
SciFiSurfer said:
Are there any long-term recovery plans in New Zealand?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
#snark alert
Yup, all the kiwis are moving out.
#endsnark
Kinda hard to have a plan when you just got hit with an earthquake 6 months ago. I guess they will have to go the Tokyo way and redesign their entire infrastructure.
<NZ_JOKE>
They have sheep in Japan?
</NZ_JOKE>
SciFiSurfer said:
<NZ_JOKE>
They have sheep in Japan?
</NZ_JOKE>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait... I don't understand that joke. At the expense of lacking laughs... can you explain it?
The gist of it goes like this...
There are more sheep in New Zealand then there are human beings. As a consequence of this, there are a lot of sheep jokes or sheep references relating to them (largely coming from their Australian neighbors) and, in general, the "implication" is that New Zealanders have improper relations with sheep.
So, if you're going to read the joke (and was a joke, I don't really believe this to be true) in the "context" it was intended, you would read it like this:
They have sheep in Japan [so the New Zealanders will have something to do at night] ?
Now, in the interest of full disclosure, I have an ex g/f who's from Australia who clued me in on this whole thing, and I've got a couple online friends from NZ who are really fantastic people.
SciFiSurfer said:
The gist of it goes like this...
There are more sheep in New Zealand then there are human beings. As a consequence of this, there are a lot of sheep jokes or sheep references relating to them (largely coming from their Australian neighbors) and, in general, the "implication" is that New Zealanders have improper relations with sheep.
So, if you're going to read the joke (and was a joke, I don't really believe this to be true) in the "context" it was intended, you would read it like this:
They have sheep in Japan [so the New Zealanders will have something to do at night] ?
Now, in the interest of full disclosure, I have an ex g/f who's from Australia who clued me in on this whole thing, and I've got a couple online friends from NZ who are really fantastic people.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok... that's disturbing. Reminds me of the python song, "We love sheep"... and of course, there is that rumour that effluent Japanese business men have... shall we say, a night out with various domesticated animals prior to enjoying them for a dinner.
^There are no grammatical errors in the above statement. Read carefully and slowly.
I got interested in this after being in prison with a JP5. I've followed that game fairly closely while not actually doing any work myself beyond movies and music.
Recently someone going by Tony, Tdogg and some 352 phone number scammed the s--t out of me. Got me for $300. He's on EBay and Reddit ripping people off for the JP6 security removal software.
The thought of having that key in prison has made me want it. Bad.
So, I'm a novice. Let's work together and solve this for all the people behind bars who just want a taste of freedom.
I'm with you and I'm still in prison the problem is the only thing you can get prisoners to help each other do for free is stay here or they'll even work together to put the fences back up trust me ive seen it with my own two eyes at a maximum security prison inmates working side by side for free to help each other repair the fence after a tornado tore it down. Lol they repaired it to help each other stay inside.
What's up man I . Got had to o..Im still looking for jp6 hack
Thread has been closed as hacking of JP6's is considered an illegal activity in some countries! For this reason XDA doesn't support respective discussions and advice.
XDA Forum Rules (excerpt):
...
9. Don't get us into trouble.
Don't post copyrighted materials or do other things which will obviously lead to legal trouble. If you wouldn't do it on your own homepage, you probably shouldn't do it here either. This does not mean that we agree with everything that the software piracy lobby try to impose on us. It simply means that you cannot break any laws here, since we'll end up dealing with the legal hassle caused by you. Please use common sense: respect the forum, its users and those that write great code.
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse