Good camera that uses SD storage? - Off-topic

I'm kind of in the market for a new digital camera, and I'd like one that uses SD cards (then I can take pictures and plop the card into my PPC Phone and email them and do all sorts of stuff!
Anyone have recommendations for a good medium priced camera? Say $199-299?

Hey GregP74,
Take a look at the HP photosmart line, I have and use the 320, 2.1 MP with 4x digital zoom ($100 - $149). Oh ya it also does video clips. 8)
HTH

I use a Canon IXUS II Digital
3.2MP video clips optical and digital zoom.
very nice but might be just above your price range

dont the ixus II use CF ?
i know my ixus v2 use CF would love if it used SD
though because it's a super cam
though it's not called ixus everwhere think that it's called
powershot sXXXX something in us

If I tried to fit a CF into my IXUS II I would need a Hammer :lol:
It definately uses SD

http://www.powershot.com/powershot2/sd100/specs.html
well anyway this is one of the ixus cams which use sd ram
in it's american flavour not 100% sure which ixus it translate to
because they only seem to have 3 versions

Oh man that one is sweet...nice and small too! Gotta love a cam you can keep in your shirt pocket for have-to-record-moments (like when the gal across the bar is flashing you :shock: )

Man it sure is, sweet! :lol:

looks just like the Digital IXUS II and the specs are the same so I think this is the same camera. It is fantastic the picture quality is superb and even though is small the LCD is still a good size and works well in any ligh condition I have tried it in so far. With a 128 SD I can get over 130 pictures before I run out of space

yeah it's design is ok imho
plus that it dont break all that easy
i've drop'd mine on a stone floor more then once
without it getting a scratch
and if you need to you can swing it in the strap as a weapon
though i hate the software not sure about the newer ones but
my ixus v2 need canon software to download the pictures
that is of cause unless i have a flash reader
i pref cams which emulate usb storage controllers so you can avoid
using some "easy" to use program

The Dig IXUS II is OOTB compatible with XP so if you don't want to use the cannon software you don't have to

another option
anoter options in the Pentax Optio S4 which is smaller and 4Mpix.
I should have it soon.
I have the original Canan Ixus, but for 4Mpix instead of 3Mpix,
a larger zoom, and a smaller footprint, I figured the S4 must
be a more useful camera overall.
Casio has the Z4 or something which is similar

I haven't experimented much in WM2003, but in PPC 2002 the photo viewer would try to load all of the pictures in a folder into RAM in order to display thumbnails. Obviously (maybe not?) if you have more than ~12 MB of pictures on the card this makes the picture app crash due to insufficient memory.
The lesson would be to limit the size of the picture files or copy images from the SD card to device RAM and view from there.

I have not noticed that on my XDA I and WM2003 ...
pdhenry said:
I haven't experimented much in WM2003, but in PPC 2002 the photo viewer would try to load all of the pictures in a folder into RAM in order to display thumbnails. Obviously (maybe not?) if you have more than ~12 MB of pictures on the card this makes the picture app crash due to insufficient memory.
The lesson would be to limit the size of the picture files or copy images from the SD card to device RAM and view from there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmmm, maybe due to the fact I am using SD card with pictures only for about 2 weeks or so, heh ....
seems like M$ has been full of surpises, :wink: as usual
regards,
monika

Bump.

VaderSKN said:
Bump.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ja pierdole...
Really??? A 2003 thread???

VaderSKN said:
Bump.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

VaderSKN said:
Bump.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

jaszek said:
Ja pierdole...
Really??? A 2003 thread???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oldest I could find

VaderSKN said:
Oldest I could find
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
View attachment 1547770
View attachment 1547771
____________________________________
ಇದು ನನ್ನ ಆಪ್ ಸಿಗ್ನೀಚುರ್
Nothing is True.. Everything is Permitted©

Related

Sample photos

Could anybody post some sample photos from the kaiser camera at maximum quality settings?, maximum resolution, best jpeg compression...
thanks!
pepeto2001 said:
Could anybody post some sample photos from the kaiser camera at maximum quality settings?, maximum resolution, best jpeg compression...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://klamstwo.org/evad/stuff/kaiser/samples/
eva_d said:
http://klamstwo.org/evad/stuff/kaiser/samples/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very good quality.
eva_d said:
http://klamstwo.org/evad/stuff/kaiser/samples/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are not bad at all. Colors seem a little faded though. Oh well, it's a cellphone!
eva_d said:
http://klamstwo.org/evad/stuff/kaiser/samples/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eva_d, the new photos are better than the initial ones (the ones yo uploaded to modaco forum), could you try a macro photo?, or some photos with the camera holded firmly to very near objects?, and a recorded video?
Thank youuu very much!!!!
pepeto2001 said:
Eva_d, the new photos are better than the initial ones (the ones yo uploaded to modaco forum), could you try a macro photo?, or some photos with the camera holded firmly to very near objects?, and a recorded video?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Macro pics just uploaded (note: adjusted white balance). IMHO they are pretty good! Video - don't have yet, maybe tomorrow.
eva_d said:
Macro pics just uploaded (note: adjusted white balance). IMHO they are pretty good! Video - don't have yet, maybe tomorrow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That macro pics are very good, I'm beginning to think that the initial photos that werent as good as paul(modaco) samples was because of not holding the camera firmly until photo was done... isnt it?... I'm talking about imag0005, imag0006...
Nice pictures and good quality (focus/resolution).
A scan of a letter would be a other good indicator for the macro function (focus/resolution).
Maybe you can take one more photo of e.g. an advertising letter
or of a journal/magazine with text?
Thanks!
Eva_d, I've seen in the photos you also have a nokia with the keyboard "always visible", do you feel this kind of keyboard (always on) to be better than on the tytn that you must "expand" it all the time?
pepeto2001 said:
Eva_d, I've seen in the photos you also have a nokia with the keyboard "always visible", do you feel this kind of keyboard (always on) to be better than on the tytn that you must "expand" it all the time?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I must say that kind of keyboard is really convenient, I was using Nokia E61 for almost 2 months as a primary phone, and actually I liked it. But I'm back on board with WM platform.
Btw. I've uploaded example video - sorry for rotation, I did it from a mobile holder in my car. I've also uploaded close-up of texts, as requested - a little blurry tough, I should have done them from more distance.
the video looks really good... the macro shots... maybe there wasnt enought light, this phone cameras have a big shutter lag, this is the time since you press de button and the photo is really done, then, it is really important to hold steady the "camera" till the photo is on screen..
Thanks for your photos again!!
Is 320x240 the highest resolution?
Here some of my "masterpieces"
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
great photos, they look very good!!!, any photo with faces?, in a crowded street or something similar..
eva_d said:
Macro pics just uploaded (note: adjusted white balance). IMHO they are pretty good! Video - don't have yet, maybe tomorrow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quite impressive for a cameraphone. I can't believe what I'm seeing actually.
Although http://klamstwo.org/evad/stuff/kaiser/samples/IMAG0039.jpg shows that the debayering algorithm used by the phone is CRAP. "maze" patterns like those seen in the sky are a known issue with the simpler interpolation algorithms. Has anyone created a camera app for HTC phones that can save raw sensor data to be given to an application such as dcraw?
pepeto2001 said:
Eva_d, I've seen in the photos you also have a nokia with the keyboard "always visible", do you feel this kind of keyboard (always on) to be better than on the tytn that you must "expand" it all the time?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The slide-out keyboard has major form factor advantages (phone is smaller and keys are larger), but there are plenty of times I miss my Treo 650's non-slideout "always-there" keyboard, especially when dialing.
Palm has stagnated a lot, but the one thing where they are way ahead is in terms of "non-stylus" operation. Strange that there is a Smartphone Edition of Windows Mobile but many of its improvements are not in the version for phones with a touchscreen.
Entropy512 said:
Quite impressive for a cameraphone. I can't believe what I'm seeing actually.
Although http://klamstwo.org/evad/stuff/kaiser/samples/IMAG0039.jpg shows that the debayering algorithm used by the phone is CRAP. "maze" patterns like those seen in the sky are a known issue with the simpler interpolation algorithms. Has anyone created a camera app for HTC phones that can save raw sensor data to be given to an application such as dcraw?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sadly coolcamera doesn't work with Kaiser for some reason.
http://www.ateksoft.com/features.html
I was usually getting better pictures with coolcamera on any HTC phone.
This is a Sample Photo:
Enjoy
Nadavi
wow!, last photos are very good, they show the quality of the camera!!
One more. I did tweaked parameters a bit.

Quick question. Please read :X

Ok, So the camera's 3.2 mega pixel and the video recorder records pretty low res.
Would it be possible to edit the recorder so that it can record higher res/better quality?
Or is there any apps or console commands to change this
Unfortunatly the camera is very poor and nothing will fix it. Thats all there is too it.
Ok, Well that didn't answer my question.
Any the camera isn't poor it works great, Its a bit crappy in low light but still it looks awesome and better then a 5mp camera phone from samsung.
Frito37 said:
Ok, Well that didn't answer my question.
Any the camera isn't poor it works great, Its a bit crappy in low light but still it looks awesome and better then a 5mp camera phone from samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually have to agree with this as I've had the G600 and that camera SUCKED no matter what PhoneArena says. I noticed i would only use the G1 for pictures so i got rid of the 600
I took a picture of my eye and then shooped the hell outta it. (I added alot of the spots and wrinkles :X)
This is a resized/croped version, Hell you can see the g1 reflection in my eye.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Its a nice camera!
Anyone? I still would like this answered
nice fake :-D
your question was answered in post 3 but ill repeat it for you.
GenericNode said:
Unfortunatly the camera is very poor and nothing will fix it. Thats all there is too it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok you must not be able to read.
I'm not asking about quality of the camera.
Im asking if its at all possible to make video RECORDING better or higher res.
And what do you mean by nice fake?
If ur implying the pictures fake, Its not at all fake and was taken by my g1.
It depends alot on bandwidth of memory in the device. I dont know if it is possible right now to make a better/higer quality video recorder. If Google creates API's that take advantage of the full potential of the graphics chips we may get a better camcorder app.
I updated to hero and it seems to have a bit better video recording
but thats because of the codec it uses.
xsnipuhx said:
your question was answered in post 3 but ill repeat it for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously, read the freaking thread before saying something stupid.
As for the question, I'm sure a developer could create a new app for higher resolution video recorder because it has been done on other devices. Try requesting it here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=446769
just2good4u3434 said:
Seriously, read the freaking thread before saying something stupid.
As for the question, I'm sure a developer could create a new app for higher resolution video recorder because it has been done on other devices. Try requesting it here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=446769
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks.
!
post removed, misunderstood question
No, and the reason is:
A still camera has a longer exposure time and can dedicate more light overtime for each picture. A video has to a expose an image 30 times a second, so in order to expose properly the camera must take many pixels from the ccd and group them together as 1 pixel reducing image size for video. (I could be done by reducing FPS, but that will only go so far.)
And there is also issues with video format standards and the G1 ability to play back video to consider as well.
Heck, even my Canon 5D Mark II can only record video at 1/10th of the resolution it captures still images at. It does video at 1920x1080 or 2,073,600 pixels, whereas still images are captured at 5616x3744 or 21,026,304 pixels.
I think people expect far too much from a phone that has a camera that probably cost $15 to manufacture (the camera part - not the whole phone).
No I dont exspect it to do better i just wondering if it could.

Htc hd2 front camera

Did anyone ever think about installing/making this possible? Like with a spare Evo front camera or something? Just a thought. I'm not even sure if it's possible. But if it was I would be interested.
LOL: it would be impossible since no hardware support for front cam, the sensor on top left is a photo sensor which is used for Brightness adjustment and proximity measurement
I have 2 phone's with front cam and i think i have used them twice.
When do you need a front cam ?
Do you video call with your girlfriend.
No. i do not use it, and i do not miss it on the HTC HD2
I know about the proximity sensor and stuff. And I do video chat. And couldn't someone make software to run it. It would be interesting. Maybe put it on the right side...
No need for the hostility either. Just a thought.
maybe someone will mod a USB laptop camera and gorilla glue it to the front?
DrewMullen said:
maybe someone will mod a USB laptop camera and gorilla glue it to the front?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol
I'm gonna install a Core i7 into mine - it's time for the upgradings
(upgrade spelled wrong intentionally)
I think it's impossible. Use mirror.
i do not miss a front camera at all
now that skype supports video call. Front camera on skype would be a dream for me on hd2
it would be nice, but most likely impossible
So where are you going to solder that camera to if you manage to drill the plastic part of the center frame? I don't see any room on the motherboard...
in fact there has a most simple (and cheapest ) way to get a "front cam function" with your HD2, all you need to do is to find a small vanity mirror like this:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
or this:
then open it in 90° angle and put this mirror behind of your hd2, in front of camera. now you can launch your camera app and adjust the mirror to the best position to show your face in app.
Done!
it's so easy! isn't it? the only bug is your face is inverse in app (if you are graduated from school you should know why), but who care! video talk is just for fun for most people! so you want it, you get it!
PS: you still need use a app which support not just front cam but also main cam, to do this. it's the only limitation my dud.
einstein is here
ok. someone has made a more "beautiful" mirror.
here's the link:
http://www.ciccaresedesign.com/?page_id=46
I think it will cost a little more than my "cheapest" way, but it's still a nice choice. people always like getting more choices, so here you are.
poiuyasdfg said:
ok. someone has made a more "beautiful" mirror.
here's the link:
http://www.ciccaresedesign.com/?page_id=46
I think it will cost a little more than my "cheapest" way, but it's still a nice choice. people always like getting more choices, so here you are.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Too bad its only a prototype. i would get it.
Wow you people have wayyyy too much free time
Haha good find
Sent from my HTC HD2
Is this thing for sale or only the whole project? I would buy one of this things..
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
yugoport said:
Is this thing for sale or only the whole project? I would buy one of this things..
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The whole idea is for sale for manufacturing. If this happens I'm gonna get my hands on one of these.
Very good invention. But i rather buy something it had built in, no fall out and all way there when i need it.

Large capacity MP3 player >150GB

My 160GB Ipod Classic has finally died T_T The battery's not holding a charge at all, I'm thinking of getting it repaired but I'm worried something else'll fail shortly as it's had heavy use. I've been researching alternatives but all the threads etc I could find are a few years old, so what's the situation these days, are there any decent/inexpensive MP3 players with at least 150GB of storage out there? Any sort of mini hard drives with screens or anything? Or is the ipod classic still my best bet? Cheers
Hey I just bought one wid 360gb storage
U wanna buy it
Send a letter on my home address
Coz I don't rply to pm's n email's
sent using repencis 3.5 wid a2sd
press thnxxx
alkesh95 said:
Hey I just bought one wid 360gb storage
U wanna buy it
Send a letter on my home address
Coz I don't rply to pm's n email's
sent using repencis 3.5 wid a2sd
press thnxxx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry mate i don't really understand what you're saying - 360GB sounds perfect though, what's the make/model?
alkesh95 said:
Hey I just bought one wid 360gb storage
U wanna buy it
Send a letter on my home address
Coz I don't rply to pm's n email's
sent using repencis 3.5 wid a2sd
press thnxxx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obvious troll is obvious.
If you don't care about bulk archos has some massive pmps. I have a 4.8 in 250 gb but I can't use it for anything other than in my car just because its so large.
Cheers, good shout - what do you think of the Archos 48?
It's alright. Nothing special (and the resistive screen sucks after being spoiled by capacitive screens), charging (through a proprietary cable) is slow and the GUI sucks, but you can't beat the price for the capacity (I got my 250gb for like 170 a year ago).
I should add that the battery is fairly long lasting from a full charge and that in order to play movies and certain file formats (you'll be fine with mp3s) you have to buy format packs (which I find to be an obnoxious and money hungry practice that Archos should be ashamed of).
063_XOBX said:
It's alright. Nothing special (and the resistive screen sucks after being spoiled by capacitive screens), charging (through a proprietary cable) is slow and the GUI sucks, but you can't beat the price for the capacity (I got my 250gb for like 170 a year ago).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah 500GB for £100, seriously tempted - £26 (independent site) to repair my 160GB iPod but like I said, something else could just fail as it has received heavy use. Had a look and it doesn't look like there are any ROMs for the 48, would be nice to pump it at least up to froyo... from the dimensions the 48 doesn't look too bulky, still pocketable?
Pocketable-maybe, but the weight is a pretty big factor. Not to mention that it's almost an inch thick (doesn't sound that bad until you have it right in front of you. I can post pictures for comparison to my Xoom or Nexus S if you're familiar with either.
063_XOBX said:
Pocketable-maybe, but the weight is a pretty big factor. Not to mention that it's almost an inch thick (doesn't sound that bad until you have it right in front of you. I can post pictures for comparison to my Xoom or Nexus S if you're familiar with either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not 100% but I can guess what the nexus is like - pictures would be appreciated buddy!
Alright, I had to take the pictures with my Xoom so the size is a bit wonky but here you go.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Cheers, don't seem to be loading though?
*EDIT* Also is there a model (that's similar in price/storage space) that you'd recommend over the 48?
crimsonnight said:
Cheers, don't seem to be loading though?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're on mobile it might take a while (they're in UXGA resolution).
063_XOBX said:
If you're on mobile it might take a while (they're in UXGA resolution).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah on a PC - tried chrome and IE
Let me try linking you to the images directly
Click Me
Me Too
Me Three
063_XOBX said:
Let me try linking you to the images directly
Click Me
Me Too
Me Three
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers, I see what you mean about the thickness... doesn't look much thicker than my classic though thinking about it? Guess the speaker on it's crap.
Has anyone come across any custom ROMs for the 48?

Asus Nexus 7 camera versus iPad 3 frontal iSight photos, what do you think?

Hi community this is my first thread open, sorry for my quite bad english but I'm not american ..
I would propose you 6 shots take by me: 3 by the my Asus Nexus 7 camera with Modaco app and 3 takets by my iPad 3 and know what you think!
Let's start!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I have come to the conclusion that....
They're both only good for video conferencing.
veeman said:
I have come to the conclusion that....
They're both only good for video conferencing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You missed the fact that they both suck
Why are the ipad pictures a quarter the size? Does it have a significantly lower resolution or something??
irlanda3 said:
Hi community this is my first thread open, sorry for my quite bad english but I'm not american ..
I would propose you 6 shots take by me: 3 by the my Asus Nexus 7 camera with Modaco app and 3 takets by my iPad 3 and know what you think!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with markj338. The quality of the pictures from both cameras seems relatively poor, but that is to be expected. It was hard for me to tell if either was better but I would lean toward the N7. (I'm a little biased. What can I say?)
markj338 said:
You missed the fact that they both suck
Why are the ipad pictures a quarter the size? Does it have a significantly lower resolution or something??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The pictures are almost the same size when I'm viewing them. I don't know why the iPad pictures are small for you.
Sent from my Paranoid Nexus 7
The iPad pictures are smaller for me also. And I also agree the camera is only good for conferencing. N7 does look a little better to me as well.
Why iPad 3 photos are smaller?
iPad 3 has frontal VGA Camera at 1.3 MP and pictures are at resolution 480*640p (send via mail and also imported by iPhoto it's same quality) while N7 camera is at 1.2 MP but pictures are at 1280*800p. So in forum you can see them in differently size.
Flash is not a problem, both haven't that.
Errm they are only webcams.....
What did you expect?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
irlanda3 said:
Hi community this is my first thread open, sorry for my quite bad english but I'm not american ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uder is right, but you do need to scrub up on your Geography.
CJHolderUK said:
No but you are ****ing ignorant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey hey theres no need for that...
Back to the ACTUAL disscussion the N7 blows the iSight out of the water even for a 1.2mpx ffc that isnt supposed to be taking pictures in the first place it does a relatively good job . Thanks for comparison.
You should have resized the Nexus 7 images to the same as the iPad 3 for a fairer comparison. :good:
They look pretty similar to me. Though the camera isn't really meant for taking shots like these, so the test doesn't say much, they're really for face-to-face chatting.
The iPads color seemed washed out
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
irlanda3 said:
Why iPad 3 photos are smaller?
iPad 3 has frontal VGA Camera at 1.3 MP and pictures are at resolution 480*640p (send via mail and also imported by iPhoto it's same quality) while N7 camera is at 1.2 MP but pictures are at 1280*800p. So in forum you can see them in differently size.
Flash is not a problem, both haven't that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're running a comparison, the way the photos are presented matters a helluva lot.
Since this is annoying the hell out of me, I've fixed this for you.
Ok sir, no problems.
The differents sizes was another point to discuss, N7 photos resized at 640*480 can remove something in quality but ok

Categories

Resources