Database Develop

[Q] Bad performance? 1563 in Quadrant...

Hi everybody!
After installing the DocRom XXJPO v9 with lagfix Ext4 ALL (a=e4), schedule kernel, I/O, etc.. and tweaks, and I get 1563 in Quadrant's benchmark(I've just installed, i never ran the test before)...It's a very low value, isn't it?What am I doing wrong?
Thanks!

Take test scores with a grain of salt. It's not the best way of assuming something is wrong with your phone.
Sent from my GT-I9000M using XDA App

Actually if u look at the other scores unless something has changed I'm pretty sure that is still the highest s ore on that list. No worries.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App

Uh, yea. I get something between 900 and 1000 depending on the day with official 2.2. Mostly I assume down to the piss poor filesystem speed. It almost always looks like it has hung on the writing test.

Thanks for the responses!
I've read that some people got 2000 and even a little bit more. I guess they overclocked!!

outrun86 said:
Thanks for the responses!
I've read that some people got 2000 and even a little bit more. I guess they overclocked!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
People may be using an overclock but to the people with the 2000+ scores are using the EXT2 binds option/OCLF.
When using OCLF quadrants shows huge scores in the filesystem part whereas it may not reflect the actual performance of the phone.
Personally so far, hardcores new K10C kernel is by far the fastest I've used yet. He's updates a few things in K10C and my phone is really, really fast. You notice it more in the app drawer and when the phone is under load. I'm also using the all EXT4 option.
You should give K10C a go and see for yourself.

Paul, I'll have to wipe to install this new kernel?

... Quadrant scores are pretty meaningless. Only be worried if you feel lag when you're using the phone.

my scores breach 2000(by 3) but im not overclocked. look at my signature

I'll try this new kernel, PaulForde, thanks for the tip!
nwsk, you're totally right, but sometimes I notice some little lag in my live wallpaper, and I don't have lots of apps in background. That's what made me think about it, install Quadrant and compare the results with some others.
By the way racerboy3801, I see you have BUJP8 v9 installed...[offtopic]Have you noticed any differences with JPA/JPO?[/offtopic]

[Q] Linpack for android..am i lacking?

Ok so i flash theses beautiful roms and now ive tried some testing and currently on my captivate i ran the "linpack for andoid" app and it states:
MFLOPS: 13.982
time: 6.0
Norm Res:5.68
Precision: Inaccurate result
ok so i looked at the top 10 section ounder my phone and their MFLOPS is between 20-50 MFLOPS...So do i need some tweaking?..I mean the phone is good , Rom is awesome...any thoughts?
Captivate 1007
Phoenix 5.2 (2.2.1 JS5)
Speedmod i897 500hz k13c
UGJK4
Lagfix enabled
(r) Tweaks enabled

I wouldn't worry about it. First, your test said inaccurate results, so try running it a few times, though you probably won't get much more out of it. Secondly, most people believe these benchmarks are a load of BS, and I would trends to agree. If the ROM feels snappier and works smoother than stock for you, there really isn't any use in the benchmark scores. I'm running Serendipity 5.11 with the same kernel as you, and I find my scores are in the low 14's- which, as is for you, seems slow compared to the online results. However, my phone supposedly blows the other results out of the water in the Quadrant Standard benchmark, regularly achieving scores over 1500, and I imagine yours would perform similarly, so no, I wouldn't worry at all.
Overall, most of the roms on here achieve faster performance along with better battery life compared to a stock cappy. I suggest trying out as many roms as possible to find the one that fits you best, as everybody has different tastes, and each rom behaves differently for everybody.
Personally, I think Serendipity is something you should try, as it looks friggen sweet as is, and even better IMO with some tweaks. I changed the battery indicator to the android dude, the font to Armani, and use launcher pro over the base rom. Altogether, my phone is super slick and snappy. Oh yeah, it also accesses HSPA networks, so downloads are way quicker than stock (pretty sure your current rom does too).
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

that's about right, repeated tests should get you 14+. it does say inacurate so i dont think you have a problem, just a process running somewhere. the hummingbird lacks a bit in this area and snapdragons excel only in this area. i know it is weird that the nexus one and droid incredible smoke this phone in linpack but it is hardly a thorough benchmark. run quadrant on CM7 when it comes out and see what the hardware is really doing without the samsung influence. despite the low mflops you will see good scores across the board.

Thanks alot for the input everyone...jus curious how gen-pop was adding up... but who cares about the numbers i suppose when my phone is soo [email protected]## cool hahha
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

Just for the record, I'm on stock Froyo, With no SpeedMod, but with voodoo lagfix and I got better benchmark, linpack and quadrant scores than I did with a custom rom and Speedmod kernel before. Add to that the stability of a native ROM and kernel, and I think you know what I am saying here...

clemmie said:
Just for the record, I'm on stock Froyo, With no SpeedMod, but with voodoo lagfix and I got better benchmark, linpack and quadrant scores than I did with a custom rom and Speedmod kernel before. Add to that the stability of a native ROM and kernel, and I think you know what I am saying here...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm. Intresting. Makes sense. Whered ya get the stock from..curious about the release tomorrow for At&t. Think i might try some configs with it.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

Pro/Con of Captivate ROMs v. i9000 ROMs

So, I've had a flash itch for a while courtesy of S7 reaching EoL and having been on Apex for the last month or two. Now that 2.3.4 is available on both the Captivate and i9000 platforms, can somebody enumerate the pros and cons of going with one over the other? I'm starting with what I know.
Captivate ROMs
Pros
Audience chip
Cons
No HSUPA
No Voodoo sound/colour
i9000 ROMs
Pros
HSUPA
More variety of ROMs/kernels/modems
Voodoo sound/colour
OC/UV
Cons
Not native to the device

very good question,I also have been looking at them and considering this and whether there is anything different about flashing one of those roms

I've not had bad experiences with either, but here is my two cents worth...
I prefer the Captivate ROMs, for the following reasons...
1. Stable. As I Swype this, it has been four days without a restart, and not one FC (Cognition5v2).
2. Audience Chip. It is a small thing, I know, but this is a phone, and call quality counts.
3. Voodoo Sound. Yeah, I paid for the app, and was happy to do it. Simone is doing some fine work and deserves to be compensated.
4. Overclock. Tegrak. Couple bucks. give it up for 2400 Quadrant scores.
Sent from my Cappy using Swype and my finger.

Forgot 5....
What is so special about HSUPA vs HSDPA? I have HSDPA, and it seems to be more than OK, even way out in the boonies where I live.
Sent from my Cappy using Swype and my finger.

OwenW71 said:
Forgot 5....
What is so special about HSUPA vs HSDPA? I have HSDPA, and it seems to be more than OK, even way out in the boonies where I live.
Sent from my Cappy using Swype and my finger.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The U in HSUPA is for upload. If you run a speedtest on HSDPA your upload will be closer to 300kbps whereas HSUPA will be more like 1000kbps. Theoretically this means faster web browsing because it can send the requests faster to get the download faster.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S Captivate

Correct, HSUPA downloads at the same speed as HSDPA, but has higher theoretical upload rates. Since most web site requests will fit in a packet or two, UPA does not have much advantage for browsing, but is noticeably faster for things like uploading photos. I generally reserve that kind of stuff until I find a wifi hotspot.
Again, this is just my opinion, but the i897 ROMs have a slight edge in stability and call quality on the Captivate. I do wish we had more source for kernels, but with the Tegrak and Voodoo stand-alone apps, I'm happy.
Sent from my Cappy using Swype and my finger.

I have hacked my phone to get 5 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up just 4 yahh to know;D
MIUI is 2.3.5 and has HSPA becuase it runs an I9000 modem
thr ROM itself has nothing to do with the Modem, atleast wether it has HSDPA/HSUPA/HSPA.
Voodoo sound and color is available for MIUI/CM7
And also voodoo sound is available on every device, it hacks the audio driver/and files that run it .
Sent from my Stock KH3/4 2.3.4 Captivate using the XDA Premium App!

OwenW71 said:
I've not had bad experiences with either, but here is my two cents worth...
I prefer the Captivate ROMs, for the following reasons...
1. Stable. As I Swype this, it has been four days without a restart, and not one FC (Cognition5v2).
2. Audience Chip. It is a small thing, I know, but this is a phone, and call quality counts.
3. Voodoo Sound. Yeah, I paid for the app, and was happy to do it. Simone is doing some fine work and deserves to be compensated.
4. Overclock. Tegrak. Couple bucks. give it up for 2400 Quadrant scores.
Sent from my Cappy using Swype and my finger.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There was a free Voodoo control app. But i paid cuz he deserves it too.
I dont OC/UV at all and get over 3000 in quadrant on stock KH3
Sent from my Stock KH3/4 2.3.4 Captivate using the XDA Premium App!

b-eock said:
I dont OC/UV at all and get over 3000 in quadrant on stock KH3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't understand how you can get scores like that on stock KH3. Did KH3 implement EXT4? My max score on any stock ROM was just under 1000. The single biggest factor in jumping up my scores was to go to a EXT4 ROM, even OC did not have as much effect.

OwenW71 said:
I don't understand how you can get scores like that on stock KH3. Did KH3 implement EXT4? My max score on any stock ROM was just under 1000. The single biggest factor in jumping up my scores was to go to a EXT4 ROM, even OC did not have as much effect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No changing file system, still RFS. Not creating a buffer zone, no oc/uv!
Im just lucky
Sent from my Stock KH3/4 2.3.4 Captivate using the XDA Premium App!

OwenW71 said:
I don't understand how you can get scores like that on stock KH3. Did KH3 implement EXT4? My max score on any stock ROM was just under 1000. The single biggest factor in jumping up my scores was to go to a EXT4 ROM, even OC did not have as much effect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i get around 1660 on kh3 no oc and on rfs

OwenW71 said:
I don't understand how you can get scores like that on stock KH3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
I just got 1352 on KH3, fresh flash.

What is your score on quadrant standard ?

mine is around 2600 what about yours ?

mine is around 3400 with a sbf clean cm7 install ovc 1.2ghz an some other tweaks i dont wana list em all lol

2200 :/
/10char

my original droid scores a 1500 1.25ghz cm7 did alot to that phone lol

jellman said:
mine is around 3400 with a sbf clean cm7 install ovc 1.2ghz an some other tweaks i dont wana list em all lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't do anything on my phone yet. Just rooted it and removed all unused apps.lol , i'll do it soon anyway
I wish D3 had more RAM :/

jellman said:
my original droid scores a 1500 1.25ghz cm7 did alot to that phone lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh hey original droid. that was long time ago haha. anyway it's still good right ?

DoubleYouPee said:
2200 :/
/10char
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have you rooted it yet ? i just rooted it and installed Darkdroid Rom
it works really well and makes my D3 faster.

junparin said:
have you rooted it yet ? i just rooted it and installed Darkdroid Rom
it works really well and makes my D3 faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i'm rooted and on MAVrom.. is the score really that bad?

Mine gets around 3300 on cm7 with the OC to 1.2
Sent from my ics XT862 using xda premium

Sent from my XT862 using xda premium

junparin said:
Oh hey original droid. that was long time ago haha. anyway it's still good right ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea dude i love that phone

I'm at 2350 on the stock Bell 2.3.6 firmware.
Rooted and debloated but no overclock.

single core
This may be a stupid question not sure im pretty well versed in android anyway quadrant standard only shows one core on system info anyone know why? Is this normal?

Mine is 2332 running SteelDroid 4.0 with not a lot of debloat done to it.

marx1369 said:
This may be a stupid question not sure im pretty well versed in android anyway quadrant standard only shows one core on system info anyone know why? Is this normal?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've noticed that as well
Sent from my XT860 using xda premium

Quadrant is pretty garbage imo. I keep seeing videos on youtube of 2 phones starting quadrant at the same time, 1 phone finishing 5-10 seconds ahead of the other but still losing the benchmark #'s with most results (fps in the testing) appearing the same. If it was decent the faster phone would always get the higher benchmark, 2 phones render 1k frames, phone 1 in 10 seconds, phone 2 in 20, fps on phone 1 must be higher... etc etc I'd try maybe smartbench or glbenchmark

Willis111 said:
Quadrant is pretty garbage imo. I keep seeing videos on youtube of 2 phones starting quadrant at the same time, 1 phone finishing 5-10 seconds ahead of the other but still losing the benchmark #'s with most results (fps in the testing) appearing the same. If it was decent the faster phone would always get the higher benchmark, 2 phones render 1k frames, phone 1 in 10 seconds, phone 2 in 20, fps on phone 1 must be higher... etc etc I'd try maybe smartbench or glbenchmark
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've started using antutu benchmark since it breaks the score down and allows you to run custom tests
Sent from my XT860 using xda premium

If you're looking for other benchmark apps with other numbers I found this thread where a user posted a list of benchmarks on an optimus 3d (basically same hardware as our phone) after installing an optimus 2x performance tweak. Good for the list of benchmarks and numbers for you to compare, thread is here

Quadrant test on 2.3.5

im scoring 2588 2456 2648 2652 2679 2770 2716 for the full benchmark test im thinking this is pertty good i think the sg 2 scores like 3000

I thought people understood that quadrant is a useless benchmark?

i didnt know that i just though it was a way of comparing phones why would it be useless? and if its useless then are there any proper benchmarks?

I know it means nothing but I like comparing the scores with all roms just for me.With vengence I get over 3000 with doom around the same.I use it just for me to see the difference is scores.

TJj33p3rz said:
I know it means nothing but I like comparing the scores with all roms just for me.With vengence I get over 3000 with doom around the same.I use it just for me to see the difference is scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ya thats what i use it for to nice to see with a custom rom this phone scores just as high as the other top end phones and it has 3d

I main performance lead on the gs2 is due to the ext4 file system. If we had ext 4 we may even out pace the sgs2.
Sent from my LG-P925g using XDA App

cablemike01 said:
I main performance lead on the gs2 is due to the ext4 file system. If we had ext 4 we may even out pace the sgs2.
Sent from my LG-P925g using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i see so when real custom roms start hitting this thing it will be crazy good i think anyways