Related
Yes Guys We Are Looking For I9100G ICS Rom Tester Any1 Want Test Pm Me If You Want Test...
And No one want ?
Is their any ics Rom first of all?
Sent from my GT-I9100G using xda premium
Patience
Personally, I am waiting for ICS Leak before flashing Custom.
Greetz,
JR
Based On I9100GXXLB1_I9100GXEFLB1_XEF
there is still no ICS leak/release for i9100G , How do u plan on making a ICS rom for others to test ?
We Are Ported ICS On I9100GXXLB1_I9100GXEFLB1_XEF
from which device..........?
Ported On i9100xwlp7 4.0.3
Thx! I would test it.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100G mit Tapatalk 2
I would it test too
Sent from my GT-I9100G using XDA
Cant port
aways said:
Ported On i9100xwlp7 4.0.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im sorry but i thought that i9100 and i9100g had very different GPU and CPU , and that we cant port i9100 rom to i9100g ......
then how do you plan on porting ?
aways said:
Ported On i9100xwlp7 4.0.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then... you need a chinese i9100G isn´t?
Where is the screenshot?or u just making fun?
Sent from my GT-I8150 using XDA
Testing
hey there
i'm interested to test if there is any ICS
that would be with no touchwiz ?
pm me if you want me to test it..will glad to assist you..
Guys, even Codeworks can't finish CM9 on i9100g because the only leak we had is chinese with a chinese locked bootloader. Therefore, absolutely no ICS custom rom can run on a non chinese i9100g until europe release of ics for i9100g ...
Only a chinese g can test this rom, but the version lb2 you posted is GB if i remember ...
Please
Let me test your rom please.....
Indeed, by the time you ported successfully, the actual ics already in place. Which I think definitely more stable than a ported one. I bet within this few weeks should be ready, so don't mind waiting for a little longer. This request should have done earlier once it released for non g.
Anyway, appreciated your hard work for this device. Your intention is good. But a little late when the real ics is near to release.
Sent from my GT-I9100G using XDA
count me in
Sent from my GT-I9100G using XDA
Hi, I'm going to flash a new rom because I'm still on Gingerbread 2.3.5 and It's outdate now...but I like the fast browser of Gb...so in this moment what Ics or Jb rom that you tried do you recommend for daily use without bugs and with fastest browser?
Ps: I don't like rom where I have to flash other things to get it works..so give me your opinion!
Inviato dal mio GT-I9000 con Tapatalk 2
Jellybean
Pierfranc said:
Hi, I'm going to flash a new rom because I'm still on Gingerbread 2.3.5 and It's outdate now...but I like the fast browser of Gb...so in this moment what Ics or Jb rom that you tried do you recommend for daily use without bugs and with fastest browser?
Ps: I don't like rom where I have to flash other things to get it works..so give me your opinion!
Inviato dal mio GT-I9000 con Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1775169 This is amazingly fast and smooth.
jdsvec said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1775169 This is amazingly fast and smooth.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems that someone has problems with it..
Inviato dal mio GT-I9000 con Tapatalk 2
Hey
JB still has some minnor bugs..ICS doesnt but ICS is not as fast as JB..
I would vote for JB but seems it wont help your case..
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
My opinion is CM10 from DerTeufel -
I have question about JB Rom I have more than 1000 photos on my DCIM folder but the Gallery only show 500 photos
Im quite interested in ICS myself so would love to here the most stable one out there, closest to 'stock' would be good. Loving stock ICS on my Nexus S
ATM i'm using the tajb mkalter JB port it s already fast and regurarly updated
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Are over the air updates doable for the custom jobs yet?
For ICS:
- CODENAME ANDROID 2.0.0 RC, my version with Aroma is a more! Not because mine but thanks to Aroma!
For Jelly Bean:
- CM10 of Derfeutel1980
- TAJB of Mtalker
ENJOY!!!
Install ICS now: https://www.fixmystuff.in/FMS_Forum...wich-4-0-4-in-samsung-galaxy-s-g-t-i9000.125/
Jelly Bean is at a very preliminary stage now and is very sluggish. Give it some time to mature.
gopalasubramanium said:
Install ICS now:
Jelly Bean is at a very preliminary stage now and is very sluggish. Give it some time to mature.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This ++
CM9 RC2 is basically stable and issue free, I'd stay under that tree until CM10 Beta 1/ RC1 are available.
Tried Cm10 and tajb , but don't look so fast, I wait a mature version, free bug, and now I've slim ics, it is wondefoul, no bug, very smooth...only browser is slow, does anyone know a tweak for the browser?
Inviato dal mio GT-I9000 con Tapatalk 2
Probably not yet, try another play from Google?
For ics, I'm running cm9 blueberry for couple days, so far so good.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2
I'm running CM 10 Alpha, build 20120725. It's very smooth and fast and I'd recommend it for daily use.
gopalasubramanium said:
Install ICS now: https://www.fixmystuff.in/FMS_Forum...wich-4-0-4-in-samsung-galaxy-s-g-t-i9000.125/
Jelly Bean is at a very preliminary stage now and is very sluggish. Give it some time to mature.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
totally agreed mate i installed cm10 but no use jb is alpha not even beta yet i use REM-ICS fast smooth stable...
Best ROM
The best i think is JellyBean 4.1.1, you can find it on this forum
I don't find to use jelly bean now a good idea, I think is better to wait a "candidate release" that will be more affordable
Hi, sorry to interfere but just to avoid opening another thread: which is the most stable and issues free ICS rom for i9000 at the moment? CM9, AOKP, Tsunami ICS or Slim ICS? Which release exactly? Where can I find it? Thanks in advance
i cant install slim ics.....always bootloop....huhuhu
since both the devices have "almost" the same hardware... can we port the 10.1 ROM on our N7000?
If your looking for a tablet interface you might want to have a look at the Paranoid Android rom, there's a couple of different ways you can have the interface set-up including tablet mode, you can also set individual apps to whether they are in tablet or phone mode and the size or resolution they are displayed at, it's really worth a look.
Wonder why do you say "can we" as you would be doing something in the process.... Better ask.. Is it possible for any of the N7000 awesome developers make a port of xxxxxxxxx to the device?
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2
up
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2056515
xperiacle's project...RevengeDevTeam has joined with xperiacle and his team. The best tablet version, just like note 10.1, will be released in Angry v3 ROM updated with UpdateMe (OTA), I think.
So, install Angry v3 ROM (JB 4.1.2 XXLSC) from RevengeDevTeam and wait for an update
msedek said:
Wonder why do you say "can we" as you would be doing something in the process.... Better ask.. Is it possible for any of the N7000 awesome developers make a port of xxxxxxxxx to the device?
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is your problem?ah
Do we still have guys like you around???!!!
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
ravepark said:
since both the devices have "almost" the same hardware... can we port the 10.1 ROM on our N7000?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Almost same hardware??Wtf which planet are you from??
ravepark said:
since both the devices have "almost" the same hardware... can we port the 10.1 ROM on our N7000?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Theoretically, yes you could. Even though the N7000 hardware is much different. Problem is, why? Not many developers would want to spend so much time working on a port of the same TouchWiz interface, apps, and features from a separate firmware. It would be much easier to change your DPI to 160 if you want a tablet interface.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
I fully understand devs' work and the philosophy behind developing. And i thank you all devs for your great achievements in mini 2 developement
But, i have a dilema: why did no one tried to develop or port a good old cm 7 rom?
The stock rom is awfaul. It lacks, freezes, reboots... The cm 9-10.1 roms are great, but, let.s face it: untill sammy releasy official jb there is nothing to do
So, why not a cm 7 rom?
I had a galaxy ace once and switching from stock to cm 7 was revelatory...
Please consider my request
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
I have no freezes or reboots on my stock rom... But id like to have cm7
xfim said:
I have no freezes or reboots on my stock rom... But id like to have cm7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
me too
i think we can achieve the best performance that can fit into this device
it would be cool to see cm7, i think all drivers must work on it
cool idea i think that will be the right choice until offical jelly bean come
Glad to see others thinks the same
I think for a dev, porting an cm7 rom is a matter of hours.
I wish i could do that but i don.t know how.
Anyway, i hope that someone will complete this task
Best regards!
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
now i'm in exam month in the school for that i'm too busy so i think that iwill start making cm7 rom in 1 jun
My vote for cm7 to!
+1 for Cm 7.2.
Sent from my GT-S6500D using Tapatalk 2
+1 for Cm 7.
+1 for CM7
+1 CM7 :cyclops:
+1
Envoyé depuis mon GT-S7500 avec Tapatalk
+1
File manifest.xml at github.com/CyanogenMod is not working. Trying to fix it and using android git from my github.
News soon...
I think nobody ported it cause CM7 is for Armv6 and Mini 2 is Armv7
Enviado desde mi GT-S6500D usando Tapatalk 2
i don't think so cause it's build on GingerBread and it's stock ROM the deference between the that cm7 lighter slicer faster with root premession
but we will not buildandroid 2.2 or 2.3 we will at least 2.3.6
Andrespro6 said:
I think nobody ported it cause CM7 is for Armv6 and Mini 2 is Armv7
Enviado desde mi GT-S6500D usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really don't think like you. Even S2 in early days had cm7. Now lot of peoples port CM9/10/10.1 and a little bit ports cm7.
Sent from my GT-S6500D using Tapatalk 2
Well, seeing as we'll not get JB, and for that matter a fully working CM10(.1), CM7 seems like a very good idea. With a new stable kernel, without TouchWiz 3.0, and any bloatware, it'll be blazing fast. Plus, the DSP Manager combined with the already awesome stock music experience it'll be more awesome for me. I know it's on the CM 10(.1) but I want a camera damn it! (even though I know it sucks, but it's important kinda for me).
As i said in first post, i really applaud the devs' work on cm 9-10.1, but they (you) have to think that the average noob user (like me) needs a fully working custom rom, even it.s not the latest android update.
So, devs will have our support in developing new roms, in the same giving us a humble cm7 rom for our daily use
I guess that if galaxy ace was running so smoothly with cm7, mini 2 will be lighting faster
And, of course, being arm7 is not an impediment for cm7
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Hello guys. Today I tried the CyanogenMod 9 ROM based on Android 4.0 (ics). Runs very well, even much better than gingerbread 2.3.6. Unfortunately this rom, since it was never properly developed, there are still bugs like camera, wifi, mobile network seems to me, but others as well. Do you think you could focus on this rom to extrapolate a functional for our mini 2. I state that graphically and functionally would be perfect!
Inviato dal mio GT-S6500 con Tapatalk 2
No, because we are centred in CM10.1 , CM10.2 and Kernel 3.4.x
Sent from my GT-S6500D using Tapatalk 2
But why not focus on a perfect rom tor pur device. It's a old version but it is the best. Int work a lot better than 10/10.1/10.2
Inviato dal mio GT-S6500 con Tapatalk 2
portagira said:
Hello guys. Today I tried the CyanogenMod 9 ROM based on Android 4.0 (ics). Runs very well, even much better than gingerbread 2.3.6. Unfortunately this rom, since it was never properly developed, there are still bugs like camera, wifi, mobile network seems to me, but others as well. Do you think you could focus on this rom to extrapolate a functional for our mini 2. I state that graphically and functionally would be perfect!
Inviato dal mio GT-S6500 con Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm with both of you and everyone like you i tried cm9 so so so so so much better and smooth and graphics what i say about performance? oh god it's fly high really really the best rom for mini 2 and the games run very smoothly and for me and for all mini2 users we just need android 4 not more than that cuz most of apps now required android 4+ and that is what we talking about cm9 3.4 kernel updated with latest cm9 files and library files and latest adreno 200 updates and our Qualcomm MSM7227a support android 4 so we can get the latest drivers and updates and that what we missing in the newer android versions and the resolution supported what ever i said i will not finished believe me it is the perfect version of android for our jena jena need ICS CM9 +1 who is with us
portagira said:
But why not focus on a perfect rom tor pur device. It's a old version but it is the best. Int work a lot better than 10/10.1/10.2
Inviato dal mio GT-S6500 con Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my GT-S6500 using Tapatalk 2
I would really like to see it happen ! Ultra stable cm with all features working perfectly (now cm10.1 is best so far but still there are tons of bugs )
I think there is a reason why TheWhisp didn't want to pursue this matter ..maybe because samsung announced the official jb for our phone(that turned out to be a lie...) or maybe because cm9 has a lot of bugs ..and most of them were fixed in jb ..idk , or ics requires a lot of libs and stuff that are not avalible ..unlike jb. Idk , I would like to see a very fast,stable and fully functional cm ..so, good luck !
Why not making a fully working CM7.2 for our device?
I think make a full working cm9 is like when thewhisp worked on cm10/10.1
Inviato dal mio GT-S6500 con Tapatalk 2
let someone else do the CM9
someone who knows how to do, it does not have to be a whisp
or let some ports of a device rom and make CM9
We just have to face the fact that : WE NEED MORE DEVELOPERS IN GM2
you cant expect from one guy to make everything for you
and we had a non-functional cm7 past month but the dev droped it
I cannot work on 6+ projects at the same time. At the moment I focus on cm-11 and cm-10.2, and 3.4.x kernel. If you want cm10 and cm10.1 in the same level as cm-10.2, you have to say good-bye to camera. That's why I don't release any updates for those ROMs. Try thinking for once, not spam about every ROM you want.
What do you think people about this rom?
Inviato dal mio GT-S6500 con Tapatalk 2
portagira said:
What do you think people about this rom?
Inviato dal mio GT-S6500 con Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it would be great for me i think it is the best idea for mini 2 development and best rom compatibility for jena
Sent from my GT-S6500 using Tapatalk 2
NiceIceDice96 said:
I think it would be great for me i think it is the best idea for mini 2 development and best rom compatibility for jena
Sent from my GT-S6500 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would agree
we need to find someone to finish CM9
Thewisp we pray you. This is the Best rom forma our phone. A lotta of people want it
Revival CM 9
It's laudable attempt to convince you The Whisp to focus on a CM who can bring added value to the phone and that works really. Unfortunately The Whisp is used to finish something once you start. It works only on projects illusory .... He even told you that working on 6 projects simultaneously. How many of them go really well and can say that achieve perfection? None! Too bad! It's a good developer but is inconstant. The romanian people have a saying: "Good cheese, rough diamond." That's The Whisp!
Guyz he said he is doing this for himself and sharing it with us just come down and believe me
ICS sucks
Sent from my GT-S7562 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
---------- Post added at 05:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:54 PM ----------
And I believe that cm11 will be awesome as it is optimized for low ram devices
Sent from my GT-S7562 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
darkmanz said:
Guyz he said he is doing this for himself and sharing it with us just come down and believe me
ICS sucks
Sent from my GT-S7562 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
---------- Post added at 05:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:54 PM ----------
And I believe that cm11 will be awesome as it is optimized for low ram devices
Sent from my GT-S7562 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh common it is not ram problem it is more like resolution camera processor belive me
Sent from my GT-S6500 using Tapatalk 2
Sando_Khan said:
It's laudable attempt to convince you The Whisp to focus on a CM who can bring added value to the phone and that works really. Unfortunately The Whisp is used to finish something once you start. It works only on projects illusory .... He even told you that working on 6 projects simultaneously. How many of them go really well and can say that achieve perfection? None! Too bad! It's a good developer but is inconstant. The romanian people have a saying: "Good cheese, rough diamond." That's The Whisp!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MSM7x27a also has official support for Android 4.1. Just out of curiosity, I made a CM10 build with the latest changes from CM-10.2 builds (it uses everything that an official 4.1 ROM from Samsung would bring us), I'd it's not quite faster that the 4.3. If you really want your device to perform at its best, stick with 2.3
I have used GT-S6312 with Samsung's official 4.1.2 Touchwiz'ed Android and it is terribly slow. No wonder Samsung cancelled the update for Mini 2.
And an ICS ROM would have the same problems as any other CM ROM - crappy camera performance, white screen issue would persist etc.
TheWhisp said:
MSM7x27a also has official support for Android 4.1. Just out of curiosity, I made a CM10 build with the latest changes from CM-10.2 builds (it uses everything that an official 4.1 ROM from Samsung would bring us), I'd it's not quite faster that the 4.3. If you really want your device to perform at its best, stick with 2.3
I have used GT-S6312 with Samsung's official 4.1.2 Touchwiz'ed Android and it is terribly slow. No wonder Samsung cancelled the update for Mini 2.
And an ICS ROM would have the same problems as any other CM ROM - crappy camera performance, white screen issue would persist etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay bring it and please can you build cm9 too with the same changes and updates
edit: and what do you mean that cm10 faster or cm10.2
Sent from my GT-S6500 using Tapatalk 2