Hi, may I know what is the difference between AOKP JellyBean and CM10 JellyBean? What I currently know of is that AOKP is a light-weight ROM that is reliant on CM10. Can somebody explain the difference between these two ROMs in detail? Thanks in advance.
PS: Correct me if I'm wrong.
tietganFTW said:
Hi, may I know what is the difference between AOKP JellyBean and CM10 JellyBean? What I currently know of is that AOKP is a light-weight ROM that is reliant on CM10. Can somebody explain the difference between these two ROMs in detail? Thanks in advance.
PS: Correct me if I'm wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOKP is a ROM developed from AOSP sources by an Elite team of Kangers across the world. CM10 is a ROM developed from AOSP sources too, by the CyanogenMod team lead by Steve Kondik (Cyanogen). Anyways both ROMs are customized with an aim for adding new features which is not found in AOSP ROMs. Both Projects have their own customizations and tweaks added to their ROMs. CyanogenMod is there from beginning of Android Project I believe, AOKP started from the ICS release. If you need further explanations visit: http://aokp.co/index.php/about and http://www.cyanogenmod.com/about
Above, plus aokp have more customization options
Plus, AOKP are lighter ROM. If you need a 122 MB for CM10, then you will get 90MB (correct me if i wrong) for AOKP
F4uzan said:
Plus, AOKP are lighter ROM. If you need a 122 MB for CM10, then you will get 90MB (correct me if i wrong) for AOKP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you are not wrong but it is already mentioned in the op
Related
So, what are the differences between these ROM types? Any particular advantages to either of them?
Sent from my superior GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Zamboney said:
So, what are the differences between these ROM types? Any particular advantages to either of them?
Sent from my superior GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice article by a friend-
http://knowmydroid.com/blog/what-is-aokp-rom-how-is-it-different-from-cm9
Sounds like they are mostly cosmetical, although choice is good of course. Hopefully we'll have both!
Sent from my superior GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
May the KANG be with you guys!
^_^
AOSP means android open source project.. Any rom that derivates from that it's an AOSP rom...
AOKP team named their rom that way implying that they are "kanging" AOSP like many people kangs cm7/9/10
Kang means cook a rom based on other people's work so in a way every rom its a "kang" from AOSP, even TW roms as TW its just a "skin" but under the hood its just plain and simple Android.
If a developer doesn't modify the AOSP code they would be releasing Google's roms Wich its stock Android.
But there's differences between cooking and developing and that's why you see 2 sections in development the original Wich should be developers whom modify and support roms straight from AOSP being able of actually fix bugs and issues and the regular development Wich its people that uses kitchens and scrips to create roms.. No actually developing code..
So at the end AOKP its a rom based on AOSP, as cm10 and every single rom that derivates from AOSP, go and check development section in galaxy nexus forum and you will see what's development.. There's no less than 100 different rom's all coded from AOSP.. AOSP is the mother of every rom that exist
Tapatalking on my n7000
msedek said:
AOSP means android open source project.. Any rom that derivates from that it's an AOSP rom...
AOKP team named their rom that way implying that they are "kanging" AOSP like many people kangs cm7/9/10
Kang means cook a rom based on other people's work so in a way every rom its a "kang" from AOSP, even TW roms as TW its just a "skin" but under the hood its just plain and simple Android.
If a developer doesn't modify the AOSP code they would be releasing Google's roms Wich its stock Android.
But there's differences between cooking and developing and that's why you see 2 sections in development the original Wich should be developers whom modify and support roms straight from AOSP being able of actually fix bugs and issues and the regular development Wich its people that uses kitchens and scrips to create roms.. No actually developing code..
So at the end AOKP its a rom based on AOSP, as cm10 and every single rom that derivates from AOSP, go and check development section in galaxy nexus forum and you will see what's development.. There's no less than 100 different rom's all coded from AOSP.. AOSP is the mother of every rom that exist
Tapatalking on my n7000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot, that was really helpful!
doctorgallo said:
Thanks a lot, that was really helpful!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was reading different threads and found this one. Great explanation! Why is it that some features like wi-fi calling dont work on aosp?
Wipef
tytngasman said:
I was reading different threads and found this one. Great explanation! Why is it that some features like wi-fi calling dont work on aosp?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The AOSP roms are often unofficial and are made by our cool developers, so there are some features that don't work. But those are usually fixed sooner or later
Skickat från min HTC One via Tapatalk 2
Read this thread too, Will help
http://androidforums.com/triumph-all-things-root/541600-aokp-vs-aosp.html
dasunh said:
Read this thread too, Will help
http://androidforums.com/triumph-all-things-root/541600-aokp-vs-aosp.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanx
Skickat från min HTC One via Tapatalk 2
Paraniod Roms?
Quick question ppl, im prbly going to get hammered for this lol.
What is the difference between all the paranoid roms on the note? I see like 3 different ones
Cheeers for your help!
Coder-R said:
Paraniod Roms?
Quick question ppl, im prbly going to get hammered for this lol.
What is the difference between all the paranoid roms on the note? I see like 3 different ones
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1373728
There doesn't exist any paranIOd ROM. Ppl if u wd wrt prprly. WD b hily apprctd. 0.02$
Paranoid on Belly Jean // HydraCore 3.1
this is the second thread for this question :what:
all u need to know is 0.5 for ICS PA. 2.1 for Jelly Bean PA.
if you wanted tried and tested reliability, go for the 0.5, bleeding edge at the cost of memory leakage, 2.1
theres one more, the Utaka PA release, built from source rather than ported from a different device. Can't comment on this, not used it yet
this can all be discovered by simply reading the first page of the thread, a task achieved in less time than opening two threads
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
Written pretty much covered it.
1. PA v0.5 by imilka is based on ICS and is quite stable
2. PA 2.1 also by imilka is based on JB and isn't as stable as 1.
Both of these are ports from a different device.
3. PA 2.1 by Utacka is based on JB and isn't as stable as 1.
This port is based off of the official Paranoid Rom for the Galaxy Note.
Feel free to correct me if I got anything wrong.
little-vince said:
Written pretty much covered it.
1. PA v0.5 by imilka is based on ICS and is quite stable
2. PA 2.1 also by imilka is based on JB and isn't as stable as 1.
Both of these are ports from a different device.
3. PA 2.1 by Utacka is based on JB and isn't as stable as 1.
This port is based off of the official Paranoid Rom for the Galaxy Note.
Feel free to correct me if I got anything wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine is not based of the official n7000 one, in fact nothing is ported from the official n7000 one, its the first PA rom built from source.
Skickat från min GT-N7000 via Tapatalk 2
So, are there differences between imilka's and Utacka's JB PA in terms of features/functions that work or don't work? (I'm guessing they would be the same since they're both CM10 based, but I'm not sure, hence the question)
Or, is the difference just in terms of optimisations/tweaks/battery life/look etc.?
Thanks,
Rich
richlum said:
So, are there differences between imilka's and Utacka's JB PA in terms of features/functions that work or don't work? (I'm guessing they would be the same since they're both CM10 based, but I'm not sure, hence the question)
Or, is the difference just in terms of optimisations/tweaks/battery life/look etc.?
Thanks,
Rich
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
imilkas latest pa is ported to official preview #5 so it do not include latest cm merges since then basicly. Mine is straight from source and I build mine everynight and always include the latest. Also next nightly will include new lib drivers from note 2 JB and make it more buttery, look at my thread in few hours. stay tuned.
Skickat från min GT-N7000 via Tapatalk 2
Hi All,
I want to know, any of the developer is developing AOSP Rom 4.1.2?
Could some can do that please.
Siva.
psiva2010 said:
Hi All,
I want to know, any of the developer is developing AOSP Rom 4.1.2?
Could some can do that please.
Siva.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Developers primary is CM10.1 for now.
Cm is based on aosp, any change made on aosp is reflected on cm repo
Yeah, once we have CM 10.1 working... only then we can go for AOSP or Paranoid or other custom ROMs that requires CM as the "Base" ROM...
Sent from my GT-I9070
Sami Kabir said:
Yeah, once we have CM 10.1 working... only then we can go for AOSP or Paranoid or other custom ROMs that requires CM as the "Base" ROM...
Sent from my GT-I9070
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That isn't true. AOSP, PA etc are built from source!
It's just that they share the device tree. And cm is easier than others
I do not respond to tech support via PM
Shaaan said:
That isn't true. AOSP, PA etc are built from source!
It's just that they share the device tree. And cm is easier than others
I do not respond to tech support via PM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was just trying to act smart.. as I don't have much knowledge about all these.. :silly:
Atleast I was "half" correct...
It's just that they share the device tree.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good Evening to everybody.
I was reading about the Jellaxy Project has been discontinued and i thinked "oh damn... they say there are far better 4.2. roms but I don't like 4.2... i just want the good old Jellaxy's 4.1.2". I think our screen is too little for a lockscreen like that (it is difficult to insert the code), it is more unstable et cetera et cetera...
So... why not? Somebody could continue that project if there are a few people who want they to do it. Nobody else agrees with me?
I apologise because of my very bad english (I'm Italian). I hope you'll understand if I don't know what you mean
P.S. i don't know if this thread is a question so I don't know what to do with that checkbox down there
|
|
|
v
Use lagloose's cm 10 for that.
And also read the thread carefully.,you will get your ans..
KranTi said:
Use lagloose's cm 10 for that.
And also read the thread carefully.,you will get your ans..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry I couldn't find the rom you mentioned... searching "lagloose cm10" "cm10 lagloose cooper"... I only find out about Jellaxy discontinued project...
Apotheosys said:
Sorry I couldn't find the rom you mentioned... searching "lagloose cm10" "cm10 lagloose cooper"... I only find out about Jellaxy discontinued project...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol..
Its same..
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
KranTi said:
Lol..
Its same..
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So... no cm10.0 for us?
Apotheosys said:
So... no cm10.0 for us?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeap, i guess there will be no more project for 4.1.2 rom in the meantime, until there are devs who want to develop it again..
But maybe its hardly for that to happen (maybe) because devs (like erikcas, bieltv.3 or Old Droid) will focus only on the latest JB rom, that is 4.2.2 rom.
Why dont you give a try the 4.2.2 JB rom on ur ace? Install it, n try it for a while (adaption to a new rom will takes time), you will like it
There is alot of choices, like:
AOKP jb-mr1 by erikcas
Cyanogenmod 10.1 4.2.2 androidarmv6 by Bieltv.3 (Official maintainer after Wayland_Ace work, and Erikcas)
or CM10.1, PAC-rom 22.0.0, PARANOIDANDROID by OldDroid
The 4.2.2 Rom will become the best rom for our ace s5830, have faith to our ace devs.. they will bring us the best JB rom, its just matter of time from them to give us an amazing JB rom :highfive: :victory:
Aces5 said:
yeap, i guess there will be no more project for 4.1.2 rom in the meantime, until there are devs who want to develop it again..
But maybe its hardly for that to happen (maybe) because devs (like erikcas, bieltv.3 or Old Droid) will focus only on the latest JB rom, that is 4.2.2 rom.
Why dont you give a try the 4.2.2 JB rom on ur ace? Install it, n try it for a while (adaption to a new rom will takes time), you will like it
There is alot of choices, like:
AOKP jb-mr1 by erikcas
Cyanogenmod 10.1 4.2.2 androidarmv6 by Bieltv.3 (Official maintainer after Wayland_Ace work, and Erikcas)
or CM10.1, PAC-rom 22.0.0, PARANOIDANDROID by OldDroid
The 4.2.2 Rom will become the best rom for our ace s5830, have faith to our ace devs.. they will bring us the best JB rom, its just matter of time from them to give us an amazing JB rom :highfive: :victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First, I tried so many roms, but I just like CM... Second, I tried OldDroid's CM10.1 and I hated it; Third, I love the work of these developers, but I think they should focuse on bettere projects like KERNEL 3.0... I just noticed that Samsung Corby has this kernel and we don't... a port would be a very good thing.
Hi guys! Im curious why our monster device dont have too much ported roms though it is possible? is it because there is only few users? I want to learn how to port roms for our device. Im reading a tutorial here in XDA and have a porter friend from my past device. I asked him to port roms for our device like slimbean, carbonrom, Pac etc. Hope this device gets more attention from the rom makers
marshygeek said:
Hi guys! Im curious why our monster device dont have too much ported roms though it is possible? is it because there is only few users? I want to learn how to port roms for our device. Im reading a tutorial here in XDA and have a porter friend from my past device. I asked him to port roms for our device like slimbean, carbonrom, Pac etc. Hope this device gets more attention from the rom makers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will help you as much as i can...will share links which i have read to port MIUI V5 for our device...
And the reason that our device does not has many roms is that it was not released globally like the S3 or S4...
It is actually local only to Korea...and still many have managed to get it...
And its good if we all work together as a team ... we sure will have many roms for our device too....:good:
Shrewdy said:
I will help you as much as i can...will share links which i have read to port MIUI V5 for our device...
And the reason that our device does not has many roms is that it was not released globally like the S3 or S4...
It is actually local only to Korea...and still many have managed to get it...
And its good if we all work together as a team ... we sure will have many roms for our device too....:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's good news! I will talk to my friend who ports rom to my ex-device. and also let's ask for other members to participate.
This is the link that im reviewing http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1908008
We need Base CM10 or CM10.1 depending on what we will port. Do we have "Clean" CM10 or CM10.1 as base?
marshygeek said:
This is the link that im reviewing http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1908008
We need Base CM10 or CM10.1 depending on what we will port. Do we have "Clean" CM10 or CM10.1 as base?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, even i am referring to the same guide...
Now as far as i know we do have a clean CM10 as base for SHV-E120L & SHV-E120S both...but we dont have a pure clean CM10.1 for either of the devices...
But we do have Mokee OS 4.2.2 for both of the above mentioned devices...and i even tried to take CM10.1 from Cyanogen mods website and take Mokee OS as base to port the latest to CM10.1 and have a running CM10.1 but i never succedded...
And i was also wondering if you know what is the difference between these 2 devices...
Thanks
Thats what i dont know. Im just a new user of this device. If we have clean CM10 then we can port 4.1.2 roms. but not 4.2.2. It's OK there are lot of nice 4.1.2 roms out there Can u give me the link of the clean CM10 for SHV e120L?
Shrewdy said:
Yup, even i am referring to the same guide...
Now as far as i know we do have a clean CM10 as base for SHV-E120L & SHV-E120S both...but we dont have a pure clean CM10.1 for either of the devices...
But we do have Mokee OS 4.2.2 for both of the above mentioned devices...and i even tried to take CM10.1 from Cyanogen mods website and take Mokee OS as base to port the latest to CM10.1 and have a running CM10.1 but i never succedded...
And i was also wondering if you know what is the difference between these 2 devices...
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeas there is Mokee 4.2.2 and ive tried it. Its base on CM10.1. We must first know what did the porter used as a base to port Mokee 4.2.2.
marshygeek said:
Yeas there is Mokee 4.2.2 and ive tried it. Its base on CM10.1. We must first know what did the porter used as a base to port Mokee 4.2.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, check these links
This link contains pure CM10 compiled by Socim:
http://d-h.st/users/Space/?fld_id=0#files
And this link contains a spread sheet which mentions most of the roms that exist for our devices...
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AosAjYg4w51XdHkxNlRzWFk4UllTTHFNd1JpLW9TWHc&pli=1#gid=19
Hope this helps...:good:
Ok i will try using Socim's CM10 as base.