Related
developer. htc. com/
Just noticed this on AndroidCentral. Apologies if posted already. Steps toward new sense
Just to clear this up, this is the kernel source.
Berzerker7 said:
Just to clear this up, this is the kernel source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to know,. Although this literally has nothing to do with us
Edit; quoted wrong person, but you get the point.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
jdkoreclipse said:
Good to know,. Although this literally has nothing to do with us
Edit; quoted wrong person, but you get the point.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe he was informing people who are trying to port the Z ROM to the Incredible?
Berzerker7 said:
Maybe he was informing people who are trying to port the Z ROM to the Incredible?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm trying.... I know a kernel source is near useless for us, but great news to hear of progress.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
That is exactly why I posted it. The name Incdoes ring any bells? How about Ihtfp or his incorporation of new sense in to skyraider? Sorry jdk, not everyone is all about jdkevolution or blackhawk, or whatever your daily created rom is.
TheIncredibleJ said:
That is exactly why I posted it. The name Incdoes ring any bells? How about Ihtfp or his incorporation of new sense in to skyraider? Sorry jdk, not everyone is all about jdkevolution or blackhawk, or whatever your daily created rom is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
TheIncredibleJ said:
That is exactly why I posted it. The name Incdoes ring any bells? How about Ihtfp or his incorporation of new sense in to skyraider? Sorry jdk, not everyone is all about jdkevolution or blackhawk, or whatever your daily created rom is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks - anytime a source is posted is good. It may not be for the Inc, but there may be things in the code that a dev reads and says "Wow, I didn't think of that".
JD, you have been back from ban for only a few days, but drama still follows you
Jdk it is useless for someone like you who does not know what to do with it but the others may use it to get the camera working in the desire hd port. Hahah
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
jdkoreclipse said:
I'm trying.... I know a kernel source is near useless for us, but great news to hear of progress.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're trying?
Advice: Stop trying.
I'm sure he's bitter over me calling him out in the past so he had to use his "community standing" and post count belittle me. My post count is miniscule for a reason. If I don't know something, I research. If I don't have something to contribute, I keep quiet. I don't pretend to know things when I don't. So jdk quit acting like the 12 year old we all know you are, and start acting like the 23 year old college student you pretend to be. I posted Z code with good intentions and not just to see myself speak. I have seen nothing but improved development when code is released. Look at kernels we all use by posters on xda. They are all updated with latest code from htc, and thus we reap stability and functionality benefits. Willing to bet the devs here utilize something from that code, and do it before official new sense comes to us.
TheIncredibleJ said:
I'm sure he's bitter over me calling him out in the past so he had to use his "community standing" and post count belittle me. My post count is miniscule for a reason. If I don't know something, I research. If I don't have something to contribute, I keep quiet. I don't pretend to know things when I don't. So jdk quit acting like the 12 year old we all know you are, and start acting like the 23 year old college student you pretend to be. I posted Z code with good intentions and not just to see myself speak. I have seen nothing but improved development when code is released. Look at kernels we all use by posters on xda. They are all updated with latest code from htc, and thus we reap stability and functionality benefits. Willing to bet the devs here utilize something from that code, and do it before official new sense comes to us.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was man enough to pm you and admit i was wrong...but im sorry, and i will edit all my posts.
Lets let this go...last thing the forums need is bitterness..
SO good find with the code, and hopefully we can get cam working
jdkoreclipse said:
Lets let this go...last thing the forums need is bitterness..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then...Why are you stirring up stuff?
ncwildcat said:
Then...Why are you stirring up stuff?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I apologized for my douchebagggery.
jdkoreclipse said:
I was man enough to pm you and admit i was wrong...but im sorry, and i will edit all my posts.
Lets let this go...last thing the forums need is bitterness..
SO good find with the code, and hopefully we can get cam working
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just read pm i did not see it before. I accept the apology. Let me add a few things. I think we can all agree your not being honest with your real identity and background. Just be real man. No one is gonna look down on you because your a younger. Why live a lie? Im sure im not the only one who thinks you have a lot of potential as far as developing goes. But your not there yet. Get educated, get experience, and just observe for a while. Its ok to sit on the sidelines while learning. You dont need to dev to be accepted. We can clearly see that you have no real developing or coding experience, and in reality dont have a highschool diploma yet. You are young, slow down. This doesnt mean you cant learn as you go, but i reiterate, be real. I no doubt speak for all of us when i say no one wants to hear your bold and inaccurate statements anymore. Your young and just dont have any qualification or justification for most of the things you do and say. Also i will point out that I could never do what you have done with computing at your age, so props to you. With this said, im sure the entire community forgives you for the past but show them that you deserve their forgiveness. No more bold statements, no more "factual opinions", no more relabeling others' roms and calling them your own (,even when credit is given), and lastly there is other ways of contributing to the community without making roms and themes. There would be no drama, bans, or threads like this that generally make this place counterproductive
TheIncredibleJ said:
Just read pm i did not see it before. I accept the apology. Let me add a few things. I think we can all agree your not being honest with your real identity and background. Just be real man. No one is gonna look down on you because your a younger. Why live a lie? Im sure im not the only one who thinks you have a lot of potential as far as developing goes. But your not there yet. Get educated, get experience, and just observe for a while. Its ok to sit on the sidelines while learning. You dont need to dev to be accepted. We can clearly see that you have no real developing or coding experience, and in reality dont have a highschool diploma yet. You are young, slow down. This doesnt mean you cant learn as you go, but i reiterate, be real. I no doubt speak for all of us when i say no one wants to hear your bold and inaccurate statements anymore. Your young and just dont have any qualification or justification for most of the things you do and say. Also i will point out that I could never do what you have done with computing at your age, so props to you. With this said, im sure the entire community forgives you for the past but show them that you deserve their forgiveness. No more bold statements, no more "factual opinions", no more relabeling others' roms and calling them your own (,even when credit is given), and lastly there is other ways of contributing to the community without making roms and themes. There would be no drama, bans, or threads like this that generally make this place counterproductive
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I take your advise...thanks
Sent from my Incredible using XDA App
I did a search and no one on here posted about this.
All Nexus owners should be aware of this.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2360349
I'm not a developer but I am a lover of individual liberties, freedom and privacy.
In a less worrisome way, the NSA has contributed to the AOSP. Many companies and agencies have. And individuals too. Keep in mind changes have to be reviewed, we can't just stick **** in there and get away with it. Nothing malicious has come out from this (yet).
I was under the impression that they contribute code to make it more secure. So that android devices can be used by NSA, government, employees.
But that's not to say they wouldn't spy on their own kind.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
You realize how many knowledgeable people have combed through this stuff? I am pretty sure anything malicious would have been spotlighted by now.
I'm not saying we aren't monitored just that there's less transparent ways for them to do it.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
sub1287 said:
You realize how many knowledgeable people have combed through this stuff? I am pretty sure anything malicious would have been spotlighted by now.
I'm not saying we aren't monitored just that there's less transparent ways for them to do it.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like wacking great big apk exploits galore.
Android is about as secure as whores pair of knickers.
sub1287 said:
You realize how many knowledgeable people have combed through this stuff? I am pretty sure anything malicious would have been spotlighted by now.
I'm not saying we aren't monitored just that there's less transparent ways for them to do it.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So knowledgeable that they can't find anything. You really think the government will leave a trail that is discoverable to the user's? They are watching you 24/7, whether you like it or not.
Deeco7 said:
So knowledgeable that they can't find anything. You really think the government will leave a trail that is discoverable to the user's? They are watching you 24/7, whether you like it or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And not enough.
Would they watch enough, Boston teract would not happen.
This thread is going to end well...
Is that why the Nexus speaker has that buzz? I suppose that is the NSA software attempting to intercept the audio, which would explain all the wakelocks the nexus has too. Very intriguing details indeed, I'll have the boys at the office investigate later.
Ace42 said:
Is that why the Nexus speaker has that buzz? I suppose that is the NSA software attempting to intercept the audio, which would explain all the wakelocks the nexus has too. Very intriguing details indeed, I'll have the boys at the office investigate later.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol nice.
lol like it matters? dont be a suicidal/terrorist idiot and go about ya business.
Deeco7 said:
So knowledgeable that they can't find anything. You really think the government will leave a trail that is discoverable to the user's? They are watching you 24/7, whether you like it or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You really think that government has some secret sauce that they can apply to open source code that the open source community couldn't read or detect?
Put the tinfoil hats away. This idea isn't even needed in the first place since they already have the capability to gather info.
albundy2010 said:
You really think that government has some secret sauce that they can apply to open source code that the open source community couldn't read or detect?
Put the tinfoil hats away. This idea isn't even needed in the first place since they already have the capability to gather info.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree with this guy. From my experience the government is a bunch of numb nutz. They couldn't code some secret spy code to save...Er well our country. You give these morons in Washington way to much credit.
tweaked said:
Agree with this guy. From my experience the government is a bunch of numb nutz. They couldn't code some secret spy code to save...Er well our country. You give these morons in Washington way to much credit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wouldn't say that really. The morons in Washington don't code. They hire people that do.
They wrote stuxnet for example. They know what they are doing. It's different for open source though.
Can't wait for selinux.
https://plus.google.com/u/0/115049428938715274412/posts/jfw5nKANUKa
---------- Post added at 07:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:48 PM ----------
And before anyone says NSA, yes, I do realize that.
If I cover my nexus in tinfoil will the NSA still control my phone?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Ace42 said:
I'll have the boys at the office investigate later.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We are done with the investigation now. Very disturbing news indeed. I would tell you what we found but I think they are listening in.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
uploder said:
lol like it matters? dont be a suicidal/terrorist idiot and go about ya business.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I always try hard not to be a terrorist.
I see huge tinfoil hat is coming lol
Neo3D said:
I did a search and no one on here posted about this.
All Nexus owners should be aware of this.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2360349
I'm not a developer but I am a lover of individual liberties, freedom and privacy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is NSA code in Linux as well it's called SELinux. Govt agencies routinely add security enhancements to open source OS so it's safer for their own personal use.
Since Android is open source, you need not worry about this NSA code that's present. You need to actually be more careful about iOS and Windows. Even if the companies say they don't,
you have no way of knowing if they are speaking the truth. With Android you have a way to know it as the code is open.
There are lot of talented people looking at the Android code. If someone even tried to sneak a backdoor, it will be found easily and quickly.
I for one, am extremely disappointed in regard to the fact that the devs behind PSX (Pure Speed eXperiment ROM) have left XDA and are going private. If you wish to see exactly why, head over to the now closed thread in OAD, but basically they've resorted to deserting their presence in the Nexus 5 forums due to disrespect put forth by us, the users.
This is a significant wake up call for our community. Now obviously not all of us have been disrespectful, at least the mature majority of us. But, there are many people who have, will continue to be to not only these developers but to all of them.
I'd like to remind those select people of why you are WRONG in every sense of the word by being disrespectful in any matter towards these wonderful developers here at XDA and beyond.
They share *FREE* software that they have spent HOURS upon HOURS on developing not only for themselves but for everyone at absolutely no cost.
Obviously some may provide opportunities to donate monetarily but 99% of the time this is optional.
(Although I do encourage donating and buying their paid apps)
To be ungrateful and simply acting like a whiny brat towards them is unacceptable!
If you experience any bugs, quirks, or anything you don't like in their software; go about reporting these things in a respectful, mature manner in their respective threads, or by PM.
If you can't do that, then simply do not use their software and revert back to stock! It's that simple.
So to end off, thank you Team Speed for your wonderful ROM and kernel that you have provided and will continue to provide to your core user base privately. You all will be missed dearly here on good ol' XDA. And to every other developer, do know that many of us appreciate your hard work, do not be discouraged and please continue to provide your awesome ROMs, kernels, themes, mods, apps and so on.
-Anthony
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Actually for a thread that encouraged off topic discussion their thread was pretty good, people mostly talking about whatever and it seemed pretty happy. I would see people ask about features, but they weren't demanding anything there. The last few pages were of people not wanting the ROM to go, and people donating money...which looks a little suspect since they made an announcement of leaving and left the thread open for a while.
If you really can't live without that ROM try using Purity and you'll be fine.
Smatter, u getty no invitey?
Personally, I think the whole deal says more about the people who left, not the people here.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
^this! For now Purity works for me... plenty of awesome N5 roms!
lol devs do this all the time until they figure out people aren't downloading there shiz then they "surprise" everyone with a return and use it as a threat... basic psychology
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
They'll be back sooner or later... else their stuff will become extinct
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Hehe. No idea what happened but Op is right. You guys are self entitled jerks.
You guys act like devs are magical fairies who seize to exist if no one believes in them...or in this case, downloads their roms.
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
Could someone link the offending posts from that thread. I can't really find any.
nyyankees1237 said:
They share *FREE* software that they have spent HOURS upon HOURS on developing not only for themselves but for everyone at absolutely no cost.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not going to pretend every dev here works altruistically, that their work isn't documented and categorized into a work portfolio for future employment opportunities. I can write up a very persuasive essay showing how the devs should be grateful that they're gaining access to free tools and a free test bed to sharpen their skills: whereas in other industries, would cost a lot to even put it through trials. But that's not the point there. The point is that these people(devs) are opportunity-seekers that happen to have a goal that benefits us, the end-users where money doesn't have to exchange hands. Ask Steve Kondik what opportunities he was afforded as a result of his community-work.
These people definitely work hard and that alone deserve acknowledgement, but let's not pretend this was not a mutual business relationship. Do what one has to do in order to sooth the ethical side of this, but end of the day gains and losses all around. Where one team closes up shop, another one opens up to make a name for themselves. (Purity over PSX)
For the lost: the major discussion started here
Not to justify ignorance and rudeness, but the devs need the xda community as much as the xda community needs them. You really think that sharing a rom between friends will get the rom to a stable state anytime soon? Hell most of the roms shared on xda have thousands of users and they are still bugged...
If the dev wants his rom in a anywhere near useful state, then he needs the large pool or tests and bug reports that the whole xda community can provide, simple as that.
tylerdurden83 said:
Not to justify ignorance and rudeness, but the devs need the xda community as much as the xda community needs them. You really think that sharing a rom between friends will get the rom to a stable state anytime soon? Hell most of the roms shared on xda have thousands of users and they are still bugged...
If the dev wants his rom in a anywhere near useful state, then he needs the large pool or tests and bug reports that the whole xda community can provide, simple as that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol.
finalhit said:
lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Laugh all you want, but altho I haven't had the urge to develop a rom yet, I can tell you that this is exactly like it went when I was the lead developer of one of the most used world of warcraft addons. You get (at times) stupid questions by lazy people, rude comments, etc, but without the reach of the wide community that debugs stuff it'd have not gotten anywhere. Hell even Google, Apple etc release software full of bugs that us the more experienced users find out and report back to them for fixing, you really think that a handful of developers can do better?
tylerdurden83 said:
Laugh all you want, but altho I haven't had the urge to develop a rom yet, I can tell you that this is exactly like it went when I was the lead developer of one of the most used world of warcraft addons. You get (at times) stupid questions by lazy people, rude comments, etc, but without the reach of the wide community that debugs stuff it'd have not gotten anywhere. Hell even Google, Apple etc release software full of bugs that us the more experienced users find out and report back to them for fixing, you really think that a handful of developers can do better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am also a software developer. And I get what you're saying. You need your tester base to represent your entire user base to account for. use cases you might not see because you don't use the software that way.
This is also true for Roms. And that's where your analogy breaks. The only reason a Dev would need the community to test his ROM is to ensure that the rom works for the use cases of the community.
If all a Dev wanted was to make the ROM work for himself only, then he can test the feature himself. You should probably know, an average user is not skilled enough to be a constructive tester. A Dev would have an easier time testing for bugs himself for features he does use rather than chasing false flags by unskilled users.
To sum up, the involvement of the community in the rom building process is a predicated on the devs desire to make the ROM work for everyone. It is not a service everyone provides to the Dev.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4
finalhit said:
This is also true for Roms. And that's where your analogy breaks. The only reason a Dev would need the community to test his ROM is to ensure that the rom works for the use cases of the community.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you look at rom like Purity (on gnex I've been using it since forever), 99% of the changelog bug fixes were reported by users, not the author himself. Whether those were bugs on features that the author wasn't using at the time, or didnt have enough time to debug himself, cause afterall this is a "night job", etc, etc is irrelevant really. In the end the author himself will benefit from a more stable, less battery draining, filled with more features that his users came up with, whatever, rom.
tylerdurden83 said:
If you look at rom like Purity (on gnex I've been using it since forever), 99% of the changelog bug fixes were reported by users, not the author himself. Whether those were bugs on features that the author wasn't using at the time, or didnt have enough time to debug himself, cause afterall this is a "night job", etc, etc is irrelevant really. In the end the author himself will benefit from a more stable, less battery draining, whatever rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not irrelevant. It is exactly my point.
A weed is any plant that you don't want in your garden. If 99 percent of fixes in that ROM is user reported, it means the Dev was nice enough to go to those users' gardens and pull out their weed for them.
If a Dev doesn't have that plant in his garden, then classifying it as a weed or not is moot to the Dev. (This is a very apt methaphor but I can sense I'm explaining it poorly)
Any bugs the Dev didn't know about, its because its not pertinent to their use case. So they're doing the community a favor by fixing bugs that doesn't really matter to them, not the other way around.
If all a Dev wanted to do was to create a garden with only the plants he likes, then that's something he can do all on his own. The fact that a Dev would invite others to his garden, and take suggestions on which plants he should have is again a service he is providing to the community, not the other way around.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4
finalhit said:
Any bugs the Dev didn't know about, its because its not pertinent to their use case. So they're doing the community a favor by fixing bugs that doesn't really matter to them, not the other way around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some, but not all. If after release x.y the rom randomly exits out of loudspeaker it might mean that the author doesnt use loudspeaker ever, or simply that he didnt use it yet before another user did. It doesnt change the fact that maybe sooner or later he'll need to use it, and he'll be surely happier to be able to use it when that circumstance presents itself, rather than having an unknown bug preventing him.
Also sometimes bugs arent easy to reproduce so user input and data like logcats can speed up the resolution process a lot.
A ton of users are reporting and trying to pinpoint the battery drains in 4.4 xposed framework, I'm sure that the author will love his own phone's battery lasting longer.
tylerdurden83 said:
Some, but not all. If after release x.y the rom randomly exits out of loudspeaker it might mean that the author doesnt use loudspeaker ever, or simply that he didnt use it yet before another user did. It doesnt change the fact that maybe sooner or later he'll need to use it, and he'll be surely happier to be able to use it when that circumstance presents itself, rather than having an unknown bug preventing him.
Also sometimes bugs arent easy to reproduce so user input and data like logcats can speed up the resolution process a lot.
A ton of users are reporting and trying to pinpoint the battery drains in 4.4 xposed framework, I'm sure that the author will love his own phone's battery lasting longer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If the developer of that mod, Is having the same problems, I guarantee you he is the most able to diagnose that problem.
The most likely scenario of course it's that he's trying to pull weed out of someone else's garden.
Running logcats is not testing. At the end of the day. The devs logs cats are equally useful, and ultimately, the dev has to sift through those logs.
Would you ever hire an unskilled person to be your qa? That would be horrible. You're gonna basically tell the guy everything he needs to do to the point that you're better off ding it yourself.
The only reason a dev would need others logs is to help then pull out weeds from other people's gardens.
Time for me to sleep but for anyone to claim that devs equally need users for a free product that they are providing is a laughable statement.
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
If you claim that the xda devs require users to give them feedback and bug reports, how many of them are actually useful and does not sound something like "i flashed the ROM and it is very slow", "I get blablabla wakelocks" without any other details?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
This is why there are mods. Devs don't have to deal with the sh1t throwing. They'll live.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
can anyone pointe to the thread to root a nexus 6 with marshmallow on it please? i search but i see a lot of old, conflicting and outdated reports
I just want solid instructions that somebody here already used
cpugeeker said:
can anyone pointe to the thread to root a nexus 6 with marshmallow on it please? i search but i see a lot of old, conflicting and outdated reports
I just want solid instructions that somebody here already used
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here are the steps I used:
- flash/upgrade to Marshmallow
- flash modified boot.img
- flash/boot TWRP and sideload latest v2.50+
No. Not that unless you want unknown evil invading your phone and stealing your private information.
Use this instead;
http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-6/general/root-t3231211
doitright said:
No. Not that unless you want unknown evil invading your phone and stealing your private information.
Use this instead;
http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-6/general/root-t3231211
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW what happen with them? I found some readings but now all. What exactly went down? Any good reads on this?
doitright said:
No. Not that unless you want unknown evil invading your phone and stealing your private information.
Use this instead;
http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-6/general/root-t3231211
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol. I appreciate your work on providing other root access methods, but you really shouldnt go around claiming made up info as fact and trying to spread fear everywhere you can. You have no proof whatsoever of the things you claim.
EniGmA1987 said:
lol. I appreciate your work on providing other root access methods, but you really shouldnt go around claiming made up info as fact and trying to spread fear everywhere you can. You have no proof whatsoever of the things you claim.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You obviously don't know the first thing about security, or the gravity of offering root control to an unknown entity.
To make it simple, unless you can *prove* that something is safe, the only rational assumption is that it isn't.
In other words, it is not my place to prove them unsafe. It is your responsibility to prove that they are safe, and frankly, that is an impossible task.
Feel free to use whatever you like. But don't go recommending to somebody that they take dangerous risks that are unnecessary.
---------- Post added at 01:33 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:27 AM ----------
cpugeeker said:
WOW what happen with them? I found some readings but now all. What exactly went down? Any good reads on this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was almost acceptable when it was maintained by a single individual, but at some point fairly recently, the code was transferred/sold to an outfit that has been buying up all the root control software that can be found on play store.
Although the original author continues to make the software available under his pseudonym, there is no indication of the contract in place between him and the software's new owners, and no indication of their motives.
That makes the situation incredible frightening and dangerous.
doitright said:
You obviously don't know the first thing about security, or the gravity of offering root control to an unknown entity.
To make it simple, unless you can *prove* that something is safe, the only rational assumption is that it isn't.
In other words, it is not my place to prove them unsafe. It is your responsibility to prove that they are safe, and frankly, that is an impossible task.
Feel free to use whatever you like. But don't go recommending to somebody that they take dangerous risks that are unnecessary.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So something that has always been a bit closed, yet still trusted and used, gets transfered to a newly made company started through XDA leaders and still maintained currently by Chainfire for a while, and suddenly this means secret organizations with corrupt ties have suddenly taken control of the Android root world?
EniGmA1987 said:
So something that has always been a bit closed, yet still trusted and used, gets transfered to a newly made company started through XDA leaders and still maintained currently by Chainfire for a while, and suddenly this means secret organizations with corrupt ties have suddenly taken control of the Android root world?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't guarantee that it's bad. But for it to not be controlled by the creator (a first ballot Hall of Famer in this community) and ownership switched to an unproven entity, it turns it from solid and secure to who knows what. The new owners could be just as good. But we should skeptically wait and see
EniGmA1987 said:
So something that has always been a bit closed, yet still trusted and used, gets transfered to a newly made company started through XDA leaders and still maintained currently by Chainfire for a while, and suddenly this means secret organizations with corrupt ties have suddenly taken control of the Android root world?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not really a newly made company and no where are the XDA leaders involved.
Now make no mistake. Chains SU will be around for a very long time. Will there be other options? Sure, there are many already. If not as mainstream. Apps like this will come and go. It is the nature of the beast.
Now before people start bashing others they better have something to prove it. Other wise they have nothing to say worth listening to.
zelendel said:
It is not really a newly made company and no where are the XDA leaders involved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you provide some info on the company to the people here then? Because business filings say that you are wrong on that. The filings for the company were done on August 11th of this year and they rent a virtual office space at the Trump Building on Wall Street. Chainfire himself also said that the XDA leadership was involved in getting his project moved over to this company. Now maybe he wasnt supposed to let that slip, IDK, but he did say it.
EniGmA1987 said:
Could you provide some info on the company to the people here then? Because business filings say that you are wrong on that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just look deeper and you will see. Just because they have a different name, or make an off shoot doesnt really make them a different company. If you read you will see that they already have their fingers into a few SU apps already. Dont you think that is odd for a new company?
XDA admins only made introductions. I personally dont really care. Nor should anyone really. If you are using SU then you know the risks you run and how to spot them.
zelendel said:
Just look deeper and you will see. Just because they have a different name, or make an off shoot doesnt really make them a different company. If you read you will see that they already have their fingers into a few SU apps already. Dont you think that is odd for a new company?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What would be incredibly useful and go a long way in putting people's minds at ease, would be a realistic explanation of the MOTIVATIONS of this company, WHICH IS NEW, regardless of your perception of it being a simple name change, for acquiring and controlling ALL of the different mechanisms for controlling root on Android.
Frankly, I can imagine only a few motivations, none of which ANYONE should be ok with;
1) Charging for it,
2) Forcing ads that the user cannot control,
3) Backdoor/botnet/etc.
You need to remember that while their software will prompt you when some OTHER software tries to access root, it has the ability to hide its own use of root, as well as to wipe evidence from the logs.
Root access should ONLY EVER be open source.
doitright said:
What would be incredibly useful and go a long way in putting people's minds at ease, would be a realistic explanation of the MOTIVATIONS of this company, WHICH IS NEW, regardless of your perception of it being a simple name change, for acquiring and controlling ALL of the different mechanisms for controlling root on Android.
Frankly, I can imagine only a few motivations, none of which ANYONE should be ok with;
1) Charging for it,
2) Forcing ads that the user cannot control,
3) Backdoor/botnet/etc.
You need to remember that while their software will prompt you when some OTHER software tries to access root, it has the ability to hide its own use of root, as well as to wipe evidence from the logs.
Root access should ONLY EVER be open source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The open source was done once. It didnt last very long and due to the nature of SU will never stay open source and mainstream at the same time. If someone wants to charge for the SU app then ok let them. Heck most already paid for the SU pro anyway. No point in going on a witch hunt before there is something to hunt. All we can do is sit back and wait. If chain trusts them then I am willing to give them a chance. Root itself is a security risk and anyone that does root should know just what they are doing. If not then they get whats coming to them.
This is not this companies first root app. As stated they own/profit from just about all the root apps that are around.
zelendel said:
The open source was done once. It didnt last very long and due to the nature of SU will never stay open source and mainstream at the same time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no idea how to respond to that besides saying to you that this statement is *ABSURD*.
The open source root was the *FIRST* root, and has persisted. In fact, the root that *I* am working on, is the extension of that very same *ORIGINAL* root done by Koush. It has remained *the* primary mechanism for controlling root access from 2009 to present, except for a brief loss of maintenance during the reign of Android 5.x.
Further, the nature of root REQUIRES it to be open source.
And will be THE ONLY mainstream method of providing root access control for anyone who has ANY consideration for security.
If someone wants to charge for the SU app then ok let them. Heck most already paid for the SU pro anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only because they are being denied simple and mandatory features. This isn't a voluntary charge, this is coercion and even RANSOM.
No point in going on a witch hunt before there is something to hunt.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But there IS a witch to hunt: SECURITY. Or lack thereof.
All we can do is sit back and wait. If chain trusts them then I am willing to give them a chance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are a fool. Not only did the author of that binary root NEVER actually do anything to EARN your trust, the fact that you put your trust into a business arrangement that doesn't even involve you is tremendously scary... for you.
Root itself is a security risk and anyone that does root should know just what they are doing. If not then they get whats coming to them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. This is entirely invalid. Root is not a security risk when done correctly, in open source, and treated with *respect*.
Binary root control *IS* a security risk, and unfortunately you are wrong again on this, since knowing what you are doing DOES NOT protect you from it. There is NOTHING you can do to protect yourself from binary software that you VOLUNTARILY put into a sensitive position of high trust.
This is not this companies first root app. As stated they own/profit from just about all the root apps that are around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is a TERRIFYING prospect for reasons I've already discussed.
doitright said:
I have no idea how to respond to that besides saying to you that this statement is *ABSURD*.
The open source root was the *FIRST* root, and has persisted. In fact, the root that *I* am working on, is the extension of that very same *ORIGINAL* root done by Koush. It has remained *the* primary mechanism for controlling root access from 2009 to present, except for a brief loss of maintenance during the reign of Android 5.x.
Further, the nature of root REQUIRES it to be open source.
And will be THE ONLY mainstream method of providing root access control for anyone who has ANY consideration for security.
Only because they are being denied simple and mandatory features. This isn't a voluntary charge, this is coercion and even RANSOM.
But there IS a witch to hunt: SECURITY. Or lack thereof.
You are a fool. Not only did the author of that binary root NEVER actually do anything to EARN your trust, the fact that you put your trust into a business arrangement that doesn't even involve you is tremendously scary... for you.
No. This is entirely invalid. Root is not a security risk when done correctly, in open source, and treated with *respect*.
Binary root control *IS* a security risk, and unfortunately you are wrong again on this, since knowing what you are doing DOES NOT protect you from it. There is NOTHING you can do to protect yourself from binary software that you VOLUNTARILY put into a sensitive position of high trust.
That is a TERRIFYING prospect for reasons I've already discussed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He has done alot to earn my trust. You would know that had to been around as long as I have been.
I am fully aware of the first root. And the reasons behind him stopping its development. The only ones that I am aware of that was even using it was CM and they are almost as much of a joke as MIUI.
I am fully aware of what you are working on and to be honest not something I or many others would use would even use as you are unknown and to be honest not really trusted. Maybe after you have been around a while more people will put faith in you and your projects. Not to mention your attitude is enough to make many not bother with it.
Root is a security risk. Just as any real developer. Even Google is making things like root harder to obtain because they see the risk. But to be honest as I have already said "Mobile security is and illusion" If I was truly worried about security I would not unlock my bootloader or bother with rooting.
Now we can argue this back and forth and never get anywhere. So We can end this here.
doitright said:
You obviously don't know the first thing about security, or the gravity of offering root control to an unknown entity.
To make it simple, unless you can *prove* that something is safe, the only rational assumption is that it isn't.
In other words, it is not my place to prove them unsafe. It is your responsibility to prove that they are safe, and frankly, that is an impossible task.
Feel free to use whatever you like. But don't go recommending to somebody that they take dangerous risks that are unnecessary.
---------- Post added at 01:33 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:27 AM ----------
It was almost acceptable when it was maintained by a single individual, but at some point fairly recently, the code was transferred/sold to an outfit that has been buying up all the root control software that can be found on play store.
Although the original author continues to make the software available under his pseudonym, there is no indication of the contract in place between him and the software's new owners, and no indication of their motives.
That makes the situation incredible frightening and dangerous.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is almost the most amazing post on xda. :good:
Could you kindly prove that the Google Factory Image is safe? Otherwise I would advise you destroy your handset immediately as its probably not safe.
zelendel said:
He has done alot to earn my trust. You would know that had to been around as long as I have been.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been around longer than you. Try again.
I am fully aware of the first root. And the reasons behind him stopping its development. The only ones that I am aware of that was even using it was CM and they are almost as much of a joke as MIUI.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I won't argue with CM being a joke, but MOST people used Koush's superuser up until they were stopped by selinux.
I am fully aware of what you are working on and to be honest not something I or many others would use would even use as you are unknown and to be honest not really trusted. Maybe after you have been around a while more people will put faith in you and your projects. Not to mention your attitude is enough to make many not bother with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Speak for yourself, but don't you DARE to speak for others.
As far as the trustworthiness of my work goes... go ahead and AUDIT IT. The code speaks for itself.
Root is a security risk. Just as any real developer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I ask myself. Answer is that you have no idea what you are talking about.
Even Google is making things like root harder to obtain because they see the risk. But to be honest as I have already said "Mobile security is and illusion" If I was truly worried about security I would not unlock my bootloader or bother with rooting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google is correctly worried about the dangers of binary root. As YOU should also be.
Now we can argue this back and forth and never get anywhere. So We can end this here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only because you have degenerated into personal attacks rather than rational argument.
---------- Post added at 06:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:05 PM ----------
Amos91 said:
This is almost the most amazing post on xda. :good:
Could you kindly prove that the Google Factory Image is safe? Otherwise I would advise you destroy your handset immediately as its probably not safe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't prove that google factory image is safe. I can make a strong argument to suggest that it most likely is, and I can prove that AOSP is safe.
FYI: I use a Nexus, so I'm not limited to factory images, as implied by your last sentence.
Well, I'm no techie, I'm just an end-user of other people's talented work, but I'm with doitright on this one. I have trusted Chainfire for years - I have a number of his apps on my device, all of them paid for even though most work perfectly as free apps, simply because I do trust his work. Even if it's closed source black box stuff, he has always appeared to be a straight-up guy.
Still, once the black box passes into company ownership, at that point my trust ends. Companies are not charities hoping for donations. They want some return on whatever investment they've put into taking over SuperSU. Bottom line, I don't trust companies - and yes, that does include Google or Alphabet or whatever piece owns Android these days. I live with the knowledge that I am the product - my choice.
It's also my choice to opt for an open-source solution over a black box one. If doitright's superuser can be audited by people who know what they're looking at (I don't) then that'll do it for me.
And as an afterthought, yes, doitright is a spiky character. So is Torvalds. So what? As long as he comes up with the goods I have no problem with it. He comes across as passionate, doesn't suffer fools gladly (and that is just a saying, I'm not referring to any posters), and since I'm pretty much the same, if a bit more politic in the way I write, I can't criticise that...
doitright said:
Feel free to use whatever you like. But don't go recommending to somebody that they take dangerous risks that are unnecessary
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Risk = Chance * Effect.
doitright said:
I've been around longer than you. Try again.
I won't argue with CM being a joke, but MOST people used Koush's superuser up until they were stopped by selinux.
Speak for yourself, but don't you DARE to speak for others.
As far as the trustworthiness of my work goes... go ahead and AUDIT IT. The code speaks for itself.
I ask myself. Answer is that you have no idea what you are talking about.
Google is correctly worried about the dangers of binary root. As YOU should also be.
Only because you have degenerated into personal attacks rather than rational argument.
---------- Post added at 06:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:05 PM ----------
I can't prove that google factory image is safe. I can make a strong argument to suggest that it most likely is, and I can prove that AOSP is safe.
FYI: I use a Nexus, so I'm not limited to factory images, as implied by your last sentence.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I only speak for the developers I have talked to about using your root set up instead of chains. Got the same answer from all of them.
As for being around longer then me in the modding area. I would put a bet on that. I have been modding phones before a smart phone was even a thought.
You were the first to throw insults. As seems to be your way. Anyone that doesn't agree with you is called a fool or other wise.
Nope you are right. I have no idea what I'm talking about. Now excuse me I have some bugs to fix thanks to Google messing things up.
So I've been frequenting these forums for years now. And specifically the Note5 forums ever since I got an n920i. Coming from a OnePlus One, the development for the Note5 is quite underwhelming, and hey, I get it, it's a tough device to develop for. I've seen some really cool things come from these forums. And a lot of users that are passionate about getting the max out of their devices.
But the last few months I've seen two of the major kernel developers drop out from the game. One, well he doesn't even have a device on hand. But the other one, a very passionate developer left because of supposedly problems with the moderators. And if it is because of moderators that are pushing developers away from an admittedly small community, then I feel the community should at least deserve some answers to why developers are leaving the note5 over the moderators. And, if possible, how to resolve these problems. The note5 isn't even a year old and yet support is already dwindling. Developers get bored and quit. That's fine. But when people who are given control to moderate these threads are the ones pushing them away, we should get answers.
That's pretty much my rant. Feel free to chime in if you agree or disagree.
abde27 said:
So I've been frequenting these forums for years now. And specifically the Note5 forums ever since I got an n920i. Coming from a OnePlus One, the development for the Note5 is quite underwhelming, and hey, I get it, it's a tough device to develop for. I've seen some really cool things come from these forums. And a lot of users that are passionate about getting the max out of their devices.
But the last few months I've seen two of the major kernel developers drop out from the game. One, well he doesn't even have a device on hand. But the other one, a very passionate developer left because of supposedly problems with the moderators. And if it is because of moderators that are pushing developers away from an admittedly small community, then I feel the community should at least deserve some answers to why developers are leaving the note5 over the moderators. And, if possible, how to resolve these problems. The note5 isn't even a year old and yet support is already dwindling. Developers get bored and quit. That's fine. But when people who are given control to moderate these threads are the ones pushing them away, we should get answers.
That's pretty much my rant. Feel free to chime in if you agree or disagree.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you. If you frequent the forums. You can piece it together when you read bits in different forums. There's still some rom makers and cm13 is being cooked. But unless something changes I reckon in that next 3-4 months. Note 5 is going to become a waste land. Or *young devs* will remain. Nothing wrong with them but.. You know what I mean. Compared to devs that have always done this kind of thing. So I think it's going to dwindle slowly. And then just fade off. Specially when the note 6/other devices hit. Game over...... That's my bet
I totally agree, the issue is there are just so many variants for Samsung devices now its hard for the developers to keep up with every device. Back when I had the Note 3 there were only two variants whereas now there are more than 5 variants for the Note 5.
Even the amount of actual devices there are, there are just too many Samsung are releasing. Back in 2013 there were only 'flagship' devices being developed for as they were the only ones worth developing for, but now there are low-mid range devices that can have a lot of development potential.
If its going to be poor development like this for the Note 5 in the near future or even possibly the Note 6 I might just buy the next Nexus device. I had only bought the Note 5 as I had the Note 4,3 and 2 and the Note line-up was always more powerful than the regular flagship devices.
I've seen and heard complaints about the moderation teams, and I've seen many, many developers come and go on these forums. What most of you do not see is the reason that some of these "developers" leave badmouthing the moderators.
We have a very lenient set of rules here, yet many people feel the need to try to push the boundaries of them, some much more than others.
We have had "developers" leave because they got busted stealing others work, because they got busted trying to make money off of the users here, busted for trying to get users to buy them devices, computers, etc...
We've had our fair share of those who let the "fame" go to their heads and began believing they were above the rules.
And finally, what you don't see, is that we try to work with these people, for the community's sake, to correct the problems, long before they are reprimanded for their actions. In the end it comes down to these people not getting their way, so they take their ball and go home, all the while complaining about the big, bad moderators.
You can choose to believe what you wish, but believe me when I tell you that development is dying because the type of developers that you're seeing more and more of, truly don't care about the community unless you line their pockets or subjugate yourselves to their abuse.
Why do you not see a great majority of the above in the forums? We moderators clean it up so that the community thrives, because really, who wants to support a developer that belittles, berates and humiliates his supporters? Ask him that on whatever social media he's taken up to complain about how he was treated here...
Thank you. I am personally not against moderators. They save threads again and again when things get out of hand. Without moderators, XDA might not be here still.
All I'm asking for is some transparency. To see if a developer left because of moderators or because they themselves broke rules, or whatever the reason is. A device with a lot of development behind it doesn't need that type of transparency because if someone leaves, it doesn't hurt the overall community if there are others working on it. But in a small community like this, it's harder to swallow. If a developer leaves claiming that the moderation team forced them away then maybe the moderation team should give their side of the story so the community knows what's going on, and if there are people interested in developing for the device that they have a frame of reference of knowing what is acceptable here and what isn't.
I hope that makes sense. And I know being transparent isn't the easiest thing to do. But if people are seeing that moderators are being blamed when developers leave and moderators staying quiet, then what kind of message does that send?
There's a clear line between acceptable transparency and airing out other people's dirty laundry in a publicly visible space. It's easy to ask for transparency when someone else is at fault, but imagine being on the other side--transparency might not be the word you'd use to describe it. As far as what's acceptable and what's not, the forum rules are sufficiently clear. Stay within the bounds of that document and you'll have no trouble from the mods. Our goal is to make this a developer-friendly environment that encourages everyone to contribute.
I agree that there is a difference but we are looking at a device that is losing devs by the minute. I do not want to start a political revolution here, or change rules. I do not expect development for the Note5. I would like to see development, but I'm not expecting it. It's very heartbreaking seeing that this forum is mysteriously losing developers for a device not even a year old.
If anything, lets work together to create a place for development to flourish, just like the rules ask us to.
yeah seems like all the big devs are leaving and we left with roms updated from December. All threads are closed without any explanation. Kinda sad since the note 5 really needs more devs to develop. great device but if there's no support from devs. i will stay away from samsung for a while.
The biggest question of me till now is Why @UpInTheAir left the community?
Lam pham said:
Why @UpInTheAir left the community?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read his post where he explain something about problems with moderator(s) and I saw a strange phrase something like "developers need help from moderators" or something similar to it, but I don't understand WHAT help a moderator could give to the Dev.
More over I don't understand why a Dev could think to leave a community due to problems with moderator(s)....Moderators manage rules and I don't figure out how this could touch/ruins Dev's work.
All of this is strange for me.
At the end of the day, every closed thread here is closed because there was an issue revolving around kanging of people's work- that's where it STARTS...from there mods are forced to step in, and it's at this stage that SOMEONE will always feel they were done wrong- either thru uneducated assumptions on things like the GPL or apache licenses and what is or is not acceptable to document "credit given" and "permission" to maintain compliance with these licenses- or it's knowingly stolen...the mods start taking heat when they moderate with their emotions not their duty, take it from a guy just again logging in again after a ban issued in anger...only to find a ghost town...believe me when i say you'll never get transparency. I just read a mod basically call out uita in "whatever social circle he's in" and very tastelessly degrade him when he can't defend himself- at the end of the day this is the mod's sandbox- i can't even count now how many times I've seen MY statement repeated (take their ball and go home) by multiple mods who obviously read MY feelings on it all- but again, it's your sandbox boys...I've been told half a dozen times now that this is a private site, the mods don't owe us anything for explanations, nor will we get them (at least not truthful ones because no one will admit fault), and that none of this was even acceptable to discuss, not would it be, in public. my response was simply that public outcry would need to be answered eventually and here it is, inevitably, as i predicted. I stood for what i believed to be right, i got banned. Every mod told me i was wrong to even voice an opinion, and how dare that opinion contrast, it was against the rules, if i didn't agree then kick rocks and this 2 week ban will give me time to reflect. Well, that's the same attitude that pushed away a few devs, and even tekhd, apparently, cuz i come back and tekhd, evren, drketan, all have locked threads and are currently ceased development on xda...
Devs will come and go, that's the nature of the beast, but the Note 5 forums you currently see are the results of something else. I've always considered myself to be a rational person very open to hearing out another's side, but all i got was banned and told it ain't a democracy, shut up or get out and stay out. That was my honest experience. Fwiw...
Lam pham said:
The biggest question of me till now is Why @UpInTheAir left the community?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You haven't know what's secret behind the scenes, so don't ask for the reason....you will never get the answer....
Sent from my SM-N910C using Tapatalk
haifish9999 said:
You haven't know what's secret behind the scenes, so don't ask for the reason....you will never get the answer....
Sent from my SM-N910C using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope it's not a case of " Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad". (As in Animal Farm story)
Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk
Well, just to be perfectly "transparent", i don't even rightfully know how long my original ban was, but i DID just make another account and get an extra, oh i dunno week or something....does that make my bucket of lies an accurate account, @KennyG123 ?
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
The winter is coming .....
I've been banned myself for well over 3 weeks and I stopped the work I was doing for another phone. The mod thought it was ok to keep deleting my messages and close my thread so I can't say that all the mods are perfect and do the right thing.. Seems more like moderating from emotion or stress... I can understand why he left the community and for those that don't know that doing any type of dev work usually takes hours upon hours, weeks even months just to get something made perfectly and then a moderator bans him and basically made him feel worthless with all the time spent working on stuff.. You'd be mad too if this was done to yourself!!
Rx8Driver said:
Well, just to be perfectly "transparent", i don't even rightfully know how long my original ban was, but i DID just make another account and get an extra, oh i dunno week or something....does that make my bucket of lies an accurate account, @KennyG123 ?
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want your dirty laundry aired and not the pack of lies about "poor me voicing my opinion" I will be happy to post all your transgressions publicly with your permission. You are just like everyone else that received a short ban, then continued to break rules...it is always the evil moderators. And to add to your character, you just lied about the other account in the PM you sent me and now here you admit to it...so why should anyone believe anything you say? Not trying to argue, but it gets tiresome seeing people post these "Poor me" posts and the "evil moderators" stuff. You don't think it hurts us to see that? We are volunteers just trying to give back to the forums we love so much. We try to keep the drama down because drama is NOT development. But people like to assume things..and usually they are wrong.
As for the rest of the ridiculous comments in this thread...why...why on a development website would ANY moderator chase away a developer? Why...why would the owners allow that? Think about it! We do everything we can to help and work things out with developers...maybe you heard of something we have here...called Private Messaging!!!! Not to mention we have a very lenient system of dealing with rule breaking....people and especially developers get a whole lot of chances before even their first very short ban...then there are several of those before they work themselves into a permanent ban.
The problem is when these developers start demanding that moderators break the rules, or copyright, or licensing agreements just for them. Then they go berserk when moderators don't bend over backwards against licensing just for them, the oh so mighty developers! And somehow you want to blame moderators for their actions, ego and demands. Formats of this site are constantly changing for developers...they get free hosting on DevDB, can set their thread preferences on DevDB. Special Q&A threads were set up for developers so they can concentrate on development in their threads. Developer ONLY forums were created for them to work. I can list dozens of more things done just for developers but none of that matters obviously...only that your developer decided to leave over GPL. No, instead you think out of the 30,000 developers on this site, that the 50 moderators banded together to run off one guy....ludicrous!
KennyG123 said:
If you want your dirty laundry aired and not the pack of lies about "poor me voicing my opinion" I will be happy to post all your transgressions publicly with your permission. You are just like everyone else that received a short ban, then continued to break rules...it is always the evil moderators.
As for the rest of the ridiculous comments in this thread...why...why on a development website would ANY moderator chase away a developer? Why...why would the owners allow that? Think about it! We do everything we can to help and work things out with developers...maybe you heard of something we have here...called Private Messaging!!!! Not to mention we have a very lenient system of dealing with rule breaking....people and especially developers get a whole lot of chances before even their first very short ban...then there are several of those before they work themselves into a permanent ban.
The problem is when these developers start demanding that moderators break the rules, or copyright, or licensing agreements just for them. Then they go berserk when moderators don't bend over backwards against licensing just for them, the oh so mighty developers! And somehow you want to blame moderators for their actions, ego and demands. Formats of this site are constantly changing for developers...they get free hosting on DevDB, can set their thread preferences on DevDB. Special Q&A threads were set up for developers so they can concentrate on development in their threads. Developer ONLY forums were created for them to work. I can list dozens of more things done just for developers but none of that matters obviously...only that your developer decided to leave over GPL. No, instead you think out of the 30,000 developers on this site, that the 50 moderators banded together to run off one guy....ludicrous!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have any dirty laundry to hide...feel free to Pat anything you got with my name on it, but don't fabricate stuff, and sure you've my permission. And I'm NOT just like everyone else, another short sighted statement since you don't even know me. Also, pm is pm, but the OP asked for the moderators side of the story with all this, yet that wasn't addressed nor was anything other than my acting like a 2yr old....again an unwarranted insult, and another PM attempt to draw me into an argument. Air whatever you like, but know i can and will do the same.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Rx8Driver said:
I don't have any dirty laundry to hide...feel free to Pat anything you got with my name on it, but don't fabricate stuff, and sure you've my permission. And I'm NOT just like everyone else, another short sighted statement since you don't even know me. Also, pm is pm, but the OP asked for the moderators side of the story with all this, yet that wasn't addressed nor was anything other than my acting like a 2yr old....again an unwarranted insult, and another PM attempt to draw me into an argument. Air whatever you like, but know i can and will do the same.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, feel free. Thanks for openly admitting you violated forum rules after the long post stating you were banned for 2 weeks for voicing your opinion. But at least you admitted it finally. I guess your statement that PM is PM, somehow means it is ok to lie to moderators then post how you got wronged..whatever.
As for everyone else in this thread concerned about reality and development...moderators want nothing but more development. We do not run off developers. And as stated we actually invest a lot of our volunteer time in PMs trying to work things out with developers. I have lots of developers that I talked out of leaving and they come to me with their issues...sometimes we can help them...sometimes we can't. In UITA's case. we couldn't because GPL rules over XDA rules. All kernel developers should know this when pulling code from any git. I have had many good conversations with UITA and he came to me often with issues. This time he came to me and asked about the ruling for kernels. I explained it to him and not even sure if he ever read it because he exploded at about the same time. I hope he takes this time to refresh and recharge and considers coming back after his "vacation." But that is up to him. I am here to work with him when he is ready to let him know the boundaries...the same boundaries that every one of the hundreds of kernel developers on XDA deal with.
The best thing to do might be to encourage UITA in PM to relax and work within the system and do what he does best. I can help him to ensure his credits are properly preserved in his commits and in threads. All he has to do is ask.
I will also add, YES i did in fact create an extra account. Plainly and openly...and it's here nor there because the root of the issue wasn't accounts...it was my opinion...creating an account to circumvent a ban is petty...at least when the ban is originally due to a difference of opinion and instead of working thru it whoever actually banned me decided to do that...
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 05:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:08 PM ----------
If there's some other dirty laundry i got around here other than testing for devs and working on synapse profiles, and feedback on roms, and helping noobs find their way I'd love to see it...
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 05:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:10 PM ----------
KennyG123 said:
If you want your dirty laundry aired and not the pack of lies about "poor me voicing my opinion" I will be happy to post all your transgressions publicly with your permission. You are just like everyone else that received a short ban, then continued to break rules...it is always the evil moderators. And to add to your character, you just lied about the other account in the PM you sent me and now here you admit to it...so why should anyone believe anything you say? Not trying to argue, but it gets tiresome seeing people post these "Poor me" posts and the "evil moderators" stuff. You don't think it hurts us to see that? We are volunteers just trying to give back to the forums we love so much. We try to keep the drama down because drama is NOT development. But people like to assume things..and usually they are wrong.
As for the rest of the ridiculous comments in this thread...why...why on a development website would ANY moderator chase away a developer? Why...why would the owners allow that? Think about it! We do everything we can to help and work things out with developers...maybe you heard of something we have here...called Private Messaging!!!! Not to mention we have a very lenient system of dealing with rule breaking....people and especially developers get a whole lot of chances before even their first very short ban...then there are several of those before they work themselves into a permanent ban.
The problem is when these developers start demanding that moderators break the rules, or copyright, or licensing agreements just for them. Then they go berserk when moderators don't bend over backwards against licensing just for them, the oh so mighty developers! And somehow you want to blame moderators for their actions, ego and demands. Formats of this site are constantly changing for developers...they get free hosting on DevDB, can set their thread preferences on DevDB. Special Q&A threads were set up for developers so they can concentrate on development in their threads. Developer ONLY forums were created for them to work. I can list dozens of more things done just for developers but none of that matters obviously...only that your developer decided to leave over GPL. No, instead you think out of the 30,000 developers on this site, that the 50 moderators banded together to run off one guy....ludicrous!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And whoa whoa whoa...i never denied making that account. It's DroidPro35....i NEVER denied that, pm or not.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 05:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:12 PM ----------
Lastly, and I'm finished with it is i have every pm between myself and bajanman and between myself and JJD...I'll gladly post them all, i was angrier two weeks ago, but there's nothing in any of them leading up to my ban that wasn't plain and simple language describing what's been transgressing here...and say what you will about uita, yeah he's got a reputation for being harsh, but over the past few months he'd come a long way from when he and i first "met"...I'd say, for him, publicly at least he'd been on his best behavior and even gentle on the noobs and all...
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 10:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:24 PM ----------
Rx8Driver said:
Well, just to be perfectly "transparent", i don't even rightfully know how long my original ban was, but i DID just make another account and get an extra, oh i dunno week or something....does that make my bucket of lies an accurate account, @KennyG123 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you mean here? Cuz i said DID....like not DIDNT...so like i did...and who cares if i admit it? The ban for that is already over...time served and all that...