Please post any speculations about the S5 specs.
1080p or 4k display amoled
16 core
Android key lime pie
64gb storage
4K resolution screen expandable up to 56" via flexible graphene technology
7.1 surround sound speakers
32 core bigLITTLE CPU
SLI graphics
Direct brain interface for HUD and audio overlay over reality plus telepathic hands free communication and control
Spoiler
Of course I'm taking the piss, this is an utterly pointless thread.
Qualcomm snapdragon 16 cores - 2.6Ghz
5.3 Inch Full Hd Display with Gorilla Glass 4
4GB Ram
Baets by Dre (or Eminem) :laugh:
32/64/126GB Memory
16Mp Camera
3800Mah Battery
And most importand Metal Body.
Useless, NON meaningful, lousy sh!t thread!
300 gb internal
69 cores
50 gb ram
A brain
The ability to use the brain
The abiltity to use the brain in a smart way- S smart
Ability to create fire
Ability to fly
Another extra brain
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app
why are you trolling my thread?
Why are u making this thread ?
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app
Well this thread will probably get locked anyways - BUT.
3 Million Core CPU - 4 of them.
Liquid Nitrogen cooling.
18K Resolution SAMOLED display.
Trillion Cuda cores nvidia titan GPU.
192837 Million mAh Battery.
Yeah , I know this thread is pointless and the specs he even mentioned are ridiculous for now.
Skander1998 said:
Yeah , I know this thread is pointless and the specs he even mentioned are ridiculous for now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what people said about 1080p and 8 cores on a photo two years ago.
FinancialWar said:
That's what people said about 1080p and 8 cores on a photo two years ago.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"FOR NOW" - Read it again
That stuff isn't for 2013 - 2014 bro
Skander1998 said:
"FOR NOW" - Read it again
That stuff isn't for 2013 - 2014 bro
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what do you mean it isn't for 2014? S5 is a 2014 product. Go learn some arithmetic...
FinancialWar said:
what do you mean it isn't for 2014? S5 is a 2014 product. Go learn some arithmetic...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*facepalm* My brain is starting to hurt - I'm talking about the specs and NO, you won't see 16 core CPU's in 2014 - neither this year 2013.
Man you hurt my brain.
Skander1998 said:
*facepalm* My brain is starting to hurt - I'm talking about the specs and NO, you won't see 16 core CPU's in 2014 - neither this year 2013.
Man you hurt my brain.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since you can't do simple arithmetic, I see why this might hurt your brain cells.
1 cores, 2 cores, 4 cores, 8 cores ....
Applying simple geometric sequence equation a*r^(n-1), where a is the first term, r is the common ratio.
Since a = 1, r = 2, therefore the number of cores in the nth generation phone is 1*2^(n-1) = 2^(n-1)
number of cores in S5 will be
= 2^(5-1) = 16 cores
number of cores in S10 will be
= 2^(10-1) = 512 cores
Did your brain explode?
Welcome to XDA 2013, where 13 y'old trolls hang around :3
One of the main reasons I don't even bother developing and sharing my work here.
PS: Facepalm at doubling the cores - I owe you 100$ if the S5 comes with 16 CPU cores.
Not trolling ... why would someone create a thread about next year's product ? We all know this thread is going to get closed ..
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app
This thread pisses me off
It's pointless you should be more concerned about your s4 if you even have one mate
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2
chubby65 said:
This thread pisses me off
It's pointless you should be more concerned about your s4 if you even have one mate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why would I want a S4 when I have the Note 2? S5 could be a good candidate to replace my Note 2 but not S4.
FinancialWar said:
why would I want a S4 when I have the Note 2? S5 could be a good candidate to replace my Note 2 but not S4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No chance
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2
Plutonium battery
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2
Thread Closed and Cleaned...this thread has ran its course....
Related
This phone has the potential to be a beast. This has nothing to with the Evo 3D but you might as well read up a bit while you guys wait for ICS.
http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/lg-optimus-4x-hd-unveiled-quad-core-tegra-3-ice-cream-sandwich/
Damn, this phone looks like it will raise the bar for all the other phones, just like the Evo 4G did.
4.7 inch, HD (could be higher def), quad core - the perfect phone for mobile gaming
Pretty much. I think it will need a bigger battery. 2000+ or whatever won't cut it.
That phone does indeed look like a beast, and I look forward to MWC 2012, where I hope that HTC can deliver an equally beastly phone
Funny thing is, with all the negativity surrounding its predecessor, the Optimus 2X, previous owners are highly skeptical lol. They hate LG with a passion.
Sent from my Galaxy SII
Not impressed
Sent from my mean EVO 3d
http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/lgs-upcoming-mwc-lineup-runs-into-some-italians-gets-documente/
engadget just dropped a video looks so smooth its in italian thou lol
im digging it so far. only thing im waiting to see is if a quad core a15 chip gets dropped at MWC. the tegra 3 is nice and im sure the exynos quad core will be very nice but they r both a9's. i believe the dual core a15's match up or beat the a9 quad cores so imagine an a15 quad core dont take my word for it thou haha im pretty sure i read that somewhere
only a couple days left cant wait. ill most likely get a dual core a15 over a tegra 3 need to see how they stack up next to each other!
swaze said:
Not impressed
Sent from my mean EVO 3d
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep... Pretty much
dylan6879 said:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/23/lgs-upcoming-mwc-lineup-runs-into-some-italians-gets-documente/
engadget just dropped a video looks so smooth its in italian thou lol
im digging it so far. only thing im waiting to see is if a quad core a15 chip gets dropped at MWC. the tegra 3 is nice and im sure the exynos quad core will be very nice but they r both a9's. i believe the dual core a15's match up or beat the a9 quad cores so imagine an a15 quad core dont take my word for it thou haha im pretty sure i read that somewhere
only a couple days left cant wait. ill most likely get a dual core a15 over a tegra 3 need to see how they stack up next to each other!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Texas instruments just showcased dualcore A15 omap.it beats the tegra 3 and its just clocked at 800mhz.so imagine a 2ghz one.
Full article here
http://www.slashgear.com/ti-omap-5-blows-past-quadcore-tegra-3-23215003/
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
josephnero said:
Texas instruments just showcased dualcore A15 omap.it beats the tegra 3 and its just clocked at 800mhz.so imagine a 2ghz one.
Full article here
http://www.slashgear.com/ti-omap-5-blows-past-quadcore-tegra-3-23215003/
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha yeah I thought so. That's insane can't wait to see these things fly I'll be skipping the whole quad core trend for one of these unless of course there happens to be some magical quad core a15. Performance over big numbers haha.. hope Sprint shows something off at MWC even thou they normally don't.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
dylan6879 said:
Ha yeah I thought so. That's insane can't wait to see these things fly I'll be skipping the whole quad core trend for one of these unless of course there happens to be some magical quad core a15. Performance over big numbers haha.. hope Sprint shows something off at MWC even thou they normally don't.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have fun waiting till Q1 2013.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda premium
I haven't heard anything about a microsd card in this thing yet. Am I missing something or does that seem to be the case? I don't want anything to do with a phone that doesn't have microsd.
Sent from my Shooter using xda premium
swaze said:
have fun waiting till Q1 2013.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well now i meant an a15 processor TI isnt the only company announcing them. wait now that i look r they i thought there was more? what is the new sanpdragon krait based on? someone knowledgable chime in pls! and for the moment i dont mind waiting haha my 3d is still perfect in my eyes im just a tech junkie and whenever there is something new i either sell mine or hand it on down in the family and jump on the newest
wish it was as easy to do with my car
dylan6879 said:
well now i meant an a15 processor TI isnt the only company announcing them. wait now that i look r they i thought there was more? what is the new sanpdragon krait based on? someone knowledgable chime in pls! and for the moment i dont mind waiting haha my 3d is still perfect in my eyes im just a tech junkie and whenever there is something new i either sell mine or hand it on down in the family and jump on the newest
wish it was as easy to do with my car
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty sure Qualcomm's S4 chips r A15 based, also being built with 28nm processing...that's where the difference is being seen. Smaller chips much more efficient in the end.
What's funny is Samsung is going to be showing off their new chips at MWC and they only went down to 32nm with A9 cores for the quad chip shown on engadget...
Thought it was a tad odd though Samsung only making it to 32nm while everyone else is pushing for 28nm and lower. Hell Intel stated they are shooting for 14nm at CES if i remember right! They will be one to keep an eye on in the long run. Imho
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Garbage
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D using XDA App
sgt. slaughter said:
Pretty sure Qualcomm's S4 chips r A15 based, also being built with 28nm processing...that's where the difference is being seen. Smaller chips much more efficient in the end.
What's funny is Samsung is going to be showing off their new chips at MWC and they only went down to 32nm with A9 cores for the quad chip shown on engadget...
Thought it was a tad odd though Samsung only making it to 32nm while everyone else is pushing for 28nm and lower. Hell Intel stated they are shooting for 14nm at CES if i remember right! They will be one to keep an eye on in the long run. Imho
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i thought the snapdragon s4 was but i wasnt sure, tried to search it and couldnt find anywere that mentions its an a15 although im sure it is. was thinking the same thing as i read that everyone is going to 28nm and samsung of everyone is only going down to 32nm but u know it will be a very nice one.
definitely need to keep an eye on intel i havent been impressed with what theyve shown off so far but them being intel they have the background and resources to make some serious competition around here. 14nm is crazy mwc hasnt even started and i cant wait for ces..
sgt. slaughter said:
Pretty sure Qualcomm's S4 chips r A15 based, also being built with 28nm processing...that's where the difference is being seen. Smaller chips much more efficient in the end.
What's funny is Samsung is going to be showing off their new chips at MWC and they only went down to 32nm with A9 cores for the quad chip shown on engadget...
Thought it was a tad odd though Samsung only making it to 32nm while everyone else is pushing for 28nm and lower. Hell Intel stated they are shooting for 14nm at CES if i remember right! They will be one to keep an eye on in the long run. Imho
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read in andtech that S4 is modified architecture with a performance between A9 and A15.still sounds awesome
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
That video was impressive. But I don't like lg phones....
Sent from my EVO 3D with ViperROM via XDA premium app
z50king said:
That video was impressive. But I don't like lg phones....
Sent from my EVO 3D with ViperROM via XDA premium app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same here bro.i never trust LG
josephnero said:
I read in andtech that S4 is modified architecture with a performance between A9 and A15.still sounds awesome
Sent from my HTC EVO 3D X515m using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah your right to an extent but its NOT "between" them its inline with A15 if not better...the write up at anandtech.com about the new S4's benchmarking is really well done. As are their other write ups concerning the chip.
...Qualcomm, unlike most ARM chip makers, does not license the architecture for its application processors directly from ARM Holdings. Instead, it designs its own cores in-house and simply licenses the ARM instruction set. At the most basic level, Qualcomm’s Krait core is more advanced than Cortex-A9, the current standard from ARM, and it may even best the next-generation Cortex-A15 core....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.extremetech.com/computin...ragon-s4-has-the-competition-on-the-defensive
a friend got a HTC ONE X which is using Tegra3. Just so so.
Yes, because ICS is not optimized for quad core. Plus, it is Tegra 3 which means no support.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
OP, you're not making yourself clear. Please elaborate.
kaspar737 said:
Yes, because ICS is not optimized for quad core.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, but how is that so? What is your definition of an OS not being "optimized" for multiple cores? Based on my limited knowledge, kernels take control of the activation and deactivation of the cores, and the apps themself are the ones that are supposed to "take advantage" of the cores.
How is an OS supposed be "optimized" for a quad core CPU?
tkkyobaby1 said:
a friend got a HTC ONE X which is using Tegra3. Just so so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now I think buying a tegra inside device is not a good idea, the same with lg.
kaspar737 said:
Yes, because ICS is not optimized for quad core. Plus, it is Tegra 3 which means no support.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is up there with some of the stupidest things iv ever read.
I think the Android ecosystem is so complex that occasional lags are bound to happen even if we reach a point of using 8 cores on a smartphone. (And that, is why iOS is so smooth with slower hardware. It's a simpler OS.)
But the Tegra3 pretty much leaves everyone in the dust when it comes to games.
But when it comes to support... oh noes
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
kaspar737 said:
But when it comes to support... oh noes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The international version of the HTC One X with Tegra 3 has already gotten its full sources released a while ago.
At least it seems Nvidia isn't as unsupportive as we think they are. LG, apparently, is the one that is holding back from releasing sources for us.
Yea, but when Android 5 comes out then I hope that they will release all the necessary stuff. That may make me think better about Nvidia.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
silentmelodies said:
The international version of the HTC One X with Tegra 3 has already gotten its full sources released a while ago.
At least it seems Nvidia isn't as unsupportive as we think they are. LG, apparently, is the one that is holding back from releasing sources for us.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With nvidia drivers and hals to the public?
tkkyobaby1 said:
a friend got a HTC ONE X which is using Tegra3. Just so so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok good for you
now i am goign to enjoy my Quad Core phone again okay?
What is the point of this thread? As for desktop PC's, more cores = better (most of the time). Since dual cores work just fine in both GB and ICS the same goes for quad cores. And NO, quad cores don't mean less battery duration.
Maybe he is just jeaulous but i dont think a phone needs quad core. For web browsing and watching videos (well.. lol tegra 2 ) some gameing. dual core is more than enough. As i mentiond some time ago in other thread this reminds me of megapixel hunt in compact digital cameras market.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
tkkyobaby1 said:
a friend got a HTC ONE X which is using Tegra3. Just so so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And what was the purpose of posting it here? do you want to make an excuse that quadcore isn't nowhere near better than dualcore?
I agree with someone said quadcore isn't really important for mobile phone. If only O2x have more than 512 MB RAM I bet it will last for next 2-3 years
Durio said:
And what was the purpose of posting it here? do you want to make an excuse that quadcore isn't nowhere near better than dualcore?
I agree with someone said quadcore isn't really important for mobile phone. If only O2x have more than 512 MB RAM I bet it will last for next 2-3 years
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It can still last for 2-3 years, you just wont be able to multitask when playing games so much in the future.
quadcores will be **** if they dont have that 5th core for when there isnt much going on or they will chew through battery.
The new huwai something has its own quadcore and it smashes all cuurent quad cores in benchmarks, tegra 3 the exenos ect. But if it doesnt have that 5th core it will probably be bad. Its said to come with a 2300mah battery.
eraldo said:
It can still last for 2-3 years, you just wont be able to multitask when playing games so much in the future.
quadcores will be **** if they dont have that 5th core for when there isnt much going on or they will chew through battery.
The new huwai something has its own quadcore and it smashes all cuurent quad cores in benchmarks, tegra 3 the exenos ect. But if it doesnt have that 5th core it will probably be bad. Its said to come with a 2300mah battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But branding sometimes matter. Market rarely pay attention to a brand like Huawei,compared to samsung. I heard Meizu MX also decent but yeah it has the same market problem
Sent from fastest O2X ever
Durio said:
But branding sometimes matter. Market rarely pay attention to a brand like Huawei,compared to samsung. I heard Meizu MX also decent but yeah it has the same market problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Meizu MX Quad has pretty good specs (including the same Exynos 4212 in the S3), but is sold only in China. It's not meant to compete internationally.
Most useless thread ever.
My HTC one x is a hundred times better than my o2x was
Sent from my HTC One X
Kickasskev said:
My HTC one x is a hundred times better than my o2x was
Sent from my HTC One X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and o2x is hundred times cheaper...common sense
Aight ot, its time to build myself a overpowered gaming machine
Amount to spend $3000 give or take a few hundred.
Picked out a case already: http://www.epcservices.com/proddetail.asp?prod=3003023
So feel free to throw down your suggestions, and I'll update this thread to show my progress
Cool man! With your budget, this thing is gonna kick some ass.
Sent from my coffee pot.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130797 VGA
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116501 CPU
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820233232 RAM
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811119160 Case (better than urs)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131850 Motherboard
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820148443 SSD
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ..._Keyboards_&_Mice-_-Hot_Deal-_-26-201-003 Mouse
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823114011 Keyboard
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148844 HDD
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817171055 Power supply
Well i didn't count the total cost but if you want a high end pc these items are the best of the best, enjoy
32 gigs of RAM, unless your board supports 64GB.
2 X NVIDIA Dual GeForce GTX 580 in SLI
Core i7 Extreme CPU
That leaves you with about 1000 for everything else, which is more than enough for a pretty large SSD
Hmm I spent 450 usd on my build and its decent enough
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
TheSkinnyDrummer said:
Cool man! With your budget, this thing is gonna kick some ass.
Sent from my coffee pot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes indeed it is I desided it was time to step things up from this crappy $600 acer.
tarekkkkk said:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811119160 Case (better than urs)
Well i didn't count the total cost but if you want a high end pc these items are the best of the best, enjoy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I chose that case based purely on aesthetics only... and I'm sticking to it
Thanks for all the other sugestions though, ill look into them all.
jaszek said:
32 gigs of RAM, unless your board supports 64GB.
2 X NVIDIA Dual GeForce GTX 580 in SLI
Core i7 Extreme CPU
That leaves you with about 1000 for everything else, which is more than enough for a pretty large SSD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you.
scoffyburito said:
Hmm I spent 450 usd on my build and its decent enough
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
coolstorybro.jpg
m1l4droid said:
I suggest going for ATI Radeon. I've had a 4850 for 3 years, and it still kicks ass. I run Skyrim on 1 lower than the highest quality, on at least 30 fps and 1680x1050 resolution.
Sent from my Nexus S with CyanogenMod 9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm a nvidia fan myself, but thanks.
I know I am. I really hope there is a good open hardware tablet soon...
GBGamer said:
I know I am. I really hope there is a good open hardware tablet soon...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why what where you hoping for? An Intel i7??
ben83s said:
Why what where you hoping for? An Intel i7??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no, something open, with full data-sheets available, and open source drivers, i can tell you first hand how bad proprietary drivers suck.
GBGamer said:
I know I am. I really hope there is a good open hardware tablet soon...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i am not into this topic right now but afaik there is no real open source hardware competitor on a tegra 3 level
gh123man said:
no, something open, with full data-sheets available, and open source drivers, i can tell you first hand how bad proprietary drivers suck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see what you mean. But when your trying to copy the Kindle Fire and go main stream global, you need something that proven to work. IMHO at £160 its a big anouph gamble all ready.
No, the tegra 3 isn't as good as it should be, but for web surfing, a little gaming and movies and music, its more than enough. Quit griping. Lol
People always find something to complain about. Lol
OP the problem is the price. For $200 you need to go with the cheapest high end processor available, and apparently that is what Nvidia did with the Kai El project to put out speedy, low price tablets. Personally dual core is quick enough for me, plus I just bought a 7" tablet so...
Sent from my GT-P3113 using Tapatalk 2
Yes, the tegra 3 isnt the best chip-set, but if they went with the snapdragon s4 they would have horrible supply issues, as there isnt enough s4's as it is. Also this was made by asus who has an existing relationship with nvida. Google has used this as a reference platform so it will be heavily optimized so performance shouldn't be an issue especially considering the screen resolution, keep in mind this is the same processor that runs the transformer prime at 1080p, without all the new gpu goodies. fyi all current tablets run tegra 3's
Sure let's put in the top of the line CPU that costs $1000 and try to sell it main stream against the Kindle Fire priced at $199.
Cares said:
Sure let's put in the top of the line CPU that costs $1000 and try to sell it main stream against the Kindle Fire priced at $199.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not talking high end, I'm talking open hardware, like TI OMAP.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
So does this mean a non developer Nexus device? So does that mean no custom ROMs? No CM9? No kernel tweaks?
darkamikaze said:
So does this mean a non developer Nexus device? So does that mean no custom ROMs? No CM9? No kernel tweaks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah, it just means slower Dev updates after Google has given it up.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
GBGamer said:
I'm not talking high end, I'm talking open hardware, like TI OMAP.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AFAIK TI OMAP4 is performance-wise inferior to Tegra 3 in nearly every aspect, it's not wise to limit flagman device(it's Nexus, after all) capabilities just to please indy ROM developers. Especially concerning the fact that Nexus 7 is tightly bound to Google Play to squeeze from grateful consumers as much money as possible .
So does this mean a non developer Nexus device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It surely is a developer device, but it's for application developers, not ROM makers, because ROMs are not profitable for Google, but apps are.
dalkor said:
AFAIK TI OMAP4 is performance-wise inferior to Tegra 3 in nearly every aspect, it's not wise to limit flagman device(it's Nexus, after all) capabilities just to please indy ROM developers. Especially concerning the fact that Nexus 7 is tightly bound to Google Play to squeeze from grateful consumers as much money as possible .
It surely is a developer device, but it's for application developers, not ROM makers, because ROMs are not profitable for Google, apps are.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, that's why I'm hoping for a tablet with quad core OMAP5
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
My opinion tegra 3 is the best CPU+GPU combo until the s4 quad core. I have a tegra 3 on my one x and hardly any lag whatsoever. Games look amazing, and amazing standby times. Maybe the nexus 7 will force nvidia to release drivers ect because of the demand
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app
tegra3 optimized games are by far the best Android games around. Tegra3 is no slouch, CPU or gpu wise. there will be no issues with custom roms. One X has a ton of custom roms/kernels. Prime has alot of roms also. I'm sure Nexus 7 will be far more popular than either of them.
GBGamer said:
Yea, that's why I'm hoping for a tablet with quad core OMAP5
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For $199 ? And they don't arrive until Q3/Q4.
For 200$ hell no I'm not disappointed
Stop complaining about everything!!!
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
I <3 Tegra. Got a Tegra phone and tegra tsblet... so gonna get the N7. I don't see what the problem is. Its very fast and good for gaming from the TegraZone
Sent from my Asus Transformer Prime TF201 using XDA Premium HD app
The Tegra 3 is actually a pretty powerful chipset. Think it's tainted a bit by being the 'child' of the Tegra 2, which was not as great as we hoped it would be. Combined with some of the performance improvements in Jelly Bean I expect this device to fly.
Here you go, I made a quick video for Antutu X Benchmark between both devices ( Snap and Exynos )
Lets guess which device ( which CPU ) on left and right while watching this clip and then you have your answer.
Video was captured with an iphone 5 ( YEAH I know, Samsung is gonna be p*ssed LOL ).
Enjoy!
That answers my question somewhat, so the 5422 has a slight edge on the first benchmark, yet lost the second ,making it 1 to 1, but the s801 finished the test first on both testes.
Sent from my LG-D959 using Tapatalk
Are all 8 cores running on the 5422 version?
Wow, you really have both version?
Please make full comparison especially speed/tw , battery and camera.
Sent from my GT-I9500
BoneXDA said:
Are all 8 cores running on the 5422 version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont think so. Maybe the 64 bit will
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
copualt3 said:
That answers my question somewhat, so the 5422 has a slight edge on the first benchmark, yet lost the second ,making it 1 to 1, but the s801 finished the test first on both testes.
Sent from my LG-D959 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 5422 in general i felt very very smooth. major problem is still there: its hot!
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
leoaudio13 said:
I dont think so. Maybe the 64 bit will
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting... in Barcelona Samsung announced that the 5422 will support Heterogeneous Multi Processing allowing all 8 cores to run if necessary. The Note 3 Neo's 5260 can run all 6, so the S5 5422 may need an update, or benchmark tools need it, what do you think, @AndreiLux?
BoneXDA said:
Interesting... in Barcelona Samsung announced that the 5422 will support Heterogeneous Multi Processing allowing all 8 cores to run if necessary. The Note 3 Neo's 5260 can run all 6, so the S5 5422 may need an update, or benchmark tools need it, what do you think, @AndreiLux?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got a chance to played with it for half a day but its damn hot while running bench. not so sure if it ran with all eight cores at once. Gotta check again 2mo. But imo, the Exynos is very smooth. But the camera on Exynos version is not so good. Dont know why Even i took a few shots and compare with the LG G2, the G2 beats it with much better quality
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
leoaudio13 said:
I got a chance to played with it for half a day but its damn hot while running bench. not so sure if it ran with all eight cores at once. Gotta check again 2mo. But imo, the Exynos is very smooth. But the camera on Exynos version is not so good. Dont know why Even i took a few shots and compare with the LG G2, the G2 beats it with much better quality
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you say the camera on the Exynos is better?
Also how about the headphone sound quality, any differences, if so which sounds better
BoneXDA said:
Interesting... in Barcelona Samsung announced that the 5422 will support Heterogeneous Multi Processing allowing all 8 cores to run if necessary. The Note 3 Neo's 5260 can run all 6, so the S5 5422 may need an update, or benchmark tools need it, what do you think, @AndreiLux?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's running HMP...
AndreiLux said:
It's running HMP...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi sir,
Then are you gonna support it...I mean Exynos ver. Now its prefect to add your tweaks in it
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Right now honestly HMP seems a bit far-fetched. Most app developers don't even use more than 1 thread for their apps. Waste of battery imo.
AndreiLux said:
It's running HMP...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you Andrei! So can it run all 8 cores right now, does it depend on Samsung or the apps?
degast said:
Right now honestly HMP seems a bit far-fetched. Most app developers don't even use more than 1 thread for their apps. Waste of battery imo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The point of HMP is load balancing between the cores. It still has advantages even in low threaded apps. The cores are powered off when not doing anything.
BoneXDA said:
Thank you Andrei! So can it run all 8 cores right now, does it depend on Samsung or the apps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It depends on nothing specifically. If load is sufficiently high and threaded it'll use all 8.
I think Antutu is finishing the tests slower than the Snapdragon because it's dispatching twice the threads and doing twice the work, it would score higher if it actually didn't do that.
And no I'm not getting it, the S5 will be outdated in a few months.
AndreiLux said:
The point of HMP is load balancing between the cores. It still has advantages even in low threaded apps. The cores are powered off when not doing anything.
It depends on nothing specifically. If load is sufficiently high and threaded it'll use all 8.
I think Antutu is finishing the tests slower than the Snapdragon because it's dispatching twice the threads and doing twice the work, it would score higher if it actually didn't do that.
And no I'm not getting it, the S5 will be outdated in a few months.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its coming up for real, the F
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
AndreiLux said:
The point of HMP is load balancing between the cores. It still has advantages even in low threaded apps. The cores are powered off when not doing anything.
It depends on nothing specifically. If load is sufficiently high and threaded it'll use all 8.
I think Antutu is finishing the tests slower than the Snapdragon because it's dispatching twice the threads and doing twice the work, it would score higher if it actually didn't do that.
And no I'm not getting it, the S5 will be outdated in a few months.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also found that the HMP wherether its running or not, its not so right. Even though its very smooth, but well, its not so different from the 801 version. Also its HOT. I just felt its incompleted
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
leoaudio13 said:
I also found that the HMP wherether its running or not, its not so right. Even though its very smooth, but well, its not so different from the 801 version. Also its HOT. I just felt its incompleted
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on the thermal throttling settings between the two, Samsung changed the limits several times on both versions of the S4 so expect the same to happen here.
AndreiLux said:
Depends on the thermal throttling settings between the two, Samsung changed the limits several times on both versions of the S4 so expect the same to happen here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably we have to wait for S6 for the HMP to mature also we'll for your support as well Andrei :good:
leoaudio13 said:
Its coming up for real, the F
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean the Galaxy F?
This could be it I think: http://www.sammobile.com/2014/04/03/samsung-sm-g906s-with-qhd-2560x1440-screen-appears-in-benchmark/
0mega007 said:
So you say the camera on the Exynos is better?
Also how about the headphone sound quality, any differences, if so which sounds better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, the same for both models really. Sound quality is the same, still Samsung quality. But both have AptX so it wont be a big problem Both external speakers are the same, 1 word: shjt! I wish the speakers werent in the back