Related
I have to buy a new phone,and i found an offer on this model.
I was wondering if the lg 2x camera is good as the iphone 4 >_<
Personally yeah. i think its better.
My housemate has one and we are forever arguing which one is better. And i think the O2X camera is ace IMO.
I think it is :-??
The camera of the 2x is one of the worst cameras in a smartphone. I have other 3 smartphones and all of them are better.
regards!
McGiverGim said:
The camera of the 2x is one of the worst cameras in a smartphone. I have other 3 smartphones and all of them are better.
regards!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
O_O they say that is better than the GS2 one >_<
McGiverGim said:
The camera of the 2x is one of the worst cameras in a smartphone. I have other 3 smartphones and all of them are better.
regards!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would be nice if youd mention those other smartphones.
Ot: personally i think the camera quality is pretty damn decent , alot better than my gf's iphone 4 imo
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA App
Well, it IS better than the iPhone 4.. i mean, without the backcover, i just makes some very nive pictures.. and it can shoot 1080p vids ;D
With enough lighting, they are pretty close in term of quality. But in low light, the iPhone 4 is noticably better. It clearly fares better than the o2x.
McGiverGim said:
The camera of the 2x is one of the worst cameras in a smartphone. I have other 3 smartphones and all of them are better.
regards!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it's not. Maybe yours is faulty?
When I bought my O2x I had the option to choose between SGSII, O2x and one HTC something, I compared the photos on the reviews and O2x was the second best (the first was SGSII), but when I went shopping the Samsung was hefty overpriced, like 150 EUR more than the O2x and I ended buying the LG.
The camera is nice, but of course, you can't expect a Nikon or Canon DSLR quality from such small sensor.
Personally i dont like the o2x's camera. And my mates SGS2 is way better IMO.
The thing about reviews online, is that they rarely test the device's camera in low light conditions. And there is where a good camera sensor shines. And frankly, the o2x, in low light conditions is quite bad.
i think it's good with a good illumination but when the sun go down the camera works bad..
Indeed, the camera in low light, or night setting is awful, in software.
The preview is fine, then one takes the photo, and the image is frozen,
and then the image processing kicks in, and most of the detail is lost,
with just a few bright dots, and over-saturated lighting now remaining!
The over-saturated lighting is also a problem with daytime lighting too.
This is in such stark contrast to my previous Nokia E90. On that, I was
able to take a photo in apparent darkness, the frozen image would be
almost black, then the image processing brought out excellent detail,
sometimes more than I could see with a naked eye. Truly remarkable!
Since the problem is software, as far as I see it, there could be a fix.
Richard.
The camera is decent for a smartphone. There is very few smartphones with better cameras. One is the Samsung Galaxy SII, which in general is a better phone, but also more expensive and I like the O2X's look better.
The camera takes very nice pictures in snapshot mode. When taking pictures in bad lighting condition, it still outdoes many other cameras in snapshot mode but for good pictures you should use Night mode or manually alter the ISO value.
The LG camera App has many settings that can be altered.
The Pictures show more detail than the ones taken with an iPhone 4. The iP4 has hardly any settings and uses automatic enhancement software like HDR or enhance. With the O2X and an app like camera360 the HDR looks better then on an iP4 and you can adjust the level of photo enhancement.
However, the pretty good LG camera software does not work with CM7.1. So if you plan to flash CM on your phone, you have to bear with a very basic camera software which I reckon is the reason for some people in this thread calling the O2X camera "bad".
mike-o2 said:
The camera is decent for a smartphone. There is very few smartphones with better cameras. One is the Samsung Galaxy SII, which in general is a better phone, but also more expensive and I like the O2X's look better.
The camera takes very nice pictures in snapshot mode. When taking pictures in bad lighting condition, it still outdoes many other cameras in snapshot mode but for good pictures you should use Night mode or manually alter the ISO value.
The LG camera App has many settings that can be altered.
The Pictures show more detail than the ones taken with an iPhone 4. The iP4 has hardly any settings and uses automatic enhancement software like HDR or enhance. With the O2X and an app like camera360 the HDR looks better then on an iP4 and you can adjust the level of photo enhancement.
However, the pretty good LG camera software does not work with CM7.1. So if you plan to flash CM on your phone, you have to bear with a very basic camera software which I reckon is the reason for some people in this thread calling the O2X camera "bad".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeap, I agree with mike, and it is even better if you use a modified/patched stock LG camera such as by AndiCP which gives better picture and especially video because of the increased bitrate.
Overall, its a decent camera, abit on the downside when it comes to low light conditions, some say the back cover if taken off gives a more better picture, but hey.. this is the cheapest dualcore phone with 8mp and full HD recording you can get.. can't really complain.
Cheers!
tablighs said:
this is the cheapest dualcore phone with 8mp and full HD recording you can get.. can't really complain.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's for sure
From 1.to10.
Daylight - 7.5
Lowlight ( without flash ! ) - 4
For me Carl Zeiss makes best sensors for mobile cameras `for now` ... e.g. N8...
and yes , N95 8gb makes better pictures than most newest android phones ....
Has anybody seen this thread. Mindblowing that O2X camera can shoot these pics. Appears too good to be true. Credit to "mimstyle", the shooter for talking such brilliant photos with O2X.
http://www.optimus2x.net/index.php?topic=401.0
Own and love the Galaxy Nexus, I think 16gb is well more than enough storage for on-the-go music and app combination.
The two major issues I have with it however are:
1) The camera quality.
I find the image quality quite grainy after taking photos. The camera just doesn't cut it for me. However I'm hoping that the 8MP camera on the Nexus4 (I know megapixels isn't everything) will solve that issue.
***2) THE SPEAKER LOUDNESS***
I think of the old Christmas poem "Night Before Christmas"...
"'Twas the night before Christmas, when all through the house
Not a creature was stirring, not even the Gnexus at max volume".
That'll be the deciding factor on if I'll be picking up the phone or not, in all honesty.
Love you XDA,
-Aero
Well its not release yet, but we can take a few clues.
Base on this review: www.youtube.com/watch?v=a24txcFBWyE
the LG Optimus G have very weak speaker, saying that when on its back, one might even miss a phone call. Although that doesn't necessarily mean it will be the same for the Nexus 4.
As for camera, I have no proof that the 8MP camera of this device is similar to one on the Optimus G for ATT, but maybe if it is, we can look at those sample shots posted online. I think the general consensus is its not that great and might have trouble under low lighting. Overall I think it will be at least better than the current 5MP which is enough for me.
Just wait for feedbacks from other buyers before making the purchase.
PS. I still laugh at the fact when the Galaxy Nexus was just released people claimed its 5MP camera is better than the SII camera, even with side by side pictures comparison.
I'm disappointed it won't support GLONASS, base on the specs from the PlayStore.
The camera uses a Sony BSI Sensor, so I'm sure images will be crisp and sharp. Not sure what aperture it uses though, hopefully a f2.4/2.6.
kotaro_14 said:
The camera uses a Sony BSI Sensor, so I'm sure images will be crisp and sharp. Not sure what aperture it uses though, hopefully a f2.4/2.6.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
f2.4
i really love Nexus 4 but One X camera is amazing
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Well, just a very very simple thought: they advertise with their new feature, that panorama thing .. that's one selling point.. so the camera quality MUST be good, right?
Oh man, but I just remember Apple's Maps service ... hmmm.
Here's hoping both are better on the Nexus 4 as they are both somewhat of a disappointment on my Galaxy Nexus for me.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
From Josh Topolsky's initial impressions, he stated that the camera performance was a big improvement, and that Google has specifically concentrated on low-light performance. I have high hopes that a Sony sensor, let alone a BSI sensor, leads to respectable if not admirable image quality. If the f/2.4 aperture is an indication, we could easily see this sensor beat the GS3 in terms of how much light it lets in, but it all comes down to how aggressive noise correction is, which is entirely software, and affects image sharpness the most.
While the camera is a big deal to me (a BIG deal), what I'm more worried about is the speaker/earpiece output. As everyone knows, the GNex speaker and earpiece aren't great (that's putting it mildly), so I'm really hoping this phone has great speaker/earpiece volume. Do I expect it to rival my SIII? No. But being able to actually use the phone as a PHONE in a crowded place and being able to hear would be nice.
According to Cnet- The battery life and Camera are the two weakest points of the Optimus G (ATT)- its unbelievable how the google nexus phones have sourly disappointing cameras year after year.
It is becoming a HUGE feature for people- and while software can correct come issues- hopefully it does, it has to have a good sensor to start- which the LG should.
I guess we will have to wait for a proper review to get some camera samples. that is def make or break for me. coming from a One X, so camera bar is set rather high
Sony makes the camera for the legendary iPhones so I don't see why they would disappoint now.
Wonder how it would compare to the Lumia 920
shea-bird said:
According to Cnet- The battery life and Camera are the two weakest points of the Optimus G (ATT)- its unbelievable how the google nexus phones have sourly disappointing cameras year after year.
It is becoming a HUGE feature for people- and while software can correct come issues- hopefully it does, it has to have a good sensor to start- which the LG should.
I guess we will have to wait for a proper review to get some camera samples. that is def make or break for me. coming from a One X, so camera bar is set rather high
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ATT Optimus G has 13 mpx camera and LTE.
maybe that's why google decided to go without the 13 mpx camera and without LTE.
the 8 mpx camera which is also used in the sprint version is supposed to be better.
and leaving out LTE saves battery.
hsrn said:
ATT Optimus G has 13 mpx camera and LTE.
maybe that's why google decided to go without the 13 mpx camera and without LTE.
the 8 mpx camera which is also used in the sprint version is supposed to be better.
and leaving out LTE saves battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you got it reversed, Att model has the 8mp camera while the sprint version has the 13mp camera.
kotaro_14 said:
The camera uses a Sony BSI Sensor, so I'm sure images will be crisp and sharp. Not sure what aperture it uses though, hopefully a f2.4/2.6.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im sorry but how do you know that it has a Sony BSI Sensor ?
I mean that would be great as Sony makes the best sensors right now …
Thats pretty much one of my biggest selling points as i use the cameras a lot..
It was mentioned in the video done by The Verge.
Gayga
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app
Aerolith514 said:
Wonder how it would compare to the Lumia 920
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont expect the 920 to be great...the 900 was overhyped with the ziess lens and was garbage. the 920 will have GREAT low light photos- that much we know...as for regular performance, I think it will still be slightly below the top notch camera phones (S3, OneX, iphone, etc)
Praying the nexus 4 has a great camera...if so, I will snatch it up.
and what about capture speed ?
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
The One Series camera's and the Lumia 920 have a lower aperture f2.0 which is better suited for low light conditions. Now I'm pleased with the HOX camera, this has to be on par at least for day shots as I rarely take that many low light shots.
Be interesting to know what BSI module it uses so we can make comparisons!
I hope the camera is good same as speakers..
I was thinking about the camera on the one and then I got to thinking about how on my HOXL there's no way to utilize the image sense chip on AOSP roms. And the one has this fancy ultra pixil camera that I assume relies heavily on the image chip, right? So do you guys think that maybe the camera will be either totally useless or just turn into a really crappy 4mp camera on AOSP roms? I'm wondering this because I know that many people buy htc phones for their outstanding build quality whether they like sense or not, thinking that they can just throw an AOSP rom on there, but if this is true it might pose problems for the devs. Maybe someone more knowledgeable than me could chime in here
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
The ultra pixel doesn't rely on the image chip the ultra pixel is just a term they created for the fact that there using a 4 mp camera with the sensor they used. The images it creates should still be comaprable to that of the latest phones due to the light it capture per pixel which reduces the amount of noise. So the ultra pixel is hardware and not software so it shouldnt rely on the image chip. Althought since aosp can't use the chip that means that u won't be able to use the bonus features of it like zoe and things like that
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
luigi311 said:
The ultra pixel doesn't rely on the image chip the ultra pixel is just a term they created for the fact that there using a 4 mp camera with the sensor they used. The images it creates should still be comaprable to that of the latest phones due to the light it capture per pixel which reduces the amount of noise. So the ultra pixel is hardware and not software so it shouldnt rely on the image chip. Althought since aosp can't use the chip that means that u won't be able to use the bonus features of it like zoe and things like that
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So what sets it apart from the 5mp cameras of older smartphones? Shouldn't they capture comparable light to the one?
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
megapixels is not all you need, you need a good light sensor too, light sensors in older devices let in less light and are inferior.
A 4mp camera with a great light sensor will still take better pictures then a 5mp or 8mp+ if the light sensor is poor which usually is the case on mobiles
Camera will work, but you won't get the same range of options/controls and typically processing is not quite as nice.
M.
brainimpact said:
megapixels is not all you need, you need a good light sensor too, light sensors in older devices let in less light and are inferior.
A 4mp camera with a great light sensor will still take better pictures then a 5mp or 8mp+ if the light sensor is poor which usually is the case on mobiles
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He nailed it on the dot. Its not just megapixels its the cameras sensor that also plays a role. That's y u get noise in older camera because it didn't capture enough light for the pixel and that was what lead HTC to go to 4 to give them more light
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
hey guys you know that both of these phones are pretty good.so lets see if the cameras are the same too.
To see the comparison,go here:http://www.gottabemobile.com/2012/12/04/nexus-4-vs-iphone-5-camera-shootout/
The camera isn't that bad and it can only become better, thanks to google's updates
The Zel said:
The camera isn't that bad and it can only become better, thanks to google's updates
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, i honestly thought the iphone 5 is miles ahead camera wise. Guess i was wrong, comparison makes me more than satisfied with the output.
The Iphone 5 Camera isn´t better, you can´t rely on such comparisons because you could so easily manipulate them in a way you like. After you had both smartphones in your hand you can decide which suites you better. But in the end its a phone which isn´t made for taking hq pics, like all other smartphones as well.
im just annoyed with the pinkish purple tinting in photos
Never owned iPhone so didn't know it was so close to Nexus 4 in camera department.
All iPhone does it add punch to certain colors like green to make the photo look good. Nexus 4 on the other hand had more accurate colors. Especially the first photo where sky color was pretty accurate with Nexus 4 where as iPhone have it purplish tinge
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
I own both phones, iP5 and N4 and the iP5 camera is much better no question about it.
I think our camera blows. Only cuz low light is horrible.it's the same as the galaxy nexus.but I can't complain since the price is half an iPhone.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
The iPhone 5 suffers from horrible purple fringing when faced directly at the sun (or another source of light). Apple won't come up with a recall, just expect a fix once the 5s comes out.
The camera on the iphone 5 is better, its one of the best cameras out there on a phone.
tvdang7 said:
I think our camera blows. Only cuz low light is horrible.it's the same as the galaxy nexus.but I can't complain since the price is half an iPhone.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 My wife's Galaxy S4 makes me wanna cry. And to the point about phones not taking HQ pics, today's phones are without a doubt the next generation of point and shoot. We NEVER take our camera anywhere anymore unless we just happened to remember it. Now there's phones coming with 41 megapixel and great lenses. Cameras are becoming more important as we shift to this digital lifestyle. I for one wish we had a little better camera. But it works for me..... For now.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
sweet I can compare to phone I will nver touch or want
I think the only reason iPhone camera *might* arguably produce better looking pictures is because of apples software which automatically adds a bunch of effects for the iSheep. I can just take a pic and edit it with default editor and I bet it would look better than iPhone s pics.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
I remember having an iPhone and the camera is way better than the current Nexus 4 camera. Still room for improvement!
You also have to consider the price of the device out-right... N4 is a much cheaper phone using parts not has expensive as the iPhone5... if you take that into consideration, N4 puts up a good fight..
So if you compare it strickly on hardware without factor in price, there is no comparison the iPhone5 will be a better device...
Lots of Apple haters.. Then again it is XDA. Personally, and from a photographer's standpoint, my iPhone 4S took better images and videos than my Nexus. More specifically in low light situations. Can't see how the Nexus would also take better images than the iPhone 5. Because that would mean the Nexus takes better pictures than the Galaxy S4. Either way, I'm not saying our camera on or phone is terrible, but it most definitely isn't in the conversation of being in the top 3, and possibly not in the top 5.
As an owner of iPhone 4s, user of iPhone 5s and a new owner of Nexus 4, I'd say both iPhones have superior cameras in terms of image quality and colors. Nexus 4 has seems to have a faster camera though, and while the image quality isn't top, it is still quite good. Why would you expect a better camera on a much cheaper device anyway?
The issue I have with the N4 is that the pics look good in preview mode sat using up a quarter of the desktop screen but if you go full size...whoahhhhhhhhh. Noise noise noise.:silly:
I've tried several different camera apps (even one that will take 8MP 12MB .PNG shots) and the result is the same for all of them, just noisy full size shots, even in bright sunlight. So the issue with the N4's camera isn't compression at the file output stage it's somewhere earlier in the chain.
Colour balance is good though.
Someone really needs to hack that camera but I fear it may be a hardware limitation.
Fille84 said:
The camera on the iphone 5 is better, its one of the best cameras out there on a phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its behind s4 camera, not even talking about Lumia 920/925/1020. But again any phone looks like toy agaisnt Lumia cameras...
Personally from my experience all Nexus phones have come with crappy cameras. The problem is the company doesn't implement a really good camera for the Nexus which is beyond me. Even though it's an 8mp camera my note 2 takes way better still images as well as videos.
For instance on this phone when recording a video you can't click the screen to focus in on whatever your recording, instead it just takes a picture which is stupid. Quality isn't great.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Hi there,
This phone is cheaper to buy here as compare to others phones with snapdragon 845 . It gives better value when consider price to specs ratio. My only concern is about camera quality. Is camera quality match to Pixel 2 XL, HTC U11, P20 pro, S9 plus, Mi 8 etc ? Currently using pixel 2 XL
Rajaasim1980 said:
Hi there,
This phone is cheaper to buy here as compare to others phones with snapdragon 845 . It gives better value when consider price to specs ratio. My only concern is about camera quality. Is camera quality match to Pixel 2 XL, HTC U11, P20 pro, S9 plus, Mi 8 etc ? Currently using pixel 2 XL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, you'd better stick with Pixel 2.
marcogiannetta said:
No, you'd better stick with Pixel 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So xz2 camera is average/good ?
I do like camera and software of pixel 2 xl but everything else seem better in xz2
Rajaasim1980 said:
So xz2 camera is average/good ?
I do like camera and software of pixel 2 xl but everything else seem better in xz2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, average nothing more.
It was just one of the best photophone of 2018, you can see the reviews...
How does it compare with Pixel 2, I don't know.
Rajaasim1980 said:
So xz2 camera is average/good ?
I do like camera and software of pixel 2 xl but everything else seem better in xz2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The camera was very fine in 2018
Btw if you want to move to a custom ROM, there the camera driver should get better than stock in the following months.
I used the phone in the last 2 months. Camera is super ok in daylight and I can say I never missed a shot. Low light shots on the other hand require steady hands.
As a normal user I can say you won't notice a really big difference from other flagships.
What I really enjoy tho is the light post processing of pictures. All the shots have that grain of real pictures and a special vibe. In addition the white balance and color reproduction are again almost perfect.
I concur with what DUMIY said.
In daylight the pics have something special, they look like they are coming from a real camera, the color science is very good.
In low light it falls apart.
Latoc said:
I concur with what DUMIY said.
In daylight the pics have something special, they look like they are coming from a real camera, the color science is very good.
In low light it falls apart.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Low light suffer because of lack of OIS? How is video quality?
Its strange that others manufacture are using sony hardware and getting better results than sony because of better software processing ...like HDR+ , nightsight in pixel and supernight mode in Huawei etc which do magic in low lights ...I guess in good lighting condition even midrange will give better results ...flagship camera excel in challenging condition
video quality is a lot better than photo quality tbh, especially 4k hdr recording