So before the latest news about google selling moto,....... don't get me started here I ordered a dev edition for $379.
Anyway thoughts on if it is worth the $125 dollar difference in cost ( price of new dev edition - selling price my old x)
Worth the cost? I am rooted now on my X but thinking the dev ed was (before the sale of moto) more future proof?
Maybe now the unlocked boot loader is more important because of the sale?
Thoughts???
In short, the developer edition is unrestricted in the fact once you've unlocked the bootloader, you can flash any rom that's available. It's technically "future proof" in the sense that as long as developers are making roms, it will continue to get the latest AOSP updates, or in the case of the Eclipse rom, it is AOSP while retaining stock features. I don't think you made a mistake in getting the developer edition, I made a mistake getting the moto maker X and I'm kicking myself because now that Google sold Moto to Lenovo, it's possible we won't see the updates that Moto was pushing so fast. I think as long as the software team at Moto stay in place, though, and Lenovo doesn't touch what the X and the G are all about, we ultimately will see the same basic process in terms of updates and the way the X and G are almost AOSP. Dev edition really isn't more expensive, the 32GB MM is the same price as a Dev edition, which has the same 32GB of space. Only difference is you're getting an open device instead of one that is closed to modification.
rweddy1 said:
So before the latest news about google selling moto,....... don't get me started here I ordered a dev edition for $379.
Anyway thoughts on if it is worth the $125 dollar difference in cost ( price of new dev edition - selling price my old x)
Worth the cost? I am rooted now on my X but thinking the dev ed was (before the sale of moto) more future proof?
Maybe now the unlocked boot loader is more important because of the sale?
Thoughts???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
balleron24z said:
In short, the developer edition is unrestricted in the fact once you've unlocked the bootloader, you can flash any rom that's available. It's technically "future proof" in the sense that as long as developers are making roms, it will continue to get the latest AOSP updates, or in the case of the Eclipse rom, it is AOSP while retaining stock features. I don't think you made a mistake in getting the developer edition, I made a mistake getting the moto maker X and I'm kicking myself because now that Google sold Moto to Lenovo, it's possible we won't see the updates that Moto was pushing so fast. I think as long as the software team at Moto stay in place, though, and Lenovo doesn't touch what the X and the G are all about, we ultimately will see the same basic process in terms of updates and the way the X and G are almost AOSP. Dev edition really isn't more expensive, the 32GB MM is the same price as a Dev edition, which has the same 32GB of space. Only difference is you're getting an open device instead of one that is closed to modification.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not trying to start a flame war, but by the time Lenovo takes over, your X will be on your shelf and you'll be rocking a new phone anyway. All this panic is getting old. This deal has to go through all sorts of approvals will probably take a year or more before it takes shape. Plus, it's not like Lenovo bought Moto to totally dismantle it. They didn't become the dominant force in the PC world by making stupid decisions. Moto has huge brand name recognition in the US and they are currently making great strides with the X and G.
I actually think this will be a huge success for Moto. Also remember Moto has pushed a bunch of apps to the play store making updates Super easy.
Sent from my Dev Edition Moto X
rweddy1 said:
So before the latest news about google selling moto,....... don't get me started here I ordered a dev edition for $379.
Anyway thoughts on if it is worth the $125 dollar difference in cost ( price of new dev edition - selling price my old x)
Worth the cost? I am rooted now on my X but thinking the dev ed was (before the sale of moto) more future proof?
Maybe now the unlocked boot loader is more important because of the sale?
Thoughts???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't there also a difference in the frequency bands between the Dev edition and regular unlocked model? I'm interested in the Dev edition but if I'm not mistaking its missing the 1700 band for 3g. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
balleron24z said:
In short, the developer edition is unrestricted in the fact once you've unlocked the bootloader, you can flash any rom that's available. It's technically "future proof" in the sense that as long as developers are making roms, it will continue to get the latest AOSP updates, or in the case of the Eclipse rom, it is AOSP while retaining stock features. I don't think you made a mistake in getting the developer edition, I made a mistake getting the moto maker X and I'm kicking myself because now that Google sold Moto to Lenovo, it's possible we won't see the updates that Moto was pushing so fast. I think as long as the software team at Moto stay in place, though, and Lenovo doesn't touch what the X and the G are all about, we ultimately will see the same basic process in terms of updates and the way the X and G are almost AOSP. Dev edition really isn't more expensive, the 32GB MM is the same price as a Dev edition, which has the same 32GB of space. Only difference is you're getting an open device instead of one that is closed to modification.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great points. I loved Eclipse ROM on my G. Nexus, have to look into that once I get the Dev Edition.
It'd be good to look at the specs on the model you plan on getting, because there's a Dev edition for CDMA and for GSM, and different model numbers for them. But I believe you're right as well.
Henrock11 said:
Isn't there also a difference in the frequency bands between the Dev edition and regular unlocked model? I'm interested in the Dev edition but if I'm not mistaking its missing the 1700 band for 3g. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can partially agree, Schaweet. I think that as long as the reigns are with Moto, then everything will stay great as is. Maybe even better, since Lenovo does have great products presently. Love their laptops/desktops. I'm just afraid that everything the Moto X and G are could be intruded upon by the software team at Lenovo, meaning the nice AOSP-type OS that Moto use might get a lot of unwanted modifications. I think that's the bigger concern, not how Moto will be as a company, but how their products will be influenced.
Schaweet said:
Not trying to start a flame war, but by the time Lenovo takes over, your X will be on your shelf and you'll be rocking a new phone anyway. All this panic is getting old. This deal has to go through all sorts of approvals will probably take a year or more before it takes shape. Plus, it's not like Lenovo bought Moto to totally dismantle it. They didn't become the dominant force in the PC world by making stupid decisions. Moto has huge brand name recognition in the US and they are currently making great strides with the X and G.
I actually think this will be a huge success for Moto. Also remember Moto has pushed a bunch of apps to the play store making updates Super easy.
Sent from my Dev Edition Moto X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Henrock11 said:
Isn't there also a difference in the frequency bands between the Dev edition and regular unlocked model? I'm interested in the Dev edition but if I'm not mistaking its missing the 1700 band for 3g. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not sure, I referring to the Verizon Edition, GSM might be different.
Henrock11 said:
Isn't there also a difference in the frequency bands between the Dev edition and regular unlocked model? I'm interested in the Dev edition but if I'm not mistaking its missing the 1700 band for 3g. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you go.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moto_X
That shows the frequencies per model.
Sent from my Dev Edition Moto X
---------- Post added at 08:59 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:55 AM ----------
balleron24z said:
It'd be good to look at the specs on the model you plan on getting, because there's a Dev edition for CDMA and for GSM, and different model numbers for them. But I believe you're right as well.
I can partially agree, Schaweet. I think that as long as the reigns are with Moto, then everything will stay great as is. Maybe even better, since Lenovo does have great products presently. Love their laptops/desktops. I'm just afraid that everything the Moto X and G are could be intruded upon by the software team at Lenovo, meaning the nice AOSP-type OS that Moto use might get a lot of unwanted modifications. I think that's the bigger concern, not how Moto will be as a company, but how their products will be influenced.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair enough. It's a total guess about what they will do with the UI. I can say with a high degree of confidence that they won't update the X and add their UI. Going forward though, you never know. I'd hope they'd just push and market Motos existing strategy, but that's my consumer side hope. I would think the near AOSP UI that Moto has could be enough to provide the product difference they want to separate them from everyone else without some silly skin like TV.
Sent from my Dev Edition Moto X
Related
Also, wth would the difference be at this point if they would both retain moto x features lol. I believe that is what I'm doing especially at&t and they're bootloader locking stuff. Just not sure which version and which one comes out first.
SysAdmNj said:
Also, wth would the difference be at this point if they would both retain moto x features lol. I believe that is what I'm doing especially at&t and they're bootloader locking stuff. Just not sure which version and which one comes out first.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i might be waiting. I'll be considering the phone but am going to have to pay full price off contract. So if I'm going to do that, I might as well get the developer edition. However, I would really like to order the phone on opening day, so I'm hoping the Developer edition comes out same day.
dwd3885 said:
i might be waiting. I'll be considering the phone but am going to have to pay full price off contract. So if I'm going to do that, I might as well get the developer edition. However, I would really like to order the phone on opening day, so I'm hoping the Developer edition comes out same day.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hear you, same with me. I'd have to buy off contract either way and dont feel at&t needs more of my money. But you say developer edition which would most likely be on the Motorola website? What about the Google edition version that is rumored to come out? Aren't these the same companies, why make it so confusing lol.
It would be nice to have some idea of how long we have to wait......
I defently waiting. Want my unlocked bootloader...I dont want to wait to see if someone can unlock the regular bootloader. I am on Verizon...so I also need to pay full price to keep my unlimited data
Sent from my SGP311 using xda app-developers app
Price is what will decide it for me.
I am considering the purchase of a Developer Edition phone only because of the price of it. I am thinking it would be cheaper to purchase it from Google than it would be to buy it off contract from the carrier. But if it is the same price then I will just get it from my carrier. The colour designing of it isnt important to me.
News should come out in a few days about dev edition availability. I'm not getting the at&t one I don't think. I'm already hearing all the complaints about their annoying phone book software, and their locked BL.
SysAdmNj said:
News should come out in a few days about dev edition availability. I'm not getting the at&t one I don't think. I'm already hearing all the complaints about their annoying phone book software, and their locked BL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The address book software doesn't get in the way. Usually it pops up on phones like the One, but on the X, I haven't seen it yet.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4
I'm definitely waiting for a developer unlocked edition. Don't want carrier bloat and waiting for bootloader unlock and random issues.
I'll likely return mine that I bought at AT&T when a dev edition is out or news of one. I forget how much I HATE the carrier having more control over my device than me.
Latest from Sunit https://plus.google.com/111499908439497508351/posts/DMAogqTTjhL
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk 2
Developer Edition
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Motorolas-own-website-outs-the-32GB-Motorola-Moto-X-Developer-Edition_id46737
I hope that White back is only a rumour and there will be an option of black back
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
DarkVasyaK said:
I hope that White back is only a rumour and there will be an option of black back
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah...if not I'm just gonna go with the Motomaker version and unlock the bootloader another way which probably has been done already.
So what's the chance of Verizon getting an unlocked developers edition?
What was the last phone Verizon allowed unlocked out of the box on their network?
compatibility with theoretical future unlocked stock?
Question: Let's say in the future some brilliant dev-type finds a root & bootloader unlock exploit for the non-dev edition of the VZW Moto X. Would ROMs developed for that phone (the rooted/unlocked VZW stock Moto X) be compatible with the Dev Edition? Does anyone know how this has worked with previous Dev Editions?
I'm just wondering in the situation described above, whether the people who shelled out for Dev Edition early on could find themselves with a much smaller mod/dev community to draw upon than people who wait around for a potential (but maybe never coming) future unlock of the device. Would the two VZW versions of the Moto X (Dev and stock) be essentially the same device aside from bootloader, and therefore have compatibility?
I know this is all conjecture until we see an actual Dev Edition on VZW (which might not happen) but I'd be interested in thoughts.
Roms would work on both developer and regular version. One plus would be 32 GB . im hoping Verizon will get developer with the extra storage.
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk 2
Well with current rumors pegging it at around $500+, I sense this phone failing commercially.
It's just too much money.
I get Moto wants this to be their "iPhone" but if you wanted to massively pull the rug out from under their feet, you would stick this thing's non contract price around the rumors for the 5C price, which is $300-$400.
deleted
I'm going by the few articles I've read mentioning some carriers and not at&t.
SysAdmNj said:
I'm going by the few articles I've read mentioning some carriers and not at&t.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FWIW, I haven't seen coverage clearly saying that there will not be an AT&T Developer Edition. Where did you hear that?
I don't have the source right now, but I remember reading early on that there would be a "Google Play Edition" separate from Developer Edition, and that this would be AT&T/TMO compatible. If there truly is not an AT&T Dev Edition, maybe this is a substitute?
The version sold on Google Play will be the unlocked version compatible with both AT&T and T-Mobile, just like the other phones on Google Play. There will be 2 separate Developer Editions, 1 for Verizon, and 1 for AT&T (also technically compatible with T-Mobile since both use 1900Mhz for 4G). The key here is that the Google Play version will likely be only in 16GB, whereas both the Developer Editions will be 32GB.
samarth1 said:
The version sold on Google Play will be the unlocked version compatible with both AT&T and T-Mobile, just like the other phones on Google Play. There will be 2 separate Developer Editions, 1 for Verizon, and 1 for AT&T (also technically compatible with T-Mobile since both use 1900Mhz for 4G). The key here is that the Google Play version will likely be only in 16GB, whereas both the Developer Editions will be 32GB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't the Google Play version just conjecture at this point? Motorola hasn't announced that yet.
The only thing that Motorola has announced is that there will be a developer edition of the Moto X. Have they announced anything about the Dev edition (i.e. a Verizon version and an AT&T version) or are those rumours that are making the rounds?
rajeshr said:
Isn't the Google Play version just conjecture at this point? Motorola hasn't announced that yet.
The only thing that Motorola has announced is that there will be a developer edition of the Moto X. Have they announced anything about the Dev edition (i.e. a Verizon version and an AT&T version) or are those rumours that are making the rounds?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google Play edition:
http://pocketnow.com/2013/08/13/google-play-moto-x
http://www.tmonews.com/2013/08/image-confirms-t-mobile-moto-x-availability-through-google-play-only/
http://www.theverge.com/2013/8/1/4579278/google-play-edition-moto-x-announced-coming-soon
Developer Edition:
http://www.droid-life.com/2013/08/25/here-is-the-moto-x-developer-edition/
http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/0...riers-developer-editions-for-att-and-verizon/
samarth1 said:
Google Play edition:
http://pocketnow.com/2013/08/13/google-play-moto-x
http://www.tmonews.com/2013/08/image-confirms-t-mobile-moto-x-availability-through-google-play-only/
http://www.theverge.com/2013/8/1/4579278/google-play-edition-moto-x-announced-coming-soon
Developer Edition:
http://www.droid-life.com/2013/08/25/here-is-the-moto-x-developer-edition/
http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/0...riers-developer-editions-for-att-and-verizon/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still no source from Moto on the Google Play edition - just these sites conjecturing the availability of the Moto X thorough the Play store.
As for the Dev edition, you are correct. There is indeed a executive source from Motorola who mentioned the availability of the Verizon and North American version of the Dev edition.
I'm glad there's going to be a Verizon Developer edition. I was a little nervous. I'm hoping there will be some word on the Droids being rooted before the Verizon Developer edition comes out. I'm loving my Droid Mini it's the phone I've had my eyes on since it was announced and have loved the last week with it but I need root and the Motorola bootloader has been quite a pain in the days of late. Either way when things get pumping I'm pretty sure there are going to be some very great stable roms for all 4 phones since porting is going to require such little work if any really
rajeshr said:
Still no source from Moto on the Google Play edition - just these sites conjecturing the availability of the Moto X thorough the Play store.
As for the Dev edition, you are correct. There is indeed a executive source from Motorola who mentioned the availability of the Verizon and North American version of the Dev edition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On August 2, 2013 Punit Soni, who heads Moto X for Motorola said the following on his Google Plus page:
Perhaps this got missed in the launch hullabaloo ...
Moto X on the Sprint, US Cellular, Rogers and T-Mobile networks will have an unlockable bootloader, and in addition, we will be offering a Verizon Wireless Developer Edition and a general North American Developer Edition.
Hope that clarifies some of the questions out there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
.
I would link, but don't have enough posts yet, I think. You can find it at +PunitSoni on Google plus.
e-lu said:
On August 2, 2013 Punit Soni, who heads Moto X for Motorola said the following on his Google Plus page:
.
I would link, but don't have enough posts yet, I think. You can find it at +PunitSoni on Google plus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I agreed about about the Dev editions from Motorola, but there's been no confirmation about the Google Play edition. Punit Soni only mentions the Dev edition (which is not the same as the Google Play edition).
rajeshr said:
Yes, I agreed about about the Dev editions from Motorola, but there's been no confirmation about the Google Play edition. Punit Soni only mentions the Dev edition (which is not the same as the Google Play edition).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right, I put that to support, not contradict you... we are in "violent agreement!"
Punit said in a comment to that same post that they would announce plans for the Play Store "soon." Not clear what that means now almost four weeks later...
rajeshr said:
Yes, I agreed about about the Dev editions from Motorola, but there's been no confirmation about the Google Play edition. Punit Soni only mentions the Dev edition (which is not the same as the Google Play edition).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The PocketNow article cites Guy Kawasaki as the source of the information on the Google Play edition. Kawasaki is an official Motorola employee, who was picked up from Apple last year. Guy confirmed it in a google hangouts session he had conducted a few days back.
From someone (me) who really prefers the GP editions (I love plane vanilla AOSP): Why does there need to be a GPe of the Moto X? My understanding is outside of active notifications and touchless voice, this is pretty much AOSP. And the hardware is purpose built for those features (extra sensors, voice processor) as well anyway...
Just my $.02
DarthSudo said:
From someone (me) who really prefers the GP editions (I love plane vanilla AOSP): Why does there need to be a GPe of the Moto X? My understanding is outside of active notifications and touchless voice, this is pretty much AOSP. And the hardware is purpose built for those features (extra sensors, voice processor) as well anyway...
Just my $.02
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, thats exactly the reason why the GPe MotoX will still come with all the software features and optimizations, because it is essentially just stock otherwise, and built to blend in seamlessly with the UI. The reason it will be on GP is because it will be unlocked and unbranded, and have Tmobile AWS support. The GP edition is the only way you can buy a MotoX for use on Tmobile, since they won't be carrying it in the stores or online on their website.
http://www.tmonews.com/2013/08/image-confirms-t-mobile-moto-x-availability-through-google-play-only/
DarthSudo said:
From someone (me) who really prefers the GP editions (I love plane vanilla AOSP): Why does there need to be a GPe of the Moto X? My understanding is outside of active notifications and touchless voice, this is pretty much AOSP. And the hardware is purpose built for those features (extra sensors, voice processor) as well anyway...
Just my $.02
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its AOSP like on top of moto blur from what I've been reading. I'm not sure how the GP edition would be completely AOSP without those moto blur features? Its not too clear on many parts lol.
SysAdmNj said:
Its AOSP like on top of moto blur from what I've been reading. I'm not sure how the GP edition would be completely AOSP without those moto blur features? Its not too clear on many parts lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It loses no MotoBlur features. Its the ATT software with no bloat and SIM unlocked/bootloader unlockable.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk 2
SysAdmNj said:
Its AOSP like on top of moto blur from what I've been reading. I'm not sure how the GP edition would be completely AOSP without those moto blur features? Its not too clear on many parts lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's no Moto Blur on this device. Just stock Android with a couple of additions (and those seem to be showing up on the Play Store too). Moto Blur was a heavy skin on top of Android and that seems to have gone away completely!
mattlgroff said:
It loses no MotoBlur features. Its the ATT software with no bloat and SIM unlocked/bootloader unlockable.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
rajeshr said:
There's no Moto Blur on this device. Just stock Android with a couple of additions (and those seem to be showing up on the Play Store too). Moto Blur was a heavy skin on top of Android and that seems to have gone away completely!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well not moto blur, I'm just going by this post and article I post below. Regardless, 10% chance I'll be buying the at&t version lol. I rather wait, and who knows maybe by then the googorola nexus 5 appears with a superior camera ? *dreams on*
Even though, I remember trying the Droid X and it had a nice camera back then.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=45034892&postcount=3
http://anandtech.com/show/7235/moto-x-review/3
"Somewhat Stock Android
One of the first things that changed for Motorola under its new Google ownership was the final nail through the coffin for Motoblur, with OTA updates for some of its handsets gradually scaling back customized features in favor of stock ones. I joked with Anand that Google paid $12.5 billion for Motorola just to kill the beast that was Motoblur. Truth be told the presence of largely-stock Android 4.x UI is perhaps one of the best qualities of the Moto X.
ro.build.version.full=Blur_Version.139.9.51.ghost_att.ATT.en.US
"
DarthSudo said:
From someone (me) who really prefers the GP editions (I love plane vanilla AOSP): Why does there need to be a GPe of the Moto X? My understanding is outside of active notifications and touchless voice, this is pretty much AOSP. And the hardware is purpose built for those features (extra sensors, voice processor) as well anyway...
Just my $.02
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For future updates probably. It's still on 4.2.2
mattlgroff said:
It loses no MotoBlur features. Its the ATT software with no bloat and SIM unlocked/bootloader unlockable.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure we can get around the bootloader with time right? This isn't like the HTC Vivid...or at least tell me it's not like that.
SysAdmNj said:
Well not moto blur, I'm just going by this post and article I post below. Regardless, 10% chance I'll be buying the at&t version lol. I rather wait, and who knows maybe by then the googorola nexus 5 appears with a superior camera ? *dreams on*
Even though, I remember trying the Droid X and it had a nice camera back then.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=45034892&postcount=3
http://anandtech.com/show/7235/moto-x-review/3
"Somewhat Stock Android
One of the first things that changed for Motorola under its new Google ownership was the final nail through the coffin for Motoblur, with OTA updates for some of its handsets gradually scaling back customized features in favor of stock ones. I joked with Anand that Google paid $12.5 billion for Motorola just to kill the beast that was Motoblur. Truth be told the presence of largely-stock Android 4.x UI is perhaps one of the best qualities of the Moto X.
ro.build.version.full=Blur_Version.139.9.51.ghost_att.ATT.en.US
"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately I doubt the Nexus line will ever come back to ATT with subsidy (I'm just a poor boy from a poor family..) and my family wants me to get my own phone bill this weekend (and I get a nice discount on ATT through my job) so I'm 99 percent sure I'm going Moto X.
ShamanicEnzan said:
I'm sure we can get around the bootloader with time right? This isn't like the HTC Vivid...or at least tell me it's not like that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know how you can be sure of something so unlikely to happen again. More likely that Verizon give everyone unlimited data back IMO.. (Not gonna happen).
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk 2
Hey everyone.
I was thinking about importing a Moto X to the UK, but I'm concerned that it may not work. I reserched about the bands here but I don't know any really realiable source of information and I haven't been living here for long to know much about it (I've moved about 3 weeks ago). Would it be ok to get one from eBay and just pop in a SIM?
Also, I feel like I should wait for the Nexus 5 official release to compare them properly, although the voice features in the Moto X are really driving me to get it. What do you guys think? Is it really worth waiting?
Thanks for the attention. c:
uaite said:
Hey everyone.
I was thinking about importing a Moto X to the UK, but I'm concerned that it may not work. I reserched about the bands here but I don't know any really realiable source of information and I haven't been living here for long to know much about it (I've moved about 3 weeks ago). Would it be ok to get one from eBay and just pop in a SIM?
Also, I feel like I should wait for the Nexus 5 official release to compare them properly, although the voice features in the Moto X are really driving me to get it. What do you guys think? Is it really worth waiting?
Thanks for the attention. c:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Get the developer edition GSM and you'll be fine, it will be compatible with any carrier and it will get updates as soon as they are available, plus the bootloader is unlockable so u can have fun hacking it like a nexus, I think the moto X beats de Nexus 5, from the active display which the Nex5 can't have because it has an IPS display, to the lack of touchless control since the nex5 has no independant chip just for language procesing, so ye basically the X is a Nexus with somme really useful features added, great batery life, and awesome form factor, go with the X bro...
LRC1710 said:
Get the developer edition GSM and you'll be fine, it will be compatible with any carrier and it will get updates as soon as they are available, plus the bootloader is unlockable so u can have fun hacking it like a nexus, I think the moto X beats de Nexus 5, from the active display which the Nex5 can't have because it has an IPS display, to the lack of touchless control since the nex5 has no independant chip just for language procesing, so ye basically the X is a Nexus with somme really useful features added, great batery life, and awesome form factor, go with the X bro...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, dude.
One little thing: there's this auction going on at eBay and the price is half the other Xs on sale, but it doesn't mention being dev edition, although some other one does... The description doesn't clarify much either, it does mention networks types but you can never be too sure...
This is the link: ebay.co.uk/itm/Motorola-Moto-X-16GB-Unlocked-Customized-Smartphone-/221296979130?pt=Cell_Phones&hash=item338653ecba (can't post links yet, sorry)
Would that be a safe buy or I'd be better off taking another one?
uaite said:
Thanks, dude.
One little thing: there's this auction going on at eBay and the price is half the other Xs on sale, but it doesn't mention being dev edition, although some other one does... The description doesn't clarify much either, it does mention networks types but you can never be too sure...
This is the link: ebay.co.uk/itm/Motorola-Moto-X-16GB-Unlocked-Customized-Smartphone-/221296979130?pt=Cell_Phones&hash=item338653ecba (can't post links yet, sorry)
Would that be a safe buy or I'd be better off taking another one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It looks nice, that'll work for any carrier that uses gsm, if u can get it, get it, but I think the bids are gonna get much higher than that with the days, If I were u I'd rather get the dev edition, which is 530 pounds there in the uk website...
The one in the ebay listing might be a Rogers phone that has been unlocked. Its made in China so its not a US phone, and it has the Industry Canada info on it. Rogers is the only provider in Canada that has the Moto X. Assuming it is that would mean the bootloader can be unlocked via Motorola. Based on the FCC ID its a XT-1058 model (same as AT&T) if you want to see what bands it supports.
This phone works for you http://www.ebay.com/itm/Motorola-Mo...d=100040&prg=1011&rk=1&rkt=4&sd=231074547135&
Basically my questions are simple, I tried Googling quite extensively but cannot find a comprehensive answer.
Moto X Motomaker vs the Moto X Developer Edition pro and cons...
Here is what I think I know
Motomaker (MM from this point forward) is how you make it, has 16 and 32gb models and comes with a locked bootloader that must be unlocked to flash a ROM or change the fancy things like battery icons and the framework mods. Must wait for verizon to push updates to you at their own rate.. let me know if i'm wrong..
Developer Edition (DE from this for forward) is only 2 tone black and white and only available in 32gb. Bootloader is unlocked stock, can flash roms, change framework, custom apps, mod and tethering, android updates available whenever Google releases them or just come to XDA and find a leak.
I'm wondering if getting the DE is going to be worth the cost and if i comes BLANK with no Verizon bloat on-board. can i still use active notification and camera gesture etc if i flash a ROM?
I understand that the idea flashing a ROM is to get as close as humanly possible to stock android which it already is.
I'm going to be purchasing tomorrow so if you are all out there a timely response would be awesome!
On a side note I'm getting this phone to replace an S4 thats limping along with Safestrap and a Nexus Launcher.
Who's your carrier? T-mobile and Sprint allow you to unlock your bootloader http://www.droid-life.com/2013/09/09/t-mobile-moto-x-added-to-motorola-bootloader-unlock-program/
If you have Verizon or AT&T you'll need to get the dev edition.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Verizon Wireless..
Dev edition it is
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
If you want to run latest versions of android as soon as possible, Developer Edition might not be the ticket. As you can see already, carriers have started to push out kitkat earlier than motorola itself.
Titanoxide said:
Basically my questions are simple, I tried Googling quite extensively but cannot find a comprehensive answer.
Moto X Motomaker vs the Moto X Developer Edition pro and cons...
Here is what I think I know
Motomaker (MM from this point forward) is how you make it, has 16 and 32gb models and comes with a locked bootloader that must be unlocked to flash a ROM or change the fancy things like battery icons and the framework mods. Must wait for verizon to push updates to you at their own rate.. let me know if i'm wrong..
Developer Edition (DE from this for forward) is only 2 tone black and white and only available in 32gb. Bootloader is unlocked stock, can flash roms, change framework, custom apps, mod and tethering, android updates available whenever Google releases them or just come to XDA and find a leak.
I'm wondering if getting the DE is going to be worth the cost and if i comes BLANK with no Verizon bloat on-board. can i still use active notification and camera gesture etc if i flash a ROM?
I understand that the idea flashing a ROM is to get as close as humanly possible to stock android which it already is.
I'm going to be purchasing tomorrow so if you are all out there a timely response would be awesome!
On a side note I'm getting this phone to replace an S4 thats limping along with Safestrap and a Nexus Launcher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm in the same boat. I think the idea of the Moto X is great especially since it's getting the updates in a timely manner. I wonder though if the Developer Edition would be any different. Just because it's a Developer Edition doesn't mean it's a Google Play Edition meaning it will probably only receive the update when the Moto Maker X gets an update. That being the case (if I'm correct). Should I purchase the Developer Edition over the Motor Maker X. The only thing I would need to do is wifi tether since I am still on unlimited data and use it daily.
I have the Verizon Dev edition, and the only reason why I got it was so that I can unlock it and root it. With Dev editions you can only get white. If you want to unlock and root and are on AT&T or Verizon, then get the Dev edition, otherwise just get the Moto Maker edition.
chuda.pati09 said:
I have the Verizon Dev edition, and the only reason why I got it was so that I can unlock it and root it. With Dev editions you can only get white. If you want to unlock and root and are on AT&T or Verizon, then get the Dev edition, otherwise just get the Moto Maker edition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What have you done with your Dev Edition Moto X that you couldn't have done with the Moto Maker Version? And I'm asking what have you done, not what you plan on doing. Given the opportunity to do it all over again would you get the Dev Edition again or would you get a Moto Maker version?
Got the Dev edition and have not even unlocked the bootloader. Its that good . was thinking about it to install viper audio mod but have not yet
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
bigmook said:
Got the Dev edition and have not even unlocked the bootloader. Its that good . was thinking about it to install viper audio mod but have not yet
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LoL. Makes it even harder to decide if I want the Dev Edition or the Moto Maker personalized one tomorrow morning.
pablomoca said:
What have you done with your Dev Edition Moto X that you couldn't have done with the Moto Maker Version? And I'm asking what have you done, not what you plan on doing. Given the opportunity to do it all over again would you get the Dev Edition again or would you get a Moto Maker version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have unlocked and rooted my phone, I have installed Xposed and Gravity Box, and Greenify. I also plan on changing the bootloader, but have not found one I liked.
I believe you can root the Moto X without unlocking the bootloader, but from what I understand it is a headache when OTAs come through and there are chances of it bricking the phone. Since I was able to unlock the bootloader, I was able to flash TWRP and flash SU. And I don't have to worry about OTAs screwing up my phone.
But I need to stress this, do not spend the extra money on Dev edition if you are not on Verizon or AT&T, the Moto Xs from Motomaker can be unlocked.
The only added bonus the Dev edition brings is that unlocking it does not void the warranty which is nice because there can be cases which arise when it is a manufacture defect which the warranty would cover and it is nice to have that protection. But if you unlock a non Dev edition, it will void the warranty.
I personally would go with the Dev edition. There is always bound to be something I want to do to it. Plus future proofing
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
bigmook said:
Got the Dev edition and have not even unlocked the bootloader. Its that good . was thinking about it to install viper audio mod but have not yet
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did not unlock the bootloader until last week, which is also when I finally got time to unlock it and root the phone. But the change in warranty policy was a nice push.
I recommend unlocking and rooting your phone, I really missed Greenify and Titanium Backup. It might be a placebo effect or being on break last week I didn't use the phone as I normally do, but Greenify really helped the battery life. I went almost 22 hrs and about 2 hrs of screen time with no recharge couple times, using (Snapchat, Chrome, Reddit News, SMS, Hangouts, Phone, Plume, Maps, CBS Sports) heavily. Hopefully when I go back to normal usage this occurs again.
I should have been thinking about this a lot sooner than tonight. I'm leaning towards the Moto Maker edition for the obvious reasons of the color options. All I need is root the main thing I care about is tethering. And if I'm not mistaken there are apps on the market that will allow me to do that without root. I currently have a rooted Verizon Galaxy Note 3 and the only thing I use root for is tethering.
I went for the developer edition. I think it is worth the money..
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
What does the Dev edition offer that the retails does not?
1) a true custom recovery
2) no exploit needed for root
Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
Perhaps faster upgrade process, flagship product.. Investment in quality products...
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
elpmet27 said:
Perhaps faster upgrade process, flagship product.. Investment in quality products...
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your post doesn't add up...
" Perhaps faster upgrade process" - nope. Same for everyone. I believe motomaker version got it first...
"flagship product" - Motomaker is advertised, Dev edition is not known to all.
"Investment in quality products" - they are both the same phone.
Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
I'm planning to buy the Moto X today. I live in Asia/Middle East. Will the T-Mobile Off contract version work? Because i want to customize my phone through moto maker. I know LTE most likely most wont work, but my main concern is will it detect any sim and 3g data should work. Thanks for the help in advance.
varun.gid said:
I'm planning to buy the Moto X today. I live in Asia/Middle East. Will the T-Mobile Off contract version work? Because i want to customize my phone through moto maker. I know LTE most likely most wont work, but my main concern is will it detect any sim and 3g data should work. Thanks for the help in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes t-mobile is sim unlocked and 3g should work.
Hi,
I currently own a Nexus S, customized with AOSP Kitkat ROM. While this is a wonderful device, I think the time has come to change it. 512MB of RAM is just way too low for KitKat and newer apps that are RAM hungry. However, I don't like big phones. I like my Nexus S because it is small and fits everywhere. My brother has a Nexus 5 and it just doesn't fit in my hand. The screen is beautiful, but it is too big for my hand.
I was passing by a carrier store last week and came accross the Moto X and Moto G, both last generation. Both are the same physical size, even though the screen on the Moto G is 4.5inches and the X is 4.7. They fit pretty well in my hands and I love their design. It is also a great thing that it is running nearly stock Android with Motorola applications.
I know the Moto X isn't the most powerful phone on the market, and this isn't what I'm looking for. I'm looking for a nice upgrade with features that I like and a device that feels good in my hands.
Is the device worth it ? Are the Motorola extra features (Moto Assist, Active Display, Touchless controls) working fine ? I can easily imagine my Moto X docked in my car and me asking it for directions or change songs. I can't do that with the Nexus S; it is way too weak in power.
Do you know if I have to keep the stock launcher to get those features ? I really enjoy Apex.
How's the battery life ? I am usually not power hungry as I don't play games on my phone or even watch videos. I listen to music, check rss feeds and social networks.
Lastely, what would you change to the (old) Moto X ? From the reviews that I have read, I understand that the screen isn't incredible, but would you say that it is an issue ?
Thanks for any input
Neo.
Honestly, you would be better served reading through general and Q&A sections and reading the threads that have topic titles you're curious about.
You will get much more info than you will from this thread
Just my opinion. ?
The screen is pretty good as far as I can tell. Better in direct sunlight compared to LCD screens which I had cup my hand to be able to read clearly. That said, the moto features work but I don't make use of them. And you can use any alternative launcher if you like; I use action launcher btw. Is it worth the money? That's up to you. I paid $324 for the 32GB version and it is worth what I paid for it.
What carrier? If vzw?
Get a Maxx if you can cheap enough. Much brighter display
Was in the same situation as u 2 months ago, coming from a droid 3. Was looking at moto x and maxx, but battery was a huge plus for me, and went with the maxx, and I couldn't be happier with my choice. Although, it is a 5 inch screen.
Sent from my XT1080 using XDA Free mobile app
KJ said:
Honestly, you would be better served reading through general and Q&A sections and reading the threads that have topic titles you're curious about.
You will get much more info than you will from this thread
Just my opinion. ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. It did answer if a third party launcher can be installed and keep Motorola features. The answer is yes
titetanium said:
The screen is pretty good as far as I can tell. Better in direct sunlight compared to LCD screens which I had cup my hand to be able to read clearly. That said, the moto features work but I don't make use of them. And you can use any alternative launcher if you like; I use action launcher btw. Is it worth the money? That's up to you. I paid $324 for the 32GB version and it is worth what I paid for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am in Canada, so the device costs more. In fact, I can't really buy the device anymore in Canada and would have to import it from the US. More of a hassle, but may be worth it. I could get the 16GB XT1058 for about 300$USD shipped.
aviwdoowks said:
What carrier? If vzw?
Get a Maxx if you can cheap enough. Much brighter display
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am currently with Koodo (Telus) in Canada, but I would buy an unlocked device or unlock it myself. Rogers and Fido had the Moto X as an exclusive here in Canada. You couldn't buy the Moto X anywhere else than these carriers store. So if I wanna get a Moto X on Koodo, I must unlock it anyway. As for the Droid Maxx, I've read many times that the radio isn't working properly in Canada. I would have to dig a bit.
On another note, I was looking at how to root the Moto X and it is much more complicated than my Nexus S. If I can get a Dev edition it would be easier but they are hard to find (and not cheap). Gotta love Nexus devices for that reason !
You can buy an X from carriers still. Mine was 18 bucks to sim unlock. (Rogers phone and I'm on Telus)
And there's many used on kijiji.
---------- Post added at 02:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:07 PM ----------
You can also unlock the Rogers version and root easily.
KJ said:
You can buy an X from carriers still. Mine was 18 bucks to sim unlock. (Rogers phone and I'm on Telus)
And there's many used on kijiji.
---------- Post added at 02:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:07 PM ----------
You can also unlock the Rogers version and root easily.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really ? I've done some stores and no fido or rogers had stock on Moto X, although they had it in display.
So you have the XT1058 ? According to the Moto X guides thread, how complex rootinng is, depends on what version of Android is installed. Do you run KitKat or JellyBean ?
The best buy in the last couple of years. I definitly recommend it. I always was the type of person, who felt like having to fiddle a lot with the phone, to fulfill my needs. (I came from LG devices). I always rooted and installed custom ROMs. But believe it or not, I still dont feel the need to root or install a different Software, since the stock ROM runs amazingly great on my phone. I also had the G in my hands, but the X display is way better. Camera... Well it is not the best, but also not as bad as many said. Battery is amazin. And although I already had phones with more capacity, this one lasts longer by far. I also listen to a LOT of music and the phone still gets me through the day quite easily. But there is one thing I would consider. The new 2014 X. For me personally, the screen is too big, but maybe it will be just right for you? And yeah it does not have killer specs, but the phone is definitly smoother than other flagship phones, which often laag due to the extra ("great"/"special") custom UI.
Those are my 2 cents. Hope it helps a bit
Sent from my XT1052 using XDA Free mobile app
I think it would be quite an upgrade for you and still worth it..
If you have any specific questions feel free to post here or message me
spookyneo said:
Really ? I've done some stores and no fido or rogers had stock on Moto X, although they had it in display.
So you have the XT1058 ? According to the Moto X guides thread, how complex rootinng is, depends on what version of Android is installed. Do you run KitKat or JellyBean ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, xt1058. Unlocked on moto site, then just used fastboot for custom recovery and rooted. Done. No different than rooting a Nexus. Simple.
I did all that in jelly bean, but it's no different on KitKat.
I don't remember the site I used to unlock Sim, but they're a dime a dozen. I think it was cellularunlocker. Or something like that.
I did have to try the moto site the night I got it, and the next day after work before it worked. The unlock site is glitchy.
...
KJ said:
Yup, xt1058. Unlocked on moto site, then just used fastboot for custom recovery and rooted. Done. No different than rooting a Nexus. Simple.
I did all that in jelly bean, but it's no different on KitKat.
I don't remember the site I used to unlock Sim, but they're a dime a dozen. I think it was cellularunlocker. Or something like that.
I did have to try the moto site the night I got it, and the next day after work before it worked. The unlock site is glitchy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK thanks, I'll check the Moto website. If a get a XT1058 from the US or from Rogers/Fido, I guess I can root it using Moto website and it will work on Koodo. Rooting shouldn't affect the bands and carrier. From what I know, AT&T and Telus/Koodo uses the same bands.
The Complete Moto X Guides/Information Thread got all me confused with downgrading from KitKat to Jelly Bean and flashing the 4.2.2 camera app. Is the downgrade procedure only for Locked Bootloaders (which the XT1058 isn't) ?
Thanks everyone for your feedback yet. I think it will be a device as good as my Nexus S, if not better
$324 seems really high to be the current value.
If the 2014 Moto G is selling for $179 Brand New, what do you think a used 2013 Sprint Moto X is worth now ????
spookyneo said:
OK thanks, I'll check the Moto website. If a get a XT1058 from the US or from Rogers/Fido, I guess I can root it using Moto website and it will work on Koodo. Rooting shouldn't affect the bands and carrier. From what I know, AT&T and Telus/Koodo uses the same bands.
The Complete Moto X Guides/Information Thread got all me confused with downgrading from KitKat to Jelly Bean and flashing the 4.2.2 camera app. Is the downgrade procedure only for Locked Bootloaders (which the XT1058 isn't) ?
Thanks everyone for your feedback yet. I think it will be a device as good as my Nexus S, if not better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Downloading was going from 4.4 to 4.2.2. That's gone as of 4.4 2. No more downgrading. Not without great risk.
There's no Telus moto x... I don't think. Was only Rogers and fido . Maybe I'm wrong. I got a Rogers one new, but off a guy. I just unlocked it to use on Telus. Maybe there's a telus model... But I didn't think so.
But remember, whatever model number it may be, an AT&T phone can't be unlocked. Avoid getting that if you can.
tt c6 said:
$324 seems really high to be the current value.
If the 2014 Moto G is selling for $179 Brand New, what do you think a used 2013 Sprint Moto X is worth now ????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am looking at new phones, so this is why it is a bit more expensive. I don't know if you are in the US or CA, but the Moto G will sell for about 225$CDN here and the new Moto X will for around 450-500$ if not more. Cellphones in Canada are more expensive than in the US. Pretty much like anything else on the market...
KJ said:
Downloading was going from 4.4 to 4.2.2. That's gone as of 4.4 2. No more downgrading. Not without great risk.
There's no Telus moto x... I don't think. Was only Rogers and fido . Maybe I'm wrong. I got a Rogers one new, but off a guy. I just unlocked it to use on Telus. Maybe there's a telus model... But I didn't think so.
But remember, whatever model number it may be, an AT&T phone can't be unlocked. Avoid getting that if you can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No there was never any Moto X on Telus or Koodo. It was a Rogers/Fido exclusive. Sorry, I think my post was misleading.
An AT&T phone cannot be unlocked ? I think since a month or 2, this isn't true anymore.
spookyneo said:
I am looking at new phones, so this is why it is a bit more expensive. I don't know if you are in the US or CA, but the Moto G will sell for about 225$CDN here and the new Moto X will for around 450-500$ if not more. Cellphones in Canada are more expensive than in the US. Pretty much like anything else on the market...
No there was never any Moto X on Telus or Koodo. It was a Rogers/Fido exclusive. Sorry, I think my post was misleading.
An AT&T phone cannot be unlocked ? I think since a month or 2, this isn't true anymore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought you were talking bootloader unlocked, which AT&T can't. Yes, Sim unlock sure.
But you risk not having root. Depending what version it comes with and whether you're willing to pay 45 to bootloader unlocked, if you're on the list for the China Middleman.
KJ said:
I thought you were talking bootloader unlocked, which AT&T can't. Yes, Sim unlock sure.
But you risk not having root. Depending what version it comes with and whether you're willing to pay 45 to bootloader unlocked, if you're on the list for the China Middleman.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for pointing that out. I didn't notice that AT&T has a locked bootloader. I thought either locked or unlocked bootloader was model dependant (XT1058,60,etc) and not carrier dependant. Let the search continue. My best bet would be to find a Rogers one
spookyneo said:
Thanks for pointing that out. I didn't notice that AT&T has a locked bootloader. I thought either locked or unlocked bootloader was model dependant (XT1058,60,etc) and not carrier dependant. Let the search continue. My best bet would be to find a Rogers one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup. ?
Kijiji.