Hi to all
AS I have seen in Andro - Id forum Tj Sir has said th:laugh:t it is possible to port kernel 3.08 from our device.
He has written that
"
It's possible. But better to porting from vanilla codeaurora, not from other device. We know Huawei X6 (U9000) and Huawei Honor (U8860) is the same brand, but it's from different manufacture. Huawei X5 (U8800) can use U8860 because from same manufacture, the source is not very different."
So it is a request for CK,ABEN and AEOI to please look into the matter and check or PM Tj SIr as he can share how to port the same for our device as I am sure it is not difficult now and I am sure that this will help our team to port kernel.
Link for reference
http://forum.andro-id.net/fb0_system_modification/is_it_possible_kernel_3.0.8_port_392.0.html
I personally hope that someone will give at least a try to this,
Here I found out link for Kernel Kitchen
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1659584
Hope it is helpful for CK, Abenand AEOI
Thanks in Advance
Keep up the FIH - FBO Spirit
U8860 kernel useful?
Is this useful?
HUAWEI Honor Open Source（U8860,IcecreamSandwich,kernel-3.0.8)
http://www.huaweidevice.com/worldwi...=toDownloadFile&flay=software&softid=NDY4NTg=
i'm already work on porting 3.0.8 kernel for our device,, it will take a long time,, since 5 weeks ago i'm still working to make it happen,, always fail but i always trying.. so wish me luck..
abenagiel said:
i'm already work on porting 3.0.8 kernel for our device,, it will take a long time,, since 5 weeks ago i'm still working to make it happen,, always fail but i always trying.. so wish me luck..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks Abenagiel ... its great that you are working on 3.0.8 kernel ...... wish you very best luck and hope that you will able to make it very soon.....................:good:
abenagiel said:
i'm already work on porting 3.0.8 kernel for our device,, it will take a long time,, since 5 weeks ago i'm still working to make it happen,, always fail but i always trying.. so wish me luck..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aben
As an advice why don"t you PM Sir Tj style and take some help or search someone in this forum who has already ported kernel.
I think it may help you
As we knows guys,our device not getting firmware update from official,and we cant get stable firm/OS/ROM till now
Just inform to you all,,
All we need is new KERNEL for step up on developments,not new ROM or anything else
Even we get new lib,new bin for ROM,we will alwats get stuck without new KERNEL
Sorry I just say,cant doing anything
But I suggest to all,think about port/backport KERNEL,not port ROM
For me,its very useless if we always think for new ROM without new KERNEL
so,this topic minds is
ALL WE NEED FOR MOVE OUT AND STEP UP IS "NEW KERNEL" VERSION
Thanks,
Please read the title,I dont have mind to offense anyone
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
How, will, when, what will this update come from?
Sent from my A99 using xda app-developers app
I've tried so many times to port our kernel to higher version but always failed.. now I'm little bit busy with my job and preparing to get a college to continue my study.. for now,, i just developing android if i really have a free time.. and i will share if i succeed to port our kernel..
thanks for all support..
No spill overs from PA or AOPK?
Sent from my A99 using xda app-developers app
Tj_style was told me about kernel,,its very hard to port/backport kernel,so surely make new kernel is excellently hard
He said, our device is far from standard google architecture
Last time ago,,he planning to release Andro-id v3.3 RC4 with new baseband and kernel 2.6.35.14, unfortunately,his device getting brick and his development didn't complete yet,,new kernel still give issue on WiFi and GPS
Maybe we really need talk and ask help for hard kernel modder for this
As aben said,he also busy at this time and will help when he have free time
We can't step up if still on this
We need help from kernel modder/kernel devs
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
We have to reconsider the bounty initiated by our good friend naynesh.
Happy Holidays everyone.
^_^
aeoi said:
We have to reconsider the bounty initiated by our good friend naynesh.
Happy Holidays everyone.
^_^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats it
Sorry for donating,,I cant donate as you know Indonesian people minority does have Credit Card
So we must try ask for real dev for developing our device
Where is naynesh??I never meet him in this forum since he announce bounty will refund
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
why not to just optimize current kernel with stable gingerbread rom?
want ics/jb features?
one of my friend's highly customized cm7 rom has it, not all, but most cool features. and ton of customization available. why not try it?
port it or build it from source.
ardX said:
why not to just optimize current kernel with stable gingerbread rom?
want ics/jb features?
one of my friend's highly customized cm7 rom has it, not all, but most cool features. and ton of customization available. why not try it?
port it or build it from source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats kind ROM?
What about CyanMobile X?
Om,simple things is,,our 2.6.35.7 is far from stable,,CM7 with .35 doesnt have fully working default camera,,simple thing,but very important,and what about the others?WiFi SoD?ICV OCV?
Thats what I mean and force me downgrade my Mia to .32
About backport kernel fro 3.x.x or make new kernel,,how about your opinion om ardx?
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Arya_3RDNumber said:
Whats kind ROM?
What about CyanMobile X?
Om,simple things is,,our 2.6.35.7 is far from stable,,CM7 with .35 doesnt have fully working default camera,,simple thing,but very important,and what about the others?WiFi SoD?ICV OCV?
Thats what I mean and force me downgrade my Mia to .32
About backport kernel fro 3.x.x or make new kernel,,how about your opinion om ardx?
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whatever, just try to develop it yourself, truth is, that fix was available in various commit on various github that develop this device or other
about backport, check other Recognized Developer that try it at other device, are they suceeded, yet? so...
Arya_3RDNumber said:
Tj_style was told me about kernel,,its very hard to port/backport kernel,so surely make new kernel is excellently hard
He said, our device is far from standard google architecture
Last time ago,,he planning to release Andro-id v3.3 RC4 with new baseband and kernel 2.6.35.14, unfortunately,his device getting brick and his development didn't complete yet,,new kernel still give issue on WiFi and GPS
Maybe we really need talk and ask help for hard kernel modder for this
As aben said,he also busy at this time and will help when he have free time
We can't step up if still on this
We need help from kernel modder/kernel devs
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If some one can request Tj style to provide his kernel source to aben or CK and they can try to work out issues.
Bcoz 2.6.35.14 will help us to have many more roms for our device.
I tried few roms to port but failed due to kernel
Aben
Can you take lead on this to provide us stable 2.6.35.14 kernel . we can also try same kernel with wifi and GPS issue.Tj style has shared his source on github
you need to just build it
Requesting you to please help and build 1 version of 35.14 kernel for all of us
Arya
Can you request TJ STYLE to provide his kernel
EDIT : I am trying to port Cyanmobile from sometime but failed to boot it up also tried AURORA ICS on .35 kernel booting but getting into bootloop don't know what to do
If I not wrong,,Cyanmobile X is GB 2.3.8
Dont know what is mean with "2.3.8" as we know higher version GB is 2.3.7
Maybe,thats which make it cant boot
I was request TJ from some days ago,but he dont reply my PM till now,,I dont know why,,maybe you can also PM him
35.14 can take backport kernel 3.x.x architecture
I also saw kernel 2.6.66.7 on galaxy ace 4.2.1 alpha
Seriously,we totally need new kernel for continue ROM projects
My suggest,,try to build Cyanmobile X friends
I think,you need build new source for Cyanmobile,it cant boot if just porting
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
You got the point ArdX... I was tried with 3.0.xx months ago, but damn it's tooo many to change, it will took much time which I didn't have, so I dropped the project. I was thinking to modified .32 to make it faster, but l still like .35. May be later.
By the way, Vigo has .35 kernel officially. Any one has the source?
Sent from my bike using Tapatalk 2
CacingKalung said:
You got the point ArdX... I was tried with 3.0.xx months ago, but damn it's tooo many to change, it will took much time which I didn't have, so I dropped the project. I was thinking to modified .32 to make it faster, but l still like .35. May be later.
By the way, Vigo has .35 kernel officially. Any one has the source?
Sent from my bike using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup that's right.. I've did that too.. so many changes on kernel 3.x.x.. even sometimes my computer getting Hank if I want to see the different between our kernel and 3.x.x,,
I still try it sometimes in my free time..
Btw nice to see you again on CK.. :thumbup:
Arya_3RDNumber said:
Thats it
Sorry for donating,,I cant donate as you know Indonesian people minority does have Credit Card
So we must try ask for real dev for developing our device
Where is naynesh??I never meet him in this forum since he announce bounty will refund
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Friends I am here only, but remaining silent. Unfortunately while i was touring Delhi my dear MI 410 got broken and now i am stuck with galaxy ace s5830.
I think it is too late now. If we were able to raise the sum in time then randomblame would surely have helped us, he is a very good developer. Besides him i had asked to dzo, doomlord, lord clockan they also said that they are busy.
If you are still interested in the bounty idea, then i suggest you contact some developer (May be edowar) and ask him for help. As i have already informed that randomblame had turned down the proposal and tj_style did not reply, it is upto someone from you who has to take a lead. I can transfer the entire bounty amount to any senior member. Please advice before i start refunding by the next month for sure.
PS Thanks to everyone of this board particularly the devs/porters/modders/testers. I owe you more than what i can put in words.
abenagiel said:
Yup that's right.. I've did that too.. so many changes on kernel 3.x.x.. even sometimes my computer getting Hank if I want to see the different between our kernel and 3.x.x,,
I still try it sometimes in my free time..
Btw nice to see you again on CK.. :thumbup:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Aben. I don't know, may be next week am going to dissapear again due to entering busy mode again.
Sent from my bike using Tapatalk 2
hi CK n aben. yeah, you have no life if doing that. lol
btw, can you two put your kernel source to the github? and device config maybe, GB based will be better. just want to try build cyanmobile. but cant test myself, so stable config+kernel can help me to fixing bug without device. hehe
@nayneshdev so,,are planning to repair your Mi-410?
Honestly,I dont have any idea for that,,since all devs get busy like CK,ardx,aben,and TJ
Also our friends like elol,zuk,and many,sory if I forget them dissapear from this forum
What about anyone guys?about this bounty
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Arya_3RDNumber said:
@nayneshdev so,,are planning to repair your Mi-410?
Honestly,I dont have any idea for that,,since all devs get busy like CK,ardx,aben,and TJ
Also our friends like elol,zuk,and many,sory if I forget them dissapear from this forum
What about anyone guys?about this bounty
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is a damage beyond repair, screen crushed, board broken into pieces even the sim crushed, a construction truck ran over it, i don't know how it got damaged that bad, previously it was touch enough to withstand many falls, must have been a very bad position.
Personally i think devs should concentrate on fixing the issues with the present kernel and tj_style for sure can fix the camera issue. So it would be better if someone asks to tj_style whether he is willing to do development if we provide him a device.
Hi ardx /aben/ CK
Tj style has shared his kernel 2.6.35.14 source on GIT Hub.
Can you guys built it for our device
Thanks in advance
Hello to all,
The Maclawstudio have announced that they are working on kernel 3.0 for galaxy Ace / Gio.
All those who are interested to port this kernel by Ace / Gio in galaxy mini, please contact me.
I do not think it will be so difficult
Please contact me(pm) :highfive:
greetings
Ma-90 @
Request
Can u also port his cm10.1.
Venomstar said:
Can u also port his cm10.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but I do not think there is a need for mini already there
reported .....mods may close this thread..
and dude if you want help goto either general or q and a section.....
post here only when you are done with the project..
Nice idea.. i would really like to join you in that.. but, i hv no time till 16th may..
Can I join you after my exam which will end on 16th may. ?
OJ said:
Nice idea.. i would really like to join you in that.. but, i hv no time till 16th may..
Can I join you after my exam which will end on 16th may. ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ofcourse
MaclawStudio just takes psyke83's work and again saying it's his. What a tool - same for everything else - taken from androidarmv6. And people still download his builds. Pathetic. Then keeps everything closed source (even the kernel, lol) so nobody can see that. x) Just haven't got enough words to describe this "developer"
i dont care if its stolen, remaked, rearanged, modified, etc...the truth is gonna come along with punishment (sound like Jehova whitness), as long as this 3 kernel works...
I don't know if you're aware of that, but erikcas is working on it since the day psyke83 ported it. He never brags about it. The problem is that Ace/Gio/Mini/Fit uses closed source FSR drivers which don't work on 3.x kernel (yet)
TheWhisp said:
I don't know if you're aware of that, but erikcas is working on it since the day psyke83 ported it. He never brags about it. The problem is that Ace/Gio/Mini/Fit uses closed source FSR drivers which don't work on 3.x kernel (yet)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it is not necessary to port kernel since Erikcas already is working on it right?
Erikcas has been working on it for months. Galaxy 5 uses older FSR drivers which have open source package or SDK, not sure. The problem is that Mini/Ace/Gio/Fit uses newer version and that open source package is not working.
TheWhisp said:
Erikcas has been working on it for months. Galaxy 5 uses older FSR drivers which have open source package or SDK, not sure. The problem is that Mini/Ace/Gio/Fit uses newer version and that open source package is not working.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But if maclawstudio kernel port about Ace / Gio you can use them on our FSR galy mini, right?
Yes
I only leave this here:
bgm92 said:
Just shut up! Maclaw offered us more stable builds than you or other devs ever did! Show a little respect and stop denigrating him because he did a better job than you!
I really hope Maclaw won't release 3.x kernel sources so you won't steal his work and port it to other phones.
__________________________________________________
And one another important thing! How can you tell us he stoke psyke83's work? From where do you know? Have you got any proofs? How can you just speak like that? Again, just shut up - like a romanian proverb says: If you would shut up, you would remained a philosopher...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
News flash bro ....Ever tried erikcas's builds please do if you didn't they are the most stable ones available.
also maclaw can/most likely isnt working on a source port for ace/gio but the truth of the matter is that would be sheer waste of time.Psyke83 already did the work,erikcas and wayland ace ported it to gio and ace respectively(they added their defconfigs and nessary parts) so it would be foolish of maclaw to start from scratch.
Also lets clarify he may/most likely is Kanging erikcas , wayland ace and psyke83 's work but since its open to all to build its not actually stealing(provided he gives credit but thats just good manners).
also the fsr module is a proprietary module(source code is not available) the one that psyke83 is using was leaked via a galaxy5 eclair kernel sources and still contained proprietary blobs(possibly that's the problem area).
Erikcas spent about what 3-4 months 14 hrs a day on the kernel trying all permutations and combinations but was not successful so ....you realize if i show doubt to maclaws possiblity of fixing it(nonetheless miracles happen).
PS reported you.(for starting a possible flame war).
PPS also maclaw still breaks the gpl by distributiing a closed source kernel based on opensourced resources(its still linux).
---------- Post added at 07:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:21 PM ----------
marcin1147 said:
I only leave this here:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
knock knock ....correction Erikcas and psyke83's not TheWhisp.
Dark Passenger said:
Erikcas spent about what 3-4 months 14 hrs a day on the kernel trying all permutations and combinations but was not successful so ....you realize if i show doubt to maclaws possiblity of fixing it(nonetheless miracles happen)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
COOL STORY BRO
*click*
BTW. Maybe you don't know but our sources are here: https://github.com/MaclawStudio/aosp_kernel
Also the fact that maclaw asked for donations to buy a galaxy mini....
many people trusted him and donated..
and when there was enough he betrayed by stopping development and not using the money what it was meant for ...
most people argue that he promised but as always there is no proof or a written agreement or contract and thus the money donated with trust of further development of various development was pocketed...
I am not blaming or accusing anyone of anything but just stating the facts that i know..
hsay said:
Also the fact that maclaw asked for donations to buy a galaxy mini.... many people trusted him and donated..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maclaw told me that nobody has donated.
and you believed?
anyway lets stop the discussion right here...
if maclaw comes back for development i dont have any problems...
he is welcome anytime
Please, stop this stupid arguing.
I know a lot of people hates me here, I don't care.
Just relax, let every developer like erikcas, TheWhisp etc. do their bests without fighting.
Maybe our device sources are closed, but we've to share kernel sources. If we do 3.x kernel, we'll have to share sources aswell.
Erickas will make 3.x? Great, every Samsung device with msm7x27 will be able to use it with mention that it's ported by him.
We will make 3.x? Great, as up. We must to share kernel sources when we release it.
What a difference?
Hello everyone
This is the first time Im creating a thread in all my years here on XDA. So please bear with me
Im very happy and excited to see the recent boom of custom roms for our device, its going really well and at a break neck speed.
Much rapid then I can download and flash it too
However, the only thing bugging me the lack of custom kernels.
I understand that the pINKman kernel by slukk and unnamed kernel by luca are both fantabulous kernels , and are mighty contenders for your time.
Dont get me wrong, I fully and whole-heartedly appreciate the kernel-devs and the awesome work made by them
The furnace kernel by savoca seemed to be a good one too, but I noticed that the thread has been closed and my recent pm to him about some possible update has not yielded any results.
I dont possibly know where im going with this conversation (lol), but if you catch my drift, we'd certainly want to see the boom of custom kernels just as we did with custom roms
Sorry for such a lengthy post .
*bows out*
:cyclops:
EDIT- lol, sorry for creating a thread in the general section, I botched it
Should have created in the QA section
metalrules321 said:
However, the only thing bugging me the lack of custom kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, as long as Motorola doesn't release the kernel sources for lollipop, there isn't much that can be done. I found today some commits for lollipop but nothing official (look at Motorola's github kernel under issues). It took Motorola quite a while to release the sources for kitkat, so we have to keep patient.
need some OC and OV feature
@doppelhelix
Whelp
Thanks for clearing that up for me man.
Yeah it kinda sucks , I mean with the recent influx of so many roms and only 2 kernels was an eye-sore xD
Anys ways
*fingers crossed*
@doppelhelix
But on a second thought
How come slukk is developing and updating kernels even though the sources have not been released ??
metalrules321 said:
@doppelhelix
But on a second thought
How come slukk is developing and updating kernels even though the sources have not been released ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
based on kitkat. Thats why they don't work on stock lollipop, only cm