Is it true that Xposed doesn't play nice with Cyanogenmod? - Xposed General

Hello, someone on the Cyanogenmod chat channel told me was a bad idea to install Xposed on a CyanogenModded phone. Is this true?
I have CM 13 (Lollipop) on my Samsung Galaxy S3 phone.

bbwarfield said:
Hello, someone on the Cyanogenmod chat channel told me was a bad idea to install Xposed on a CyanogenModded phone. Is this true?
I have CM 13 (Lollipop) on my Samsung Galaxy S3 phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been running Xposed on my Cyanogen phone for a long time now and nothing bad happens. Cyanogen just doesn't support you if you have Xposed on there so if you have any problems they won't help you.

For you bigger problem is what phone you have, not the system you run
Most of rooted phones who wants to use CM have cm or cm based roms, so if there will be a big problem with xposed you will know that. Only problem is lack of support form ROM developer if you use xposed. OFC some phones/ CM modifications can cause problems with xposed ut there are less .

plantator said:
For you bigger problem is what phone you have, not the system you run
Most of rooted phones who wants to use CM have cm or cm based roms, so if there will be a big problem with xposed you will know that. Only problem is lack of support form ROM developer if you use xposed. OFC some phones/ CM modifications can cause problems with xposed ut there are less .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My phone is a Samsung Galaxy S3. Will this phone be okay with Xposed?

Just to let you all know that Xposed works well in Cyanogenmod as long as you follow the instructions specific to your device when it comes to installing the Framework and installer app. It's not magic nor does all the modules work for all the devices. As for anything you install for the first time as a noob to XPosed... "do your homework" and "understand what it is your installing first". If your tech savvy, try it out and if needed, ask questions. Then you should do just fine.
Sent from my D2VZW on the Bridge of the U.S.S. Enterprise.
---------- Post added at 12:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:18 AM ----------
bbwarfield said:
My phone is a Samsung Galaxy S3. Will this phone be okay with Xposed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I too have a Galaxy S3 and I have Cyanogenmod and XPosed installed.
Sent from my D2VZW on the Bridge of the U.S.S. Enterprise.

I'm running the build of CyanogenMod for the 6P from November 6th with Xposed and it's working fine.
I'm holding off upgrading until 7.1.1 gets Xposed writing and the 6P's battery's issue shutdown is figured out.

Running both CM13 and Xposed on my Galaxy Note 10.1, no issues detected.
Sent from my GT-N8013 using XDA-Developers mobile app

bbwarfield said:
My phone is a Samsung Galaxy S3. Will this phone be okay with Xposed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be more accurate. The Software (aka Rom) and sometimes Android Version is important to kno when running Xposed. Many custom Roms and Xposed Modules clean clash or not be compatible. Some Modules are generic in design and pretty much work on every Rom across the board like YouTube AdAway because it's App Based. But then their some that are Rom based like xMiui that's specifically for Miui V8 or xTouchWiz for Touchwiz on Marshmallow. Both of which won't work on our do anything on CyanogenMod. Then their are many like GravityBox* that put a disclaimer on using it with Roms outside of AOSP or Google Stock, yet it works fine on CM in my experience.
Just read each module clearly before activation. No need to be discouraged and Xposed have 2 methods of failsafe if something goes wrong. It can be disabled in the recovery by flashing the uninstaller or during the boot screen by pressing the volume buttons 5 times.
Personal favorites nearly all us experienced would use on CM is GravityBox*, YouTube AdAway & Greenify.
*GravityBox is by far the arguable best module. It's a like a swiss army knife but this also means it can clash with none stock (including heavier custom) roms. Simply because these Roms often have the features it adds already baked in.

Related

CM12 is great, but I miss Xposed.

Since Xposed is only compatible with ARM7 phones on Lollipop I think I will flash the latest stock again which is 4.4.2 for my klte. With Xprivacy there is no problem with security I guess? BubbleUPNP has a module for Xposed that lets me stream audio from phone to Chromecast for apps without Chromecast support.
andacro said:
Since Xposed is only compatible with ARM7 phones on Lollipop I think I will flash the latest stock again which is 4.4.2 for my klte. With Xprivacy there is no problem with security I guess? BubbleUPNP has a module for Xposed that lets me stream audio from phone to Chromecast for apps without Chromecast support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Real happy for you, but... what's the point of this post. We know that Xposed doesn't work (is in alpha stage) on lollipop and we also know the module's function. I don't get why you've made this thread in the first place
Understand. Got the phone yesterday, and was eager to write something I guess.
andacro said:
Understand. Got the phone yesterday, and was eager to write something I guess.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Imho 4.4.2 is better than lollipop for now. Most mods here aren't updated for lollipop plus xposed is working there and everything is black instead of the ugly white in 5.0. I got my S5 at the end of January and am real happy with it. Not a single problem so far Check my signature to see which is the latest ROM for the G900F. I also highly recommend you to try the kernel I'm on, it's awesome!
If you like the galaxy S6 and S6 Edge exclusive features, check out my thread on how to get them on our S5s ?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3083566
Sent from my "Black Beauty" using Tapatalk
koragg97 said:
Imho 4.4.2 is better than lollipop for now. Most mods here aren't updated for lollipop plus xposed is working there and everything is black instead of the ugly white in 5.0. I got my S5 at the end of January and am real happy with it. Not a single problem so far Check my signature to see which is the latest ROM for the G900F. I also highly recommend you to try the kernel I'm on, it's awesome!
If you like the galaxy S6 and S6 Edge exclusive features, check out my thread on how to get them on our S5s
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3083566
Sent from my "Black Beauty" using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you so much. Will be fun to try it out. Knew Xposed supported Lollipop, but had no idea that it was only for ARM7 devices until yesterday That doesn't matter now that I know how bad it performs in Lollipop. I prefer the GUI in KitKat over Lollipop. It's too polished in Lollipop., and I dislike white too. Great to learn that it's a great phone. So far I love it too.
Spent many hours yesterday to get it working with Windows, figuring out how to root and install rescue and trying out roms. Takes some time to getting into it when getting a new phone, and I don't miss the Sony Xperia Acro S.
If you get stuck in bootloop while reverting back to kitkat, flash kitkat modem and baseband and then try flashing the ROM itself. But i think with Odin you just flash PDA (AP) and that's it. Took me a week until i had my phone completely the way i want it xD
Sent from my "Black Beauty" using Tapatalk
Thank you for the help. I have installed 4.4.2 with Odin already, and it went fine luckily. Got the rom from Sammobiles.
Great toy this with so many options. Not used to that with my former phone. Will be fun.
Is the 09.21.14 kernel better than the latest?
andacro said:
Is the 09.21.14 kernel better than the latest?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you like to control your TV or air-conditioning and stuff with your phone's infrared blaster, then yes it's better. Latest one doesn't have IR blaster working so you can't control anything with Smart Remote. Technically, latest one built on Samsung's official sources is the 21.09.2014 one. Only issue is with the camera. Sometimes when you open it there are some weird colored lines inside and it lags. Toggling HDR on/off fixes it until you start it up again.
Thanks for the info. Running the latest and cannot connect to my WiFi with it. Got a backup of stock luckily.
I had to forsake Xposed to follow the development of CM. 4.4.2 works fine, but following the forefront of the development was hard to resist.
andacro said:
I had to forsake Xposed to follow the development of CM. 4.4.2 works fine, but following the forefront of the development was hard to resist.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you're back on CM. Blah, TouchWiz = the best for me!
koragg97 said:
So you're back on CM. Blah, TouchWiz = the best for me!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What advantages has TouchWiz? I have no clue.
andacro said:
What advantages has TouchWiz? I have no clue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Features. Features. Features.
Sent from my "Black Beauty" using Tapatalk

Most Stable 5.1.1 ROM with Xposed Support?

Hey all,
So I recently developed an Xposed module while running KitKat. I released it and users are having trouble getting it to work correctly when running Lollipop 5.1.1 - can someone recommend me a stable ROM with working Bluetooth, SMS, and support for Xposed?
mrinehart93 said:
Hey all,
So I recently developed an Xposed module while running KitKat. I released it and users are having trouble getting it to work correctly when running Lollipop 5.1.1 - can someone recommend me a stable ROM with working Bluetooth, SMS, and support for Xposed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are many great ROMs on every variant of the HTC One M7 that run well on 5.1.1. My personal favorite is Candy5, which can be found here.
In terms of Xposed itself, as long as you flash the correct framework flashable for the version of Android you're running, (in your case, 5.1.1) then everything will work.
For the correct framework files to flash on top of your 5.1.1 ROM of choice, here they are.
Get the arm version, NOT arm64. Arm is the compatible version for our phone.
On top of this, you need to install the .apk for Xposed as well to utilize the framework modules (this shouldn't be a surprise to you, as you've used Xposed on KitKat)
Signal2Noise said:
There are many great ROMs on every variant of the HTC One M7 that run well on 5.1.1. My personal favorite is Candy5, which can be found here.
In terms of Xposed itself, as long as you flash the correct framework flashable for the version of Android you're running, (in your case, 5.1.1) then everything will work.
For the correct framework files to flash on top of your 5.1.1 ROM of choice, here they are.
Get the arm version, NOT arm64. Arm is the compatible version for our phone.
On top of this, you need to install the .apk for Xposed as well to utilize the framework modules (this shouldn't be a surprise to you, as you've used Xposed on KitKat)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the reply! I ended up trying out Candy and AICP... both are kinda buggy, though. AICP doesn't find my cell network, and Candy makes weird static noises randomly Which ROM do you use?
mrinehart93 said:
Thanks for the reply! I ended up trying out Candy and AICP... both are kinda buggy, though. AICP doesn't find my cell network, and Candy makes weird static noises randomly Which ROM do you use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use Candy5 as a daily driver and actually, I helped the ROM developer fix the static noise you mentioned. The link for the full ROM with that fix can be found here. It's by far the smoothest (and most stable) stock-like ROM on the m7spr because of the wonderful Candy Kernel baked in.
Signal2Noise said:
I use Candy5 as a daily driver and actually, I helped the ROM developer fix the static noise you mentioned. The link for the full ROM with that fix can be found here. It's by far the smoothest (and most stable) stock-like ROM on the m7spr because of the wonderful Candy Kernel baked in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome, I'll check that link out. How is the battery life for you? Last time I actually "tried" Lollipop ROMs were a few months ago, and battery life was pretty bad which kept me on KitKat.
mrinehart93 said:
Awesome, I'll check that link out. How is the battery life for you? Last time I actually "tried" Lollipop ROMs were a few months ago, and battery life was pretty bad which kept me on KitKat.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right in that Lollipop ROMs have pretty terrible battery life. This one has much better battery than any other ROM on stock Android. It's not great, but it is rather good once your battery is optimized to it, considering.
For example, I went to a theme park with this ROM and I would check my phone just about every ten minutes. When I got to the park itself, it was only on 10% (reason being because I didn't charge it overnight, haha!). With power saver mode enabled, it lasted over three hours before dying, which is impressive for any ROM, let alone a Lollipop ROM.
It's a fine accomplishment of the CandyROM team for sure.
Signal2Noise said:
You're right in that Lollipop ROMs have pretty terrible battery life. This one has much better battery than any other ROM on stock Android. It's not great, but it is rather good once your battery is optimized to it, considering.
For example, I went to a theme park with this ROM and I would check my phone just about every ten minutes. When I got to the park itself, it was only on 10% (reason being because I didn't charge it overnight, haha!). With power saver mode enabled, it lasted over three hours before dying, which is impressive for any ROM, let alone a Lollipop ROM.
It's a fine accomplishment of the CandyROM team for sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll definitely be checking this out when I get a chance, thank you for the replies!
mrinehart93 said:
I'll definitely be checking this out when I get a chance, thank you for the replies!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem!
Have a nice evening

Help me please! U.U

Help!!! As I install on my Samsung Captivate Xposed !? I install it and says that the processor is not compatible.... :'(
Yeiivaldez02 said:
Help!!! As I install on my Samsung Captivate Xposed !? I install it and says that the processor is not compatible.... :'(
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have seen reports of people running CM11 on their Captivates and having xPosed enabled.
: Friend you could tell me how to do what you told me? I'm just a little new Android 4.4.4 KitKat and the truth is that I have seen in Xposed install this version of android but this smartphone because I can not ... Oh and am using a translator in case
Yeiivaldez02 said:
: Friend you could tell me how to do what you told me? I'm just a little new Android 4.4.4 KitKat and the truth is that I have seen in Xposed install this version of android but this smartphone because I can not ... Oh and am using a translator in case
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have used Xposed on other devices, but never on this one. It will take a bit of searching and reading. I am willing to help with this but I will need more information.
What version of bootloader is installed on your Captivate?
Is your Captivate rooted?
What rom is installed on your Captivate?
If the ROM is not a stock ROM, is it based on Touchwiz, CM, AOSP, or what?
---------- Post added at 10:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:31 PM ----------
dawgdoc said:
I have used Xposed on other devices, but never on this one. It will take a bit of searching and reading. I am willing to help with this but I will need more information.
What version of bootloader is installed on your Captivate?
Is your Captivate rooted?
What rom is installed on your Captivate?
If the ROM is not a stock ROM, is it based on Touchwiz, CM, AOSP, or what?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So far I have found that you must be on at least an ICS Rom. You said you were on KitKat, so no worries there. But, the ROM must be Halo enabled. I see that Dirty Unicorns and CM do, I don't know which others do.
Well, when I did superuser on Android 2.3.5, will install the "Corn kernel" and that it will install CM11 The boot loader will not touch anything, I think. The terminal has superuser, I will install Cyanogenmod 11 (Nigthy 13/12/2015) and one that you have installed, nothing more.

Xposed framework Galaxy Tab s2

What framework do I flash to xposed for my model galaxy tab s2 sm-t817t
Sent from my SM-T817T using Tapatalk
I have also tried flashing with twrp xposed-v80-sdk22-arm. And xposed-v80-sdk22-arm64 I had to restore from a bootloop I was stuck in and now I am back to normal
Sent from my SM-T817T using Tapatalk
Same boot loop problem with SM-T810.
I guess you have to wait for a newer version of the Xposed framework.
You can get exposed version already built in. Scroll towards end of first post.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/tab-s2/development/rom-neked-nook-oj1-5-1-1-710-t3317823
It honestly isnt that great. It certainly works but loses that buttery smooth glide when browsing android store and such. Unfortunately trying to add it to the stock rom caused boot loops for me as well. Guess xposed is out for me.
The only rom I haven't tried is the cynogen mod listed. I still have version 9 on the xoom?. Served me well for root. Even then stock with root was better in my opinion. Honeycomb and ICS. The good old days. Now its this touch whiz crap. ug
I loved swapping roms with my first tablet motorola xoom. A new version to try every week. Not so for this tablet. So I've chosen to live without expose or whatever slight variation of settings is offered from the others. No offnse to the creators. Any option is better then none. The best rom so far is the first one I flashed to get root, t810_cf-autoroot_5.1.1 found below. I'm still using it.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3187202
AmigaPhil said:
Same boot loop problem with SM-T810.
I guess you have to wait for a newer version of the Xposed framework.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, he's using the wrong one.
you should deodex your installed firmware and use "requestConcurrentGC" version of xposed from arter97. It can be downloaded from: http://forum.xda-developers.com/xposed/unofficial-xposed-samsung-lollipop-t3113463
bonuzzz said:
you should deodex your installed firmware and use "requestConcurrentGC" version of xposed from arter97. It can be downloaded from: http://forum.xda-developers.com/xposed/unofficial-xposed-samsung-lollipop-t3113463
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are running 5.1.1 then no need to deodex with Wanams xposed.
ashyx said:
If you are running 5.1.1 then no need to deodex with Wanams xposed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have t715 with 5.0.2 only
I see, SM-T817T has 5.1.1 already
Thanks Ashyx. Works perfectly on stock rom. Link for anyone else looking. Used v80 sdk 22 arm one.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/xposed/unofficial-xposed-samsung-lollipop-t3180960
Sent from my SM-T810 using XDA-Developers mobile app
I have a Galaxy Tab S2 T715 with Stock ROM 6.0.1 ... which wanam version should i use?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/xposed/unofficial-xposed-samsung-lollipop-t3180960
MrX2008 said:
I have a Galaxy Tab S2 T715 with Stock ROM 6.0.1 ... which wanam version should i use?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/xposed/unofficial-xposed-samsung-lollipop-t3180960
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For my T710, I used this https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=24533103863136626
I'm 99.999% sure it'll work on the T715
Nvrmmd

Is it worth installing CM now?

So I just got my O+3T about an hour ago and I love it, fastest phone I've ever owned by a mile.
I sold my brand new S7 Edge to buy this mainly because it was more developer friendly and I really love cm.
I realise there will be no more updates in terms of cm roms but what are the implications of installing cm now? Is it just security updates?
Is anyone else running cm now and keeping it regardless or is it a better idea to stick with/return to stock?
rm83855 said:
So I just got my O+3T about an hour ago and I love it, fastest phone I've ever owned by a mile.
I sold my brand new S7 Edge to buy this mainly because it was more developer friendly and I really love cm.
I realise there will be no more updates in terms of cm roms but what are the implications of installing cm now? Is it just security updates?
Is anyone else running cm now and keeping it regardless or is it a better idea to stick with/return to stock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is buggy as hell
Michalko5896 said:
it is buggy as hell
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No? I'm assuming you're referring to cm14.1. Sultans cm13 is fast as hell and completely stable.
mforminio7 said:
No? I'm assuming you're referring to cm14.1. Sultans cm13 is fast as hell and completely stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, but I have no intentions of using MM ROM in 2017 lol.
I'll use CM13 as long as all my apps continue to run and my xposed modules all work and my battery lasts 2-3 days with 10 hours of screen on time. XdaSultan and his ROM run perfect on my phone.
Cm14.1 is fine. The RR versions are even better. I would recommend the official RR build more then anything. Been running it for a while and not a single issue
c_86 said:
Cm14.1 is fine. The RR versions are even better. I would recommend the official RR build more then anything. Been running it for a while and not a single issue
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the official RR builds?
I wouldn't trust these unofficial builds of CM (Lineage), both from sultan and koenkk. Most of the developers have no idea how to make safe roms + fact that they all turned off forceencrypt is just repulsive. I strongly recommend you to wait for official builds.
rm83855 said:
What's the official RR builds?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-3t/development/rom-kernel-resurrectionremix-n-t3524715
Tesla N is good same with official RR. Other then that I wouldn't bother.
I've been happy with the stock rom using xposed, arise and systemless root with francos kernal and all running sweet as.
Michalko5896 said:
I wouldn't trust these unofficial builds of CM (Lineage), both from sultan and koenkk. Most of the developers have no idea how to make safe roms + fact that they all turned off forceencrypt is just repulsive. I strongly recommend you to wait for official builds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? Just how unsafe is this, this is encryption right? I'm hoping lineage won't take too long, I suspect our device will be one of the first to receive it?
c_86 said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-3t/development/rom-kernel-resurrectionremix-n-t3524715
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A Sad Napkin said:
Tesla N is good same with official RR. Other then that I wouldn't bother.
I've been happy with the stock rom using xposed, arise and systemless root with francos kernal and all running sweet as.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I assume these roms such as RR don't have cm themes? Does the systemless root work with Android Pay?
rm83855 said:
I assume these roms such as RR don't have cm themes? Does the systemless root work with Android Pay?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No the CM theme engine isn't out for nougat yet.
Yes it does. But you need Franco Kernal as well because it Bypasses the verified boot flag for Android Pay compatibility.
rm83855 said:
Really? Just how unsafe is this, this is encryption right? I'm hoping lineage won't take too long, I suspect our device will be one of the first to receive it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What I have noticed is that many custom roms have poorly configured SELinux, many unfixed CVEs in kernel, disabled forceencrypt (encryption disabled by default, user must go to settings and manually turn it on, what most of the users don't do), distribution through unsecure channels and many more mistakes. Stock roms are mostly fine because google force OEMs to apply certain configurations to their roms. But unofficial developers have free hand, so they do whatever they want and results are sometimes atrocious. Official CM was pretty good, there were certain requirements that ROMs must have met and I really liked the way CM was compiled and distributed. Imho, if you are serious about security, you should wait for the official Lineage OS (if there will ever be the official Lineage OS).
Michalko5896 said:
What I have noticed is that many custom roms have poorly configured SELinux, many unfixed CVEs in kernel, disabled forceencrypt (encryption disabled by default, user must go to settings and manually turn it on, what most of the users don't do), distribution through unsecure channels and many more mistakes. Stock roms are mostly fine because google force OEMs to apply certain configurations to their roms. But unofficial developers have free hand, so they do whatever they want and results are sometimes atrocious. Official CM was pretty good, there were certain requirements that ROMs must have met and I really liked the way CM was compiled and distributed. Imho, if you are serious about security, you should wait for the official Lineage OS (if there will ever be the official Lineage OS).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a very valid point but security isn't a massive concern for me considering i set selinux to permissive for v4a anyway. I suppose even having root is classed as a security flaw in the first place.
Sultanxda always has the best optimized roms in terms of stability, photos and battery.
A Sad Napkin said:
No the CM theme engine isn't out for nougat yet.
Yes it does. But you need Franco Kernal as well because it Bypasses the verified boot flag for Android Pay compatibility.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks so much, this community is awesome.
This phone is gorgeous, fast and dare I say near perfect. Finding the perfect set up over the next few days will be interesting. The sheer speed and smoothness of this phone is screaming "don't touch me" but oxygen os just isn't quite there for me yet, if it included a theme engine etc then I'd be sold.
rm83855 said:
Thanks so much, this community is awesome.
This phone is gorgeous, fast and dare I say near perfect. Finding the perfect set up over the next few days will be interesting. The sheer speed and smoothness of this phone is screaming "don't touch me" but oxygen os just isn't quite there for me yet, if it included a theme engine etc then I'd be sold.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no theme engine but it has a dark mode which is nice and you can change the accent colours.
OxygenOS with systemless root, systemless xposed makes it perfect. I'm just waiting for the official nougat update. I also have ARISE and DOLBY ATMOS as well.
A Sad Napkin said:
no theme engine but it has a dark mode which is nice and you can change the accent colours.
OxygenOS with systemless root, systemless xposed makes it perfect. I'm just waiting for the official nougat update. I also have ARISE and DOLBY ATMOS as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't even notice this, the dark colour is much better. Did u have to set selinux to permissive for arise? Does this pose any issues with ota's, android pay etc?
rm83855 said:
I didn't even notice this, the dark colour is much better. Did u have to set selinux to permissive for arise? Does this pose any issues with ota's, android pay etc?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android pay will work with system less root and magisk
It doesn't work with system less xposed. Just tested it although you can disable xposed and reboot then use Android pay but that's just hassle.
Selinux status I'm not 100% sure but I much prefer having xposed then Android pay. But that's me.

Categories

Resources