Well, I am looking one Android radio for a friend, but the radio must be 1din, we found the Joying and the format and idea it is so nice, but they use Intel SoFIA 3GR 4 Cores... And now I think it is not the right moment for these SoC and ppl say it not work fine with Windows 10 either...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
¿Any other idea?
thanks!
The joying Intel units don't use Windows they use Android. If you have found a good unit with Intel sofia then I would just buy it, the real world performance compared to the rk3188 is almost identical, it's the 2gb of ram that makes the most difference. The Joying sofia units also have a much more flexible Bluetooth implementation allowing you to connect to devices other than OBD and Phone .
WILD9 said:
The joying Intel units don't use Windows they use Android. If you have found a good unit with Intel sofia then I would just buy it, the real world performance compared to the rk3188 is almost identical, it's the 2gb of ram that makes the most difference. The Joying sofia units also have a much more flexible Bluetooth implementation allowing you to connect to devices other than OBD and Phone .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is no a problem about performance, I'm afraid, the x86 android apps not continue develope... and I spend around 500$ for a something not wrok right and will be not any solution in the near future.
The windows 10 idea is the plan B.... but...
((((
The apps don't need to be x86 Intel chip can run run arm native apps as well as dalvik apps
WILD9 said:
The apps don't need to be x86 Intel chip can run run arm native apps as well as dalvik apps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? I always saw the apk for arm, arm64 and x86, then I thought the system and the apps must had the versions of their SOC's.... sound strange for me... then The only main problem will be the system never will get an update?
Read the top answer here it explains it better than I would :
https://www.quora.com/Can-Android-phones-with-the-Intel-SoC-run-every-app-on-Play-Store-as-efficiently-as-with-the-Qualcomm-SoC
on Android only legacy applications really distinguish between architecture, modern apps using Dalvik or ART (almost everything these days) are not specific to x86, ARM or MIPS and run fine on all architectures. Updates aren't really relevant either, its a processor and still supported by Rockchip (SoFIA was a joint venture between Intel and Rockchip) It's just that there wont be any newer SoFIA models coming out in the future. That isn't the same as no future x86 processors running android:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/3174751/mobile/intel-isnt-yet-done-with-x86-smartphone-chips.html
Related
I was hoping I can run Cinema 4D with my current setup. I'm just planning to make intros, not anything too fancy or with "life-like" graphics. What do you guys think?
Example of Intro-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaQsJtsfpRk
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Thanks for you help
Hm..
Just try the Demo-Version: http://www.maxon.net/en/downloads/demo-version.html
and/or the Maxon Cinebench: http://www.maxon.net/en/downloads/cinebench/cinebench-115.html
doubt it - looking at that you have a intel gma which is usless at gaming unless it is a sandy bridge chip
brilldoctor said:
doubt it - looking at that you have a intel gma which is usless at gaming unless it is a sandy bridge chip
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure I have a Sandy Bridge Machine. i5, dual core @ 2.67 ghz without the turbo boosting. With Turbo Boost it is 2.97 ghz.
This is the Intel HD Graphics 3000 with 1.7 GB of memory (I think, if the screenshot I showed is accurate)
Aiakio said:
and/or the Maxon Cinebench: http://www.maxon.net/en/downloads/cinebench/cinebench-115.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If I read correctly, the benchmark uses the same engine as Cinema 4D and uses it in real time. Should be good to use. I'll post my results later.
Bump...
I also found this out Dell's Website
1024MB ATI Mobility RadeonTM HD5650
Integrated Intel® HD
On the driver CD there was a Driver for the ATI Mobility Radeon GPU but it doesn't show in dxdiag. I was wondering why I had 1.7 GB of memory for my GPU
http://www.dell.com/us/p/inspiron-15r/pd
UberMario said:
Bump...
I also found this out Dell's Website
1024MB ATI Mobility RadeonTM HD5650
Integrated Intel® HD
On the driver CD there was a Driver for the ATI Mobility Radeon GPU but it doesn't show in dxdiag. I was wondering why I had 1.7 GB of memory for my GPU
http://www.dell.com/us/p/inspiron-15r/pd
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because it robs all of your free RAM.
sakai4eva said:
Because it robs all of your free RAM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Explain please
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App
UberMario said:
Explain please
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Certain mobility solutions has the ability to utilize your physical RAM as graphics RAM when they are not in use. Not much faster, and the resolution on your monitor limits the ability to actually utilize such an amount of RAM. I reckon that for up to 720p resolutions, about 1GB is more than enough. The rest actually relies on your GPU instead.
Has anyone been eyeing up the Raspberry Pi? Soon to come out of the development stage into production. Looks like it would be a winner combined with a small touchscreen display and a port of ICS (with the phone stuff, etc, removed to enhance performance)
The details :The first product is about the size of a credit card, and is designed to plug into a TV or be combined with a touch screen accessory for a low cost tablet. The product will be available in two configurations: Model A and Model B. The expected price is $25 for a fully-configured Model-A system and around $35 for a Model B.
http://elinux.org/RaspberryPiBoard
700MHz Broadcom BCM2835 media processor featuring an ARM11 ARM1176JZF-S core, Broadcom GPU core, DSP core and support for Package-on-Package (PoP) RAM
128MiB (Model A) or 256MiB of SDRAM (Model B), stacked on top of the CPU as a PoP device
OpenGL ES 2.0
1080p30 H.264 high-profile decode
Composite and HDMI video output (not at the same time)
One USB 2.0 port provided by the BCM2835
SD/MMC/SDIO memory card slot
General-purpose I/O (About 16 3v3) and various other interfaces, brought out to 1.27mm pin-strip
Optional integrated 2-port USB hub and 10/100 Ethernet controller (Model B)
Open software (Iceweasel, KOffice, Python)
Capability to support various expansion boards
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=te8jt-jUkm8&feature=player_embedded
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I know you wouldn't create a new thread without first searching, as specified in the rules which you read when you joined, so I assume there's something wrong with the search function. Would you like to let admin know it's not working or shall I?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1240667&highlight=raspberry+pi
ahhh ****, I was typing in rapberry pi lmao, and no it's not spam. Went up and typed it again, soon as I had Ra in it came up Rapberry. No wonder I never saw it Q_Q
Too bad! Plus its coming out soon.
Yeh, looking forward to the release date, hoping to be one of the lucky bidders chosen
Have you registered?
looking forward to it....also FXI Cotton Candy
I've discovered this folder in leaked WP8 SDK - does it mean there will be WP8 x86 devices?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
That will probably be for the emulator, which is probably x86 like the wp7 one. As you have the SDK, could you please upload it somewhere where other people can get it, eg MediaFire
Microsoft is still being extremely cautious with their silicon (and, well, everything). You can also target x86 from within Visual studio but this is all 99% for the emulator which is definitely still x86.
Yes, that is just for emulator. Even WP7 emulator is x86! The best speed you can get with "emulator". Unlike that foody thing - Jelly Bean I think?
Also NT kernel has many target architectures - even originally it was not just for x86 but also for MIPS and others. ARM is the latest architecture they added now with W(P)8.
I think its likely that there will be x86 phones, since isn't Intel really pushing for mobile with its new Medfield architecture and said that Atom would be the first to get 14nm?
Except that none of the "new" D3D apps wouldn't run it, unless you would be able to upload both ARM and x86 versions .
Windows Phone 8 was created from Windows 8. They share the same kernel so it is possible.
I speak the truth; you just have to open your ears to hear it.
Intel and MS have been "friends" for a very long time. So I'd say, yes, definitely. Especially since Intel is pushing quite hard to get into the mobile space, but the most phone manufactures weren't very interested. As MS has built the infrastructure to essentially only hit one button and you get an ARM and an Intel version of an app it seems at least QUITE possible... :angel:
Hades32 said:
Intel and MS have been "friends" for a very long time. So I'd say, yes, definitely. Especially since Intel is pushing quite hard to get into the mobile space, but the most phone manufactures weren't very interested. As MS has built the infrastructure to essentially only hit one button and you get an ARM and an Intel version of an app it seems at least QUITE possible... :angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That depends on code itself, not on friendship D:
It would be possible but I am with OndraSter on this one: it is highly unlikely that we will see Intel-based WP8 devices. I'm still curious to see how that Multi-Platform approach will work out for Windows RT given that many native Applications in the W8 Store at the moment tell you that they are not able to run on ARM-based machines.
Microsoft can make it possible to upload different binaries but in the end it would create fragmentation (does not work on ARM-devices as the Dev only had an x86 phone or does not work on x86-devices).
Source : http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/2221
Good news if I understood right :
Video driver for the Raspberry Pi are now open-source.
Does that mean we could soon have a working Android 4.0/4.1(or any other OS needing Video Acceleration) without hideous lag, for instance.
Ghuntar WALDMEISTER said:
Source : http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/2221
Good news if I understood right :
Video driver for the Raspberry Pi are now open-source.
Does that mean we could soon have a working Android 4.0/4.1(or any other OS needing Video Acceleration) without hideous lag, for instance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
COOL So Android is around the corner.
Are You sure ?
On the drawing it says GPL/BSD Licenced :
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Yeah I don't think he read the blog post
I don't think createpassword knows what he's talking about This is good news as it has great potential for devs looking to port other operating systems. Now devs won't need to waste time reverse engineering this, they can get right to the good stuff!
As seen on Phoronix:
With the opened up user-space, the kernel driver also stands a chance of being accepted into the mainline Linux kernel tree... The only bit that's not opened up is the microcode/firmware, which still must be loaded at boot, but still that's nothing different than how the AMD Radeon driver functions along with some other GPUs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for the links. Ok it's not "fully" open source as advertised, but is it usable to build something functional ?
If I understand well, they gave a "how-to" of their black box, not the blue prints.
createpassword said:
You're seriously quoting Michael Larabel?
LMFAO!!!!!
And FYI: Larabel posted a retraction: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTIxNDk
:cyclops:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol yeah I read his retraction and I was hoping to get back to this thread to retract my comment but you beat me to it... is it too late to blame Phoronix? So yeah, I was wrong about that one, big time. But seriously, what do you have against Michael Larabel? I always thought Phoronix to be fairly reliable (though how this played out is making me second guess that). Is there a better source for Linux hardware related news you can recommend? I'd be interested to check it out, you obviously have a better grasp on this than me :laugh:
createpassword said:
Adreno (which involves some RE, but is mostly from Radeon documentation since Adreno happens to actually BE a Radeon -- specifically, its a hybrid of R500 and R600).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i never knew that, you learn something new every day! and here i was thinking that ATI/AMD didnt have any real foothold in the mobile world and my phone is basically packing a radeon
Introducing Android Oreo (Go edition)
A powerful experience for entry-level smartphones. It’s the best of Android, built with new and reimagined apps, so even the most affordable Android smartphones are as sweet as can be.
Built to use less
Brand new apps designed for lighter updates and downloads help create more space while significantly improving performance. That’s what we call a win, win.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hope somebody will start porting soon.
Thank you.
vishaletm said:
Introducing Android Oreo (Go edition)
A powerful experience for entry-level smartphones. It’s the best of Android, built with new and reimagined apps, so even the most affordable Android smartphones are as sweet as can be.
Built to use less
Brand new apps designed for lighter updates and downloads help create more space while significantly improving performance. That’s what we call a win, win.
Hope somebody will start porting soon.
Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude that's targeted for devices with low specs... About 512-1024MB RAM. Our device is not that low spec to use android go. Normal android will run just fine with no difference in performance. Instead it will only degrade the UX...
Think of it like this :
There's a game which needs 8gb RAM and 2gb GFX mem to run.
Now if you have two pc with following spec :
PC1 : 16gb RAM, 4gb GFX mem
PC2 : 32GB RAM, 4gb GFX mem
Do you think the game will run faster on PC2 than PC1? Not at all! Both of them already have the required amount of RAM. Both will be fluid and smooth and fast. The difference is almost zero and the most noticeable difference in them would be fps only (which is not comparable on our phone)
It would be unnecessary to waste time on making go edition when the normal edition works fast already.
I don't think anyone from my development group will make it.
However if we do make it under some circumstances in future, it would take months. Android 8 development has been going on from September. It still isn't out yet. Expect the same for go.