CPU Temperature - Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

I have setcpu installed on my Nexus One, along with the Zimage and lib files I need to overclock it. Can anyone tell me what an appropriate temperature range is for the Nexus, as would be shown in the SetCPU widget? I want to be sure I don't cause my Nexus to overheat.

Around 21-36 for me.. highest it ever got was 40.3 degrees.
crawler9 said:
I have setcpu installed on my Nexus One, along with the Zimage and lib files I need to overclock it. Can anyone tell me what an appropriate temperature range is for the Nexus, as would be shown in the SetCPU widget? I want to be sure I don't cause my Nexus to overheat.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

rjhay22 said:
Around 21-36 for me.. highest it ever got was 40.3 degrees.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that in Celcius or Fahrenheit?

i would hope its in Celsius, or it would mean that the CPU is cold enough to freeze water

Alright thanks mines been on average about 99 degrees Fahrenheit

that's what I get when I'm charging my phone, so that's pretty high if that's what you have on standby.
crawler9 said:
Alright thanks mines been on average about 99 degrees Fahrenheit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Would it matter if I have a silicon case on it? And how high is dangerously high?

I have the same case, I wouldn't want it to go over 40C or bout 102 F. Thats pretty hot, I notice my phone gets sluggish and starts forceclosing too... What ROM are you running? And are you using OC-UV kernel? If not I suggest you get it.
crawler9 said:
Would it matter if I have a silicon case on it? And how high is dangerously high?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

rjhay22 said:
I have the same case, I wouldn't want it to go over 40C or bout 102 F. Thats pretty hot, I notice my phone gets sluggish and starts forceclosing too... What ROM are you running? And are you using OC-UV kernel? If not I suggest you get it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At the time I had SetCPU and was overclocked, I had Cyanogen's latest stable ROM (5.0.5.3?) installed. I was using the UV kernel. Last night I switched to Alpha r20 of MoDaCo's desire ROM for Nexus along with whatever kernel that comes packaged with.

You should be able to flash the OC-UV kernel by pershoot over Modacos desire ROM.
Battery life means more than OCing to me so here's my SetCPU profile settings if it helps.
Default setting: 998/245
Charging: 844/245
Standby: 245/245
Power<35%: 883/245
Failsafe batt > 40: 729/245
I should add that I'm charging right now, music player on, using my phone non stop and my batt temp is 95F.
crawler9 said:
At the time I had SetCPU and was overclocked, I had Cyanogen's latest stable ROM (5.0.5.3?) installed. I was using the UV kernel. Last night I switched to Alpha r20 of MoDaCo's desire ROM for Nexus along with whatever kernel that comes packaged with.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

rjhay22 said:
You should be able to flash the OC-UV kernel by pershoot over Modacos desire ROM.
Battery life means more than OCing to me so here's my SetCPU profile settings if it helps.
Default setting: 998/245
Charging: 844/245
Standby: 245/245
Power<35%: 883/245
Failsafe batt > 40: 729/245
I should add that I'm charging right now, music player on, using my phone non stop and my batt temp is 95F.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds like a good profile, and I think I'll try that myself and see where my temperature lies with those settings. Just curious... what are the advantages of using the OC-UV without overclocking?
Here's information on the kernel with the ROM I'm using, directly copied from the page with the ROMs.
What kernel are you using? Any other tweaks worth knowing about?
The ROM has the usual MCR tweaks (tun.ko, openvpn, busybox, dropbear etc.) and is running a custom kernel by teknologist and myself based on the stock .33 source (check the changelog below for more details). Himem is enabled. The kernel runs at standard clock speeds, uniquely only using undervolt at the lowest clock speeds.

Good question, I had an option to just undervolt it, there is a UV @stock speed kernel by Persianone too, but I opt to get the OC-UV just incase I need to show off how fast my N1 is. LOL. Better to have the option to use it when i need it.
crawler9 said:
Sounds like a good profile, and I think I'll try that myself and see where my temperature lies with those settings. Just curious... what are the advantages of using the OC-UV without overclocking?
Here's information on the kernel with the ROM I'm using, directly copied from the page with the ROMs.
What kernel are you using? Any other tweaks worth knowing about?
The ROM has the usual MCR tweaks (tun.ko, openvpn, busybox, dropbear etc.) and is running a custom kernel by teknologist and myself based on the stock .33 source (check the changelog below for more details). Himem is enabled. The kernel runs at standard clock speeds, uniquely only using undervolt at the lowest clock speeds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

rjhay22 said:
Good question, I had an option to just undervolt it, there is a UV @stock speed kernel by Persianone too, but I opt to get the OC-UV just incase I need to show off how fast my N1 is. LOL. Better to have the option to use it when i need it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright thanks for all the help.

My pleasure
crawler9 said:
Alright thanks for all the help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Related

UV kernel?

I'm not sure if I actually have it even though I did install it. My battery temp is about 30c and higher. People have been saying they get 24 on the charger. And my battery time is about the same. My about phone says its the UV kernel but how can I really check?
_-..zKiLLA..-_ said:
I'm not sure if I actually have it even though I did install it. My battery temp is about 30c and higher. People have been saying they get 24 on the charger. And my battery time is about the same. My about phone says its the UV kernel but how can I really check?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you don't trust the about screen...
-open up terminal and type cat /proc/version
Try using profiles in setcpu. I keep the frequencies low when charging or when not active (phone is locked, sleeping,etc) which increases battery life and keeps the phone cool.
Check in phone settings (About the phone, or whatever it's called in english) for your kernel version. Yo should see kmobs after cyanogenmod (if you're on cm).
Well i bought setcpu and started using that a little. and the cat version did come back with kmobs so thats good. What do you recommend for profiles?
sleep standby 245/245 on demand
charging 600/245 on demand
power under 10 400/245 on demand
Sweet thanks
btw what is ondemand? compared to the others?
on demand: it only goes to the max clockrate if needed
performance: always on the max clockrate
thats what I figured out.
userspace: i dont really know. I'd like to know if its better to put standby 245/245 userspace instead of ondemand
_-..zKiLLA..-_ said:
Well i bought setcpu and started using that a little.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good on you for supporting setcpu! I bet most just pull the latest from here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=505419
Wtf i totally didn't know that. Well payday so i dont mind i guess

[REQUEST] Kernel

Hey all,
i am searching for something special, which none of the well known kernel designers could offer. I myself cant create kernels
Here is what i am looking for:
Device: Nexus FroYo with root
Kernel features:
OC: 1.13 GHZ
UV: 800mV
Audiohack
Ramboost
Is there anyone that could create a working Kernel with the given features?
Thx a lot
Tigger
The closest one you'll find with everything you need is: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=653598
It doesn't have OC but it's not necessary anyways. It has everything else you want.
mrandroid said:
The closest one you'll find with everything you need is: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=653598
It doesn't have OC but it's not necessary anyways. It has everything else you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know, but its exactly what i need. OC AND UV...thats why my request. but thanks for ur help,
im using intersectravens atm bfs .34 now...but it doesnt have OC
Froyo = pimpin'
With Froyo, you dont need OC... I thought I NEEDED it... but with SetCPU on active you'll see that the phone really only needs to run around the 245Mhz mark on the home screen and it'll rarely use all 998Mhz that it has...
RinTinTigger said:
i know, but its exactly what i need. OC AND UV...thats why my request. but thanks for ur help,
im using intersectravens atm bfs .34 now...but it doesnt have OC
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd say it's a want, no so much a need, but I digress.
Wait for Ivan to update his kernel. He's been MIA though. Maybe he's dealing with real life. Look for his kernels a couple pages back and PM him. Or maybe send an email.
RinTinTigger said:
Hey all,
i am searching for something special, which none of the well known kernel designers could offer. I myself cant create kernels
Here is what i am looking for:
Device: Nexus FroYo with root
Kernel features:
OC: 1.13 GHZ
UV: 800mV
Audiohack
Ramboost
Is there anyone that could create a working Kernel with the given features?
Thx a lot
Tigger
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with not really needing OC on froyo but I guess its nice to have the option so here yah go
http://www.mediafire.com/?tzxwm0mjweo
Flash through the recovery menu or push to the phone just like you do with Raven's kernels but make sure you do a nandroid backup just in case something happens.
You didn't specify if you wanted BFS or CFS so I used CFS in this because personally I think CFS runs better overall on froyo.
(Although BFS really makes the launcher super silky smooth, it really chugs when I try to load Flash content in the browser but maybe this is happening to me only, I don't know )
wildmonks said:
I agree with not really needing OC on froyo but I guess its nice to have the option so here yah go
http://www.mediafire.com/?tzxwm0mjweo
Flash through the recovery menu or push to the phone just like you do with Raven's kernels but make sure you do a nandroid backup just in case something happens.
You didn't specify if you wanted BFS or CFS so I used CFS in this because personally I think CFS runs better overall on froyo.
(Although BFS really makes the launcher super silky smooth, it really chugs when I try to load Flash content in the browser but maybe this is happening to me only, I don't know )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But this oine is 950mV ...i wanted 800mV for better Battery!
RinTinTigger said:
But this oine is 950mV ...i wanted 800mV for better Battery!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
beggers cant be choosers
xXJay_RXx said:
beggers cant be choosers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But its why i opened the Thread. Im not to dumb to find the pershoot with 950mV...but i am requesting something different.
And it might be that requesters wont get what they ask for but for me, its totally worth a try!!!
RinTinTigger said:
But this oine is 950mV ...i wanted 800mV for better Battery!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oops.. sorry about that... I uploaded the wrong one... here yah go:
http://www.mediafire.com/?xni3mduojj3
wildmonks said:
Oops.. sorry about that... I uploaded the wrong one... here yah go:
http://www.mediafire.com/?xni3mduojj3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Testing it...who made it?
Does it have audi and ram boost?
RinTinTigger said:
Testing it...who made it?
Does it have audi and ram boost?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, BMW but they're both German so you're okay...
djmcnz said:
No, BMW but they're both German so you're okay...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought the same thing too when I read "audi"
RinTinTigger said:
Testing it...who made it?
Does it have audi and ram boost?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I compiled it using the code that Raven publicly provides on his Github (latest as of 5/27/2010) and i added the overclocking code that you requested.
http://github.com/intersectRaven/ir-kernel-2.6.34/commits/master/
So it has everything that Raven's kernel has like the audio boost, 21MB ram, optimization flags, etc.
I decided to give this a try. Running great so far. Not sure if it's just a placebo effect, but it definitely feels snappier with that added .1 ghz.
halorin said:
I decided to give this a try. Running great so far. Not sure if it's just a placebo effect, but it definitely feels snappier with that added .1 ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice, glad to hear it working out well so far for someone. Yah, after testing this out for a day I notice the same thing, a little more responsive, linpack has increased from 36ish to around 40 and flash heavy sites load quicker.
I'll probably use this kernel in my phone now for everyday use but use SetCPU to keep it at 998MHz until I need that little extra boost.
(Reason being because in order to run at 1113MHz the AVS has to boost the voltage up even higher then usual to keep it stable.)
Hm. Didn't know that, the voltage. Thanks.
RinTinTigger said:
But this oine is 950mV ...i wanted 800mV for better Battery!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummm... didn't we test this out in some huge blind test of kernels and conclude that 950 gets better battery life than 800?
pjcforpres said:
Ummm... didn't we test this out in some huge blind test of kernels and conclude that 950 gets better battery life than 800?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess there are those few who see better battery life when using 800 .
Personally I use 950 because 800 makes my radio erratically switch between 2G and 3G in my workplace which in turn causes a big drain on my battery. This doesn't occur when I'm home though, probably because I'm so close to a cell tower.
wildmonks said:
I thought the same thing too when I read "audi"
I compiled it using the code that Raven publicly provides on his Github (latest as of 5/27/2010) and i added the overclocking code that you requested.
http://github.com/intersectRaven/ir-kernel-2.6.34/commits/master/
So it has everything that Raven's kernel has like the audio boost, 21MB ram, optimization flags, etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THANKS a LOT! Its working really good.
And to thos with the 950>800 opinion, i thought this at well, but, i testet so much kernels now, with my usage parameters and it worked better with an 800mV
Wildmonky, any chance you could also make an BFS Version?
I think you should give both kernels then to raven to add em to his repo! They are GREAT!
I was so much looking for this kernel!!!
THX a lot!
Tigger
RinTinTigger said:
THANKS a LOT! Its working really good.
And to thos with the 950>800 opinion, i thought this at well, but, i testet so much kernels now, with my usage parameters and it worked better with an 800mV
Wildmonky, any chance you could also make an BFS Version?
I think you should give both kernels then to raven to add em to his repo! They are GREAT!
I was so much looking for this kernel!!!
THX a lot!
Tigger
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem Tigger
Here yah go. Still no changes from Raven for kernel version 34 so its still dated 05/27/2010 to match.
2.6.34_AVS-800mV_BFS_1113Mhz_052710:
http://www.mediafire.com/?j2kmytmhqjm
Raven really hates overclocking so this will never be in his repo. But what I might end up doing is compile and upload to mediafire when a new update is out, if there is enough interest in this.

[Kernel] Dragon 3.6

Download link: http://goo.gl/vzEB4
FAQs: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=11436660&postcount=11 (Thanks Alienz!)
Yes, the kernel is still based on the i9000 JPX source release. Hopefully we get real source soon.
Main Features:
NEAR STOCK BATTERY!!! (Thanks Morfic!)
Overclock up to 1.4Ghz.
BLN (Backlight Notifications).. A basic app is included to turn it on if you want it
Voodoo lagfix v5
Voodoo Sound v4
Many parts of the "speedmod" patch from the i9000 forum
OC is based on raspdep's OC patches, also from the i9000 forum
Various speed tweaks
CIFS/SMB and NFS support compiled in (no modules)
Tunnel support compiled in (no modules)
Changes since 3.2:
New boot logo. (Thanks Alexia!)
Added battery drain fix in standby discovered by Morfic. Should be about the same battery as stock now.
Voltages and frequency scaling have been adjusted to more quickly jump to higher frequencies and come down slower. Improves response time while you use the phone.
The Voltage Control app has the correct voltages, I recommend leaving the lower speeds alone to start with. Going too low can cause the sleep of death. That's why they are as high as they are. NOTE: The voltage control app does not control the available states they way the older ones do. That screen is useless, ignore it. Set your max and scheduler if you wish, and the voltages if you want to change them.
SetCPU.... If you want to use it, you can have it set min/max. If you set profiles, don't set the max under 800. The phone needs 800 to be available. I use a screen off profile at 100-800 just to keep the OC disabled while sleeping. No reason it should need to really crank up the speed if I'm not looking at it. SetCPU is NOT required, I'm offering this as a tip for fans of that application.
The kernel has proven stable for a number of testers so far. If you get crashes, disable any OC/UV settings and try again. I recommend you only change one setting at a time, and NOT set at boot until you have run for a while to ensure you can run stable at that voltage/speed.
Great job testing it out now. Edit: screen is a little dark but the kernel is super smooth
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Going to test! Will post results in a couple of hours.
onix
I am considering flashing this new kernel but have a couple of questions I would like to ask first. I am currently on Bionix V 1.21 and love it. Is this kernel compatible with Bionix V 1.21? It appears that this kernel is Voodoo enabled so I presume I would not have to disable voodoo. If I decide to go back to the Kb1 with voodoo enabled which I believe is the stock kernel for Bionix V 1.21 would i just flash the kernel( is is available on TW forum?)or would I have to flash the whole rom again? I would think I would not have to but want to be sure before I leap. I would not like to have to ask for help for problems that could have been avoided by reading and asking questions. Any and all help is greatly appreciated.
Is it ok to not use set cpu? Will this kernel will oc over 1000?
ttabbal said:
Download link: http://goo.gl/vzEB4
Yes, the kernel is still based on the i9000 JPX source release. Hopefully we get real source soon.
Main Features:
Voodoo lagfix v5
Voodoo Sound v4
Many parts of the "speedmod" patch from the i9000 forum
OC is based on raspdep's OC patches, also from the i9000 forum
Various speed tweaks
CIFS/SMB and NFS support compiled in (no modules)
Tunnel support compiled in (no modules)
Changes since 3.2:
New boot logo. (Thanks Alexia!)
Added battery drain fix in standby discovered by Morfic. Should be about the same battery as stock now.
Voltages and frequency scaling have been adjusted to more quickly jump to higher frequencies and come down slower. Improves response time while you use the phone.
The Voltage Control app has the correct voltages, I recommend leaving the lower speeds alone to start with. Going too low can cause the sleep of death. That's why they are as high as they are. NOTE: The voltage control app does not control the available states they way the older ones do. That screen is useless, ignore it. Set your max and scheduler if you wish, and the voltages if you want to change them.
SetCPU.... If you want to use it, you can have it set min/max. If you set profiles, don't set the max under 800. The phone needs 800 to be available. I use a screen off profile at 100-800 just to keep the OC disabled while sleeping. No reason it should need to really crank up the speed if I'm not looking at it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
This kernel is much more stable for me than the dow kernel. Great work.
tenbeau said:
I am considering flashing this new kernel but have a couple of questions I would like to ask first. I am currently on Bionix V 1.21 and love it. Is this kernel compatible with Bionix V 1.21? It appears that this kernel is Voodoo enabled so I presume I would not have to disable voodoo. If I decide to go back to the Kb1 with voodoo enabled which I believe is the stock kernel for Bionix V 1.21 would i just flash the kernel( is is available on TW forum?)or would I have to flash the whole rom again? I would think I would not have to but want to be sure before I leap. I would not like to have to ask for help for problems that could have been avoided by reading and asking questions. Any and all help is greatly appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im not sure if you have to disable voodoo or not .. probably not but don’t take my word for it and no you do not have to flash the whole rom again, just the kernel. Thanks for not clogging up the forums. Lol I know its hard to ask questions in the vibrant forums, (cause you'll get beaten to death with mean comments) but ask them anyway, someone will answer eventually. Ignore the whiny, ungrateful 2 year olds that somehow wandered onto this forum...
Sent from Bionix powered vibrant! If I helped, hit the thanks button!
I flashed without disabling voodoo
treyvaporizer said:
Im not sure if you have to disable voodoo or not .. probably not but don’t take my word for it and no you do not have to flash the whole rom again, just the kernel. Thanks for not clogging up the forums. Lol I know its hard to ask questions in the vibrant forums, (cause you'll get beaten to death with mean comments) but ask them anyway, someone will answer eventually. Ignore the whiny, ungrateful 2 year olds that somehow wandered onto this forum...
Sent from Bionix powered vibrant! If I helped, hit the thanks button!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
tenbeau said:
I am considering flashing this new kernel but have a couple of questions I would like to ask first. I am currently on Bionix V 1.21 and love it. Is this kernel compatible with Bionix V 1.21? It appears that this kernel is Voodoo enabled so I presume I would not have to disable voodoo. If I decide to go back to the Kb1 with voodoo enabled which I believe is the stock kernel for Bionix V 1.21 would i just flash the kernel( is is available on TW forum?)or would I have to flash the whole rom again? I would think I would not have to but want to be sure before I leap. I would not like to have to ask for help for problems that could have been avoided by reading and asking questions. Any and all help is greatly appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is compatible with Bionix 1.2.1, that's what I developed it on.
If you have the red voodoo recovery, there is no need to disable voodoo for flashing. Generally speaking, kernels can be flashed without disabling voodoo in any case.
This is what iv'e done, I've lowered my Volts on some clocks, 1000 and up, and I was wondering should/can I use setcpu for profiles?
Answers to COMMON questions:
1. Can I flash this over Voodoo or RFS (stock)
You do NOT need to disable Voodoo. Flash right over Voodoo or RFS kernels. Make sure you are not running JFS though. JFS is not supported
2. How is stability? Does it crash? Sleep of death? etc?
Stability on this is AMAZING. It will not crash unless you overclock/undervolt and your settings are unstable. If that is the case, you know its your settings.
3. Do I need SetCPU to overclock?
You do not need to use SetCPU (You can if you want to). Use the Voltage Control App to overclock.
4. How do I overclock? Can I use this without an overclock?
By default, the kernel will boot to 1.0Ghz. To OVERCLOCk to 1.4Ghz (or lower) you need to use the app that this kernel installs during the flash. The app is called "Voltage Controll" and can be found in your app drawer after the flash
5. What is the battery life?
Battery life should be close to stock now. The battery drain issue that was present in the I9000-based kernels earlier has been solved.
6. Does this support BLN (Back-light-notificaations)?
Yes. You need the BLN control app from the market to use it.
7. How do I use Voodoo sound? What is it?
Voodoo sound is a vast improvement to the sound quality of your phone. To use it, download the Voodoo Control app from the Market.
8. What ROMs is this compatible with?
This is compatible with ALL Vibrant Froyo ROMS. This means 2.2 ROMS made for the Vibrant. 2.2.1 is not yet tested but should theoretically work.
I hope this helps.
ttabbal said:
It is compatible with Bionix 1.2.1, that's what I developed it on.
If you have the red voodoo recovery, there is no need to disable voodoo for flashing. Generally speaking, kernels can be flashed without disabling voodoo in any case.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks so much for your kind and patient and swift reply. Donation just made. I really admire yours and all of TW generosity and patience with noobs like me. I am flashing the kernel now. Thanks again for sharing your brilliant work!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
cashyftw said:
This is what iv'e done, I've lowered my Volts on some clocks, 1000 and up, and I was wondering should/can I use setcpu for profiles?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can use setcpu for profiles, just keep 800Mhz available. The phone will likely crash if you don't. I set a screen off profile of 100-800 to keep the oc disabled when I don't need it, as 800 is a lower voltage.
Hint with voltages, try to keep 1000 and higher at the SAME voltage. Changing the voltage too often can cause instability as the voltage regulator doesn't adjust as fast as we would like sometimes. OC makes this worse as you need a higher voltage to maintain a stable CPU at the higher frequency. The kernel is set to jump to 1000, then to the max set clock speed. Setting 1000 to the higher voltage gives us some extra time to stabilize the new voltage before the just into the OC speeds.
tenbeau said:
Thanks so much for your kind and patient and swift reply. Donation just made. I really admire yours and all of TW generosity and patience with noobs like me. I am flashing the kernel now. Thanks again for sharing your brilliant work!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your kind words and the donation. I'm glad you find my work useful.
just flashed this..
and a few questions ive never used OC before..
What does VOODOO Sound really do?
I set my thing on SetCPU as 1.4ghz as max and .1 as low with conservative.
then a profile with screen off and on conservative.
will those save battery?
xriderx66 said:
just flashed this..
and a few questions ive never used OC before..
What does VOODOO Sound really do?
I set my thing on SetCPU as 1.4ghz as max and .1 as low with conservative.
then a profile with screen off and on conservative.
will those save battery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SetCPU by itself will NOT overclock. You need to use the Voltage app that comes with the kernel. See my above post with the Common questions.
I'd like any of the kernels developers gave me a clue about an issue im having with all custom i9000 based kernels (eugene's and TW's). The problem is with line2 voip app which calls isn't heard in the other end when running these kernels, but in stock/voodoo it works just fine. Please any of you have an idea of what could be going wrong?
thanks.
Okay tested so far, everything is working good (undervolted to about 175 for lower clocks 100-1000 and 75 for higher clocked 1200-1400)
Don't try this, as every phone can't handle some things, i'm just stating.
EDIT: I'm seriously stupid, how do I remove the settings again? I know it's in system/ something
Edit: NEVERMIND fixed
I've never used an OC kernel, was thinking of giving it a try. If I decide its not for me is this like removing a voodoo injected kernel, disable, then flash a diff kernel then delete files?
kcp877 said:
I've never used an OC kernel, was thinking of giving it a try. If I decide its not for me is this like removing a voodoo injected kernel, disable, then flash a diff kernel then delete files?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just flash other voodoo kernel on top of it no need.to.disable voodoo
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk

[KERNEL][AOSP][ICS] invisiblek-ics

New thread to house the custom kernel built with linaro's gcc 4.7.1 toolchain
This *should* work with any AOSP ics rom.
Just because this kernel is built with the linaro toolchain it does not mean the rom needs to be compiled in a certain way.
Download here: http://tinyw.in/gnOy
I'll add more details when i have some more time.
source: https://github.com/invisiblek/android_kernel_htc_qsd8k
toolchain used: http://tinyw.in/gYmj
General question on this--is this kernel intended to be used with the nightlies in your testing folder only, or are its benefits universal? I'm a little confused by this whole toolkit thing...
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA
polarimetric said:
General question on this--is this kernel intended to be used with the nightlies in your testing folder only, or are its benefits universal? I'm a little confused by this whole toolkit thing...
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good question. This *should* work with any ics rom.
I tested this out last night (been running mamarley's kernel) and I ended up switching back for two reasons: first, this doesn't appear to have the 128MHz CPU speed - I'm not sure if that's intentional or not. And secondly, my phone apparently couldn't handle this kernel on 1113MHz - I got lots of FCs. And the rating on Nenamark was essentially the same as my baseline on other kernels.
Just some observations - and your mileage may vary! I really appreciate the fact that this is even being worked on, invisiblek.
EDIT: Totally meant AnTuTu, not Nenamark.
stiltzkin said:
I tested this out last night (been running mamarley's kernel) and I ended up switching back for two reasons: first, this doesn't appear to have the 128MHz CPU speed - I'm not sure if that's intentional or not. And secondly, my phone apparently couldn't handle this kernel on 1113MHz - I got lots of FCs. And the rating on Nenamark was essentially the same as my baseline on other kernels.
Just some observations - and your mileage may vary! I really appreciate the fact that this is even being worked on, invisiblek.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great to hear feedback. Thats all im looking for here really.. It doesnt have 128mhz because its the same voltage as 245 hence no real benefit to having it. Plus some devices are unstable there. I never overclock but i can look at the voltages and maybe get 1113 stable
I can say it works on the new ICS TW rom, drains kinda fast although I think its rom related only.
I had only one reboot, got a freeze and then 10 seconds later a reboot. Its the only one I've had since reapplying new settings.
On freeze I was running SAv2 1113 Max/245 Min.
I have now lowered it to 998 and its running fine on that rom.
Other than that, its amazing.
Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk 2
invisiblek said:
Great to hear feedback. Thats all im looking for here really.. It doesnt have 128mhz because its the same voltage as 245 hence no real benefit to having it. Plus some devices are unstable there. I never overclock but i can look at the voltages and maybe get 1113 stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i take this back, 128mhz is 25mV under 245mhz here
never mind
Can you clear up the linaro tool chain for me, I'm confused as to if the ROM currently utilizes it... and if so is there a certain kernel you have to use along side it. Sorry if that's a stupid question...
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA
Does this have fast charge?
thekendog said:
Does this have fast charge?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think so, based on this commit below I'd say yes:
add smb329.c for fast charging when plugged into usb
I'm getting some pretty great battery life with this kernel and the 6/21 kang. 1 day and 9 hours after moderate use and I'm still at 30%
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA

[Q] My note getting warm

Hello, Im new in Note, installed yesterday Slim Bean Rom and hydracorenirvana v7 OC kernel and I noticed that Note get warm, like 35-50 C while browsing internet or doing some low requerements stuff. I tried to low CPU to 1ghz but still the same... And while playing it jumps more then 50C, is that normal? I really dont want to burn it
Probably the media scanner is maxing the CPU, normal after installing a new ROM especially if you have a lot of files. Give it some time to settle down.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
+1
Dont forget the Hydracore is a maxed out performance kernel, designed for ultimate speed, so it will generate more heat doing basic things unlike the stock kernel.
and not to mention the massive power hungry screen and huge battery inside, its normal so dont worry about it. If it gets to the point where its too hot to touch, just remove the battery for 10mins and allow it to cool down.
Can I OC and UV GPU with hydracore kernel? I have S2 with dorimanx kernel , there is Stweaks app its very usefull when I can choose battery or performance profiles. and its auto OC and UV on that kernel. Can we get something on Note?
there are many apps that can do this, Tegrak, SetCPU etc, but be careful messing with voltages as it can prevent the phone from functioning.
You can use a basic app such as no-frills-CPU to adjust OC and governors.
azzledazzle said:
there are many apps that can do this, Tegrak, SetCPU etc, but be careful messing with voltages as it can prevent the phone from functioning.
You can use a basic app such as no-frills-CPU to adjust OC and governors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I know setcpu, but I want OC / UV GPU not CPU. On my S2 via STweaks I can OC/UV also GPU.
Ok, now Im on jellybam woth "voldemort" kernel and on battery it looks little less warmer but when I charging and try to play games or browse it gets really hot, like ~55C . Is it normal and not damage my Note? Also I always use 1ghz cpu speed. with 1.4 or 1.6 ghz its little bit warmer
55 is ok. No issues
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
nokiamodeln91 said:
55 is ok. No issues
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is highest temp that it could be and its not bad for phone.
My record was 56 C. Do I win something
Abagnale said:
My record was 56 C. Do I win something
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my record was 59C
scorpio1991 said:
my record was 59C
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess you're the champ here
Abagnale said:
I guess you're the champ here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maybe and temp like this was on 1ghz cpu

Categories

Resources