[Q] Overcome Jupiter Why BGJP4? - Galaxy Tab Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Why chose BGJP4 as the basis for Icarus and now Jupiter Overcome? I think it is for Spanish firmware?(Telefonica). Are the developers Spanish? If not then how did they know that this particular version of Gingerbread is the most stable? Have they tried the latest gingerbread which is DXJPE. It is Asian but it happens to be the latest/newest.....

Cool story bro
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App

Sorry thought this was posted in the evo 3d section
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App

bsnyder217 said:
Sorry thought this was posted in the evo 3d section
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FAIL!!!!!!!​

No we are not spanish (as far as I know lol). We tested the carrier BGJP4 firmware and found it more stable and snappier than the stock JQ1 (probably due to extensive testing made by spanish carrier).
Overcome has a wide user base and since asian firmware have limited locales. The decision was made to follow Euro firmwares as they contain widest range of locales to suit as much users as possible.

I cannot argue about users of overcome or to some extent galaxy tab users as I don't have figures available but judging from the development of Gingerbread for Asia which happened 3 x during the past 2 months(JPC,JPD,then JPE) then Samsung might have reasons for doing so. I can only "assume" that there are more Asian users than other areas in the world.
Notice also that I did not ask this question under the Jupiter thread in development section as I have read the "rant" of thePitBull about so many questions asked there. I don't want to piss off the developers. Yet I cannot help but question why the reluctance to use other versions aside from European ones.

Thepittbull justified rant was against those who troll or throw in destructive criticism like this rom sux etc NOT on those who ask legitmate questions. Apparently you are quiet new to overcome. We have adopted the asian 2.2.1 line of rom in froyo overcome ROM. Alterbridge86 made an astronomical efforts in trying to integrate other locales into the asian rom and that included decompiling apk by apk but it was a total mess as some apps didnt work or accept new locales. On release of GB and after delibration it was decided that the European ROM be adopted for the forementioned reason
PS I understand that the asian firmware has alot of perks (I personally flashed korean firmwares on other samsung devices and it was awesome) but in this case we have to look at the bigger picture here.

Thank you for patiently replying.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using Tapatalk

bongski55 said:
I cannot argue about users of overcome or to some extent galaxy tab users as I don't have figures available but judging from the development of Gingerbread for Asia which happened 3 x during the past 2 months(JPC,JPD,then JPE) then Samsung might have reasons for doing so. I can only "assume" that there are more Asian users than other areas in the world.
Notice also that I did not ask this question under the Jupiter thread in development section as I have read the "rant" of thePitBull about so many questions asked there. I don't want to piss off the developers. Yet I cannot help but question why the reluctance to use other versions aside from European ones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL.... @Bongski, please note that I don't have issues when people ask pertinent questions like the one you asked here. It's when people ask "how do I xxx" or things that's been answered a dozen times "like why can't Nova/Asphalt" work on Overcome Gingerbread... when it's been dealt with a thousand times over, that it gets me in a grumpy mood. And it's usually on release days that it tends to happens. Yeah... PMS!
But please do not hesitate to ask if you've got a pertinent question there. How do you know it's pertinent? Someone from the team will usually answer! BTW, I think I'm gonna repost this question on our thread before someone else asked it there... just so that people will know the rationale.

DarkPal said:
Thepittbull justified rant was against those who troll or throw in destructive criticism like this rom sux etc NOT on those who ask legitmate questions. Apparently you are quiet new to overcome. We have adopted the asian 2.2.1 line of rom in froyo overcome ROM. Alterbridge86 made an astronomical efforts in trying to integrate other locales into the asian rom and that included decompiling apk by apk but it was a total mess as some apps didnt work or accept new locales. On release of GB and after delibration it was decided that the European ROM be adopted for the forementioned reason
PS I understand that the asian firmware has alot of perks (I personally flashed korean firmwares on other samsung devices and it was awesome) but in this case we have to look at the bigger picture here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excuse my noobness, but Titanium Backup is able to backup locales. I restored a German locale in Dip7 DXJPE ROM even though German is not included in this ROM. Also there are Apps with which one can custamize locales and which also ship with a lot of locales (at least thats what the market description sais).
Couldn't one just use one of the aforementioned ways to integrate more locales in asian based ROMs? I ask because there are some minor things which work in Dip7's DXJPE ROM by default but not in Overcome, like playing 1080p flash videos in browser smoothly and having apps show up in battery usage statistics. I don't think this is just due to Dip7's modding (maybe I'm wrong).
These are just minor things and I'm overall very happy with the Overcome experience, but as bongski, I also think using the latest samsung source as basis for OC ROMs definately has advantages.

Related

Different ROMs

Guys, can anyone give a brief synopsis on the main differences between the current popular Froyo ROMs? I have been running leaked Froyo ROM since it came out but about to reflash. Alot more ROMs have been developed since then, and all seem to have good reviews. I'm not sure which one to choose now.
Personal preference and what you want/need.
gordec said:
Guys, can anyone give a brief synopsis on the main differences between the current popular Froyo ROMs? I have been running leaked Froyo ROM since it came out but about to reflash. Alot more ROMs have been developed since then, and all seem to have good reviews. I'm not sure which one to choose now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They all have their ups and downs. They are all great in their own way. unfortunately I need to ask you to take this to the q&a. We need to keep the forums in order.
Thanks
-Adam
Agreed. Please post in the correct forums and please search before opening a new thread

Poll : Which Custom Rom you are running?

Poll : Which Custom Rom you are running?
Not trying to be funny, but many people here change roms more than they changed their underwear. So the poll will be flawed.
Very true. I was on Doc's a couple days ago, then went to Darky's 9.5, and yesterday changed to Simply Galaxy Sweet Honey
1) Is this post development? I don't think so.
2) Is this post necessary? I don't think so.
3) As previously stated, is this poll accurate? I don't think so.
Why bother?
Yes you are right that people are always on the move.....I know this will be not 100% accurate but at least at this instance of time it can give us an idea (say 80% accuracy) about Market Trend (means popularity of rom) at this time (lets say Mar/Apr 2011) with current available ROMs. It may change in a month or two. But then in next quarter we may run another poll...
chambo622 said:
1) Is this post development? I don't think so.
2) Is this post necessary? I don't think so.
3) As previously stated, is this poll accurate? I don't think so.
Why bother?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude....simple ...... if you want to poll....OK......if not it's your choice.......It's not like forcing anybody to participate.......Everyone suit themselves.....
omeryounos said:
Dude....simple ...... if you want to poll....OK......if not it's your choice.......It's not like forcing anybody to participate.......Everyone suit themselves.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This thread should be in General.. that's why you'll not have a good answer here. (It's typically "noobish" to post questions or poll here, unless it's for developping something by yourself or with some dudes..)
And, on my opinion that's useless, all custom rom or more or less the same : A Sammy Rom deodexed and zipaligned, changements are tweaks... it's made me laugh when in themes OP specify it's for Doc's or Darkyy (of course it will works on both, only version/region is important).
For me no matter which rom you're using, it's Android.
If there is just one difference, it's between CM/MIUI AOSP based roms and Sammy'roms.
Same for kernels, it's just more or less functions and geeking/tweaking.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Just posted in the other thread
Congrats! Your post has wayyyyyyyyyyyyy surpassed my expectation! Someone just gives you a 1-star rating!
im proud using ultimate rom 8.2
@OP, you must be very happy now! Someone just promoted you to Major-General!
cidalan said:
im proud using ultimate rom 8.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After some junk posts above.....some real reply.....
g00ndu said:
@OP, you must be very happy now! Someone just promoted you to Major-General!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Soon i 'll be Full General.....And you will be more jeolous....
You are wrong! I will be very happy! Oh btw, a full general is only a 4-star general. maybe you can become a field marshal?
I'm way past on jealousy.
Your doing it wrong, missing some of the major roms.. Loving the hate in this thread btw. Good to know XDA is not only about sharing is caring, love, puppies and nuclear war.
omeryounos said:
After some junk posts above.....some real reply.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Junk threads get junk posts its the nature of the beast........
I'm not surprised that once again the mods have failed to do the job and move this non development thread to general.
except for a few angry ones.....which i don't mind...... a lot of people are giving their votes.....the results are like an open book......It's everyone's personal choice...For the people by the people......
omeryounos said:
except for a few angry ones.....which i don't mind...... a lot of people are giving their votes.....the results are like an open book......It's everyone's personal choice...For the people by the people......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Angry ones?
You the kind of poster that only makes this forum section worse.
And this kind of thread violate the forum rules. So think one more time before posting junk in dev section.
C'mon guys some more votes & we can get some representative picture here....that what our community is actually using....
iv been using Docs rom for about a week or two now xwjs8 with ADW Launcher barely lags when im not using it.Darky's rom's are gr8 but in the last 3 weeks they've got a little hard to flash and full of stuff i don't use and a little buggy a few times messed up my phone couldn't flash froyo had to revert to eclair kitchen roms are good i can flash them with my eyes closed im waiting for a Stable GB from Darky see what's not

[Q] Which Roms are prepared by professionals? Everyone makes roms.

I really want to know this. How to these Roms prepared? If i take ficetos JVP CWM rom and add lets say modded camera, modded sms,modded other apk files to it. Choose a theme, choose one of those kernels,choose a free launcher, use darkys or juwe ram script. Add a fex wallpapers and name this Galaxied Gingerleylo Rom V.1
Who are really cooking roms, who are making roms like i told above?
This is unprofessional... The good roms are not built that way... See the supercurious voodoo for example... He did from scratch he ifs hero in samsung galaxy
But it takes time and people don't have time
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
With respect what you are describing is just someone customizing their phone, that is not a rom, and to even think of publishing it is wrong!
Insanity cm 014/glitch
Everyone can make what you said, but only a few can actually write/modify the code for a kernel or rom (sammy example). Also modifing an apk/xml is not the same as writing code for a kernel.
miui rom ,cyanogenmod,insanity rom,darkys rom, ofcourse best of 2 miui and cyanogenmod for sgs
yken said:
Who are really cooking roms, who are making roms like i told above?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Silly boy....ROMs are made by friendly trolls, and coded using Android, love and less than 1% animal byproducts as permitted by law. We ALL know that.
Do you make a habit of posting threads that mistake aggressive provocations as legitimate questions?
Actually, although it may have been seen as provocative, I understand his concern. Afterall, when you flash a rom you're entrusting your phone to whoever cooked it, and it's impossible to know if there's something unpleasant in there.
Clearly, the most popular roms are being used by enough people that surely someone would notice if it was transmitting personal data, or passwords or something... There's nothing wrong with asking questions rather than accepting blindly.
rschenck said:
Silly boy....ROMs are made by friendly trolls, and coded using Android, love and less than 1% animal byproducts as permitted by law. We ALL know that.
Do you make a habit of posting threads that mistake aggressive provocations as legitimate questions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't he allowed to ask?!?
Lunchbox115 said:
Isn't he allowed to ask?!?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand a desire to know, but then why not ask in the specific threads he is interested in? Perhaps it is partly born out of his poor English, but phrased and placed the way it was his post was more challange than query....which I am quite sure was how he meant it to be.
People who create mods and kernels are not paid employees or people he is paying for a service. They are volunteers and hobbyists who are sharing what they make. Noone has the right to demand anyone's "credentials' here, beyond the sources and details of their ROM. Some will be great, some will be pretty lousy...but a little caution and reading of threads will usually seperate the wheat from the chaff.
As for his demand to know "who" these people are...if someone said they were just a geek in their mom's basement or an off duty porn star coding android kernels on the side for fun, would he then be better informed about their ROM?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
rschenck said:
an off duty porn star coding android kernels on the side for fun, would he then be better informed about their ROM?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
now that's a rom i would use!!
official roms or stock rom - made by professionals (i hope so)
yken said:
I really want to know this. How to these Roms prepared? If i take ficetos JVP CWM rom and add lets say modded camera, modded sms,modded other apk files to it. Choose a theme, choose one of those kernels,choose a free launcher, use darkys or juwe ram script. Add a fex wallpapers and name this Galaxied Gingerleylo Rom V.1
Who are really cooking roms, who are making roms like i told above?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it is a mixture of everything. Some people take the stock code, add some stuff that is beneficial and publish it as their mod. Some other people may take this modded ROM, add some more stuff that they believe is beneficial and publish it as their mod. Atleast, thats what I believe. Please correct me if i'm wrong.
I'm not very sure about the "professional" ones, but CyanogenMOD and Darky's ROM are used by a lot of people. I'm a noob to this scene, so I dont know about others. But there are certainly a lot of mods floating around.
BTW, there should be "like" button on this forum. Some comments are very witty.
Udayakiran said:
BTW, there should be "like" button on this forum. Some comments are very witty.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most people use the Thanks button for that...though I agree having a like button as well would be nice.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
@rschenck: you are right. If he had read some dev-threads he would know more about it. But not everybody is interested in details. So I think he may ask this question.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App

LG-P920 Roms should be cleaned and banished from our LG-P925 forum.

Since we now have an official GB build for our LG-P925, i really think this forum should be cleaned up and all the builds that are built from LG-P920 GB Base should be removed. Since they are not actually for our device.
Does anybody agree?
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
Please. Get out of the development section.
EDIT: No. I do not agree. It's literally the SAME device. Open one up. Check the "P925" label that's underneath it.
And no. It's not that is:
tampaboy1984 said:
Since they are not actually for our device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's that there are other carriers in this world that exist. Besides AT&T and all.
Now tell me.
Q: If there wasn't the international version or the P920 ROMs were "banished" from our Device section, do you really think I'd still be here?
A: NO. AT&T is worthless. For the fact that they'd like to bloat everything and put restrictions and whatnot.
Conclusion?
Leave it as is.
EDIT 2: End rant. Every developer needs to have one of these. xD
One can only be nice for so long.
Dude dont be a duche. A mod will move when they see fit. And by the way great work on your roms.
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
I'd say no. They are compatible with our thrill, its the same phone.
Rogers Canada uses the P925 but calls it by its official LG name, the optimus 3d.
Should the forums be combined?
Probably. If you're willing to modify your phone with a custom ROM then you should be able to change apns and all that good stuff. Why should we keep it seperate thus making it harder for users to find a good ROM?
The average USA user isnt going to search for the optimus 3d forum.
Do you think the optimus 3d mods should get rid of roms that were made from a LG thrill dev?
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
tampaboy1984 said:
Dude dont be a duche. A mod will move when they see fit. And by the way great work on your roms.
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not that I'm being a "douche"
It's that you straight up ignored a PINNED thread.
SEE POST
poyensa said:
MOD EDIT: BEFORE POSTING ANY THREAD IN THE DEVELOPMENT SECTION, PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING:
If you have developed a ROM, or are working with others to do so, the development forum is somewhere to discuss and share ideas, post useful feedback and logs or crash dumps, and to discuss a common goal developers are trying to achieve.
It is NOT the place to post your question because it gets higher traffic, or because more experienced users frequent it. Doing this just annoys those who are working on the device, and drives them away. Developers don't want to wade through 20 threads of "Help me urgently" to find their threads for porting and fixing camera issues etc. Similarly, if a thread is designated as discussion for developers say, porting a camera fix, please do not post in there asking "When will it be ready?", "Can I flash this yet?" etc. This is both completely disrespectful to those working on the project (you evidently haven't read the important posts in the thread), and also is making it harder for developers to find comments from other developers or testers when required.
Similarly, don't make loads of "Thanks for your work here" posts in an active development thread. It's just as annoying to developers as asking when something will be ready. If a ROM is complete, then go ahead and thank the developer if you wish, but don't go into threads for devs only, and interrupt it to post "thanks". It's basically spamming, and is treated as such.
If you are posting in development, you should have read every sticky and notice there, and should be actively developing or helping in the development of something. Developing isn't installing a ROM, or using a tweak, it's creating a ROM or other hack or tweak. If you haven't read for several days before starting out on XDA, you are likely about to ask something already solved. I registered on XDA when I first wanted to post, and that was to join in a discussion on something. Sure, join up and ask a question, but read the information available in General and Q&A first, as your question will have been asked before. Search is your friend here, become familiar with it.
Regarding when to post in development if you are not actually developing something, there is one occasion where it's acceptable. If you find a leak of a new ROM, which isn't already posted, and you verify it's legitimacy via either running it, or based on the source you obtained it from, then this is assisting in development, and should be posted in development. If you want to ask when a leak will be available use search first, then if not already in discussion, open a thread in general or Q&A.
If you have a problem flashing a ROM, this is NOT related to development. It's up to you to determine if it is specific to a particular ROM, and post useful information in that developer's existing thread for the ROM. If it happens on more than one ROM, and isn't a known issue (remember you should read several times more words than you post), then find out what you are doing wrong. Check guides written by others, try to repeat the problem and see if it happens every time. Something needs to be reproducible to be fixed effectively.
Once you have identified what you need help with go to the device Q&A forum (general if device lacks one), and make a clear, informative thread that explains the issue, and what you have tried doing to fix it. Did you re-download the ROM? Did you ask a friend to flash it for you, to reduce chance of user error? What steps (exactly) did you follow? What errors did you see (exact wording)? Did you double check all the steps? Did you do a wipe or hard reset?
If you make a clear, concise, yet detailed post, you will find help forthcoming, and should get the problem sorted very quickly. If someone suggests you try something, report back on what happened, did it work etc. Then, next time someone has this issue and searches, they will find this and have a verified and tested solution.
So remember... before you start a thread in development, ask yourself what you are developing. If you can't answer, then stop, step away from the post button, and think about where you are posting. Would it be better in General or Q&A, or is some more time with your best friend, search, required?
Regards,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone lock this obnoxious idiots thread, if it weren't for half the O3D Devs, we'd never had a Temporary GB Baseband.
Do a quick favor for me, go back to when you joined XDA and watch the n00b video, I think there's a few things you didn't pay any attention to!
Sent from my LG-P925 using XDA
Ok well obviously no one can see the obvious that the 920 based GB roms all pretty much run like crap on our 925. And also the fact that none of the GB based kernels made previous to v20p are not compatible with v20p, why have a forum full of roms that really arent made for our phone and that are borked
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
Oh let me point out this is the LG Thrill 4G forum (LG-P925) not (LG-P920)
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
tampaboy1984 said:
Oh let me point out this is the LG Thrill 4G forum (LG-P925) not (LG-P920)
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright. No more BioHazard? Enjoy a ROMless device.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II w/ CM9
And let me point out that the P920 and P925 are pretty much the same phone. Quoted from Engadget's review of the Thrill 4G:
Talk about a spitting image of the LG Optimus 3D. Don't get us wrong, we were expecting the Thrill 4G to be incredibly similar to its global counterpart, of course -- we just didn't believe it would be that close. We expect US carriers to take a handset popular in other parts of the world, tweak its design, change the UI and essentially turn it into a completely different phone. Interestingly enough, we found it difficult to find any significant variations at all between the twins aside from a few minor adjustments.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and
Reviewing the Thrill 4G was essentially a complete rehash of the LG Optimus 3D, with the obvious exception of AT&T branding and price ($100 with a two-year commitment).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or, look at the specs of the P925 and the P920 and tell me what major differences you can find.
The Dark Lestat dont get so upset seriously dude, like your roms were great dont get me wrong. Buuuut, your 2.0 and 2.1 versions honestly were crap, the new v20p completely satisfies my taste and runs way smoother than your 2.xx versions. So by all means leave if you want to. Thanks for your time while you were here though dude. v20p has made this phone is usable until the Samsung Galaxy III comes out. These are just my opinions im not speaking for ghe whole community here The Dark Lestat.
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
tampaboy1984 said:
The Dark Lestat dont get so upset seriously dude, like your roms were great dont get me wrong. Buuuut, your 2.0 and 2.1 versions honestly were crap, the new v20p completely satisfies my taste and runs way smoother than your 2.xx versions. So by all means leave if you want to. Thanks for your time while you were here though dude. v20p has made this phone is usable until the Samsung Galaxy III comes out. These are just my opinions im not speaking for ghe whole community here The Dark Lestat.
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know. I'm not actually leaving. That's essentially what it would be like. NO DEVELOPMENT for the Thrill except for bedwa.
As for 2.0 and 2.1, I posted a fix already.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II w/ CM9
So, you would alienate a superb developer on behalf of the whole P925 community just because v20p satisfies *your* tastes? That's the textbook definition of selfishness.
The Dark Lestat said:
I know. I'm not actually leaving. That's essentially what it would be like. NO DEVELOPMENT for the Thrill except for bedwa.
As for 2.0 and 2.1, I posted a fix already.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II w/ CM9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Believe it or not. Urabewe is teetering on the idea of coming out with the next edition of doomed roms based on this new official gb. So count him as a dev still...
Posted from my ICS'd Captivate
Trekfan422991 said:
Believe it or not. Urabewe is teetering on the idea of coming out with the next edition of doomed roms based on this new official gb. So count him as a dev still...
Posted from my ICS'd Captivate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's legit. I really hope this place is flooded with devs. I really do.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II w/ CM9
The v20c base band is the same as the one released in the new gb v20p so essentially its the same except bloatware. I'm on att using v20c with 2.1. And I absolutely don't understand how someone could Complain about. Its flawless, and if not maybe your doing something wrong. I have so many options, overclock, themes ect . With v20c I am finally happy with this phone. Everyone else should be too!
Sent from my LG-P920 using XDA
Thanks again lestat!
Sent from my LG-P920 using XDA
akwhite23 said:
The v20c base band is the same as the one released in the new gb v20p so essentially its the same except bloatware. I'm on att using v20c with 2.1. And I absolutely don't understand how someone could Complain about. Its flawless, and if not maybe your doing something wrong. I have so many options, overclock, themes ect . With v20c I am finally happy with this phone. Everyone else should be too!
Sent from my LG-P920 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obviously you dont know what your talking about because v20c and v20p are totally different. You cant use any existing kernels on v20p, the result is a phone with no cell signal and you cant even open apn settings. Also if no one has noticed yet v20p does have new features, one ive noticed is when you receive a text message at when phone is locked there is a cool text message pop up icon now in the middle of the lock screen that you can press snd slide down to unlock straight to messages, also if you use the built in email app its the same thing, also with a missed call.
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
I agree with akwhite, V20c is the best stock ROM to base off of; v20p is almost the same but loaded with AT&T annoyances such as the name in the notification bar. I just loaded v20p to see how it was, but it's obvious v20c is the way to go. Rogers seems to be alot better at keeping their branding less obtrusive and more removable. V20p and v20c are pretty much the same.
tampaboy1984 said:
Oh let me point out this is the LG Thrill 4G forum (LG-P925) not (LG-P920)
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Be reminded that Half of BioHazard is built ORIGINALLY off the O3D in general specifically because the very first GB Baseband mostly changes the device name and overruns software in order to put our device on possibly the first US/EU Baseband portable to the Thrill.
Yes! This is the "Thrill" forums and if I'm not correct the O3D was advertised FIRST and the most in Europe, it wasn't til a month later that the device WE call the Thrill wad advertised. Most Optimus models made are mainly for Europe! This making our device a European output device Originally based on P920. I'm beginning to think the reason for the long GB Official wait was because LG wanted to bug out the early released European GB.
Look at the facts of most European devices, half of our Mobile devices are based off them.
You slowly seem like you not even care for BioHazard. The first working GB ROM made mostly for Thrill in order to make a break and give us at least some 4G Speed & Signal.
Sent from my LG-P925 using XDA

Italian LSZ vs Germany LSZ battery performance

hi everybody. i'm an italian user, so obviously i follow nay italian forums. in many of them i have read that the italian version of the LSZ rom has a lot better battery performance. i haven't done any test yet, because at the moment i have no time to flash a rom, but i'll do it. any one tried and had this impressions?
I posted it because, if it is confirmed, maybe some developers could start using this LSZ instead of the german one, if interested.
obviously this is only a personal suggestion, i would never tell any cook what to do.
asusgarb said:
hi everybody. i'm an italian user, so obviously i follow nay italian forums. in many of them i have read that the italian version of the LSZ rom has a lot better battery performance. i haven't done any test yet, because at the moment i have no time to flash a rom, but i'll do it. any one tried and had this impressions?
I posted it because, if it is confirmed, maybe some developers could start using this LSZ instead of the german one, if interested.
obviously this is only a personal suggestion, i would never tell any cook what to do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, but this is only the next simply idiotic battery statement. Like you said "i haven't done any test yet": nobody has.
LSZ italian, german, netherlands are the same Roms - there is no difference in battery usage a single person could even measure and will bring a statistic relevance.
You can read here in XDA international or in german or like here in italian forums: you always get the same nonsense questions and statements about battery life and capacity.
asusgarb said:
hi everybody. i'm an italian user, so obviously i follow nay italian forums. in many of them i have read that the italian version of the LSZ rom has a lot better battery performance. i haven't done any test yet, because at the moment i have no time to flash a rom, but i'll do it. any one tried and had this impressions?
I posted it because, if it is confirmed, maybe some developers could start using this LSZ instead of the german one, if interested.
obviously this is only a personal suggestion, i would never tell any cook what to do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
b u l l s h i t - they're identical
Klementiy said:
b u l l s h i t - they're identical
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have you read the Forum Rules?
AW: Italian LSZ vs Germany LSZ battery performance
Klementiy said:
b u l l s h i t - they're identical
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does the Italian LSZ also have the German bloat apps like hugendubel etc? If yes, are they really identical then? Did people really check if LSZ is bit by bit the same?
Just asking because I read often on this forum that the TTT LSF is not worth to be used as a base for custom roms because it is also basically the same. But in my experience battery life is really better with stock LSF than with LSZ.
@ThaiDai I find it somehow suspicious that you act like xda-police here so often. Could you please show some more tolerance and kindness like the Buddha image in your avatar implies? The easiest way to keep unwanted threads away is to ignore them strictly. No offence thou, appreciate your work very much and also use your LSF deodex. :thumbup:
Regards, Hansi
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Please, I do not need you telling me whether I should answer a post or not. If I see obviously wrong or silly statements I will continue answering these.
If staying away from "wrong" threads is your preferred way I will not stop you - but please do not make these requests to other members.
Some of the old greek logicians would be very amused by the logic of your own anwer.
If tolerance ist accepting everything and only praise what is written then I really need to learn - but I do not want. I like the truth and especially a scientific approach when making statements that "measure" something.
I spend some of my free time in XDA trying to help other members or provide usable things. I do not care if my "special style" doesn't please everyone.
AW: Italian LSZ vs Germany LSZ battery performance
Accepted, I am tolerant and I can bear your "special style" Do you have any answer on my questions above?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
R: Italian LSZ vs Germany LSZ battery performance
I'm sorry if this thread created all this chaos. I started it because I'm only a "simple user" and, when I read comments like "I have 30% more battery with Italian lsz" I thought: how can it be; German and Italian are different only for CSC?!
So I wrote here thinking: with all these experts and developer I'll find the truth"
And it happened, so probably those comments were only exceptions.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
XDA - Police, can i apply for the JOB I really like the Sound of that....
AW: Italian LSZ vs Germany LSZ battery performance
Just go ahead, Officer Galaxtus!
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
ThaiDai said:
Sorry, but this is only the next simply idiotic battery statement. Like you said "i haven't done any test yet": nobody has.
LSZ italian, german, netherlands are the same Roms - there is no difference in battery usage a single person could even measure and will bring a statistic relevance.
You can read here in XDA international or in german or like here in italian forums: you always get the same nonsense questions and statements about battery life and capacity.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello @ThaiDai! Please, can you clarify me a question? When you say these ROMs are the same, you say this only about battery consumption, or in the whole? I am asking because I saw, in another thread, one member to confirm that the Italian ROM natively brings the lock screen shortcuts. Do you know if it is true?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app

Categories

Resources