Related
During the keynote of the new iPhone in 07 days, Phil Schiller, Apple's VP of markting, showed a mysterious plot that claimed the new processor A5X tablet offering up to four times more graphics performance than the quad-core NVidia Tegra 3 .
Nvidia did not like this chart.
Ken Brown, a spokesman for the company, told ZDNet that he was "flattered" to have been compared by Apple, but that tests performnace require more information.
"We have no information on this benchmark," said Brown. "We need to understand what application was used. Was only one or several applications? What drivers did they use? There are many issues in benchmark tests."
Ken is right to argue that Apple simply hid that information. Nowhere in the Cupertino company shows how he got those numbers, and probably will not even explain.
Nvidia promised to do their own benchmark tests so the new iPhone is released, March 16. Of course, these new tests Tegra 3 will do better on tests than Apple, as happened so many years (and still does) in disputes between NVidia and AMD, where each of the companies showed different benchmark tests where their chipsets fared better.
At least we know that once the new iPhone is released, numerous comparative tests and the Internet began to emerge, and we have more solid information about who gets the better of the fray.
jeiih said:
Ken is right to argue that Apple simply hid that information. Nowhere in the Cupertino company shows how he got those numbers, and probably will not even explain.
Nvidia promised to do their own benchmark tests so the new iPhone is released, March 16. Of course, these new tests Tegra 3 will do better on tests than Apple, as happened so many years (and still does) in disputes between NVidia and AMD, where each of the companies showed different benchmark tests where their chipsets fared better.
At least we know that once the new iPhone is released, numerous comparative tests and the Internet began to emerge, and we have more solid information about who gets the better of the fray.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Should be iPad I think.
lamborg said:
Should be iPad I think.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA
i cant imagine the A5x being anywhere close to the speed of the Tegra 3.
its basically an incremental upgrade to the A5, and the Tegra 3 is in a league of its own.
This kind of seems more as bs than actual truth. I agree with what emjlr3 said, the Tegra 3 by far sets the standard for high end tablet hardware in my opinion.. The A5X is merely an incrementally improved A5. Not to mention the Tegra 3 has a Quad Core.. While the A5X is only a dual core at most but the specs of the Tegra 3 are 12 Graphics Processing Cores, while the A5X has 4.
i've seen the "RESOLUTIONARY" iPad video its complete bull****. Everything on there is definitely untrue with no evidence. for example they claimed that their so awesome s(*it)Pad has a better display than any HDTV.. seriously my 30" Sony Monitor with which i am typing now manages 2048x1536 with ease.. and its much more sharp than what ive seen on the ipad.. and since years nvidia is miles ahead with its gpus and the A5X(which isnt even their own creation or how they would call it "groundbreaking innovation" (its made by Samsung)) isnt even near the performance of the tegra 3 or even the Adreno 225 ..
Hmm..
Well, i would like to see proof instead of just bold claims. I've seen the tegra 3..and its pretty darn impressive. Let's see how the A5x stack up ay?
realfelix said:
i've seen the "RESOLUTIONARY" iPad video its complete bull****. Everything on there is definitely untrue with no evidence. for example they claimed that their so awesome s(*it)Pad has a better display than any HDTV.. seriously my 30" Sony Monitor with which i am typing now manages 2048x1536 with ease.. and its much more sharp than what ive seen on the ipad.. and since years nvidia is miles ahead with its gpus and the A5X(which isnt even their own creation or how they would call it "groundbreaking innovation" (its made by Samsung)) isnt even near the performance of the tegra 3 or even the Adreno 225 ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, you yourself said, that you are using a monitor for Hi Res display. Apple never claimed that the new iPad's display is better than any "monitor's" display. It only claimed it has better resolution than any HDTV because the highest resolution for any HDTV right now is 1920 x1080. So in that point, apple did not lie.
In my opinion if the new iPad can display graphics that is more crisp but at the same speed as the current iPad, then it at least doubled it's own speed from the last iPad. If it renders graphics faster, then the 4x faster claim need to be proven by benchmarking.
I've had both an iPad and a Tegra tablet. Depending on configurations, the Android tablets can match the iPad when it comes to graphics, but I noticed there are some programs which are not written well and graphics stutter. This happens more for the Android, I guess it could be because Apple has strict coding regulations as compared to the Android which is more open.
Either way, I think it's more what you prefer to use. I have a Galaxy Nexus for my phone but I have the 1st gen iPad for my tablet.
Let's do the logic here, ipad 2 with sgx 543mp2> Tegra 3. Therefore ipad 3 with sgx 544 that is twice the sgx 543 is also greater than the Tegra 3.
Just search for off screen 720p benchmarks and you'll seen the proof.
Now cpu wise the Tegra 3 is more than likely much more powerful.
$1 gets you a reply
emjlr3 said:
i cant imagine the A5x being anywhere close to the speed of the Tegra 3.
its basically an incremental upgrade to the A5, and the Tegra 3 is in a league of its own.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uh... whut. They were talking about graphics performance and the even the A5 is faster than tegra 3 in that respect. The A5x being 4 times faster is quite plausible.
red12355 said:
Uh... whut. They were talking about graphics performance and the even the A5 is faster than tegra 3 in that respect. The A5x being 4 times faster is quite plausible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i thought the point of the Tegra 3 was to bring desktop graphics to a tablet/phone?
the ipad 2 surely did not have desktop like graphics
AnandTech benchmark ASUS Eee Pad Transformer Prime & iPad 3. Although the number is not up to 4x, but iPad 3 still comes with slightly better graphic performance. Obviously, CPU on Tegra 3 is better.
a friend got a HTC ONE X which is using Tegra3. Just so so.
Yes, because ICS is not optimized for quad core. Plus, it is Tegra 3 which means no support.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
OP, you're not making yourself clear. Please elaborate.
kaspar737 said:
Yes, because ICS is not optimized for quad core.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, but how is that so? What is your definition of an OS not being "optimized" for multiple cores? Based on my limited knowledge, kernels take control of the activation and deactivation of the cores, and the apps themself are the ones that are supposed to "take advantage" of the cores.
How is an OS supposed be "optimized" for a quad core CPU?
tkkyobaby1 said:
a friend got a HTC ONE X which is using Tegra3. Just so so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now I think buying a tegra inside device is not a good idea, the same with lg.
kaspar737 said:
Yes, because ICS is not optimized for quad core. Plus, it is Tegra 3 which means no support.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is up there with some of the stupidest things iv ever read.
I think the Android ecosystem is so complex that occasional lags are bound to happen even if we reach a point of using 8 cores on a smartphone. (And that, is why iOS is so smooth with slower hardware. It's a simpler OS.)
But the Tegra3 pretty much leaves everyone in the dust when it comes to games.
But when it comes to support... oh noes
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
kaspar737 said:
But when it comes to support... oh noes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The international version of the HTC One X with Tegra 3 has already gotten its full sources released a while ago.
At least it seems Nvidia isn't as unsupportive as we think they are. LG, apparently, is the one that is holding back from releasing sources for us.
Yea, but when Android 5 comes out then I hope that they will release all the necessary stuff. That may make me think better about Nvidia.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
silentmelodies said:
The international version of the HTC One X with Tegra 3 has already gotten its full sources released a while ago.
At least it seems Nvidia isn't as unsupportive as we think they are. LG, apparently, is the one that is holding back from releasing sources for us.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With nvidia drivers and hals to the public?
tkkyobaby1 said:
a friend got a HTC ONE X which is using Tegra3. Just so so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok good for you
now i am goign to enjoy my Quad Core phone again okay?
What is the point of this thread? As for desktop PC's, more cores = better (most of the time). Since dual cores work just fine in both GB and ICS the same goes for quad cores. And NO, quad cores don't mean less battery duration.
Maybe he is just jeaulous but i dont think a phone needs quad core. For web browsing and watching videos (well.. lol tegra 2 ) some gameing. dual core is more than enough. As i mentiond some time ago in other thread this reminds me of megapixel hunt in compact digital cameras market.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
tkkyobaby1 said:
a friend got a HTC ONE X which is using Tegra3. Just so so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And what was the purpose of posting it here? do you want to make an excuse that quadcore isn't nowhere near better than dualcore?
I agree with someone said quadcore isn't really important for mobile phone. If only O2x have more than 512 MB RAM I bet it will last for next 2-3 years
Durio said:
And what was the purpose of posting it here? do you want to make an excuse that quadcore isn't nowhere near better than dualcore?
I agree with someone said quadcore isn't really important for mobile phone. If only O2x have more than 512 MB RAM I bet it will last for next 2-3 years
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It can still last for 2-3 years, you just wont be able to multitask when playing games so much in the future.
quadcores will be **** if they dont have that 5th core for when there isnt much going on or they will chew through battery.
The new huwai something has its own quadcore and it smashes all cuurent quad cores in benchmarks, tegra 3 the exenos ect. But if it doesnt have that 5th core it will probably be bad. Its said to come with a 2300mah battery.
eraldo said:
It can still last for 2-3 years, you just wont be able to multitask when playing games so much in the future.
quadcores will be **** if they dont have that 5th core for when there isnt much going on or they will chew through battery.
The new huwai something has its own quadcore and it smashes all cuurent quad cores in benchmarks, tegra 3 the exenos ect. But if it doesnt have that 5th core it will probably be bad. Its said to come with a 2300mah battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But branding sometimes matter. Market rarely pay attention to a brand like Huawei,compared to samsung. I heard Meizu MX also decent but yeah it has the same market problem
Sent from fastest O2X ever
Durio said:
But branding sometimes matter. Market rarely pay attention to a brand like Huawei,compared to samsung. I heard Meizu MX also decent but yeah it has the same market problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Meizu MX Quad has pretty good specs (including the same Exynos 4212 in the S3), but is sold only in China. It's not meant to compete internationally.
Most useless thread ever.
My HTC one x is a hundred times better than my o2x was
Sent from my HTC One X
Kickasskev said:
My HTC one x is a hundred times better than my o2x was
Sent from my HTC One X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and o2x is hundred times cheaper...common sense
I know I am. I really hope there is a good open hardware tablet soon...
GBGamer said:
I know I am. I really hope there is a good open hardware tablet soon...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why what where you hoping for? An Intel i7??
ben83s said:
Why what where you hoping for? An Intel i7??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no, something open, with full data-sheets available, and open source drivers, i can tell you first hand how bad proprietary drivers suck.
GBGamer said:
I know I am. I really hope there is a good open hardware tablet soon...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i am not into this topic right now but afaik there is no real open source hardware competitor on a tegra 3 level
gh123man said:
no, something open, with full data-sheets available, and open source drivers, i can tell you first hand how bad proprietary drivers suck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see what you mean. But when your trying to copy the Kindle Fire and go main stream global, you need something that proven to work. IMHO at £160 its a big anouph gamble all ready.
No, the tegra 3 isn't as good as it should be, but for web surfing, a little gaming and movies and music, its more than enough. Quit griping. Lol
People always find something to complain about. Lol
OP the problem is the price. For $200 you need to go with the cheapest high end processor available, and apparently that is what Nvidia did with the Kai El project to put out speedy, low price tablets. Personally dual core is quick enough for me, plus I just bought a 7" tablet so...
Sent from my GT-P3113 using Tapatalk 2
Yes, the tegra 3 isnt the best chip-set, but if they went with the snapdragon s4 they would have horrible supply issues, as there isnt enough s4's as it is. Also this was made by asus who has an existing relationship with nvida. Google has used this as a reference platform so it will be heavily optimized so performance shouldn't be an issue especially considering the screen resolution, keep in mind this is the same processor that runs the transformer prime at 1080p, without all the new gpu goodies. fyi all current tablets run tegra 3's
Sure let's put in the top of the line CPU that costs $1000 and try to sell it main stream against the Kindle Fire priced at $199.
Cares said:
Sure let's put in the top of the line CPU that costs $1000 and try to sell it main stream against the Kindle Fire priced at $199.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not talking high end, I'm talking open hardware, like TI OMAP.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
So does this mean a non developer Nexus device? So does that mean no custom ROMs? No CM9? No kernel tweaks?
darkamikaze said:
So does this mean a non developer Nexus device? So does that mean no custom ROMs? No CM9? No kernel tweaks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah, it just means slower Dev updates after Google has given it up.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
GBGamer said:
I'm not talking high end, I'm talking open hardware, like TI OMAP.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AFAIK TI OMAP4 is performance-wise inferior to Tegra 3 in nearly every aspect, it's not wise to limit flagman device(it's Nexus, after all) capabilities just to please indy ROM developers. Especially concerning the fact that Nexus 7 is tightly bound to Google Play to squeeze from grateful consumers as much money as possible .
So does this mean a non developer Nexus device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It surely is a developer device, but it's for application developers, not ROM makers, because ROMs are not profitable for Google, but apps are.
dalkor said:
AFAIK TI OMAP4 is performance-wise inferior to Tegra 3 in nearly every aspect, it's not wise to limit flagman device(it's Nexus, after all) capabilities just to please indy ROM developers. Especially concerning the fact that Nexus 7 is tightly bound to Google Play to squeeze from grateful consumers as much money as possible .
It surely is a developer device, but it's for application developers, not ROM makers, because ROMs are not profitable for Google, apps are.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, that's why I'm hoping for a tablet with quad core OMAP5
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
My opinion tegra 3 is the best CPU+GPU combo until the s4 quad core. I have a tegra 3 on my one x and hardly any lag whatsoever. Games look amazing, and amazing standby times. Maybe the nexus 7 will force nvidia to release drivers ect because of the demand
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app
tegra3 optimized games are by far the best Android games around. Tegra3 is no slouch, CPU or gpu wise. there will be no issues with custom roms. One X has a ton of custom roms/kernels. Prime has alot of roms also. I'm sure Nexus 7 will be far more popular than either of them.
GBGamer said:
Yea, that's why I'm hoping for a tablet with quad core OMAP5
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For $199 ? And they don't arrive until Q3/Q4.
For 200$ hell no I'm not disappointed
Stop complaining about everything!!!
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
I <3 Tegra. Got a Tegra phone and tegra tsblet... so gonna get the N7. I don't see what the problem is. Its very fast and good for gaming from the TegraZone
Sent from my Asus Transformer Prime TF201 using XDA Premium HD app
The Tegra 3 is actually a pretty powerful chipset. Think it's tainted a bit by being the 'child' of the Tegra 2, which was not as great as we hoped it would be. Combined with some of the performance improvements in Jelly Bean I expect this device to fly.
http://iphone.appleinsider.com/arti...r-graphics-performance-vs-apple-iphone-6-plus
I have see a Note 4 running GTA on YouTube,, and it was lagging badly..
Yes gpu delivers lower performance than iphone 6 but its not poor .both gpus have same power but 2k lowers note 4 performance but its still more powerful than ipad air which has lower res.
And the video u saw on youtube is quallcom version of note 4 and adreno gpu s always lagged on gta games on high setting due to lack of optimzation.
JCM800 said:
http://iphone.appleinsider.com/arti...r-graphics-performance-vs-apple-iphone-6-plus
I have see a Note 4 running GTA on YouTube,, and it was lagging badly..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So because it doesn't do well in one benchmark the GPU is somehow worthless? :silly: According to apple insider apparently the Geforce GTX 660TI is faster than an AMD 290X. That's some quality reporting right there.
Well I'm no expert but look up GTA Note 4 on YouTube, looks terribly laggy.
I'm hoping to get a Note 4 - but not if it can't perform..
Outside of that being Apple dedicated website, running just one benchmark and writing nonsense (they start writing about Note 4, then post preliminary??? cost analysis of GS 4???? from 1.5 yr ago, WTF) I'm not sure if it's propaganda or somebody overdose on something or maybe forgot his medication
I think both.
Not optimized. Performance WILL be fine on other games. Don't worry.
JCM800 said:
Well I'm no expert but look up GTA Note 4 on YouTube, looks terribly laggy.
I'm hoping to get a Note 4 - but not if it can't perform..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not lag. The camera just has a really low fps. Look at his other videos and even his hand moving looks like it "lags". It's just the camera don't worry.
You will be able to play most games, just not at the maximum settings, these tests are much more intensive than the mobile games, to the people talking about the screen resolution, there is also an offscreen test which doesn't care about the resolution and the scores are still lower.
batna.antab said:
You will be able to play most games, just not at the maximum settings, these tests are much more intensive than the mobile games, to the people talking about the screen resolution, there is also an offscreen test which doesn't care about the resolution and the scores are still lower.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
offscreen tests care about res just not screen res. all offscreen tests done in 1080p and a8 gpu and note 4 gets around 17 fps on offscreen tests. and both higher than my ipad air and i can play everything at full without a stutter i dont think there will be any problem.
Oh no.. a poorly optimized game isn't as fast as it is on an iPhone. Oh jeez it MUST perform awful.. right?
Sent from my HTC6525LVW using XDA Free mobile app
Oh, cmon guys, little reality check: Note 4 is one of, if not the fastest phone on the market ATM. If it can not play the games properly, nothing else can. In most benchmarks Exynos is as fast or faster than Snapdragon. There is something about this particular benchmark that makes Exynos run poorly, that's why it was picked for this article. And how come no Note4 Snapdragon version? Maybe because Snapdragon doesn't have the issue? The most opinionated bunch of crap I read in a long while.
So I was kinda worried when reading benchmark reviews of the note 4. They would show that the iPhone 6's gpu was superior and to prove that they used GFX bench.
Sure after trying it myself I noticed something pretty obvious.
They are comparing the note 4's 2k res against the 720p res of the iPhone 6.
When you look at the note 4's offscreen performance it's better or equal.
I made a screen show to show you all.
Anyone else want to show their results?
Its not misLeading at all onscreen and offscreen tests 2 different things. And onscreen is more important cuz shows real world performance(if games support 2k ofc)
Biggest misleading information was when all reviews done benchmarks werent updated to support new iphone resolutions. All was running on 640p which was 5s res.
They published reviews with 18 fps ofscreen and 30 fps onscreen for 6 plus and didnt even think about what was wrong . Both score should be same cuz both tests done in 1080p for 6 plus. Even reviews said "apple did a great job with 6 plus. While having higher res screen it still beat iphone 6 in onscreen tests." It was totaly wrong and misleading stuff.
Now all benchmarks updated to support new screens and all gpu benchmark scores lowered iphone 6 has like 40% better performance in onscreen than 6 plus. But they just didnt update their reviews and still has wrong information for people. And still comparing new phones with wrong scores from iphones.
I don't know why people are so obsessed with benchmarks. I would never buy a phone because it is faster in some worthless synthetic benchmark
Skickat från min iPhone med Tapatalk
easycure1974 said:
I don't know why people are so obsessed with benchmarks. I would never buy a phone because it is faster in some worthless synthetic benchmark
Skickat från min iPhone med Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benchmarking gives a user an idea if their system is running normally. We do it with our pc's all the time. The note 4 has new hardware compared to the note 3. The new gpu adreno 420 has also a new architecture.
My point of the post isn't about the note performing low or anything but simply pointing out the lies about the iPhone being better when they obviously didn't point out that the note 4 is running 2k res vs the 1080p from the iPhone 6+. Even the s5 plus with the same hardware as the note 4 has higher scores because of its lower res.
Either way don't look at benchmarks to say your device is top dog but also don't Base your judgement on a device from inappropriate testing.
jetbruceli said:
Benchmarking gives a user an idea if their system is running normally. We do it with our pc's all the time. The note 4 has new hardware compared to the note 3. The new gpu adreno 420 has also a new architecture.
My point of the post isn't about the note performing low or anything but simply pointing out the lies about the iPhone being better when they obviously didn't point out that the note 4 is running 2k res vs the 1080p from the iPhone 6+. Even the s5 plus with the same hardware as the note 4 has higher scores because of its lower res.
Either way don't look at benchmarks to say your device is top dog but also don't Base your judgement on a device from inappropriate testing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When comparing PCs, they're (almost) always using the same CPU architecture and operating system. It's kind of a difficult comparison on phones, since they're often nothing alike.
I also don't understand why it's so important it's better than the iPhone. It's like if it's worse than the iPhone, it's utter ****. Which is not the case.
3D Benchmarking on phones/tables is pointless when comparing to other devises 9 times out of 10 the screen res is not same and they never take this into factor.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
---------- Post added at 11:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:26 AM ----------
Mafle93 said:
When comparing PCs, they're (almost) always using the same CPU architecture and operating system. It's kind of a difficult comparison on phones, since they're often nothing alike. .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You clearly don't benchmark on PC
---------- Post added at 11:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:38 AM ----------
jetbruceli said:
Benchmarking gives a user an idea if their system is running normally. We do it with our pc's all the time. .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea but on PC we have option to set a fixed res to compare hardware.
demo23019 said:
3D Benchmarking on phones/tables is pointless when comparing to other devises 9 times out of 10 the screen res is not same and they never take this into factor.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
---------- Post added at 11:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:26 AM ----------
You clearly don't benchmark on PC
---------- Post added at 11:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:38 AM ----------
Yea but on PC we have option to set a fixed res to compare hardware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you often see benchmarks with 2 completely different types of RAM, GPU, CPU, OS and monitor resolution when doing HW comparisons?
Does your Note 4 perform how YOU want it to perform? If so, then who cares about benchmarks? This benchmark obsession has gotten completely out of control. I never run them, I benchmark my phones myself and decide if it's running to MY liking.
WizeGuyDezignz said:
Does your Note 4 perform how YOU want it to perform? If so, then who cares about benchmarks? This benchmark obsession has gotten completely out of control. I never run them, I benchmark my phones myself and decide if it's running to MY liking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I completely agree. Benchmarks are a good as an indication of your device's performance. Nothing more. The software "feeling" is just as important for the overall experience, and it can't be measured as easily.
Mafle93 said:
I completely agree. Benchmarks are a good as an indication of your device's performance. Nothing more. The software "feeling" is just as important for the overall experience, and it can't be measured as easily.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah exactly. It's almost like letting an app decide if the food you just ate tasted good or not. Just judge it for yourself, screw all these synthetic benchmarks lol.
Benchmarks are only useful to find out performance differences, not which is the best or the better, like when you OC your phone.
From personal experience, benchmarks resulted as fake, because my own device was outperforming the one in their list or table not slightly, but 10 to 20%.
I am talking about Antutu benchmark.
I had the same issue wtih Quadrant.
I didnt bother anymore because I didnt want to stress test my phone any longer.
Mafle93 said:
Do you often see benchmarks with 2 completely different types of RAM, GPU, CPU, OS and monitor resolution when doing HW comparisons?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All the time people who generally benchmark build their own system .
You almost never see the same exact specs.
And when gpu benchmarking involved rules are set to run x resolution to get accurate comparison when comparing
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Not all games run native 2k. Hi quality 3d games will most likely upscale a 1080p to 2k on your phone. Don't worry about it. This monster is fast even at 2k.
demo23019 said:
All the time people who generally benchmark build their own system .
You almost never see the same exact specs.
And when gpu benchmarking involved rules are set to run x resolution to get accurate comparison when comparing
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok so here is the scenario for the pc, lets say you have the same mobo, gpu, cpu, ram and etc. You benchmark your completely new system and notice its not performing as well. Would using a benchmark then be helpful? YES
Second our devices share common specs with other devices. Galaxy s5 and Xperia z3, Note 4 and Nexus 6. These systems also produce different benchmarks. Of you own a Nexus 5 you will notice it doesnt play everything the same as the note 3. The note 3 was faster and smoother than the nexus 5. i would know I had both. I was so mad when I gave up my note 3. The nexus 5 ran poorly on benchmarks and would throttle instantly. I actually had to put it in the freezer for it come atleast close to the performance of the Note 3.
For me its really saying my note 4 is better than yours or your nexus 6 but it does suggest that I might get performance getting the note 4 over the G3