Related
I haven´t found any info around the web about CM team making a vivo release? Does anybody have information about that?
weaselEST said:
I haven´t found any info around the web about CM team making a vivo release? Does anybody have information about that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The CM team tend to not discuss a lot of what they will release untill it is due soon. Guess it's to stop people nagging about deadlines.
They are probably waiting for the source code and kernel.
acme anvil said:
They are probably waiting for the source code and kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source code for HTC ROM? Or what?
weaselEST said:
Source code for HTC ROM? Or what?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are waiting for the source code for kernel 3.0.16. Currently, it only works for Sense ROM's and not AOSP ROM's. AOSP for our device uses 2.6.x GB kernel hacked to work with ICS which is why our ROM's aren't fully stable yet unless your using the stock 3.0 kernel.
I emailed HTC regarding kernel sources and was told they will release it 90-120 days after the release of the WWE ICS RUU. The RUU was released a few weeks ago, so a few months to go unfortunately.
ZaySk said:
They are waiting for the source code for kernel 3.0.16. Currently, it only works for Sense ROM's and not AOSP ROM's. AOSP for our device uses 2.6.x GB kernel hacked to work with ICS which is why our ROM's aren't fully stable yet unless your using the stock 3.0 kernel.
I emailed HTC regarding kernel sources and was told they will release it 90-120 days after the release of the WWE ICS RUU. The RUU was released a few weeks ago, so a few months to go unfortunately.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exacly
s*ck but we must waiting
check ice cold sandwich
4 me best ics rom
5!
Just curious, what is the difference between AOSP kernel and Sense kernel in general? If I got the source for the Sense kernel, what do I need to do to make it work for AOSP?
itandy said:
Just curious, what is the difference between AOSP kernel and Sense kernel in general? If I got the source for the Sense kernel, what do I need to do to make it work for AOSP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
do you have the source ;o !
and you would need to build a aosp kernal based on the sense source
naathaanb96 said:
do you have the source ;o !
and you would need to build a aosp kernal based on the sense source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just don't get so excited. It's just a big IF. ,-)
What do you meaning building an AOSP kernel based on the Sense kernel? I previously compiled some AOSP kernels from source but dunno about porting Sense kernel to AOSP.
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
itandy said:
Just don't get so excited. It's just a big IF. ,-)
What do you meaning building an AOSP kernel based on the Sense kernel? I previously compiled some AOSP kernels from source but dunno about porting Sense kernel to AOSP.
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think you need to compile a AOSP kernal from the sense kernal source. id private message kaijura or lord clokan or nik, being developers they would be able to tell you more do you know someone who is a htc dev or something ?
naathaanb96 said:
i think you need to compile a AOSP kernal from the sense kernal source. id private message kaijura or lord clokan or nik, being developers they would be able to tell you more do you know someone who is a htc dev or something ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wish I do but I don't
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
Now as the source code is available, we can hope for stable ICS rom.
Well ICS is already kind of stable just some minor bugs if you mean that. However JB would very likely be possible imo.
Our devs are working on it and I'm sure CM10 will be on our device Nik just got a port from DHD ROM booting and will release it tomorrow Also Floatshow and djpbx are building a JB ROM from source and I guess they're making awesome progress, too. So it's just about time, mate
Nice to see that my old thread has been awaken
Waiting from CM10 now.
Just a matter of time. Gonna be a fun few weeks
Sent from my HTC Incredible S
Nik got it booting!
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda premium
Nik released his JB rom stating he uses CM10 kernel. I understand that kernel is phone specific and does that mean we well see a CM10 alpha build really soon?
weaselEST said:
Nik released his JB rom stating he uses CM10 kernel. I understand that kernel is phone specific and does that mean we well see a CM10 alpha build really soon?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't surely mean that but it's possible
What about CM9. will we get it?
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
Hi All,
I want to know, any of the developer is developing AOSP Rom 4.1.2?
Could some can do that please.
Siva.
psiva2010 said:
Hi All,
I want to know, any of the developer is developing AOSP Rom 4.1.2?
Could some can do that please.
Siva.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Developers primary is CM10.1 for now.
Cm is based on aosp, any change made on aosp is reflected on cm repo
Yeah, once we have CM 10.1 working... only then we can go for AOSP or Paranoid or other custom ROMs that requires CM as the "Base" ROM...
Sent from my GT-I9070
Sami Kabir said:
Yeah, once we have CM 10.1 working... only then we can go for AOSP or Paranoid or other custom ROMs that requires CM as the "Base" ROM...
Sent from my GT-I9070
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That isn't true. AOSP, PA etc are built from source!
It's just that they share the device tree. And cm is easier than others
I do not respond to tech support via PM
Shaaan said:
That isn't true. AOSP, PA etc are built from source!
It's just that they share the device tree. And cm is easier than others
I do not respond to tech support via PM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was just trying to act smart.. as I don't have much knowledge about all these.. :silly:
Atleast I was "half" correct...
It's just that they share the device tree.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is question for developers and porters.Why no one is porting new builds of liquidsmooth rom since it is for me best rom for our phone.I am still flashing old demetris build...
dimi89 said:
This is question for developers and porters.Why no one is porting new builds of liquidsmooth rom since it is for me best rom for our phone.I am still flashing old demetris build...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry to ask for this, I know I should install and test for myself the rom,
But I just would like to know how is the battery life on this rom?
What about the power button? Does it work properly? Because I had this issue on android 4.3 based rom's.
And the camera? Clear images and sharper?
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards from Brazil
By the way, in my opinion android 4.2.2 is the most stable atm
Rafael Cardoso said:
Sorry to ask for this, I know I should install and test for myself the rom,
But I just would like to know how is the battery life on this rom?
What about the power button? Does it work properly? Because I had this issue on android 4.3 based rom's.
And the camera? Clear images and sharper?
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards from Brazil
By the way, in my opinion android 4.2.2 is the most stable atm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Build that we currently have ported by Demetris is 4.2.2 and for me it is the best custom rom out there.Camera and battery are great even with stock app and stock kernel.Alwayse switching between MIUI and LiquidSmooth.Flash it and test is for couple of days yourself and see if you are satisfied.
Greetings from Serbia
what bugs does it have?
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk
Ben36 said:
what bugs does it have?
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Test it or read the last few posts of the rom thread.
Not that hard, is it?
Sent from my 4X HD via XDA Premium
it's also not hard for the devs to just put them in the OP but they all seem scared to admit there are bugs on this forum
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk
dimi89 said:
Build that we currently have ported by Demetris is 4.2.2 and for me it is the best custom rom out there.Camera and battery are great even with stock app and stock kernel.Alwayse switching between MIUI and LiquidSmooth.Flash it and test is for couple of days yourself and see if you are satisfied.
Greetings from Serbia
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@dimi89 Dimi! Thank you again! You have already answered me on another post, and again here, with the same education and niceness
Thanks, I flashed LiquidSmooth rom and until this moment, no problems at all.. everything ok with iodak kernel v8 10.1..
Greetings from Brazil
Ben36 said:
it's also not hard for the devs to just put them in the OP but they all seem scared to admit there are bugs on this forum
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's even easier for YOU to test it yourself. Backup your current setup and flash it. Most of the mentioned bugs aren't even for everybody and it is actually quite hard for the devs to make a full list of bugs which occur for every single user.
If you don't agree with that it's your fault. The devs are doing an awesome job here and they do it because they want to.
Sent from my 4X HD via XDA Premium
In my honest opinion, bugs should be on the OP if they are known bugs. It's a matter of structure and information. But that's just me
From what I understood, carbon is a "fork" from Liquid and I think it's a compilation from source and not a port, right? If so, is it possible to compile Liquid from source as well ?
This question is for someone who knows or a developer
MidnightDevil said:
In my honest opinion, bugs should be on the OP if they are known bugs. It's a matter of structure and information. But that's just me
From what I understood, carbon is a "fork" from Liquid and I think it's a compilation from source and not a port, right? If so, is it possible to compile Liquid from source as well ?
This question is for someone who knows or a developer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They stated that Carbon rom doesnt have anything to do with liquid team.Also if you look at title on older liquid builds by demetris you will see it says "Official" so i think it is possible to compile from source.Asked demetris long time ago about liquid future for our phone but still no answer.
dimi89 said:
They stated that Carbon rom doesnt have anything to do with liquid team.Also if you look at title on older liquid builds by demetris you will see it says "Official" so i think it is possible to compile from source.Asked demetris long time ago about liquid future for our phone but still no answer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, they stated the following:
CarbonRom is an aftermarket firmware based on the Android Open Source Project. The team is composed of former members of Team Liquid who have forked the code in an attempt to bring greater speed, better coding, and full authorship to code. We are in no way affiliated with Liquid0624. The rom was forked at Liquid beta 3.2.1 and has since undergone major code changes and modifications.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They "forked" the code, although it was changed a LOT, a fork is a fork
Anyway, I'm gonna have a look later on see if Liquid can be compiled for our p880.
Thanks dimi :good:
MidnightDevil said:
No, they stated the following:
They "forked" the code, although it was changed a LOT, a fork is a fork
Anyway, I'm gonna have a look later on see if Liquid can be compiled for our p880.
Thanks dimi :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No,THANK you man Someone sayed that all 4.2 builds are much better then 4.3 roms builds and i agree on that.
Far as I understood the source is published.
Will see what I can do during the weekend
https://github.com/LiquidSmooth/android
And yeah, I agree, I'm pretty happy with CM10. 1.3. Although I do miss the privacy features from 4.3.
Mods can lock and delete this since demerits answered our prayers and ported new version.
Sent from my microwave.
I am looking to give my dying device one last chance and wondering what ROM is the most stock barebone rom?
MonthOLDpickle said:
I am looking to give my dying device one last chance and wondering what ROM is the most stock barebone rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock cm.If you want some extra features go for Paranoid Android.
Pristine rom
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Slim Bean for me. I don't know how close to stock it is, but it seems very light on bloat. I did use Paranoid Android for a few weeks, but found stability going backwards the further it was developed. Maybe PA is good now, but I'm sticking with Slim.
Slim thread - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2425949
tdodd said:
Slim Bean for me. I don't know how close to stock it is, but it seems very light on bloat. I did use Paranoid Android for a few weeks, but found stability going backwards the further it was developed. Maybe PA is good now, but I'm sticking with Slim.
Slim thread - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2425949
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am up for whatever has the less bloat. I see it has install instructions..very vague. Can you help me?
MonthOLDpickle said:
I am up for whatever has the less bloat. I see it has install instructions..very vague. Can you help me?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The instructions are here - http://www.slimroms.net/index.php/installation. Make sure you read the page fully, including the warning in bold at the top, and that you understand everything before you start.
The instructions make sense to me, but I'm used to flashing. The instructions are not a full flashing tutorial and they only cover the key points specific to Slim Bean. Steps which would apply for all custom ROMs include....
1. You will need to install a custom recovery on your phone as the instructions cannot be followed using the standard Samsung recovery. This would be true for any custom ROM. There are various options for installing custom recovery. Telling you what to do is outside the scope of the ROM developer and the installation instructions for the ROM. Personally I install Philz kernel onto my stock ROMs in order to gain custom recovery features. Now that I have a custom recovery installed this is not a step I need to repeat every time I want to flash a new ROM. It's also why ROM installation instructions don't bother to mention this - it's assumed as a given.
2. It would be a wise precaution to create a Nandroid backup before flashing a new ROM. A custom recovery will let you do this. While recommended, it is not a requirement for a new ROM install so it may or may not get mentioned in the instructions.
3. You will need to download the new ROM and Gapps to the phone. I download to external storage (the micro SD card).
4. Worth repeating - wiping/flashing always carries the (small) risk of something going wrong, which could in the worst case destroy your phone. Less dramatic problems might be boot hangs or boot loops. I've only got into a boot loop once, and that was because I tried to short cut the instructions. Fortunately I dug myself out of that hole by flashing a stock Samsung ROM using PC Odin. The risk is yours if you want to go ahead.
That's the best I can do to help. If anyone else cares to chip in to cover anything I've missed then feel free.
If you want a pure aosp experience use the supernexus rom.
All the others mentioned here are CM based ones, not AoSP
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
projeto56 said:
If you want a pure aosp experience use the supernexus rom.
All the others mentioned here are CM based ones, not AoSP
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Slim is not CM based.
LAKAME_MAN said:
Slim is not CM based.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right.
Always thought it was, but it seems it only has cherry picks from CM and AOKP.
Still, super nexus is built purely on AOSP code, and technically is 'closest to pure android'.
Thanks for correcting me tough.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
LAKAME_MAN said:
Slim is not CM based.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Paranoid is also not CM based.
chasmodo said:
Paranoid is also not CM based.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it's far from being pure aosp
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
projeto56 said:
But it's far from being pure aosp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nevertheless, it's base is AOSP, that's why it's called AOSPA.
chasmodo said:
Nevertheless, it's base is AOSP, that's why it's called AOSPA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha. I know that. But the thread is about the ROM that is closest to AOSP, and nothing is closer than AOSP than AOSP itself.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
projeto56 said:
Haha. I know that. But the thread is about the ROM that is closest to AOSP, and nothing is closer than AOSP than AOSP itself.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You said PA is CM based which is wrong.
@chasmodo sorry I knew PA is AOSP based, I just missed it.
LAKAME_MAN said:
You said PA is CM based which is wrong.
@chasmodo sorry I knew PA is AOSP based, I just missed it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've taken back what I said (or at least I should have).
Just chill out guys. So much nerves around here
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
First of all, this is NOT a request to developers to leave everything and start making AOSP ROMs. I am just curious why we have almost none or at least not fully functioning AOSP ROMs. The ones I tried, SpaceCaker's AOSP GB and the 2 AOSP ROMs from Maclaw, were great. Don't get me wrong, I like the CyanogenMod ROMs, just curious why AOSP gets overlooked. Are they harder to build than other ROMs or are people really not into them? Appreciate any input.
Also, if anyone knows of any AOSP builds besides the three mentioned (SpaceCaker's AOSP Gingerbread, Maclaw's AOSP ICS and Jellybean), I would be grateful if you would share them. Cheers!
I agree with you...there aren't much aosp ROM for our Ace although there are the best ROM that works smoother...but on the other hand there has much less function compared to CMs ROM...so maybe people want CM more..
What do you want more? I mean we have one aosp for gb, ics and jb.
If a developer would make another aosp rom, it would be more or less the same rom.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
blugonjic said:
First of all, this is NOT a request to developers to leave everything and start making AOSP ROMs. I am just curious why we have almost none or at least not fully functioning AOSP ROMs. The ones I tried, SpaceCaker's AOSP GB and the 2 AOSP ROMs from Maclaw, were great. Don't get me wrong, I like the CyanogenMod ROMs, just curious why AOSP gets overlooked. Are they harder to build than other ROMs or are people really not into them? Appreciate any input.
Also, if anyone knows of any AOSP builds besides the three mentioned (SpaceCaker's AOSP Gingerbread, Maclaw's AOSP ICS and Jellybean), I would be grateful if you would share them. Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
buddy you can try AOSP ics of olddroid its also fast stable and offers descent battery life
here it is http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2196926
good luck:good::good:
Blackbox421 said:
What do you want more? I mean we have one aosp for gb, ics and jb.
If a developer would make another aosp rom, it would be more or less the same rom.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not a matter of "want". As I stated in my thread, this is not a request. I was just being curious, to be honest. Maybe, I was not clear. I also meant that AOSP ROMs are not used as base ROMs. Maybe, CM is more favorable towards that. Anyway, thanks for the input, valid point you made,
aditya rathee said:
buddy you can try AOSP ics of olddroid its also fast stable and offers descent battery life
here it is http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2196926
good luck:good::good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the suggestion, appreciate it. There is no download link in the thread though. If you have one you can PM me. Seems something is fishy about that thread.
Aditya please give me its link
Thanks sir
blugonjic said:
Thanks for the suggestion, appreciate it. There is no download link in the thread though. If you have one you can PM me. Seems something is fishy about that thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i will see what i can do
blugonjic said:
Thanks for the suggestion, appreciate it. There is no download link in the thread though. If you have one you can PM me. Seems something is fishy about that thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here it is buddy
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2196926&page=7
in the first post of mr viper its written AOSP 4.0.4 rc1 in red colour click it and download the file
good luck :good::laugh::good::good:
aditya rathee said:
here it is buddy
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2196926&page=7
in the first post of mr viper its written AOSP 4.0.4 rc1 in red colour click it and download the file
good luck :good::laugh::good::good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This link doesn't work As OD said he deleted the rc1 so can anyone reupload?? Please.
The Wolverine1800 said:
This link doesn't work As OD said he deleted the rc1 so can anyone reupload?? Please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you trued what i said i mean clicked on red written aosp rc1 in mr viper's post cos i downloaded the rom from there
aditya rathee said:
did you trued what i said i mean clicked on red written aosp rc1 in mr viper's post cos i downloaded the rom from there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, we tried. It leads to some dummy site sadly
aditya rathee said:
did you trued what i said i mean clicked on red written aosp rc1 in mr viper's post cos i downloaded the rom from there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I tried and it doesn't work.Please reupload
The Wolverine1800 said:
Yeah I tried and it doesn't work.Please reupload
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok let me try
---------- Post added at 09:41 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:40 AM ----------
blugonjic said:
Yup, we tried. It leads to some dummy site sadly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
when i click it in my pc idm opens and we can download it
i would upload it if olddroid allows me i will ask to tem about this matter
it is because aosp is based purely on armv7+ devices and not armv6
and cm is adapted to support ore types of sockets and such
wich is why its easier to build cm then aosp
Sent from my S500 using xda app-developers app
SpaceCaker said:
it is because aosp is based purely on armv7+ devices and not armv6
and cm is adapted to support ore types of sockets and such
wich is why its easier to build cm then aosp
Sent from my S500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot! That was the answer I was looking for. Makes sense why we have so little AOSP then. And btw, your GB AOSP is one
of my favorite ROMs. Cheers!
If someone needs OldDroid AOSP ICS RC1, PM me.