Related
Just wondered how things were moving forward in terms of an Alpha3/beta release for CM9 Touchpad. I haven't yet rooted my TP as I've been waiting for a bit more progress. However news seems to have slowed since Alpha2 went nightly and from what I've read, it seem they can be a bit hit or miss form night to night.
Look at the roms mentionned here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1438158
in my case the nightlies have always worked great, with no issues except for the mic/camera of course.
you just have to remember, the people who have touchpad issues are the ones who post, and there are thousands more cm9 users who don't.
I guess I'm just trying to say, go ahead and try it. its pretty stable and alpha3/nightly is just a name.
dalingrin said somewhere on his twitter hes considering the nightlys as beta.
I am running the May 17 OaT's ROM and it is very stable with WIFI working. That was a problem other ROMs. still comparing it to my Acer A500, and while stable, I think I prefer the Acer in many ways.
i can confirm this. the nightlys are very stable
petergab said:
i can confirm this. the nightlys are very stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I second that for awhile I was using one of the april nightly builds (can't remember exactly which one) and I found it to be more stable and responsive than Alpha 2. At least on my TP with Alpha 2, if I tried to shut it down it would reboot even though I touched the shut down button but that hasn't occured since moving to the nightly. Recently, I flashed AOKP build 36 and I have to say I am enjoying it and am planning on sticking with it unless one of the nightlys fixes the camera or microphone. I like the extra customizations AOKP ROM control adds and it so far has been just as stable as the CM9 nighty I was using. It's definitely worth checking out.
I've been using the nigthlies since they were released, and now they are hugely stable.
mossman44 said:
I second that for awhile I was using one of the april nightly builds (can't remember exactly which one) and I found it to be more stable and responsive than Alpha 2. At least on my TP with Alpha 2, if I tried to shut it down it would reboot even though I touched the shut down button but that hasn't occured since moving to the nightly. Recently, I flashed AOKP build 36 and I have to say I am enjoying it and am planning on sticking with it unless one of the nightlys fixes the camera or microphone. I like the extra customizations AOKP ROM control adds and it so far has been just as stable as the CM9 nighty I was using. It's definitely worth checking out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm running the nightly from 07-07-2012 and it has the microphone fixed, but still no camera. And I third the nightly's ... they are very stable. I had ClassicNerd and AOKP before and my Touchpad would constantly reboot and the touchscreen would become unresponsive. Ever since I flashed the nightly the Touchpad has been running like a dream. I haven't even overclocked it considering how well it's running.
I'm new to this but I understand the root & flash process.
I just need some help selecting & locating a rom for my nook hd.
I don't like the Barnes & noble os as it seems a little laggy.
Therefore I'd like to replace if with a proper android rom but I get confused with what the difference between stock & cm10 is.
I just want a stable android rom that's fast for browsing & will play netflix well.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
Stock ROM is the default Barnes & Noble operating system, the one you're using now. The term "stock" is used to describe this ROM, as it's the default ROM that comes installed with the Nook.
There are other ROMs available, so that you can customise your Nook. The one I would recommend, so that you can comfortably just use Android on a daily basis without worrying about anything else is CyanogenMod 10.1.3 (stable). This is a stable ROM, and ready for daily use without worrying about anything else. That's CyanogenMod (CM) 10.1.3. Do NOT install CyanogenMod 10.2, as this is a nightly version and not ready for daily use. You can install CM10.2 if you desire, but don't expect it to be perfect; there may be few issues and problems here and there.
Installing CyanogenMod 10.1.3 runs Android version 4.2.2, so that's Jelly Bean. CM10.2 runs Android 4.3 (however, this isn't stable yet). Here's a beginners guide to installing CyanogenMod for your Nook: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2317500
All the best, if you require any assistance, feel free to reply back.
For what it's worth, performance on my Nook HD+ with CyanogenMod 10.1.3 is absolute garbage. 10x worse than stock B&N ROM, everything lags to hell and back. Even scrolling the damn app menu lags, and I'm constantly seeing "<Insert App Name Here> isn't responding. Do you want to close it?" Everything, even the system idle process. I don't know what to advise as there seems to be no general consensus as to what's the best ROM, everything's under development, the only ROM listed under Original Android Development (which I'm hoping is as close as possible to stock) doesn't work.
rpop said:
For what it's worth, performance on my Nook HD+ with CyanogenMod 10.1.3 is absolute garbage. 10x worse than stock B&N ROM, everything lags to hell and back. Even scrolling the damn app menu lags, and I'm constantly seeing "<Insert App Name Here> isn't responding. Do you want to close it?" Everything, even the system idle process. I don't know what to advise as there seems to be no general consensus as to what's the best ROM, everything's under development, the only ROM listed under Original Android Development (which I'm hoping is as close as possible to stock) doesn't work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My experience wasn't like that at all. While I wouldn't say it was blistering, it did seem on par or better than the Stock ROM. swiping was just a smidge laggy using Nova Prime.
I went on to Carbon and while it has a very nice feature set, it seems a good bit LAGGIER than the previous ROMs. I've been told that SlimBean runs nicely though, so I'm going to play with Carbon a little more but likely go on to that one when I decide to flash again.
I should expand a bit on my experience.
Performance was great the first half day, very speedy, better than stock ROM. By the end of the day it got a little slower than stock, a day or two later it was already pretty bad, noticeably slower, a week later absolutely terrible. It's as if performance degrades with time. I've tried reflashing it and now it sucks from the very beginning. If you find yourself trying CyanogenMod 10.1.3 stable and it still works great a week later, let me know--maybe I need to send mine in for a warranty swap.
rpop said:
I should expand a bit on my experience.
Performance was great the first half day, very speedy, better than stock ROM. By the end of the day it got a little slower than stock, a day or two later it was already pretty bad, noticeably slower, a week later absolutely terrible. It's as if performance degrades with time. I've tried reflashing it and now it sucks from the very beginning. If you find yourself trying CyanogenMod 10.1.3 stable and it still works great a week later, let me know--maybe I need to send mine in for a warranty swap.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I have been running 10.2 nightly for awhile now and have my tablet running several hours a day surfing Web, watching movies, reading, etc. and I have not had any of the lag or slowdown that you mention. I have had no random reboots or any trouble, I think it performs better than stock rom.
I am very happy with this setup.
So I hope this helps you some.
Sent from my BN Nook HD using Tapatalk 4
rpop said:
I should expand a bit on my experience.
Performance was great the first half day, very speedy, better than stock ROM. By the end of the day it got a little slower than stock, a day or two later it was already pretty bad, noticeably slower, a week later absolutely terrible. It's as if performance degrades with time. I've tried reflashing it and now it sucks from the very beginning. If you find yourself trying CyanogenMod 10.1.3 stable and it still works great a week later, let me know--maybe I need to send mine in for a warranty swap.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not CM10.1.3, it is your device being hit with the need for trim. Your stock would act the same way. Read in the CM10.2 thread.
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using xda premium
Oh my god, you're right! I have to admit I noticed the TRIM issue when I first installed CyanogenMod (hard to miss, it's at the top in big red letters ). I realized it's a perfect match for the performance degradation I'd been seeing, but I dismissed it as a possible cause out of a naive belief that there's no way a manufacturer could ship something that crippled. I thought surely it would have been caught during testing. I also didn't want to read a 100+ page thread to figure out exactly what the issue is when the search was broken. I've taken a few hours and caught up on the thread now... I guess if it looks like cheese, and smells like cheese... it's gotta be cheese.
I've got MAG2GA & 0x000015 memory chips, looks like my only option is to brick it and do a warranty swap I'm curious as to how the other people above reported good experiences; are you guys purposely installing builds with TRIM enabled because you know have good memory chips? Seems to me almost every ROM around here has it purposely disabled. Either that or you've barely used the internal flash memory.
I guess the first recommendation for Kido44 would be to figure out what kind of memory you have, so you know if you can install a kernel with TRIM enabled. The degradation in performance without it is so bad, I want to fling it at the wall. I guess it might not be noticeable right away for you if all you're planning on doing is some light web browsing and Netflix viewing, but you'll run into it at some point and weep. I suspect you're already getting there if the stock ROM is starting to lag a little bit.
As always, thanks to leapinlar for pointing me in the right direction
I've been happy with CM 10.1 for a while, ran really stable without any major hiccups, but the lag got so bad due to the lack of trim that I decided to take the plunge and risk installing 10.2 Milestone 1 with a trim-enabled kernel. I also have a bad emmc chip but I'm willing to risk it.
It's not what I'd recommend for everyone, but that's my experience.
episode96 said:
I've been happy with CM 10.1 for a while, ran really stable without any major hiccups, but the lag got so bad due to the lack of trim that I decided to take the plunge and risk installing 10.2 Milestone 1 with a trim-enabled kernel. I also have a bad emmc chip but I'm willing to risk it.
It's not what I'd recommend for everyone, but that's my experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Carbon B11 + cm10.1.3 kernel has been working well on my HD+ for a while. It's almost as fast as the trimmed cm10.2 but without the fault risk.
jamus28 said:
Carbon B11 + cm10.1.3 kernel has been working well on my HD+ for a while. It's almost as fast as the trimmed cm10.2 but without the fault risk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure I understand. Won't it get slow eventually because of the lack of trim?
Sure, but it was still usable after several weeks.
I like Slimrom for the most part and observedly better than CM 10.1.3 on my nook hd+. Seems faster and more responsive, and if you use Puffin browser, it seems like it's 2x faster compared to stock browser (that's just my imo, ymmv). Anyway, I've tested only 3 roms so far, slim, cm, and carbon, so my question is, are there any roms that you guys recommended on the hd+ that can maybe compare with slim? Slim doesn't seem to be officially supported.
Hello,
Nice to see an active community for the Nook HD+. I'm seeing them here in the UK for £70-80 refurbished and wondered if it's still worth buying one? I'm most specifically looking for a tablet that can comfortably display sheet music in portrait orientation (I will never get an iPad, it's Android all the way for me). The Nook HD+ still seems to be one of the only larger screened Android tabs with a comfortable display ratio for portrait, aside from the Nexus 9, but that is way expensive for my budget.
Anyone comment on the above? I'm particularly interested if you have used a Nook HD+ to display sheet music successfully. Also, anyone think there is a better large screen tab for under £100 at the moment? Obviously the cons of the Nook HD+ are the propriety charger, lack of cameras (thought that really isn't an issue for me) and lack of GPS and the other things taken for granted on other tabs. But I can't seem to find anything under £100 that comes close to the Nook's display. 9" full HD is pretty impressive for that price. Everything else I've seen has really poor resolution, or a smaller screen (or both).
The large circa 2000x1200 display of the nook is good so I think you have the best value for your use, as the other weakness ie procesor and graphics accellertion won't effect your music.
I use my look for web reading, comics and pdf manual reading and its excellant for that.
Just be aware that the Nook OS is 3 generations behind and likely won't support many recently written apps. To make it fully functional you'll have to install a custom ROM. If you do that it's probably the best value in an Android tablet.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Free mobile app
lmacmil said:
Just be aware that the Nook OS is 3 generations behind and likely won't support many recently written apps. To make it fully functional you'll have to install a custom ROM. If you do that it's probably the best value in an Android tablet.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, definitely wouldn't consider it without CM11, but I can't find anything else that comes close to matching the screen size and quality for £80. My finger is hovering over the payment button... [emoji2]
lmacmil said:
...
If you do that it's probably the best value in an Android tablet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1.
The Nook HD+ running CM11 is my favorite amongst all my tablets which include the Google Nexus and Samsung Note. Prior to the HD+my favorite tablet was the Nook Tablet running CM10/11. It's too bad that BN got out of the tablet hardware business.
digixmax said:
+1.
The Nook HD+ running CM11 is my favorite amongst all my tablets which include the Google Nexus and Samsung Note. Prior to the HD+my favorite tablet was the Nook Tablet running CM10/11. It's too bad that BN got out of the tablet hardware business.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great, you've sold me.
Next question is, which is the most stable, CM10 final stable build, CM11 (and if so, the latest nightly or the M12 snapshot) or SlimKat? I use SlimKat on my Galaxy S4 and love it's layout and features. I've posted a question on the SlimKat thread here, as 9.0 is the latest stable but the build for the Nook seems to be 8.12...
Oops, just realised the above post might come across as a "which ROM is better" request which are (quite rightly) frowned upon in these parts. It's more which is the most stable. My sense from reading here is that it's CM11...
gordonthegopher said:
Oops, just realised the above post might come across as a "which ROM is better" request which are (quite rightly) frowned upon in these parts. It's more which is the most stable. My sense from reading here is that it's CM11...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The most stable is CM10.1.3.
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using XDA Premium HD app
gordonthegopher said:
It's more which is the most stable. My sense from reading here is that it's CM11...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here are some data points for you. My wife has the HD+ and runs 10.1.3. She mostly surfs the web and watches movies but will occasionally look at Yelp or Facebook and run a few other apps. I have an HD which was running 10.2.1 until yesterday. I had no issues on 10.2.1. Yesterday I installed CM11 snapshot M12. I have only used email, Chrome, FB and a weather app. So far, so good. The only hiccup installing CM11 was that I couldn't backup to or install from the external SD card. Had to do both from internal storage but other than that it went smoothly.
Thanks guys. I'm think gonna start on CM11 M12, prefer to be on KitKat. I saw a YouTube video saying bluetooth causes lag on CM11, is this still the case? And is there the same problem on CM11?
Personally, a custom CM10.2.1 (Android 4.3) build by @Jon Lee has been exceptionally stable for me with F2FS for /data and /cache partitions. No lag, no bugs, extreme stability and exceptional battery life.
Link http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=58382663&postcount=148
Can anyone give me a summary as to why F2FS is better than Ext4? I'd never heard of F2FS before I started looking on here for Nook HD+ advice.
gordonthegopher said:
Great, you've sold me.
Next question is, which is the most stable, CM10 final stable build, CM11 (and if so, the latest nightly or the M12 snapshot) or SlimKat? I use SlimKat on my Galaxy S4 and love it's layout and features. I've posted a question on the SlimKat thread here, as 9.0 is the latest stable but the build for the Nook seems to be 8.12...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been running CM11 (snapshot builds) for nearly a year now, it's been very stable for my use of the tablet -- email, news and web surfing, occasional Hulu/Netflix streaming.
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using XDA Premium HD app
gordonthegopher said:
Can anyone give me a summary as to why F2FS is better than Ext4? I'd never heard of F2FS before I started looking on here for Nook HD+ advice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2697069
Well, I've gone for the latest M12 snapshot of CM11 with ext4 and ART. Haven't played too much so far, but very happy with the Nook HD+ overall. The screen is fantastic! Perfect for my main usage as a sheet music display (we make so many tweaks in rehearsals I was ripping through paper in no time! 9" 3:2 is just about big enough to read in portrait mode and this way we only have to print right before a gig. Savin' me some trees!)
Thanks for everybody's advice.
I rooted with CM 10.2, but am getting sick of my browsers crashing all the time. I've tried Chrome and Dolphin. Dolphin seems a little more stable, but, like Chrome, will often crash after 10 minutes of use. Any suggestions on what I might try to get a more stable response from this tablet? Thanks.
59 views and not one reply? What's up with that? Doesn't anyone have an opinion or the most stable ROM for this tablet?
woneil said:
I rooted with CM 10.2, but am getting sick of my browsers crashing all the time. I've tried Chrome and Dolphin. Dolphin seems a little more stable, but, like Chrome, will often crash after 10 minutes of use. Any suggestions on what I might try to get a more stable response from this tablet? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have tried most all the rom's for the HD+ and the browser issues are there with all of them. Turning off flash and keeping java off when possible has made both Dolphin and Chrome more stable for me. Your mileage may vary, but the fix is not with the rom.
woneil said:
59 views and not one reply? What's up with that? Doesn't anyone have an opinion or the most stable ROM for this tablet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use CM10.1.3 exclusively. It is very stable. And I use Firefox. But no one's opinion seems to hold and is why none have answered.
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using XDA Premium HD app
Leapinair
Thanks for the reply, and thank you for posting excellent instructions on how to root the Nook HD and HD+. I was contemplating a change to CM11, but will try 10.3.1 first.
Kokercey - Sorry I didn't see your post. Thanks for the reply. I will try your tips before changing ROMs.
leapinlar said:
But no one's opinion seems to hold and is why none have answered.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To add to leapinlar's point, no two Nooks seem to behave the same way on the same ROM. I was waiting for you to try them all and tell us which ROM works best FOR YOU on your particular Nook.
I just posted about Chrome crashing quite frequently since I installed CM11. It wasn't a problem on CM 10.2.1 but I'm not going back.
Sent from my BN Nook HD using XDA Free mobile app
I use CM11 and recently just installed the latest nightly. I've never had any browser crashing with it, and with ART and 2D Hardware Acceleration it seems swift enough.
i have hashcode's unofficial cm12 build and its working pretty well for me.
Thanks to all
I didn't take Wellersl's suggestion and test all the ROMs out there to see how they'd work for my Nook HD+. That would sort of defeat the whole concept of a fourum, and seems like a task more suited to a blog. Still, I did install a CM11 nightly, twice now. The first install worked great for a few days, then I installed a new theme and it started to crash and reboot constantly. So I wiped it and reinstalled the most current nightly. It is working, but I've had a few instances where Chrome crashed and it rebooted, but these have been fairly rare. So I'm going to stick with this ROM and see how it goes. My biggest complaint is the lagginess of the back button (soft button) and N button (hard button) when trying to get out of and app. Also trebuchet launcher crashes every now and then. Thanks to leapinlar for his excellent dummies guides to CM 10 and 11. And thanks to kokercy for his suggestion to not install flash or java on browsers which seems to make them more stable.
I am running the CM11 official and am totally satisfied with it. CM10 builds were always unstable and would spontaneously reboot several times a day. No instability and no unscheduled reboots on CM11.
I just started using Chrome Beta and it does not shut down spontaneously like regular Chrome. I'm running CM11 M12.
Sent from my BN Nook HD using XDA Free mobile app
woneil said:
Thanks to all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been using the Mokee Open Source history version. It has some cool festures, it's fast and seems to be about as, or perhaps a little more stable than CM 11 builds.
refresh on most responsive ROM
Hi all,
although this thread is more than a year old the ROM development for the Nook didn't stop. Now, I use the latest CM13 build but I'm not quite happy with the responsiveness. What ROM would you currently recommend for a fast and least lagging user experience?
dastu said:
Hi all,
although this thread is more than a year old the ROM development for the Nook didn't stop. Now, I use the latest CM13 build but I'm not quite happy with the responsiveness. What ROM would you currently recommend for a fast and least lagging user experience?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FWIW I've been using CM11 (11/22/15 nightly build) and am quite happy with it.
I think stock firmware from B&N didn't crash the browser. I'm gonna try it, since I've not used the stock fw since 5 or so days after I got the device.
I was running CM11 M12, then the 11/22 nightly since January and for about a week, the latest nightly. I think it's time to move to a more recent Android version. I'd like to hear from anyone who is running 12.1 or Marshmallow and how your experience has been. Would especially like to hear from anyone who moved from any CM11 version and from those who have tried both 12.1 and 13. Which did you like better and why? I use my HD primarly to surf the web with Chrome and as a reader (Kindle and epub formats.) Occasionally look at Facebook, pictures (Google photos or QuickPik), the NYTimes app, and of course, XDA!
Thanks.
No one has tried both 12 and 13? Oh well, guess I'll just flip a coin to decide. Or maybe it's time to say goodbye Nook.
lmacmil said:
No one has tried both 12 and 13? Oh well, guess I'll just flip a coin to decide. Or maybe it's time to say goodbye Nook.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just saw your post. I've used anything from cm10.1 to cm13 on my ovation and hummingbird. Mine lives off marshmallows now. I personally prefer aosp over cm but cm gets faster updates. The available cm13/aosp builds out perform cm11 and 12.1. Also development of 12.xx is dead. The dev that does the newer builds is fully involved in the mm builds.
ieatabiscuit said:
Just saw your post. I've used anything from cm10.1 to cm13 on my ovation and hummingbird. Mine lives off marshmallows now. I personally prefer aosp over cm but cm gets faster updates. The available cm13/aosp builds out perform cm11 and 12.1. Also development of 12.xx is dead. The dev that does the newer builds is fully involved in the mm builds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info. MM sounds like the way to go. I'll give it a try.
Installed CM13 today. Went smoothly. So far so good.
Sent from my BN Nook HD using XDA-Developers mobile app
lmacmil said:
Installed CM13 today. Went smoothly. So far so good.
Sent from my BN Nook HD using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd be interested in your experience with CM13 after a few week soak.
digixmax said:
I'd be interested in your experience with CM13 after a few week soak.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll try to remember. After 2 days, I'm liking it a lot. Seems to have refreshed my Nook HD. A little zippier overall than the CM11 nightly. No real issues at this point. Installing the zip files with TWRP was easier than CWM due to the graphical interface. I don't use too many different apps but my main apps, Chrome, Facebook, NYTimes, XDA, Overdrive, all work fine. I did have to reinstall SuperSU from the zip file. It wouldn't update the binary for some reason. Once I did that, Titanium Backup worked again. I am going to update my wife's HD+ soon. She's still on 10.2.1 and has been complaining lately about spontaneous reboots and shutting down at random.
lmacmil said:
Installed CM13 today. Went smoothly. So far so good.
Sent from my BN Nook HD using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you link me to the version you used. Considering that CM13 on Nook has been buggy I'd like to go for the exact same version you are using
Scorchgid said:
Can you link me to the version you used. Considering that CM13 on Nook has been buggy I'd like to go for the exact same version you are using
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The files are in the appropriate folder here:
https://m.box.com/shared_item/https://notredame.box.com/s/26a4bygh9vbaw7jjq08xr5evomvaw5ww
I used this recovery for my HD: https://www.androidfilehost.com/?w=files&flid=52420
I used pico Gapps from opengapps.org
lmacmil said:
After 2 days, I'm liking it a lot. Seems to have refreshed my Nook HD. A little zippier overall than the CM11 nightly. No real issues at this point. Installing the zip files with TWRP was easier than CWM due to the graphical interface. I don't use too many different apps but my main apps, Chrome, Facebook, NYTimes, XDA, Overdrive, all work fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The CM13 install has not cured some of the problems. Very slow to respond sometimes and occasionally an update will hang during the install process. FB was updating and after the download was complete, after 90 seconds it still said updating. I closed the play store and when I opened it back up, the update was complete.
I think some of the issues are just related to the (relatively) ancient hardware and will not be cured by on OS update. My Nexus 7 running stock MM does not exhibit any of these issues but its hardware is far superior to the Nook. Since I bought the Nook primarily to experiment with custom ROMs, I can live with its limitations.
lmacmil said:
The CM13 install has not cured some of the problems. Very slow to respond sometimes ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have not tried CM13, but my experience with CM12.1 was similar to yours -- response time was initially very zippy after fresh installation, but then after about two weeks unresponsiveness started to manifest more and more frequent in unpredictable manner ...
As my HD+ is my daily-driver tablet I opted to go back to CM11 for a more predictable albeit less zippy responsiveness.
digixmax said:
I have not tried CM13, but my experience with CM12.1 was similar to yours -- response time was initially very zippy after fresh installation, but then after about two weeks unresponsiveness started to manifest more and more frequent in unpredictable manner ...
As my HD+ is my daily-driver tablet I opted to go back to CM11 for a more predictable albeit less zippy responsiveness.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My HD with CM13 is still better (I think) than it was with CM11. It's probably my imagination but it seems to be better with a good charge. I should probably also reboot more often. I regularly go days, sometimes even weeks, without a restart.
digixmax said:
I'd be interested in your experience with CM13 after a few week soak.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After 10 days, the bloom is off the rose. Many of the issues I was experiencing under CM11 have returned. Slow app loading/switching, occasionally unresponsive touch-screen, and the overall sluggishness. I noted today in the CM13 thread that a Facebook update took 9 minutes to install after the download finished. Of course, I have no idea if this is FB-related or CM13 but I don't recall it taking that long in the past. I don't intend to go back to CM11. I don't think CM13 is any worse than CM11 but at this point, it doesn't seem like much of an improvement. I think the Nook hardware is just showing its age. It will probably be relegated to the role of book-reader. I have a Nexus 7 that overall works much better although it too suffers from occasional touch-screen unresponsiveness.
lmacmil said:
After 10 days, the bloom is off the rose. Many of the issues I was experiencing under CM11 have returned. Slow app loading/switching, occasionally unresponsive touch-screen, and the overall sluggishness.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This morning the Nook with CM13 was its old zippy self, just like after I installed it. The XDA app loaded in 6 seconds, about the same as my Nexus 7. Yesterday it took over twice as long. I had two other apps open. Don't know why performance seems to be inconsistent. When it's working well, it's great, when it's not it's very frustrating. Oh well.
lmacmil said:
After 10 days, the bloom is off the rose. Many of the issues I was experiencing under CM11 have returned. Slow app loading/switching, occasionally unresponsive touch-screen, and the overall sluggishness. I noted today in the CM13 thread that a Facebook update took 9 minutes to install after the download finished. Of course, I have no idea if this is FB-related or CM13 but I don't recall it taking that long in the past.
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FWIW I just updated Facebook on my HD+ running CM11, it took 55sec including download time.
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using XDA Premium HD app
digixmax said:
FWIW I just updated Facebook on my HD+ running CM11, it took 55sec including download time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow! Even my Nexus 7 took almost 3 minutes today.
Well, after about 5 weeks with CM13, I'm going back to CM11 Snapshot on my HD. I just posted the reasons in the main CM13 thread so I will not repeat them here. It was good at first but for whatever reason, performance has deteriorated to the point where it is too frustrating to continue using it.
lmacmil said:
Well, after about 5 weeks with CM13, I'm going back to CM11 Snapshot on my HD. I just posted the reasons in the main CM13 thread so I will not repeat them here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have gotten some good suggestions in the MM thread so I will try them before reverting to CM11.
Sent from my Nook HD running CM13 (Android 6.0.1)
Necro. What was the end result? Did you ever try 12.1, Slimkat or any other builds? Anyone else?